Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Housing Floor Replacement Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C24525Q0698
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a Department of Veterans Affairs flooring replacement project at the Perry Point campus. The solicitation (36C24525Q0698) seeks a contractor to replace flooring in three of five village houses for the Constructive Work Therapy (CWT) program, with an approximate total area of 1,053 square feet. The specific flooring requirement is J&J Classics II #V5023 in Heirloom #1003 color.
Key project parameters include a 30-day performance period, with work to be completed after hours and on weekends to minimize disruption to patient services. The contractor must prepare the site, including demolition and removal of existing flooring, and verify installation requirements around existing modular wall systems. The performance evaluation will assess the contractor's quality of work, management performance, cost control, and overall contract execution across multiple rating categories from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24525Q0698.docx | DOCX document | |
| Map - Perry Point VAMC Campus.pdf | ||
| 36C24525Q0698.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination No. 2015-4215.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
The Department of Veterans Affairs is evaluating a quote [Offeror’s name here], hereafter referred to as “Offeror,” for replacing floor services. Offeror has provided your name so that we may ask you questions regarding Offeror’s past performance on a similar contract between your company and Offeror.
Any information you provide in this questionnaire is considered Evaluation Information and is prohibited from disclosure and exempt from release under the Freedom of Information Act; as such, the Department of Veterans affairs will not release your name or the names of other individuals providing reference information about Offeror’s past performance.
Instructions: Provide an assessment of the Offeror’s past performance by checking the box with one of the following rating options. You are encouraged to write comments as often as you’d like. If your assessment is “Excellent” or “Unacceptable,” then please provide a brief narrative that explains your rationale for the rating.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND PARTICIPATION!
Rating Options:
Exceptional—Offeror’s performance exceeds (or exceeded) most contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
Very Good—Offeror’s performance exceeds (or exceeded) some contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which Offeror’s corrective actions were highly effective.
Satisfactory—Offeror’s performance meets (or met) all contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with minor issues or concerns, for which Offeror’s corrective actions were effective.
Marginal—Offeror’s performance meets (or met) some contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with frequent problems, issues or concerns, for which Offeror’s corrective actions were somewhat effective.
Unsatisfactory—Offeror’s performance does not meet (or did not meet) contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with significant problems, issues or concerns, for which Offeror’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Not Applicable—Unable to provide a meaningful assessment.
Performance Assessment
1. Quality of performance
a. What is your overall assessment of the quality of the Offeror’s performance?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Comments:
b. Assess Offeror’s quality of performance in these areas:
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Conformance of contract requirements
Standards of workmanship (technical, professional, safety, etc.)
2. Management performance
a. What is your overall assessment of the Offeror’s ability to meet contract requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
b. Assess Offeror’s contract management performance in these areas:
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Management responsiveness (timeliness, reliability, cooperation, etc.)
Management of personnel (hiring, training, retaining, replacing, etc.)
Management of program (coordination, use of resources, communication, risk management, etc.)
Management of conflicts or issues (reactive, provides good solutions, flexible to changing needs, etc.)
3. Cost control
a. What is your overall assessment of the Offeror’s ability to forecast, manage and control costs?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
b. Assess Offeror’s cost control performance in these areas:
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Cost/Price Estimates (ability to meet forecasted costs/prices)
Invoicing accuracy and timeliness of invoice submission
4. General comments:
_____________________________ Date:_____________ Company Name:
Assessor’s Name:
Title:
Assessor’s Email: __________________________
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND PARTICIPATION!
Source Selection Information—See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .