PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Freight Elevator No. 6 Modernization Project, H. Garcia Federal Building, San Antonio, TX
- Solicitation number
- 47PH0923R0038
About this file
This solicitation requests proposals for a freight elevator modernization project at a federal building in San Antonio, Texas. The General Services Administration seeks to upgrade Elevator No. 6 with a new AC motor, solid state controls, cab, doors and associated components. The total small business set-aside project with a budget between $250,000-$500,000 requires a 365-day period of performance. Offerors must submit price and technical proposals by July 17, 2023 addressing experience, technical approach, schedule, past performance and maintenance. Award will be made based on a best value determination evaluating non-cost factors more than price.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Site Visit Sign-In sheet for R0038.pdf | ||
| GSA 527 - Contractors Qualifications and Financial Information.pdf | ||
| 47PH0923R0038 - RFP Cover Sheet.pdf | ||
| RFP 47PH0923R0038.pdf | ||
| Proposal Summary Template - Freight Elevator No. 6.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EXPERIENCE AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation No. 47PH0923R0038 Freight Elevator No. 6 Modernization Project Building No. TX0164ZZ, Hipolito Garcia FB, San Antonio, Texas Project #9051
CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR: ________________________________________________
Reference Contacted:
Name: ____________________________________________________________
Company: __________________________ Telephone No.: _________________
Title:_________________________________ Fax No.________________________
Building location of contractor’s performance: ______________________________
Start/End date of Contract Performance:___________________________________
Estimated price/cost for services:_________________________________________
Construction period (# of days):___________________
EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions –
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Did contractor provide work schedule for this project?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Question 4. Preventive Maintenance / Warranty Period
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements?
Did contractor provide operation and maintenance services after project?
If so, how long?
Was equipment under the service maintenance program identified?
Was free service warranty period contracted or was in-house?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality of Maintenance or Warranty
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Would you contract with this company again?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
General Comments:
Name of Interviewer: __________________________ Date: __________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .