Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24823Q0745
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24823Q0745 POST.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24823Q0745_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 852.219-75 VA NOTICE OF LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING--CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 1
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER SHEET
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION#
The entire questionnaire should be forwarded to your previous customers (at least 3) for completion and customers shall directly return the cover sheet and questionnaire to Keila President at e- mail address: keila.president@va.gov It is your responsibility to ensure correct and verifiable point of contact information. Information that is incorrect or unverifiable may lead to a lower past performance rating.
(Offeror Fill-In Below)
1. Offeror Name (Name of Organization/Firm being Evaluated):
2. Name of Organization/Firm Providing Reference:
3. Address of Organization/Firm Providing Reference:
4. Contract Number:
5. Project Description:
6. Contract/Task Order Amount:
7. Performance Period:
8. Evaluator’s Point of Contact Information:
Name and Title:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail Address:
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SOLICITATION RFP #36C24823Q0837
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR
EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
| E (EXCELLENT) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds expectations. The contractual performance of the element assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. (High |
Confidence).
| G (GOOD) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. (Significant |
Confidence).
| S (SATISFACTORY) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the elements contains some minor problems for which corrective action taken by the contractor is satisfactory. |
(Confidence).
| M (MARGINAL) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. (Little |
Confidence).
| P (POOR) |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is no likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains serious problems for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. (No |
confidence).
| NR (NO RATING) |
| No relevant past performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance risk prediction. A search was unable to identify any relevant past performance information for the contractor or their key personnel. (This is neither a negative or |
positive assessment).
EVALUATOR: PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVAL RATING WHICH BEST
REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
| Was this a competitive contract? |
| YES |
| NO |
| Role of the contractor |
| Prime Contractor |
Subcontractor or
Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
Compliance with contractual terms and conditions
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirement.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the project.)
E
G
S
M
P
NR
Effectiveness of on-site management and control of multidiscipline construction categories, including management of subcontractors.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;
responsiveness to administrative reports).
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
Ability to successfully respond to emergency situations.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
| Effectiveness of material management. |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
| Contractor Safety Record. |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
| Contractor responsiveness to safety issues. |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
Contractor’s timeliness, completeness, and accuracy in submitting invoices.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
Ability to hire and retain a qualified workforce to this effort.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
If this was a government contract has the contract been terminated for default or Convenience? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued or any default action in the comment section below.
Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problem?
G S M P NR
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| P |
| NR |
COMMENTS:
Evaluator’s Point of Contact Information:
Signature and Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .