Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Bronze Door Restoration Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 47PF0022R0031
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by a reference for a contractor bidding on RFP 47PF0022R0031. It asks the reference to rate the contractor's performance on quality, budget, schedule, management and staffing, and administration.
The federal contract opportunity is solicitation 47PF0022R0031, set aside for woman-owned small businesses. The General Services Administration seeks a contractor to restore historic bronze doors, door hardware and frames at four entrances of the Peoria Federal Building constructed in 1938. The work also includes restoration and re-lamping of historic light fixtures and replacement of a stair railing. The performance period is 100 calendar days from notice to proceed with an anticipated award in June 2022. The estimated construction cost range is $500,000 to $1,000,000.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Amendment 3 47PF0022R0031_0003.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment 2 47PF0022R0031 combined.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment 47PF0022R0031_0001.pdf | ||
| 47PF0022R0031 Conbined.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
For RFP
47PF0022R0031
Please complete and submit this reference directly to the GSA Contract Specialist, Roger Schulte at roger.schulte@gsa.gov, no later than April 15, 2022 at 4 PM EST.
Section 1 – To be completed by the Contractor
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Point of Contact (POC):
Role of the POC:
Project Title or Brief Description of the Work:
Dates of Performance:
Section 2 – To be completed by the Reference Please complete the following questionnaire on behalf of the contractor listed in Section 1. Only the project listed in Section 1 shall be considered for this evaluation. For each question below, select the rating that best describes the Contractor’s performance. Please provide a narrative explanation where appropriate; any narrative comments are greatly appreciated.
The completed questionnaire should be emailed directly to the Contract Specialist to ensure the confidentially of your responses. Your responses will be reviewed solely for the purposes of a past performance evaluation and no one other than the selection committee will see your response.
Name of Respondent:
Title/Company Name:
Role of Respondent on the Project being Referenced:
Telephone:
Email:
If you have additional comments to provide, please add them at the end of the attached questionnaire. Thank you, in advance, for your time and providing GSA with this valuable feedback.
QUALITY
1. Overall, how well did the quality of the work conform to the contract requirements?
Excellent - 5 4 3 2 1 - Poor
BUDGET
2. Overall, how was the contractor’s performance with regards to budget?
Excellent - 5 4 3 2 1 - Poor
3. Was the project completed within the original contract budget? Yes No If not, please provide the reason for actual cost differences. (e.g. owner driven changes, differing site conditions, errors and omissions, etc…)
4. Was change order work pricing determined fair and responsible? Yes No If there were issues with change order pricing, please explain.
SCHEDULE
5. Overall, how was the contractor’s performance with regards to schedule?
Excellent - 5 4 3 2 1 - Poor
6. Did the contractor complete the project within the original contract schedule? Yes No If not, what were the reasons for changes to the schedule?
MANAGEMENT & STAFFING
| 7. Did the Contractor staff the job adequately? (PM, Superintendent, etc.) | Yes | No | |
| 8. Were key personnel adequately qualified for their positions? | Yes | No |
9. How well did the prime contractor manage his subcontractors? (e.g. Coordinating trades, updating subs on changes to the SOW, prompt payment, performance issues, etc…)
Excellent - 5 4 3 2 1 - Poor
10. How effective was the Contractor at communicating with key project stakeholders?
Excellent - 5 4 3 2 1 - Poor
11. How well did the Contractor demonstrate sensitivity to client/tenant concerns? (e. g. Coordination issues, site cleanliness, noise, etc…)
Excellent - 5 4 3 2 1 - Poor
ADMINISTRATION
12. How responsive and responsible was the contractor in administrative areas? (e.g. Documenting progress, responding to RFI’s, processing payments, tracking changes, etc.)
Excellent - 5 4 3 2 1 - Poor
OVERALL
13. How would you rate this Contractor’s overall performance?
Excellent - 5 4 3 2 1 - Poor
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .