Past Performance Questionnaire and Cover Letter.docx
DOCX document 51 KB Posted
- Attached to
- C1DA--Project# 544-25-125, Replace Dental Vacuum System Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C24725R0049
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template and cover letter for an Architect-Engineer (A-E) solicitation from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) VISN 7 Network Contracting Office. The PPQ is designed to evaluate A-E firms' past performance on previous contracts through a detailed rating system covering design services, construction support, LEED certification, BIM capabilities, and overall performance. The questionnaire uses a 5-point rating scale from Unsatisfactory (1) to Exceptional (5) across 21 evaluation factors.
The template requires detailed project information including contract numbers, dollar amounts, period of performance, and the A-E firm's role (prime/sub). Completed questionnaires must be submitted directly to Christopher Jenkins, Contract Specialist at the Dublin, GA VA office. The form includes sections for general information, performance ratings across multiple categories, and a narrative summary section for explaining any marginal or unsatisfactory ratings. The document emphasizes that completed PPQs are considered sensitive information and cannot be released back to the A-E firms being evaluated.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24725R0049.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COVER LETTER
Complete one set of letters and forms for each project identified in your firm’s SF 330 Section F, Example projects Which best Illustrate proposed Team’s qualifications for This contract. Additional space or blank sheets may be added to answer any question.
Transmittal Letter to Accompany Past Performance Questionnaire
FROM: [Insert Company Official Name, Title, and Company Name]
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Contract(s):
[Insert Company Name] is currently responding to Department of Veterans Affairs (NCO 7) request for SF 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications for a complete design to correct and replace all utility system FCA deficiencies. This Request for SF 330’s requires respondents to identify customers and solicit their response regarding [Insert Company Name] performance.
[Insert Company Name] is providing past performance data to NCO 7 relating to our performance on contract [Insert contract name/number] and have identified [Insert name of reference] as the point of contact for this contract.
The request for SF 330 instructs that the respondents will provide customers with the attached questionnaire. Please complete the questionnaire and submit it by close date directly to the NCO 7 Contracting Office Contracting Officer. The requested data must be submitted by e-mail to the Government representative identified below.
Christopher Jenkins, Contract Specialist VISN 7 Network Contracting Office (NCO7) 1826 Veterans Blvd Dublin, GA 31021 E-mail: christopher.jenkins@va.gov
The information contained in the completed Past Performance Questionnaire is considered sensitive and cannot be released to [Insert Company Name]. Please direct any questions about the acquisition or the attached questionnaire to the VISN 7 NCO point of contact identified above.
Thank you, [Insert Company Official Name and Title]
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
A-E FIRM TO BE EVALUATED:
Firm Name:
Phone:
Address:
Email:
Point of Contact:
Firm Cage Code: ______________________________ Firm Tax ID Number: __________________________ Firm UEI Number: _________________________________ Project Title: _______________________________________
Description of Project:
Description of A-E Firms’ Responsibilities:
Contract Number: ________________________________________________________ Dollar Amount: _____________________ _____________________________________ Contract Period of Performance: _____________________________________________ A-E Firm performed as: Prime Contractor/Sub-Contractor/Consultant/Team Member ______ Percent of work performed by A-E Firm: ___________________________________________ Other (Please describe) ________________________________________________________
B. EVALUATION INFORMATION:
Evaluator’s Company or Agency Firm Name:
Evaluator’s Name:
Address:
Title:
Phone:
Email:
A. SEND COMPLETED QUESTIONAIRE (SECTIONS B through D) TO: (Email Only)
Christopher Jenkins, Contract Specialist VISN 7 Network Contracting Office (NCO7) 1826 Veterans Blvd Dublin, GA 31021 E-mail: christopher.jenkins@va.gov
B. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate rating that most accurately describes the A/E’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ALL RATINGS OF Marginal or Unsatisfactory on page 7 under Narrative Summary.
| Exceptional (5) |
| Very Good (4) |
| Satisfactory (3) |
| Marginal (2) |
| Unsatisfactory (1) |
| N/A |
| -Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many of your company’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects or reflected few minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be highly effective or corrective actions taken were effective. |
| -Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some of your company’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects or reflected some minor problems and corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective or Corrective actions taken were effective. |
| -Performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects or reflected some minor problems. |
Corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective or Corrective actions taken were effective.
| -Performance does or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects or reflected serious problems(s) for which the contractor has not yet identified acceptable corrective actions or did not provide acceptable corrective actions. |
| -Performance does or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely or did not occur. The contractual performance contains or contained serious problem (s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective or were ineffective. |
| -Not applicable or rater has not observed performance in this area. |
A-E FIRM’S NAME: PROJECT NAME:
Contract Period of Performance:
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix on page 4.
Item
FACTORS TO BE RATED
| Exceptional (5) |
| Very Good (4) |
| Satisfactory (3) |
| Marginal (2) |
| Unsatisfactory (1) |
| N/A |
Design Services:
| 1. |
| Overall skill level and technical competence of A/E’s personnel. |
| 2. |
| A/E’s ability to identify and resolve design issues expeditiously. |
| 3. |
| A/E’s responsiveness to design review questions. |
| 4. |
| A/E’s ability to effectively coordinate, integrate and manage their consultants/subcontractors/team |
| 5. |
| A/E’s effectiveness and responsiveness in interfacing with the Client’s staff |
| 6. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, and coordination of final design documents. (Quality) |
| 7. |
| A/E’s ability to provide detailed, accurate cost estimates. |
| 8. |
| A/E’s ability to meet contract schedule. |
Follow-On Construction Support Services:
| 9. |
| Thoroughness and timely review of construction submittals. |
| 10. |
| Timely resolution of construction design issues. |
| 11. |
| Overall quality, responsiveness, and timeliness of A/E follow-on construction support services. |
LEED (If Applicable):
| 12. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and coordination of LEED documentation. |
| 13. |
| A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall LEED process. |
BIM (If Applicable):
| 14. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and coordination of BIM documentation. |
| 15. |
| A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall BIM process. |
Owner’s Representative on Design/Build Projects (If Applicable):
| 16. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and coordination of requirements documents and bridging documents. |
| 17. |
| A/E’s ability, thoroughness, timeliness, and support as Owner’s Representative throughout the project. |
Overall:
| 18. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s ability to control cost? |
| 19. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s overall management performance on this contract? |
| 20. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s overall technical/quality performance on this contract? |
| 21. |
| Would you use this A/E again? (If “No”, please comment in the Narrative Summary) |
| YES |
| NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
PROJECT NAME:
CONTRACT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
NARRATIVE SUMMARY (Use this section to explain any rating from the previous page)
| ITEMS |
| COMMENTS |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .