Past Performance Evaluations.pdf
PDF 431 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Parts Tower
- Solicitation number
- W912NS-20-Q-3501
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
This document is a solicitation for a parts storage tower. The Army National Guard is seeking quotes for two tall and two short small parts storage towers to be delivered to its facility in Springfield, Missouri by April 27, 2020. Quotes are due by April 6 and shall include individual and total pricing for each contract line item number as well as terms of warranty. The requirement has been set aside for small businesses. The award will be made based on a tradeoff between price and past performance, as offerors must provide references from previous customers that will be contacted to assess reliability, maintenance costs, satisfaction, and other performance metrics.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Combined Synopsis - Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Purchase Description - Parts Towers.pdf | ||
| EQUIPMENT OVERALL FIRST FLOOR PLAN.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Evaluations
In accordance with FAR 12.206 and FAR 13.106-2, past performance evaluations are required. The approach for evaluating past performance will be as follows.
- When responding to the solicitation, interested vendors will be requested to supply with their quotation 3 customer references of similar solutions they have sold. With each reference, the vendor will supply a point of contact that can answer the following questions.
o What is the make and model of the system you have been provided?
o How long have you owned the product?
o What has been the system uptime and reliability?
o Have you experienced any major repairs, if so how long did it take to resolve, was it covered under warranty?
o Who maintains your parts towers?
o What have been the estimated maintenance costs associated with this product?
o Are you satisfied with the system that has been provided?
- In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.
- Evaluations will be determined by the contracting officer as either outstanding, satisfactory, neutral or unsatisfactory.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .