PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 59 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25624Q1380
About this file
This document is a Past and Present Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity for Non-Hazardous Waste Removal and Refuse Disposal services at the Department of Veterans Affairs facility in Jackson, MS. The contract number is 36C25624Q1380. The questionnaire is to be completed by the contractor's past performance references and submitted to the Contract Specialist by September 5, 2024. The questionnaire evaluates the contractor's performance in areas such as quality control, problem resolution, schedule management, and cooperation with government personnel. References are asked to rate the contractor's overall performance and indicate if they would award another contract to the same contractor. The related federal contract opportunity is for Nonhazardous Solid Waste Refuse and Disposal Services at the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Integrated Service Network 16 in Jackson, MS.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25624Q1380 0001_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQ-36C25624Q1380.docx | DOCX document | |
| Wage Determination.txt | TXT text file | |
| 36C25624Q1380_1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Non-Hazardous Waste Removal and Refuse Disposal Contract Jackson, MS 36C25624Q1380
ATTACHMENT 2 : PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR
Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes). Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form and submit it according to the instructions, below.
INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT
The contractor named below is submitting an offer for a United States Department of Veterans Affairs contract requirement, and has sent this form to you, in your role as a past performance reference contact. Please complete this form in full (all areas shaded in light yellow, below). Once completed, please send the form to the Contract Specialist via postal mail or email, directly to:
Department of Veterans Affairs NCO 16 Contracting Office
| ATTN: Jennifer Stasher, Contract Specialist | REF: 36C25624Q1380 |
| Ridgeland, MS 39157 | Email Address: Jennifer.Stasher@va.gov |
Please return the completed form no later than Thursday, September 05, 2024, 3:00 pm CST. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Adams via email, Jennifer.Stasher@va.gov. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
GENERAL INFORMATION [completed by Contractor]
Contractor Company Name
Street Address
Contractor Point of Contact Name
City
Point of Contact Phone Number
State
Reference Project Title
Zip Code
Contract Period of Performance (start to finish):
Contract Number
Contract Dollar Value
Description of Work
Role of Contractor on This Project (check appropriate box)
· Prime Contractor ☐ Sub-contractor ☐ Key Personnel
RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact]
36C25624Q1380
Company Name
Street Address
POC Name
City
Phone Number
State
Fax Number
Zip Code
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2 in the Remarks section, below (text box will expand to whatever extent is necessary).
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| SATISFACTORY |
| VERY GOOD |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| NEUTRAL |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. |
There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements.
There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner. |
| No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.i |
| The Contractor … |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
36C25624Q1380
| 12. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 13. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 14. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 15. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 16. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 17. |
| Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 18. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 19. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 20. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 21. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 22. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| ☐ |
| YES |
| ☐ |
| NO |
| 23 |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.” |
| ☐ |
| YES |
| ☐ |
| NO |
| 24 |
| To the best of your knowledge, is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| ☐ |
| YES |
| ☐ |
| NO |
REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).
Printed Name Title
Signature
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .