P1SM Appendix B - Final V1-0 20240923.pdf
PDF 94 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Platform One Solutions Marketplace (P1SM)/Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8307-24-S-C001
- Issued by
- Department of the Air Force
About this file
This document is an appendix that defines the evaluation criteria for the Platform One Solutions Marketplace (P1SM) opportunity. The P1SM is a long-term, open call for innovative solutions to support the Department of the Air Force in quickly delivering high-quality, secure software at accelerated delivery times.
The evaluation criteria cover several key areas: problem definition, solution description, alignment with strategic focus, scientific feasibility, enabling technologies, DoD impact, potential scale of impact, differentiation, pricing model, and pitch quality. Each area is scored on a scale from "Unsatisfactory" to "Superior" with the overall weight of each area ranging from 5% to 35%. The document provides detailed definitions of the rating levels for each evaluation criteria. While this appendix does not directly address required products or services, it outlines the framework that will be used to assess submissions to the P1SM opportunity.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| P1SM_Announcement_v1.5_20260801.pdf | ||
| P1SM_Announcement_v1.4_20260723.pdf | ||
| P1SM_Announcement_v1.3_20260128.pdf | ||
| P1SM Announcement - Version 1.2 20250611.pdf | ||
| P1SM Appendix A - Version 1.1.pdf | ||
| P1SM Appendix B - Version 1.0.pdf | ||
| P1SM Announcement - Version 1.1 20250121.pdf | ||
| P1SM Announcement - Version 1.1 20250121.docx | DOCX document | |
| P1SM Announcement - Final 20240923.pdf | ||
| P1SM Appendix A - Final 20240923.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page 1 of 2 ® 2011 - 2024 Valid Evaluation, Inc. All rights reserved.
Platform One Solutions Marketplace v1-0 Evaluation Criteria Defined
DEFINITION
PROBLEM YOU SOLVE weight 10% Deliver a clear and concise description of the problem you are attempting to address with your technology or service.
SOLUTION SOLUTION
DESCRIPTION
Fully describe what you are offering in your solution and describe the scientific basis for the solution and how it solves the problem statement identified.
ALIGNMENT WITH
STRATEGIC FOCUS
AREA
How well does your Solution map to our published Strategic Focus Area? Argue the problem you've chosen is a perfect fit with the problems for this program.
SCIENTIFIC FEASIBILITY Is the science behind the innovation sound? Why should a skeptic believe that your approach is built upon a firm scientific foundation?
weight 35% ENABLING
TECHNOLOGIES
Do the required enabling technologies introduce added risk? Using proven underlying technologies and techniques helps to lower technical risk.
DOD IMPACT OPERATIONAL IMPACT
Looking only at the DoD personnel who will be impacted by your solution, argue that their mission or effectiveness will be significantly improved if your solution is adopted. What is the impact of your solution vs. today's solution in the context of a single individual’s work role and responsibilities?
weight 15% POTENTIAL SCALE OF
IMPACT
Look into the future to a time when your solution is both technically mature and fully "transitioned" (actively in use by DoD.) Describe the scale of your impact within the context of the DoD.
DIFFERENTIATION DIFFERENTIATION In what ways does your proposed solution introduce innovations that significantly enhance the DoD's capabilities? (Innovation is as defined in DFARS 212.7001) weight 25%
ALTERNATIVE
TECHNICAL
APPROACHES
Why is your approach is the best from a technical perspective? If you can convincingly refute alternative means to solving this problem, please briefly do so.
PRICING MODEL BUSINESS MODEL
DEFINITION
Describe how you will make money from your solution. Although we are NOT asking you to provide specifics on prices, we need to understand how you plan to capture revenue moving forward. For example, are you selling software licenses, tokens for compute services, engineering services, training and support, something else? Tell us about your revenue model.
weight 10% BUSINESS MODEL
VALIDATION
Make the case that your business model is working or will work for your business. To what evidence can you point that your strategy to monetize your solution is viable with commercial and/or Government buyers.
PITCH QUALITY PITCH QUALITY
We don't care about video production quality. We care about your ability to communicate about your innovation and the impact you believe it will have. (Amateur videos shot on your smart phone are fine. Do make sure the audio is clear and easily understood. Practice and/or multiple takes are recommended.)
weight 5% DATA QUALITY &
ATTRIBUTION
Support your arguments with relevant, properly attributed data to enhance your credibility.
XLS filename: ARI - P1 Marketplace - v1-0.xlsx
VE SuperA name: Platform One Solutions Marketplace v1-0
Page 2 of 2 ® 2011 - 2024 Valid Evaluation, Inc. All rights reserved.
Platform One Solutions Marketplace v1-0 Evaluation Criteria
ARI - P1 Marketplace - v1-0.xlsx UNSATISFACTORY MARGINAL SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
PROBLEM YOU SOLVE weight 10% Undefined problem scope.
Somewhat defined problem scope.
Adequately defined problem scope.
Very well defined problem scope.
SOLUTION SOLUTION
DESCRIPTION
Fails to describe product and beneficial features.
Partly describes product and beneficial features.
Adequately describes product and beneficial features.
Clearly and concisely describes product and beneficial features.
ALIGNMENT WITH
STRATEGIC FOCUS
AREA
Not aligned with the Strategic Focus Area.
Somewhat aligned with the Strategic Focus
Area.
Aligned with the Strategic Focus Area.
Perfectly aligned with the Strategic Focus
Area.
SCIENTIFIC
FEASIBILITY
No scientific basis for presented approach.
Incomplete scientific basis for presented approach.
Credible scientific basis for presented approach.
Convincing scientific basis for presented approach.
weight 35% ENABLING
TECHNOLOGIES
Requires nonexistent or unavailable technology.
Requires emerging, cutting edge technology.
Requires proven technologies.
Requires DoD-fielded technologies.
DOD IMPACT OPERATIONAL
IMPACT
If successful, no improvement vs.
existing technological approaches.
If successful, slight improvement vs.
existing technological approaches.
If successful, significant improvement vs.
existing technological approaches.
If successful, radical improvement vs.
existing technological approaches.
weight 15% POTENTIAL SCALE
OF IMPACT
A fully deployed, mature solution could impact only niche use cases.
A fully deployed, mature solution could impact an
DoD element.
A fully deployed, mature solution could impact several DoD elements.
A fully deployed, mature solution could have impact across the entire DoD.
DIFFERENTIATION DIFFERENTIATION
Does not demonstrate a new technology, process, or method; or a new application of an existing technology, process, or method.
Marginally demonstrates a new technology, process, or method; or a new application of an existing technology, process, or method.
Adequately demonstrates a new technology, process, or method; or a new application of an existing technology, process, or method.
Convincingly demonstrates a new technology, process, or method; or a new application of an existing technology, process, or method.
weight 25%
ALTERNATIVE
TECHNICAL
APPROACHES
No examination of alternatives.
Partially refutes alternatives.
Adequately refutes alternatives.
Persuasively refutes alternatives.
PRICING MODEL BUSINESS MODEL
DEFINITION
Poorly defined (or undefined) revenue model.
Moderately defined revenue model.
Well defined revenue model.
Expertly defined revenue model.
weight 10% BUSINESS MODEL
VALIDATION
Fails to demonstrate business model is valid.
Draws credible parallels to others' proven models.
Evidence of interested customers utilizing the above-defined model.
Evidence of paying customers utilizing the above-defined model.
PITCH QUALITY PITCH QUALITY
Poorly presented. Very difficult to impossible to follow.
Moderately presented.
Sometimes difficult to follow.
Effectively presented.
Convincing, easy to follow.
Clearly and persuasively presented. Compelling arguments.
weight 5% DATA QUALITY &
ATTRIBUTION
Poorly supported by data. Little to no data attribution.
Partially supported by data. Some data attribution.
Credibly supported by data. Adequate data attribution.
Persuasively supported by meaningful data.
Comprehensive data attribution.
VE SuperA name: Superior
XLS filename: ARI - P1 Marketplace - v1-0.xlsx
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .