oppNWO-CESU-18-09-cfda12.632-instructions.pdf

PDF 74 KB Posted

Attached to
SIKES ACT PROGRAM SUPPORT AFCEC, MULTIPLE INSTALLATIONS
Opportunity number
NWO-CESU-18-09
Issued by

About this file

Application Instructions

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
PWS CESU 18-09 Sikes Act Spt AFCEC FINAL 22MAR2018.pdf PDF
Lease vs. Buy Factors.pdf PDF
Past Performance Template.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Funding Opportunity Announcement

Multiple Air Force Installations

Funding Agency : Funding Instrument: Cooperative Agreement

US Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Ave Omaha, NE 68102

Funding Opportunity No: NWO-CESU 18-09

CFDA No: 12.632 Program Title: Sikes Act 670c-1

Issue Date: 21-MAR-2018 Application Due Date: 19-APR-2018

Overview:

SIKES ACT PROGRAM SUPPORT AFCEC

The purpose of the Sikes Act (670c-1) Support project is to provide natural resources management support to the United States Air Force (AF) for the implementation of installation Integrated Natural Resources Management Plans (INRMPs) prepared in support of the Sikes Act (Title 16 United States Code, Section 670c-1). The NFE support shall consist of temporary and seasonal support to the AF as required for the implementation of INRMP directed natural resource management activities. Sikes Act Support will be provided at the following installations: Columbus AFB, MS; Eglin AFB, FL; Holloman AFB, NM; JBER, AK; JBLE-Eustis, VA; JBLE-Langley, VA; JBSA, TX; Little Rock AFB, AR; Robins AFB, GA; Shaw AFB, SC; and Tinker AFB, OK.

POP: 18 Months

Estimated Total Funding: $426,231.00-$473,590.00 Estimated Number of Awards: 1

Contents of Full Text Announcement

I. Funding Opportunity Description V. Application Review Information

II. Award Information VI. Award Administration Information

III. Eligibility Information VII. Agency Contacts IV. Application Information VIII. Other Information

Contact Information: Questions relating to Grants.gov including the registration process and system requirements should be directed to the Grants.gov Contact Center at 1-800-518-4726. For assistance with the requirements of this Funding Opportunity Announcement, please contact stephanie.a.rostermundt@usace.army.mil or elizabeth.v.wills@usace.army.mil.

Instructions to Applicants:

The complete funding opportunity announcement, application forms, and instructions are available for download at Grants.gov.

Applications in response to this Funding Opportunity Announcement shall be submitted by the application due date. Applications may be submitted by email to Stephanie.a.rostermundt@usace.army.mil and elizabeth.v.wills@usace.army.mil.

Applicants shall have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number, register with the System for Award Management (SAM.gov).

See Section IV of the Funding Opportunity Announcement for complete application submission information.

Section I: Funding Opportunity Description mailto:stephanie.a.rostermundt@usace.army.mil mailto:shanna.m.comparato@usace.army.mil mailto:shanna.m.comparato@usace.army.mil mailto:Stephanie.a.rostermundt@usace.army.mil mailto:elizabeth.v.wills@usace.army.mil

SIKES ACT PROGRAM SUPPORT AFCEC

Section II: Award Information

$426,231.00--$473,590.00; one (1) award; 18 month Period of Performance

Section III: Eligibility Information Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) ALL NETWORKS

Cost Sharing – 100% USACE Funded

1. Other – n/a

Section IV: Application and Submission Information

1. Address to Request Application Package:

The administrative points of contact are Stephanie Rostermundt, 402-995-2083 Stephanie.A.Rostermundt@usace.army.mil and elizabeth.v.wills@usace.army.mil, 402-995-2066

2. Content and Form of Application Submission:

All mandatory documents must be completed in accordance with the instructions on the forms and the additional instructions contained in the evaluation factors.

Applications shall be submitted NO LATER THAN 19-APR-2018

3. Submission Instructions

Applications may be submitted by e-mail to:

a. E-mail:

Format all documents to print on Letter (8 ½ x 11”) paper. E-mail proposal to Stephanie.A.Rostermundt@usace.army.mil and elizabeth.v.wills@usace.army.mil

Section V: Application Review Information Evaluation for Selection: To receive consideration for award, the proposal must meet the requirements set forth in this FOA and be presented with adequate detail to assure the evaluator(s) have a good understanding of the proposed requirement(s). The Technical proposal shall be no longer than 15-pages, font 12 (This page limitation is in addition to all required forms). All questions shall be submitted no later than 28 MAR 2018 at 5 PM CST.

Basis of Award: All proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the Department of Defense Grants and Agreements Regulations (DoDGARs) § 22.315 Merit-Based, Competitive Procedures. Additionally, all proposals will be evaluated to determine the extent to which each NFE demonstrates a clear understanding of the requirements of the announcement, the Scope of Work (SOW), and the FOA. The offeror shall submit a proposal that completely addresses all evaluation criteria and specifically identifies how each requirement will be satisfied.

Factors I through III will be used to assess the merits of the NFE who will receive the award of the Cooperative Agreement. The selection decision will be based upon the merits of each proposal in comparison to each factor.

Note: Each evaluation factor shall be weighed in descending order of importance. The NFE shall address all factors within their submitted proposal.

Initial Review: The Government will perform an initial review to determine that the applicant is (1) eligible in accordance with Section III of the announcement; (2) all information required by Section IV has been submitted;

and (3) all mandatory elements of the SOW are satisfied within the NFE proposal.

Evaluation Criteria:

a. Factor I: Project Management Team and Technical Approach mailto:Stephanie.A.Rostermundt@usace.army.mil mailto:shanna.m.comparato@usace.army.mil mailto:Stephanie.A.Rostermundt@usace.army.mil mailto:shanna.m.comparato@usace.army.mil

The NFE will ensure that the proposal outlines the project team for each project.

i. The technical approach presented shall demonstrate the Offerors understanding of multiple conservation programs listed in the installations INRMP which include: Fish & Wildlife Management; Threatened & Endangered Species Management; Outdoor Recreation Management; Forest Management; Wetlands; Protection of Coastal & Marine Resources;

Livestock Grazing & Agriculture Outleasing; Land Management; and any other components required to successfully meet program objectives.

ii. The NFE will ensure that the proposal outlines the requirements of the SOW. This factor will be rated as acceptable when the applicant specifically outlines:

1. Technical Approach; and

2. Project Management Team

a. Qualifications (and/or resumes);

b. Capabilities; and

c. Experience

b. Factor II: Past Project Performance

i. The NFE will ensure that the proposal outlines the NFE’s proven ability to perform programmatic activities and submit deliverables on time. This factor will be rated as acceptable when the applicant submits a minimum of two (2) projects that demonstrates their ability and knowledge of conservation programs at government installations with favorable customer feedback. The applicant may receive a higher rating if past projects reflect experience with conservation programs at the installations listed in the SOW. Information collected will be evaluated for:

1. Relevance (Scope, Location, Value);

2. Technical Complexity;

3. Technical Team; and

4. Customer Feedback.

ii. Other Past Performance information considered shall include:

1. SAM (www.SAM.gov) to check for suspension and/or debarment;

2. FAPIIS (https://www.fapiis.gov); and

3. Past Performance history known to the agency.

c. Factor III: Cost Review The NFE shall ensure the total budget proposal does not exceed the funding amount listed in Section II and that the associated costs for the proposal are clear and easily ascertainable by the evaluator(s).

The NFE shall provide an overall cost summary, as well as a cost break down per task in the SOW. Any tasks marked as “Optional” will be evaluated at the time of proposal submission the same as all other tasks not marked as Options. Optional tasks may or may not be awarded at the time of proposal submission/evaluation/award.

i. The NFE shall ensure the budget line items are appropriate and reasonable with the level of effort needed to accomplish the tasks listed in the SOW. Cost information shall include:

1. Key Personnel with labor rates;

2. Associated travel costs per location, to include (if applicable) to include

a. Estimated flights,

b. Hotel Costs,

c. Estimated days in travel status,

d. Per diem,

e. Applicable leases, and

f. Estimated fuel costs.

Evaluation Ratings For evaluation of technical factors, the following adjectival ratings will be used:

http://www.sam.gov/ https://www.fapiis.gov/

1.1 PROPOSAL MERIT RATING SCALE

Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Outstanding Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Good Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is not awardable.

1.2 QUESTIONS

All questions, comments, concerns, or suggestions shall be submitted to Contracting no later than 28 March

2018 5PM CT.

4. Review and Selection Process See above

5. Anticipated Award Date Announcement Issue Date: 21-MAR-2018 Announcement Due Date: 19-APR-2018 Estimated Award Date: 30-APR-2018

Section VI: Award Administration Information

1. Award Notices Written notice of award will be given in conjunction with issuance of a cooperative agreement signed by a Grants Officer. The cooperative agreement will contain the effective date of the agreement, the period of performance, funding information, and all terms and conditions. The recipient is required to sign and return the document before work under the agreement commences. Work described in this announcement SHALL NOT begin without prior authorization from a Grants Officer.

2. Administrative Requirements The cooperative agreement issued as a result of this announcement is pursuant to the administrative requirements in reporting.

3. Reporting

Omaha District POC listed below

Section VII: Agency Contact

Stephanie Rostermundt, Grants Officer, Contracting Division USACE, Omaha District Tel: 402-995-2083

ATTN: CECT-NWO-E

1616 Capitol Ave Omaha, NE 68102 E-mail: Stephanie.A.Rostermundt@usace.army.mil

Elizabeth V. Wills, Grants Specialist, Contracting Division USACE, Omaha District Tel: 402-995-2066

ATTN: CECT-NWO-E

1616 Capitol Ave Omaha, NE 68102 E-mail: elizabeth.v.wills@usace.army.mil

Section VIII. Substantial Involvement

1. The Government will be substantially involved during the performance of these activities. The recipient can expect substantial agency collaboration, participation, or intervention in project performance.

Substantial involvement shall include the following:

a. Review and approval by USACE project management of the draft report prior to start of final report;

b. USACE project management site visits to at least four (4) of the installations listed in the PWS (11 total) during the field season between April and November

1. During the site visits, USACE will closely monitor or provide operational involvement.

2. The location of the site visits will be determined post-award and may change due to execution issues or identification of at-risk installations; and

c. Exercising the authority, if necessary, to immediately halt work due to failure to meet performance specifications.

mailto:Stephanie.A.Rostermundt@usace.army.mil mailto:shanna.m.comparato@usace.army.mil

1.1 PROPOSAL MERIT RATING SCALE
1.2 QUESTIONS

File details come from the government source that posted it.