oppHHS-2018-ACL-AOD-DDTI-0305-cfda93.632-cidHHS-2018-ACL-AOD-DDTI-0305-instructions.pdf

Administration for Community Living

Administration on Disabilities

Serious Mental Illness

HHS-2018-ACL-AOD-DDTI-0305

Application Due Date: 08/06/2018

Serious Mental Illness

HHS-2018-ACL-AOD-DDTI-0305

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Funding Opportunity Description II. Award Information

III. Eligibility Information

1. Eligible Applicants

2. Cost Sharing or Matching

3. Responsiveness and Screening Criteria

IV. Application and Submission Information

1. Address to Request Application Package

2. Content and Form of Application Submission

3. Submission Dates and Times

4. Intergovernmental Review

5. Funding Restrictions

6. Other Submission Requirements

V. Application Review Information

1. Criteria

2. Review and Selection Process

3. Anticipated Announcement Award Date

VI. Award Administration Information

1. Award Notices

2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements

3. Reporting

4. FFATA and FSRS Reporting

VII. Agency Contacts VIII. Other Information

Department of Health & Human Services

ACL Center: Administration on Disabilities Funding Opportunity Title: Serious Mental Illness Announcement Type: Initial Funding Opportunity Number: HHS-2018-ACL-AOD-DDTI-0305 Primary CFDA Number: 93.632 Due Date for Applications: 08/06/2018 Date for Informational Conference Call: 06/06/2018

Applications that fail to meet the application due date will not be reviewed and will receive no further consideration. You are strongly encouraged to submit your application a minimum of 3- 5 days prior to the application closing date. Do not wait until the last day in the event you encounter technical difficulties, either on your end or, with https://www.grants.gov. Grants.gov can take up to 48 hours to notify you of a successful submission.

Executive Summary The Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AIDD), Administration on Disabilities (AOD), Administration for Community Living (ACL), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), is the federal administering agency for the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act (DD Act) programs. As such, AIDD is charged with funding and oversight of State Councils on Developmental Disabilities, Protection and Advocacy Programs, and the University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities

(UCEDD).

The UCEDDs carry out four core functions: (1) interdisciplinary pre-service preparation and continuing education of students and fellows; (2) community services, including training, technical assistance, and/or demonstration and model activities; (3) research; and (4) dissemination of information. UCEDDs are interdisciplinary education, research and public service units of universities, or public or not-for-profit entities associated with universities that implement the four core functions addressing, directly or indirectly, one or more of the areas of emphasis (e.g., quality assurance, education and early intervention, child care, health, employment, housing, transportation, recreation and other services available or offered to individuals in a community, including formal and informal community supports, that affect their quality of life).

AIDD plans to award, on a competitive basis, a three-year National Training Initiative (NTI) grant to the national network of UCEDDs to pay for the federal share of a national training center for building community capacity to support individuals with co-occurring developmental disabilities and mental illness to live in the community.

I. Funding Opportunity Description Individuals with co-occurring developmental disabilities and mental illnesses experience a https://www.grants.gov number of challenges to community living. To optimize community living for such individuals, they often times need an effective, accurate diagnosis and a coordinated array of treatment interventions and supports that necessitate the collaborative involvement of providers of both the public mental health system and the developmental disabilities service system. In most states, people with these co-occurring disorders face barriers to services related to a lack of coordination and collaboration across service systems, as well as gaps in research, clinical expertise, and access to appropriate programs.

Although data is limited to describe the population of people with co-occurring developmental disabilities and mental illnesses, it is estimated that these individual comprise one-third (32.9%) of the total number of individuals with developmental disabilities served by state developmental disability (DD) agencies. A 2012 study conducted in Canada from The Center for Mental Health (CAMH) and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences found that 45 per cent of adults in Ontario with a developmental disability also had a psychiatric disorder, roughly twice the rate of the general population. A 2010 study from the Canadian Journal of Psychiatry found almost half of hospital admissions for people with developmental disabilities were for psychiatric reasons.

Individuals with co-occurring mental illness and developmental disabilities often times face challenges and barriers to living in the community. Such individuals receiving services in state psychiatric hospitals have significantly longer lengths of stay. They are also more likely to be placed in restraints during their hospital stay and often times return to institutional settings after returning to the community. Abuse is more likely to occur with this population and the more severe the disability, the greater the likelihood of abuse. Although it generally takes longer for people with developmental challenges and serious mental illness to make changes, those changes are stable once made. People with developmental disabilities and serious mental illness are less likely to recover spontaneously from trauma without treatment. It is well documented that the transition period for youth struggling with emotional and behavioral difficulties is fraught with unique challenges. Among these are greater risk for multiple psychiatric admissions, involvement with correctional authorities and sometimes a dependency on various government agencies.

Given that community-based services often are unavailable or inadequate, there is a need to build capacity within the workforce to be better able to serve this population in the community.

To address mental illness within individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, the Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities seeks to fund a national training initiative grant to the national network of University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities (UCEDDs) to establish a national training center for building community capacity to support individuals with co-occurring developmental disabilities and mental illness. The center will serve as the hub for developing and providing culturally competent comprehensive training programs for individuals with developmental disabilities and mental illness, their families, and service providers. These trainings may be conducted in-person, remotely or the combination of both. The center will promote and expand interdisciplinary training and community based training available for individuals, families, clinicians, and other providers to improve quality community living with a focus on issues such as effective methods for differentially diagnosing mental illness in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, better coordination across systems, and promoting the use of evidence-based or promising methods to the extent available in the delivery of treatment and interventions (e.g., person centered care, planning and approaches; behavioral therapy; and trauma informed care programs) by:

Developing comprehensive culturally competent training modules for multiple audiences, to include individuals with developmental disabilities, families, clinicians, and other service providers; Building a cohort of trainees in the UCEDD network with a background in developmental disabilities and mental health;

Creating a forum for knowledge exchange and transfer within the UCEDD network;

Developing a comprehensive website which provides information and resources to multiple audiences, including culturally and linguistically diverse populations; and Developing a sustainability plan that will promote further development of mental illness training programs beyond the funding period.

Seek and employ traditional and non-traditional methods for marketing and maintaining the project over time in collaboration with other UCEDD’s and AUCD to coordinate a national forum for knowledge exchange and transfer across the UCEDD network and beyond.

Statutory Authority AIDD is the lead agency in AOD,ACL, HHS for administering the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (DD Act of 2000) (42 U.S.C. 15001, et. seq.). The purpose of the DD Act of 2000 is to ensure that individuals with developmental disabilities and their families participate in the design of and have access to needed community services, individualized supports, and other forms of assistance that promotes self-determination, independence, productivity, integration and inclusion in all facets of community life, through culturally competent programs [Section 101(b)]. To achieve this purpose, the DD Act authorizes under Subtitle D University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research and Service (UCEDDs). Section 151(b) of the DD Act of 2000 states that appropriations authorized under section 156(a)(1) and reserved under section 156(a)(2), grants shall be made to University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities (UCEDDs) to carry out national training initiative grants. In accordance with the DD Act, the Secretary shall make grants under section 152(d) to UCEDD Centers after AIDD has made UCEDD core grant awards with the cost of living adjustment, funded T/TA, remaining funds may be used to award NTI grants to entities in each State designated as UCEDDs.

II. Award Information Funding Instrument Type: Grant Estimated Total Funding: $700,000 Expected Number of Awards: 1 Award Ceiling: $700,000 Per Budget Period Award Floor: $600,000 Per Budget Period Length of Project Period: 36-month project period with three 12-month budget periods

III. Eligibility Information

1. Eligible Applicants Section 151(b) of the DD Act states that from appropriations authorized under section 156(a)(1) and reserved under section 156(a)(2), grants shall be made to UCEDDs to carry out national training initiative grants. Entities eligible to apply for funds under this funding opportunity announcement are the 67 current AIDD grantees that are designated UCEDDs.

Applications will only be reviewed from the 67 UCEDDs listed in the Program Contacts section located at: https://www.acl.gov/programs/aging-and-disability-networks/national-network-unive rsity Applications from other entities not designated as a current UCEDD will not be reviewed.

2. Cost Sharing or Matching

Cost Sharing / Matching Requirement: Yes

Under this ACL program, ACL will fund no more than 75% of the project’s total cost, which means the applicant must cover at least 25% of the project’s total cost with non-Federal resources. In other words, for every three (3) dollars received in Federal funding, the applicant must contribute at least one (1) dollar in non-Federal resources toward the project’s total cost.

This “three-to-one” ratio is reflected in the formula included under Item 18 in the “Instructions for Completing Requested Forms.” The applicant can use this formula to calculate the minimum required match. A common error applicants make is to match 25% of the Federal share, rather than 25% of the project’s total cost.

Grantees are required to meet a non-Federal share of the project cost, in accordance with Section 154(d) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act.

Grantees must provide at least 25% percent of the total approved cost of the project.

Reduced Match Amount - 10% match to the total federal funds for the UCEDDs whose activities or products target individuals with developmental disabilities who live in an urban or rural poverty area Reduced Match Section 154 (d)(2) of the DD Act states:

In the case of a project whose activities or products target individuals with developmental disabilities who live in an urban or rural poverty area, as determined by the Secretary of HHS, the Federal share of the cost of the project may not be more than 90 percent of the necessary costs of the project, as determined by the Secretary of HHS.

DEFINITIONS:

Poverty area: Census tracts or block numbering areas (BNAs) where at least 20 percent of residents are below the poverty level.

Urban Area: Collective term referring to all areas that are urban. For Census 2000, there are two https://www.acl.gov/programs/aging-and-disability-networks/national-network-university https://www.acl.gov/programs/aging-and-disability-networks/national-network-university types of urban areas: urban clusters and urbanized areas.

Urban Cluster (UC): A densely settled territory that has at least 2,500 persons but fewer than 50,000.

Urbanized Area (UA): An area consisting of a central place(s) and adjacent territory with a general population density of at least 1,000 persons per square mile of land area that together have a minimum residential population of at least 50,000 persons. The U.S. Census Bureau uses published criteria to determine the qualification and boundaries of UAs.

Rural: Territory, population and housing units not classified as urban. Rural classification cuts across other hierarchies and can be in metropolitan or non-metropolitan areas. Rural can include frontier, which are places having a population density of six or fewer persons - per square mile.

TWO-TIER ELIGIBILITY SYSTEM FOR REDUCED MATCH

To meet the requirements in the DD Act, AIDD has developed a system that UCEDDs can use to request a reduced match on the core grant. Such a request is optional and not a requirement for UCEDDs. AIDD will use a two-tiered system for determining eligibility for the reduced match:

Tier 1: UCEDDs in States where the poverty rate is equal to or greater than the official national poverty rate would automatically qualify for the reduced match. For 2015, the rate was 14.8% percent.

Tier 2: UCEDDs in States with a poverty rate not equal to or greater than the official national poverty rate would have to show that the UCEDD activities target individuals with developmental disabilities in urban or rural poverty areas. In doing so, the UCEDD would demonstrate that at least 25 percent of the UCEDD projects target individuals with developmental disabilities who live in urban and rural poverty areas by providing the following information to AIDD:

1. The current State poverty rate;

2. A full listing of all the UCEDD's current projects [this can be generated from the National Information Reporting System (NIRS)];

3. Identify which UCEDD activities are targeting individuals with developmental disabilities living in urban and rural poverty areas by stating whether the UCEDD activity is associated with any of the Urban and Rural Poverty Indicators listed in the announcement or is targeted for individuals with developmental disabilities in an urban and rural poverty area through some other means.

A UCEDD seeking to establish eligibility for a reduced match through means other than showing an activity is associated with one or more of the Urban and Rural Poverty Indicators must include in its application other information that establishes that its activities are targeted to benefit individuals with developmental disabilities in an urban or rural poverty area. Because there are not Federal poverty rates for Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands, these jurisdictions can qualify for the reduced match by establishing that the UCEDD activity is associated with any of the Urban and Rural Poverty Indicators listed in the announcement or is targeted for individuals with developmental disabilities in an urban or rural poverty area through some other means.

The table below shows the Urban or Rural Poverty Indicators that will be used to determine eligibility for the reduced match.

Urban and Rural Poverty Indicator

Description

Empowermen t Zones and Enterprise Communities

(EZ/EC)

Areas designated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture as communities with high rates of poverty. The UCEDD project would have to be implemented in an

EZ/EC.

Food Stamps The Food Stamp Program helps low-income people and families buy the food they need for good health. The UCEDD project would have to target individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families who receive food stamps.

National School Lunch Program

(NSLP)

Also referred to as Free and Reduced Lunch Program NSLP is a federally assisted meal program operating to provide low-cost or free lunches to children.

The UCEDD project would have to be implemented in a school that qualifies for the NSLP.

Head Start The Head Start program provides grants to local public and private non-profit and for-profit agencies to provide comprehensive child development services to economically disadvantaged children and families. The UCEDD project would have to work with a Head Start program.

Housing Assistance

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has a variety of housing assistance programs, such as Section 8 housing assistance programs.

The UCEDD project would have to target individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families who are receiving Federal housing assistance.

Medicaid Title XIX of the Social Security Act

Is a Federal/State entitlement program that pays for medical assistance for certain individuals and families with low incomes and resources. The UCEDD project would have to target individuals with developmental disabilities and their families who are Medicaid-eligible.

Supplemental Security (SSI)

Is designed to help aged, blind and disabled people, who Income (SSI) have little or no income. It provides cash to meet basic needs for food, clothing and shelter. The UCEDD project would have to target individuals with developmental disabilities who are SSI recipients

Temporary Assistance for

TANF

Is a Federal poverty program that provides assistance and Needy Families (TANF) work opportunities to needy families through grants to States. The UCEDD project would have to target individuals with developmental disabilities, children with developmental disabilities, and their families who are TANF recipients.

Other The UCEDD may provide other indicators of poverty not included in this list.

The UCEDD would have to provide adequate information to justify use of the 'other' category. In doing so, the UCEDD will have to demonstrate the project is targeting individuals with developmental disabilities in rural and urban poverty areas. ADD will determine the adequacy of the justification for eligibility for a reduced match.

AIDD will review all the information submitted by the UCEDD to determine eligibility for the reduced match, in accordance with the DD Act.

SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR SUBMITTING INFORMATION TO AIDD

To streamline the process, below is a suggested format for submitting the information to AIDD.

List the Official National Poverty Rate of 14.4 Provide the State Poverty Rate List out the UCEDD Project Title (e.g., Provide Name of Project and project description) and Description and the Indicators of Poverty (List name of poverty program targeted by project)

Of the total UCEDD projects, provide the percent that is targeting individuals with developmental disabilities living in urban and rural poverty areas

STATES IN TIERS 1 AND 2

Below is a list of the States that fall into Tiers 1 and 2.

Tier 1 Tier 2

Alabama: 17.5 Alaska: 10.2

Arizona: 18.7 Colorado: 11.0

Arkansas: 16.1 Connecticut: 9.5

California: 14.9 Delaware: 11.1

Dist. of Columbia: 19.6 Hawaii: 10.8

Florida: 15.9 Idaho: 12.4

Georgia: 17.8 Illinois: 12.7

Kentucky: 20.5 Iowa: 11.3

Louisiana: 21.0 Kansas: 12.6

Mississippi: 20.1 Maine: 12.8

Maryland: 10.0

Massachusetts: 12.4 Michigan: 13.4

Minnesota: 9.0

New Mexico: 21.8 Missouri: 12.6

New York: 15.2 Montana: 11.5

Nevada: 14.8 Nebraska: 10.9

North Carolina: 15.7

Ohio: 14.7 New Hampshire: 6.6

Oklahoma: 17.6 New Jersey: 10.8

South Carolina: 16.7 North Dakota: 11.2

Tennessee: 15.8

Texas: 16.0 Oregon: 13.4

West Virginia: 18.3 Pennsylvania: 12.0

Rhode Island: 10.8

South Dakota: 13.3 Utah: 10.6

Washington: 11.9 Wisconsin: 11.9

US Poverty Rate 14.4 Wyoming: 10.3

Grantees must provide at least 25% percent of the total approved cost of the project. The total approved cost of the project is the sum of the ACL (Federal) share and the non-Federal share.

The non-Federal share may be met by cash or in-kind contributions, although applicants are encouraged to meet their match requirements through cash contributions. For example, in order to meet the match requirements, a project requesting $20,000 in ACL (Federal) funds must provide a non-Federal share of the approved total project cost of at least $6,667 which is 25% percent of total approved project cost of $26,667. Grantees will be held accountable for commitments of non-Federal resources even if they exceed the amount of the required match.

Failure to provide the required amount will result in the disallowance of Federal funds.

3. Responsiveness and Screening Criteria

Application Responsiveness Criteria Applications received from entities other than the 67 existing grantees defined as UCEDDs, cited in Section III.1.of this announcement, will be considered non-responsive and will not be considered for funding under this announcement. Applications disqualified for this reason will not be returned.

Application Screening Criteria In order for an application to be reviewed, it must meet the following screening requirements:

1. Applications must be received from eligible UCEDDs. Applications must be submitted electronically via http://http://www.grants.gov/ by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time.

2. The Project Narrative section of the Application must be single spaced on 8 ½” x 11” plain white paper and a standard font size of not less than 11, preferably Times New Roman or Arial.

3. The Project Narrative must not exceed 5 pages. The Project Narratives that exceed 5 pages will have the additional pages removed and only the first 5 pages of the Project Narrative will be provided to the merit reviewers for funding consideration. NOTE: The Project Work Plan, Letters of Commitment, and Vitae of Key Project Personnel are not counted as part of the Project Narrative for purposes of the 5-page limit. Unsuccessful submissions will require authenticated verification from http://www.grant/ indicating system problems existed at the time of your submission. For example, you will be required to provide an http://www.grants.gov/ submission error notification and/or tracking number in order to substantiate missing the application deadline.

IV. Application and Submission Information

1. Address to Request Application Package Application materials can be obtained from http://www.grants.gov/ or https://www.acl.gov /grants/applying-grants.

Please note, ACL is requiring applications for all announcements to be submitted electronically through http://www.grants.gov/. The Grants.gov (http://www.grants.gov/) registration process can take several days. If your organization is not currently registered, please begin this process immediately. For assistance with http://www.grants.gov/, please contact them at mailto:support@grants.gov?subject=Support or 800-518-4726 between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

At the http://www.grants.gov/ website, you will find information about submitting an application electronically through the site, including the hours of operation. ACL strongly recommends that you do not wait until the application due date to begin the application process because of the time involved to complete the registration process.

All applicants must have a DUNS number (http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform/) and be registered with the System for Award Management (SAM, http://www.sam.gov/) and maintain an active SAM registration until the application process is complete, and http://www.grants.gov/ http://www.grant/ http://www.grants.gov/ http://www.grants.gov/ https://www.acl.gov/grants/applying-grants https://www.acl.gov/grants/applying-grants http://www.grants.gov/ http://www.grants.gov/ http://www.grants.gov/ http://www.grants.gov/ http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform/ http://www.sam.gov/ should a grant be made, throughout the life of the award. Applicants should finalize a new, or renew an existing, registration at least two weeks before the application deadline. This action should allow you time to resolve any issues that may arise. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in your inability to submit your application or receive an award. Maintain documentation (with dates) of your efforts to register or renew at least two weeks before the deadline. See the SAM Quick Guide for Grantees at: https://www.sam.gov/sam/transcript/SAM_Quick_Guide_Grants_Registr ations-v1.6.pdf.

Note: Once your SAM registration is active, allow 24 to 48 hours for the information to be available in Grants.gov before you can submit an application through Grants.gov. This action should allow you time to resolve any issues that may arise. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in your inability to submit your application or receive an award.

Note: Failure to submit the correct EIN Suffix can lead to delays in identifying your organization and access to funding in the Payment Management System.

Effective October 1, 2010, HHS requires all entities that plan to apply for and ultimately receive federal grant funds from any HHS Operating/Staff Division (OPDIV/STAFFDIV) or receive subawards directly from the recipients of those grant funds to:

1. Register in SAM prior to submitting an application or plan;

2. Maintain an active SAM registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award or an application or plan under consideration by an OPDIV; and

3. Provide its DUNS number in each application or plan to submit to the OPDIV.

Additionally, all first-tier subaward recipients must have a DUNS number at the time the subaward is made.

Since October 1, 2003, The Office of Management and Budget has required applicants to provide a Dun and Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number when applying for federal grants or cooperative agreements. It is entered on the SF-424. It is a unique, nine-digit identification number, which provides unique identifiers of single business entities. The DUNS number is free and easy to obtain.

Organizations can receive a DUNS number at no cost by calling the dedicated toll-free DUNS Number request line at 866-705-5711 or by using this link to access a guide: http ://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/grants/duns_num_guide.pdf.

You must submit all documents electronically, including all information included on the SF424 and all necessary assurances and certifications.

After you electronically submit your application, you will receive an automatic acknowledgement from http://www.grants.gov/ that contains http://www.grants.gov / tracking number. The Administration for Community Living will retrieve your application form from http://www.grants.gov/.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services https://www.sam.gov/sam/transcript/SAM_Quick_Guide_Grants_Registrations-v1.6.pdf https://www.sam.gov/sam/transcript/SAM_Quick_Guide_Grants_Registrations-v1.6.pdf http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/grants/duns_num_guide.pdf http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/grants/duns_num_guide.pdf http://www.grants.gov/ http://www.grants.gov/ http://www.grants.gov/ http://www.grants.gov/

Shawn Callaway Administration on Developmental Disabilities Phone Number: (202) 795-7319 E-mail: shawn.callaway@acl.hhs.gov

2. Content and Form of Application Submission

Project Narrative The Project Narrative must be double-spaced, on 8 ½” x 11” paper with 1” margins on both sides, and a standard font size of not less than 11, preferably Times New Roman or Arial. You can use smaller font sizes to fill in the Standard Forms and Sample Formats. The suggested length for the Project Narrative is 5 pages; 5 pages is the maximum length allowed. Project Narratives that exceed 5 pages will have the additional pages removed and only the first 5 pages of the Project Narrative will be provided to the merit reviewers for funding consideration. The Project Work Plan, Letters of Commitment, and Vitae of Key Personnel are not counted as part of the Project Narrative for purposes of the 5-page limit, but all of the other sections noted below are included in the limit.

The sample components of the Project Narrative counted as part of the 5 page limit include:

Summary/Abstract Problem Statement Goal(s) and Objective(s) Proposed Intervention Special Target Populations and Organizations Outcomes Project Management Evaluation Dissemination Organizational Capability

Summary/Abstract This section should include a brief - no more than 265 words maximum - description of the proposed project, including: goal(s), objectives, outcomes, and products to be developed.

Detailed instructions for completing the summary/abstract are included in the “Instructions for Completing the Project Summary/Abstract.”

Problem Statement This section should describe, in both quantitative and qualitative terms, the nature and scope of the particular problem or issue the proposed intervention is designed to address, including how the project will potentially affect older adults and /or people with disabilities, their families and caregivers and the health care and social services systems.

Goals and Objectives This section should consist of a description of the project’s goal(s) and major objectives. Unless the project involves multiple, complex interventions, we recommend you have only one overall goal.

Proposed Intervention This section should provide a clear and concise description of the intervention (Approach) you are proposing to use to address the problem described in the “Problem Statement”. You should also describe the rationale for using the particular intervention, including factors such as:

“lessons learned” for similar projects previously tested in your community, or in other areas of the country; factors in the larger environment that have created the “right conditions” for the mailto:shawn.callaway@acl.hhs.gov intervention (e.g., existing social or economic factors that you’ll be able to take advantage of, etc.). Also note any major barriers you anticipate encountering, and how your project will be able to overcome those barriers. Be sure to describe the role and makeup of any strategic partnerships you plan to involve in implementing the intervention, including other organizations, supporters, and/or consumer groups.

Special Target Populations and Organizations

Outcomes This section of the project narrative must clearly identify the measurable outcome(s) that will result from the project. (NOTE: ACL will not fund any project that does not include measurable outcomes). This section should also describe how the project’s findings might benefit the field at large, (e.g., how the findings could help other organizations throughout the nation to address the same or similar problems.) List measurable outcomes in the optional work plan grid (“Project Work Plan – Sample Template”) under “Measurable Outcomes” in addition to any discussion included in the narrative along with a description of how the project might benefit the field at large.

A “measurable outcome” is an observable end-result that describes how a particular intervention benefits consumers. It demonstrates the functional status, mental well-being, knowledge, skill, attitude, awareness or behavior.) It can also describe a change in the degree to which consumers exercise choice over the types of services they receive, or whether they are satisfied with the way a service is delivered. Additional examples include: a change in the responsiveness or cost-effectiveness of a service delivery system; a new model of support or care that can be replicated in the ACL network; new knowledge that can contribute to the field of community living; a measurable increase in community awareness; or a measurable increase in persons receiving services. A measurable outcome is not a measurable “output”, such as: the number of clients served; the number of training sessions held; or the number of service units provided.

You should keep the focus of this section on describing what outcome(s) will be produced by the project. You should use the Evaluation section noted below to describe how the outcome(s) will be measured and reported.

Your application will be scored on the clarity and nature of your proposed outcomes, not on the number of outcomes cited. It is totally appropriate for a project to have only ONE outcome that it is trying to achieve.

Project Management This section should include a clear delineation of the roles and responsibilities of project staff, consultants and partner organizations, and how they will contribute to achieving the project’s objectives and outcomes. It should specify who would have day-to-day responsibility for key tasks such as: leadership of project; monitoring the project’s on-going progress, preparation of reports; communications with other partners and ACL. It should also describe the approach that will be used to monitor and track progress on the project’s tasks and objectives.

Evaluation This section should describe the method(s), techniques and tools that will be used to: 1) determine whether or not the proposed intervention- (Approach) achieved its anticipated outcome(s), and 2) document the “lessons learned” – both positive and negative - from the project that will be useful to people interested in replicating the intervention, if it proves successful.

Dissemination This section should describe the method that will be used to disseminate the project’s results and findings in a timely manner and in easily understandable formats, to parties who might be interested in using the results of the project to inform practice, service delivery, program development, and/or policy-making, including and especially those parties who would be interested in replicating the project.

Organizational Capacity Statement Each application should include an organizational capability statement and vitae for key project personnel. The organizational capability statement should describe how the applicant agency (or the particular division of a larger agency which will have responsibility for this project) is organized, the nature and scope of its work and/or the capabilities it possesses. It should also include the organization’s capability to sustain some or all project activities after Federal financial assistance has ended.

This description should cover capabilities of the applicant agency not included in the program narrative, such as any current or previous relevant experience and/or the record of the project team in preparing cogent and useful reports, publications, and other products. If appropriate, include an organization chart showing the relationship of the project to the current organization.

Please attach short vitae for key project staff only. Neither vitas nor an organizational chart will count towards the narrative page limit. Also include information about any contractual organization(s) and or partner organization(s) that will have a significant role(s) in implementing project and achieving project goals.

Other

Budget Narrative/Justification The Budget Narrative/Justification can be provided using the format included in the document, “Budget Narrative/Justification – Sample Format.” Applicants are encouraged to pay particular attention to this document, which provides an example of the level of detail sought.

Work Plan

The Project Work Plan should reflect and be consistent with the Project Narrative and Budget. It should include a statement of the project’s overall goal, anticipated outcome(s), key objectives, and the major tasks / action steps that will be pursued to achieve the goal and outcome(s). For each major task / action step, the work plan should identify timeframes involved (including start- and end-dates), and the lead person responsible for completing the task. Please use the “Project Work Plan - Sample Template” format as a reference and resource, if desired.

Letters of Commitment from Key Participating Organizations and Agencies

Include confirmation of the commitments to the project (should it be funded) made by key collaborating organizations and agencies in this part of the application. Any organization that is specifically named to have a significant role in carrying out the project should be considered an essential collaborator.

3. Submission Dates and Times Due Date for Applications: 08/06/2018 Date for Informational Conference Call: 06/06/2018 Conference Call: 866-646-1220 Passcode Participant: 1567487

4. Intergovernmental Review This funding opportunity announcement is not subject to the requirements of Executive Order 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs."

5. Funding Restrictions This grant program meets the ACL definition for training grants. For training grants, OGM, ACL allows for indirect costs rates to be capped at 8%. For more information on the long form see: https://rates.psc.gov/fms/dca/a21-appx_c.pdf. In accordance with 2 CFR part 200.331(a)(4) sub-grantees are permitted to use the indirect cost rate negotiated by the government. Therefore, applicants must limit the indirect cost rate to eight percent of total direct costs, exclusive of equipment, tuition and stipends, rental of space, major contracts or sub-grants and renovation and alteration, under this program announcement.

Training grant funds may not be used for travel support for conference attendance.

The following activities are not fundable:

Construction and/or major rehabilitation of buildings Basic research (e.g. scientific or medical experiments) Continuation of existing projects without expansion or new and innovative approaches

Note: A recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) report has raised considerable concerns about grantees and contractors charging the Federal government for additional meals outside of the standard allowance for travel subsistence known as per diem expenses. Executive Orders on Promoting Efficient Spending (E.O. 13589) and Delivering Efficient, Effective and Accountable Government (E.O. 13576) have been issued and instruct Federal agencies to promote efficient spending. Therefore, if meals are to be charged in your proposal, applicants should understand such costs must meet the following criteria outlined in the Executive Orders and HHS Grants Policy Statement:

Meals are generally unallowable except for the following:

o For subjects and patients under study (usually a research program);

o Where specifically approved as part of the project or program activity, e.g., in https://rates.psc.gov/fms/dca/a21-appx_c.pdf programs providing children’s services (e.g., Headstart);

o When an organization customarily provides meals to employees working beyond the normal workday, as a part of a formal compensation arrangement;

o As part of a per diem or subsistence allowance provided in conjunction with allowable travel; and o Under a conference grant, when meals are a necessary and integral part of a conference, provided that meal costs are not duplicated in participants’ per diem or subsistence allowances. (Note: conference grant means the sole purpose of the award is to hold a conference)

6. Other Submission Requirements Letters of intent should be emailed to: Shawn.Callaway@acl.hhs.gov

V. Application Review Information

1. Criteria Applicants must document all of their source material. If any text, language and/or materials are from another source, the applicant must make it clear the material is being quoted and where the text comes from. The applicant must also cite any sources when they obtain numbers, ideas, or other material that is not their own.

If the applicant fails to comply with this requirement, regardless of the severity or frequency of the plagiarism, the reviewers shall reduce their scores accordingly even to the degree of issuing no points at all.

Applications are scored by assigning a maximum of 100 points across the criteria below:

1. Project Relevance and Current Need

2. Approach

3. Budget

4. Project Impact

5. Organizational Capacity

Project Relevance & Current Need Maximum Points:15

Clearly identifies and provides a portrait of the physical, economic, social, financial, institutional, and/or other problems that substantiates the need to address Serious Mental Illness in the developmental disabilities population. In doing so, uses relevant and current data, including that collected through planning studies and/or focus groups with individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (ID/DD) and providers who serve individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. (7 points)

Clearly describes needs specific to the UCEDD provides evidence that feedback from customer surveys and community forums from the ID/DD and service providers were utilized in developing the project approach, including the goals and goal-related activities outlined. (4 points) Provides supporting documentation such as letters of support and testimonials from concerned interests, such as ID/DD and service providers other than the applicant. (4 points)

Approach Maximum Points:45

Overall strategy, methodology, and analysis in a well-reasoned manner that will appropriately accomplish the specific goal for the project of creating a training curriculum to address the mental health needs within the ID/DD community. (10 points)

A well-reasoned strategy for recruiting staff and trainees who have a background in mental health and other related fields. (10 points)

A complete description of a three-year plan for meeting the purpose of the NTI by outlining a projected measurable and attainable goal(s) in relation to training methods for service providers to adequately address serious mental health within the ID/DD community. Provides quantitative projections of the accomplishments to be achieved for each area. Provides chronological order of approach with target dates. (10 points)

Describes a plan for knowledge sharing and transfer. Describes an information dissemination plan that includes a process for identifying and developing new and innovative approaches to promote awareness of Serious Mental Illness through training, at all levels in the UCEDD Network. (10 points)

Describes a sustainability plan for continuing to address Serious Mental Illness within the ID/DD community past the project period. (5 points)

Budget Maximum Points:10

Provides a budget with line-items and detailed calculations for each budget objective, identified on the “Budget Information” form; detailed calculations that include estimation methods, quantities, unit costs, and other similar quantitative detail sufficient for the calculation to be duplicated; a breakout by the funding sources identified in Book18 of the SF-424; a narrative budget justification that describe show the categorical costs are derived; and a discussion of the necessity, reasonableness, and applicability of the proposed costs. (5 points)

Provides a narrative budget justification that describes how the categorical costs are derived and discusses the necessity, reasonableness, and applicability of the proposed costs in relation to the operation of the National Training Initiative grant. (5 points)

Project Impact Maximum Points:15

Provides a narrative (1) Outlining how the NTI results will be evaluated; (2) States methods for measuring the extent to which project goals and objectives have been achieved; (3) Discusses the criteria to be used to evaluate results; (4) Explains the methodology that will be used to determine if the needs identified and discussed are being met and if the project results and benefits are being achieved; (5) Defines the procedures to be employed to determine whether the project is being conducted in a manner consistent with the work plan presented; (6) Discusses the impact of the project’s various activities on the effectiveness of the projects; and (7) Explains the methodology that will be employed to report outcomes and results. The methodology should include use of quantitative and qualitative techniques to determine if the needs identified and discussed are being met and if the results and benefits are being achieved.

(10 points)

Describes an ongoing monitoring activity that is structured to gain information that is quantifiable and that permits objective rather than subjective judgments. (5 points)

Organizational Capacity Maximum Points:15

Provides background information on the UCEDD to ensure leadership and key staff have the developmental disabilities training to implement a Serious Mental Illness/developmental disabilities training program. (7 points)

Describes the qualifications of the faculty and staff assigned to the grant. Explains how the UCEDD will implement training to support the functions and purposes of the project and allocate enough time to carry out activities required by the Serious Mental Illness/developmental disabilities training program. (4 points)

Delineates faculty and staff roles and responsibilities in achieving the goals and objectives of the Serious Mental Illness/developmental disabilities training program. (4 points)

2. Review and Selection Process

As required by 2 CFR Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance, effective January 1, 2016, ACL is required to review and consider any information about the applicant that is in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), https://www.fapiis.gov before making any award in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $150,000) over the period of performance. An applicant may review and comment on any information about itself that a federal awarding agency has previously entered into FAPIIS. ACL will consider any comments by the applicant, in addition to other information in FAPIIS, in making a judgment about the applicant's integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed by applicants as described in 2 CFR Section 200.205 Federal Awarding Agency Review of Risk Posed by Applicants (https:// www.ecfr.gov/ cgi-bin/ text-idx?node=se2.1.200_1205&rgn=div8).

The grant applications that pass the initial screening will undergo a rigorous review process that follows the requirements of Section 154(c) of the DD Act.

This shall include the following:

(1) Peer Review.

https://www.fapiis.gov https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?node=se2.1.200_1205&rgn=div8 https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?node=se2.1.200_1205&rgn=div8

All applications submitted shall undergo a technical and qualitative review by peer review groups. Each peer review group will be comprised of approximately three people and shall include individuals with disabilities and parents, guardians, or advocates of or for individuals with developmental disabilities.

(2) Supplemental Review.

Should the peer review group determine that further review is necessary to make a decision to recommend an application for funding, it will advise AIDD of its determination. The peer review group may conduct site visits as part of the supplemental review before recommending an application for funding.

(3) Recommendation for Funding.

The peer review group will make a recommendation for funding an application. The recommendations for funding will be the following:

a. Recommended for funding;

b. Not recommended for funding.

c. Need additional information before making a recommendation for funding.

AIDD may approve an application only if the application has been recommended by the peer review group unless the requirement for such review and recommendation has been waived by the Secretary of HHS [see Section 154(c)]. AIDD may consider other factors or elements, other than the evaluation criteria, such as past performance, ability of the applicant to meet the purpose of the DD Act, and geographical dispersion and diversity, in reviewing and selecting applications.

Successful applicants will be judged on their ability to demonstrate the capacity or the development of the capacity to meet the purpose of the DD Act. Please reference Section IV.2 for information on non-Federal reviewers in the review process.

3. Anticipated Announcement Award Date The anticipated award date is on or around August 15, 2018, with an estimated project start date of September 1, 2018.

VI. Award Administration Information

1. Award Notices The award is subject to HHS Administrative Requirements, which can be found in 45 CFR Part 75 and the Standard Terms and Conditions, included in the Notice of Award as well as implemented through the HHS Grants Policy Statement.

A standard term and condition of award will be included in the final notice of award; all applicants will be subject to a term and condition that applies the terms of 48 CFR section 3.908 to the award and requires the grantees inform their employee in writing of employee whistleblower rights and protections under 41 U.S.C. 4712 in the predominant native language of the workforce.

2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements The award is subject to HHS Administrative Requirements, which can be found in 45 CFR Part 75 and the Standard Terms and Conditions, included in the Notice of Award as well as implemented through the HHS Grants Policy Statement.

A standard term and condition of award will be included in the final notice of award; all applicants will be subject to a term and condition that applies the terms of 48 CFR section 3.908 to the award and requires the…