oppF18AS00030-cfda15.657-instructions.docx

DOCX document 324 KB Posted

Attached to
Endangered Species Conservation â¿¿ Recovery Implementation Funds
Opportunity number
F18AS00030
Issued by

About this file

Application Instructions

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
oppF18AS00030-cfda15.657.pdf PDF
NOI for Chiricachua Leopard Frog FY18.pdf PDF
NOFO Chiricachua Frog.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge National Wildlife System

Mogollon Emphasis Area - Recovery of Chiricahua Leopard Frog Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 15.657

Notice of Funding Opportunity

I. Description of Funding Opportunity This opportunity is available through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Mogollon Emphasis Area (MEA) funding, which has been provided by a Regional Directorate Team organized to implement a model to effectively support strategic conservation priorities, to allow the Service to better leverage resources and achieve strategic habitat conservation throughout the Southwest Region. This will allow a cross-programmatic approach to help restore and recover federally-listed threatened and endangered species in southeast Arizona and southwest New Mexico. Through this MEA funding, the Service is combining the resources of the Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD), the American Museum of Natural History-Southwest Research Station, the University of Arizona, and other partners who together have developed, tested, and implemented cost-effective methods of eradicating non-native bullfrogs from isolated wetlands. Through this agreement, cooperators will benefit from the recovery of the federally-listed threatened Chiricahua leopard frogs, as well as other rare aquatic species including the northern Mexican garter snake and Sonoran mud turtle which are heavily dependent on the small number of wetlands in southeast Arizona and southwest New Mexico that occur within the MEA. The authorized statute for this agreement is: Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et. seq, as amended; Public Law 93-205, 87 Stat. 884, Endangered Species Act Amendments of 1978, Public Law 95-632, 92 Stat. 3751, and Endangered Species Act Amendments of 1982, Public Law 97-304, 96 Stat. 1411.

II. Award Information The Service has issued a Notice of Intent to Award Single Source. There will only be on award issued. The anticipated start date is December 4, 2017, through December 31, 2019. A systematic eradication approach will involve initial monitoring for bullfrog presence/absence; removal of bullfrogs using a variety of methods (trapping, seining, hand capture, electroshocking, use of ammonia, selective shooting using non-toxic ammunition, etc.); and subsequently monitoring the effectiveness of various removal techniques. Ongoing day and night monitoring will be conducted to ensure project success followed by removal of any previously undetected bullfrogs to prevent their immigration into previously treated wetlands.

III. Basic Eligibility Requirements Eligible Applicants:

This Single Source Award is being awarded in accordance with Department of the Interior Policy 505 DM 2.14 B(4) Unique Qualifications. Entities eligible to apply include those having demonstrated expertise in endangered species management and recovery large landscapes, habitat restoration such as outreach communication, implementation of removal practices, working with multiple private landowners and partners in the area and monitoring activities. U.S. non-profit, non-governmental organizations with 501(c)(3) Internal on Revenue Status (IRS) must provide a copy of their Section 501(c)(3) status determination letter received from the IRS.

Applicants must ensure that activities occurring outside the United States are coordinated as necessary with appropriate U.S. and foreign government authorities and that any necessary licenses, permits, or approvals are obtained prior to undertaking proposed activities. The Service does not assume responsibility for recipient compliance with the laws and regulations of the country in which the work is to be conducted.

Federal law mandates that all entities applying for Federal financial assistance must have a valid Dun & Bradstreet Data Universal Number System (DUNS) number and have a current registration in the System for Award Management (SAM). See Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 25 for more information. Exemptions: The SAM registration requirement does not apply to individuals submitting an application on their own behalf and not on behalf of a company or other for-profit entity, state, local or Tribal government, academia or other type of organization.

A. DUNS Registration Request a DUNS number at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. For technical difficulties, contact Dun & Bradstreet by email at: govt@dnb.com, or by calling the Government Customer Resource Center at voice phone: 866-705-5711 or TTY line: 877-807-1679 (hearing impaired customers only). Once assigned a DUNS number, entities are responsible for maintaining up-to-date information with Dun & Bradstreet.

B. Entity Registration in SAM Register in SAM at www.sam.gov. Once registered in SAM, entities must renew and revalidate their SAM registration at least every 12 months from the date previously registered. Entities are strongly urged to revalidate their registration as often as needed to ensure that their information is up to date and in synch with changes that may have been made to DUNS and IRS information. Foreign entities who wish to be paid directly to a United States bank account must enter and maintain valid and current banking information in SAM.

Note: The official U.S. government website address for SAM is www.sam.gov. There is NO COST to register in or access SAM.gov. There are third-party vendors who charge a fee in exchange for registering entities in SAM; please be aware that you can register to do business with the U.S. government FOR FREE directly in SAM at www.sam.gov.

C. Excluded Entities Applicant entities or their key project personnel identified in the SAM.gov Exclusions database as ineligible, prohibited/restricted or excluded from receiving Federal contracts, certain subcontracts, and certain Federal assistance and benefits will not be considered for Federal funding, as applicable to the funding being requested under this Federal program. The Service conducts a review of the SAM.gov Exclusions database for all applicant entities and their key project personnel prior to award.

D. Cost Sharing or Matching:

While the Mogollon Emphasis Area Cooperative Agreement does not specifically require cost sharing, matching, or cost participation, cooperators may elect to require cost sharing by individual applicants as a way to help build upon the funding made available through this agreement. Providing temporary housing and meals to individuals participating in bullfrog removal efforts is considered an important potential cost share.

IV. Application Requirements To be considered for funding under this funding opportunity, an application must contain:

A. A completed, signed and dated Application for Federal Assistance form (sf-424). SF-424A Budget Information, - Non-Construction Programs SF-424B, Assurances- Non-Assurances - Construction Programs SF-242C, Budget Information for Construction Programs and SF242D, Assurances - Construction Programs. All applicants forms may be found at (). Do not include other Federal sources of funding, requested or approved, in the total entered in the “Federal” funding box on the Application for Federal Assistance form. Enter only the amount being requested under this program in the “Federal” funding box. Include any other Federal sources of funding in the total funding entered in the “Other” box.

B. Project Summary In the United States, federally-listed threatened Chiricahua leopard frogs are heavily dependent on a small number of wetlands in southeast Arizona and southwest New Mexico. Recovery of the species is dependent upon eradication of non-native, predatory bullfrogs from Chiricahua leopard frog habitats, and thus, is a major recovery goal for the leopard frog. Eliminating bullfrogs from selected aquatic habitats will also benefit multiple other rare aquatic species including the northern Mexican garter snake and Sonoran mud turtle. Cost effective methods of eradicating bullfrogs from isolated wetlands have already been successfully developed, tested, and implemented. Working with partners in this area, such as AGFD, the American Museum of Natural History, the University of Arizona, and multiple private landowners, the Service can bring its expertise and funding to bear. There is currently a Cooperative Recovery Initiative Agreement in place to perform intense control efforts on approximately 116,000 acres surrounding the Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) in Frog Recovery Unit-1. The same successful eradication techniques utilized in that initiative will be implemented in this project, and will become a part of the ongoing adaptive management approach. Following the completion of baseline monitoring, a specific plan will be developed and implemented by a team of stakeholders, and trained individuals will subsequently be funded to systematically eliminate bullfrogs from crucial wetlands and also monitor the ongoing success of the overall eradication program.

C. Project Narrative:

1. Statement of Need: The Chiricahua leopard frog is federally listed as a threatened species. The amphibian has become increasingly rare because of wetland habitat loss and predation/ competition by non-native American bullfrogs. Eliminating bullfrogs from selected aquatic habitats occupied by leopard frogs will help recovery of the native frogs, and will benefit multiple other rare aquatic species including the northern Mexican garter snake and Sonoran mud turtle. Work will be emphasized in Frog Recovery Units 1 – 3 in southeast Arizona and southwest New Mexico. Because previous funding has already allowed the completion of baseline monitoring, and development of an implementation plan for bullfrog removal in Frog Recovery Unit 3, the efforts of this project will begin in that unit. Ultimately, these same techniques will be developed and implemented in Frog Recovery Unit 1 and 2 utilizing a team of stakeholders, and trained individuals will subsequently be used to systematically eliminate bullfrogs from additional crucial wetlands and also monitor the ongoing success of the overall eradication program.

2. Project Goals and Objectives: The objective of this project in southeast Arizona and southwest New Mexico is to assist in the elimination of bullfrogs which directly (through predation) and indirectly (through competition) threaten the survival of Chiricahua leopard frogs, northern Mexican garter snakes, and other aquatic species in Emphasis Area Recovery Units 1-3. A total of 100 percent of bullfrogs will be eradicated from specific areas where they threaten leopard frogs over a 3-year period. A systematic eradication approach will be implemented and involve initial monitoring for bullfrog presence/absence, removal of bullfrogs using a variety of methods, and ongoing monitoring to measure the effectiveness of removal methods.

3. Project Activities, Methods and Timetable: Up to a 3-year period after receiving funding, collaborators will provide the necessary personnel, equipment, material, services, facilities, and otherwise perform all things necessary for, or incidental to, the performance of this project. Specifically, the parties involved in this agreement will:

Task
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Performance Measure
Lead
Cost
Comm/

other Needs Strat

Write proposal
X
Proposal submitted
FWS, AGFD
Staff time
Develop Stakeholder Team
X
Team functioning
All stakeholders
Staff time
Outreach/Comms Campaign for landowners/public
X
X
X
Continued bullfrog free restoration areas
All
Staff time
Comm
Contact Landowners
X
X
X
At least 10 contacted and interested
AGFD
Staff time
Comm
Assess Wetlands
X
X
X
Maps with data
AGFD, FWS,

Partners

Staff time
GIS Skills
Develop specific
X
X
X
All areas
Team and
$2,500

removal and

with a plan
Landowners
each

monitoring practices for each site year.

NEPA Compliance
X
X
Final documents
AGFD, FWS
Staff time
Comm
Implement removal
X
X
X
Practices
AGFD, FWS,
$23,000

practices

performed
with
Each
temporary
Year.

staff hires.

Evaluate
X
X
X
Eradication conducted, analyzed
AGFD, FWS,

Partners $5,000 each year.

Ongoing
X
X
X
Determine
FWS,
Staff time
Comm

monitoring

future
Partners

including threats.

monitoring the response of CLF and other species to bullfrog eradication.

4. Stakeholder Coordination/Involvement: Service staff and their collaborative partners have a long track record of completing these types of projects both off and on NWR lands in southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico. Interest from partners and private land owners has been building for over 2 decades and provides a unique opportunity for regional collaboration on a grand scale in in combining conservation efforts on Federal, state, and private lands. Previous projects have been successful in creating and maintaining stable habitats for federally-listed fish and leopard frogs in the geographic area. Success will be measured by the increased population of the federally-listed Chiricahua Leopard Frog and multiple other rare aquatic species including the Mexican gartersnake and Sonoran mud turtle.

5. Project Monitoring and Evaluation: Because significant pre-work (Environmental Assessments, baseline monitoring, and development of an implementation plan) has already been accomplished relative to the much of Frog Recovery Unit 3, the project can be implemented immediately upon finalizing the agreement; the project is expected to be completed by December 31, 2019. AZGD has an existing Inventory and Monitoring Plan which is used annually to monitor Chiricahua leopard frogs. This data will be used to support any proposals to change listing status for threatened and endangered species. Monitoring will be accomplished by refuge staff, other Service personnel, partners, and qualified collaborators. Monitoring will measure the success of previous species re-introduction efforts, document the establishment of self-perpetuating populations, and document population trends and other species impacted by this project. A systematic eradication approach will involve initial monitoring for bullfrog presence/ absence, removal of bullfrogs, and monitor the effectiveness of various removal methods. Ongoing day and night monitoring will be conducted to ensure project success followed by removal of any previously undetected bullfrogs and to prevent bullfrog immigration into previously treated wetlands. Such monitoring on the private property is currently being accomplished by qualified and experienced employees working for AGFD, the American Museum of Natural History-Southwest Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, the Service, and private individuals.

6. Description of Entities Undertaking the Project: The Service is working with one major organization to complete this Agreement, The American Museum of Natural History-Southwest Research Station, (http://research.amnh.org/swrs) located in Portal, Arizona, the contact information is listed below:

American Museum of Natural History Southwest Research Station Project Manager Geoff Bender Post Office Box 16553 Portal, Arizona 85632 gbender@amnh.org Office: 520-558-2396 Fax: 520-558-2018

7. Sustainability: Many of the project activities are expected to continue beyond the life of this specific project period, and will require periodic monitoring in order to continue to be valuable in supporting its intended need. The Service will continue to collaborate with cooperators to encourage and support and protection and recovery of federally-listed aquatic species, wildlife, and plant species as mandated by the Endangered Species Act, the Yaqui Fishes Recovery Plan, the San Bernardino and Leslie Canyon NWR Comprehensive Management Plan, and other pertinent plans and policy.

8. Literature Cited:

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999 San Bernardino and Leslie Canyon NWRs Comprehensive Management Plan 1995-2015. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 113 pp.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1995. Yaqui Fishes Recovery Plan. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 48 pp.

9. Map of Project Area:

D. Budget Form Complete the Budget Information for Non-Construction Programs (SF 424A) or Budget Information for Construction Programs (SF 424C) form. Use the SF 424A if your project does not include construction and the SF 424C if the project includes construction or land acquisition. The budget forms are available on the Internet at http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/sf-424-family.html#sortby=1. When developing your budget, keep in mind that financial assistance awards and subawards are subject to the Federal cost principles in Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, as applicable to the recipient organization type. Links to the full text of the Federal cost principles are available on the Internet at http://www.ecfr.gov/.

Note on Multiple Federal Funding Sources: If the project budget includes multiple Federal funding sources, you must show the funds being requested from this Federal program on the budget form separately from any other requested/secured Federal sources of funding. Enter the funds being requested from this Federal program in the first row of the Budget Summary section of the form, and then enter funding related to other Federal programs in the subsequent row(s). Be sure to enter each Federal program’s CFDA number in the corresponding fields on the form. The CFDA number for this Federal program appears on the first page of this funding opportunity.

E. Budget Justification In a separate narrative titled “Budget Justification”, explain and justify all requested budget items/costs. Detail how the SF 424 Budget Object Class Category totals were determined and demonstrate a clear connection between costs and the proposed project activities. For personnel salary costs, include the base-line salary figures and the estimates of time (as percentages) to be directly charged to the project. Describe any item that under the applicable Federal cost principles requires the Service’s approval and estimate its cost.

If Federally-funded equipment will be used for the project, provide a list of that equipment, including the Federal funding source.

Required Indirect Cost Statement: Recipients that do not have an approved indirect cost rate cannot charge indirect costs to their Federal award. All applicants except individuals applying for funds separate from a business or non-profit organization he/she may operate must include in the budget justification narrative one of the following statements and attach to their application any required documentation identified in the applicable statement:

“We are:

1. A U.S. state or local government entity receiving more than $35 million in direct Federal funding each year with an indirect cost rate of [insert rate]. We submit our indirect cost rate proposals to our cognizant agency. A copy of our most recently approved rate agreement/certification is attached.

2. A U.S. state or local government entity receiving less than $35 million in direct Federal funding with an indirect cost rate of [insert rate]. We are required to prepare and retain for audit an indirect cost rate proposal and related documentation to support those costs.

3. A [insert your organization type; U.S. states and local governments, please use one of the statements above or below] that has previously negotiated or currently has an approved indirect cost rate with our cognizant agency. Our indirect cost rate is [insert rate]. [Insert either: “A copy of our most recently approved but expired rate agreement is attached. In the event an award is made, we will submit an indirect cost rate proposal to our cognizant agency within 90 calendar days after the award is made.” or “A copy of our current, approved rate agreement(s) is attached.”]

4. A [insert your organization type] that has never submitted an indirect cost rate proposal to our cognizant agency. Our indirect cost rate is [insert rate]. In the event an award is made, we will submit an indirect cost rate proposal to our cognizant agency within 90 calendar days after the award is made.

5. A [insert your organization type] that has never submitted an indirect cost rate proposal to our cognizant agency and has an indirect cost rate that is lower than 10%. Our indirect cost rate is [insert rate; must be lower than 10%]. However, in the event an award is made, we will not be able to meet the requirement to submit an indirect cost rate proposal to our cognizant agency within 90 calendar days after award. We request as a condition of award to charge a flat indirect cost rate of [insert rate; must be lower than 10%] of [insert a clear description of the direct cost base against which your rate is charged (e.g., salaries; salaries and fringe benefits; or modified total direct costs). However, please note that your organization cannot charge indirect costs in excess of the indirect costs that would be recovered if applied against modified total direct costs as defined in 2 CFR 220.68]. We understand that we must notify the Service in writing immediately if we establish an approved rate with our cognizant agency at any point during the award period.

6. A [insert your organization type] that has never submitted an indirect cost rate proposal to our cognizant agency and has an indirect cost rate that is 10% or higher. Our indirect cost rate is [insert your organization’s indirect rate; must be 10% or higher]. However, in the event an award is made, we will not be able to meet the requirement to submit an indirect cost rate proposal to our cognizant agency within 90 calendar days after award. We request as a condition of award to charge a flat de minimis indirect cost rate of 10% of modified total direct costs as defined in 2 CFR 200.68. We understand that we must notify the Service in writing immediately if we do establish an approved rate with our cognizant agency at any point during the award period. We understand that additional Federal funds may not be available to support an unexpected increase in indirect costs during the project period and such changes are subject to review, negotiation, and prior approval by the Service.

7. A [insert your organization type] that will charge all costs directly.

All applicants are hereby notified of the following:

· Recipients without an approved indirect cost rate are prohibited from charging indirect costs to a Federal award. Accepting a flat de minimis rate as a condition of award is an approved rate.

· Failure to establish an approved rate during the award period renders all costs otherwise allocable as indirect costs unallowable under the award.

· Recipients may not charge to their Service award any indirect costs calculated against the portion of total direct project costs paid by any other Federal funding source or non-Federal partner.

· Recipients must have prior written approval from the Service to transfer unallowable indirect costs to amounts budgeted for direct costs or to satisfy cost-sharing or matching requirements under the award.

· Recipients are prohibited from shifting unallowable indirect costs to another Federal award unless specifically authorized to do so by legislation.

Applicants who are individuals applying for funds separate from a business or non-profit organization he/she may operate are not eligible to charge indirect costs to their award. If you are an individual applying for funding, do not include any indirect costs in your proposed budget.

For more information on indirect cost rates, see the Service’s Indirect Costs and Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreements guidance document on the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/grants/atc.html.

Negotiating an Indirect Cost Rate with the Department of the Interior: Entities that do not have a NICRA must first have an open, active Federal award before they can submit an indirect cost rate proposal to their cognizant agency. The Federal awarding agency that provides the largest amount of direct funding to your organization is your cognizant agency, unless otherwise assigned by the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB). If the Department of the Interior is your cognizant agency, your indirect cost rate will be negotiated by the Interior Business Center (IBC). For more information, contact the IBC at:

Indirect Cost Services Acquisition Services Directorate, Interior Business Center U.S. Department of the Interior 650 Capitol Mall, Suite 7-400 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: 916-930-3803 Email: Through https://www.doi.gov/ibc/contactus/ibcfeedback web form Internet address: https://www.doi.gov/ibc/services/finance/indirect-cost-services

Single Audit Reporting Statements: As required in Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Subpart F, all U.S. states, local governments, federally-recognized Indian tribal governments, and non-profit organizations expending $750,000 USD or more in Federal award funds in a fiscal year must submit a Single Audit report for that year through the Federal Audit Clearinghouse’s Internet Data Entry System. All U.S. state, local government, federally-recognized Indian tribal government and non-profit applicants must provide a statement regarding if your organization was/was not required to submit a Single Audit report for the organization’s most recently closed fiscal year and, if so, state if that report is available on the Federal Audit Clearinghouse Single Audit Database website (https://harvester.census.gov/facweb/) and provide the EIN under which that report was submitted. Include these statements at the end of the Project Narrative in a section titled “Single Audit Reporting Statements”.

G. Assurances: Include the appropriate signed and dated Assurances form available at http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/sf-424-family.html#sortby=1. Use the Assurances for Construction Programs (SF 424D) for construction and land acquisition projects. Use the Assurances for Non-Construction Programs (SF 424B) for all other projects. The form includes a statement that some of the assurances may not be applicable to your organization and/or your project or program. Signing this form does not make you or your organization subject to laws that are otherwise not applicable to you or your organization. Changing, crossing out, or making notations on the form before signing has no impact on the applicability of law.

H. Certification and Disclosure of Lobbying Activities: Under Title 31 of the United States Code, Section 1352, an applicant or recipient must not use any federally appropriated funds (both annually appropriated and continuing appropriations) or matching funds under a grant or cooperative agreement award to pay any person for lobbying in connection with the award. Lobbying is defined as influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress connection with the award. Submission of an application also represents the applicant’s certification of the statements in 43 CFR Part 18, Appendix A-Certification Regarding Lobbying. If you/your organization have/has made or agrees to make any payment using non-appropriated funds for lobbying in connection with this proposal AND the Federal share exceeds $100,000, complete and submit the SF LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities form available at http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/post-award-reporting-forms.html#sortby=1. See 43 CFR, Subpart 18.100 for more information on when additional submission of this form is required.

I. Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Applicants must notify the Service in writing of any actual or potential conflicts of interest that are known at the time of application or that may arise during the life of this award, in the event an award is made. Conflicts of interest include any relationship or matter which might place the recipient, the recipient’s employees, or the recipient’s subrecipients in a position of conflict, real or apparent, between their responsibilities under the award and any other outside interests. Conflicts of interest may also include, but are not limited to, direct or indirect financial interests, close personal relationships, positions of trust in outside organizations, consideration of future employment arrangements with a different organization, or decision-making affecting the award that would cause a reasonable person with knowledge of the relevant facts to question the impartiality of the applicant, the applicant’s employees, or the applicant’s future subrecipients in the matter. Upon receipt of such a notice, the Service Project Officer in consultation with their Ethics Counselor will determine if a conflict of interest exists and, if so, if there are any possible actions to be taken by the applicant to reduce or resolve the conflict. Failure to resolve conflicts of interest in a manner that satisfies the Service may result in the project not being select for funding.

J. Required Overlap/Duplication Statement: Applicants must provide a statement that addresses if there is any overlap between the proposed project and any other active or anticipated projects in terms of activities, costs, or time commitment of key personnel. If any overlap exists, applicants must provide a description of the overlap in their application. Applicants must also state if the proposal submitted for consideration under this program is/is not in any way duplicative of any proposal that was/will be submitted for funding consideration to any other potential funding source (Federal or non-Federal). If such a circumstance exists, applicants must detail when the other duplicative proposal(s) were submitted, to whom (entity name and program), and when funding decisions are expected to be announced. If at any time a proposal is awarded funds that would be duplicative of the funding requested from the Service, applicants must notify the Service point of contact for this funding opportunity immediately.

Application Checklist

· Evidence of non-profit status: If a non-profit organization, a copy of their Section 501(c)(3) or (4) status determination letter received from the Internal Revenue Service.

· SF 424, Application for Federal Assistance: A complete, signed and dated SF 424

· Project summary

· Project narrative

· Timetable

· Description of key personnel qualifications

· Single Audit Reporting statement: If a U.S. state, local government, federally-recognized Indian tribal government, or non-profit organization, statements regarding applicability of and compliance with Single Audit reporting requirements.

· SF 424 budget form: A complete SF 424A or SF 424C Budget Information form.

· Budget justification

· Federally-funded equipment list: If Federally-funded equipment will be used for the project, a list of that equipment.

· Indirect cost statement

· NICRA: When applicable, a copy of the organization’s current Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement.

· SF 424 Assurances form: Signed and dated SF 424B or SF 424D Assurances form.

· SF LLL form: If applicable, completed SF-LLL Disclosure of Lobbying Activities form.

· Conflict of Interest disclosure, when applicable.

· Overlap/Duplication statement

Failure to provide complete information may cause delays, postponement, or rejection of the application.

V. Submission Instructions SUBMISSION DEADLINE: November 29, 2017, by 4 p.m. MST

Intergovernmental Review: Before submitting an application, U.S. state and local government applicants should visit the following website (https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/omb/grants_spoc) to determine whether their application is subject to the state intergovernmental review process under Executive Order (E.O.) 12372 “Intergovernmental review of Federal Programs.” E.O. 12372 was issued to foster the intergovernmental partnership and strengthen federalism by relying on state and local processes for the coordination and review of proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development. The E.O. allows each state to designate an entity to perform this function. The official list of designated entities is posted on the website. Contact your state’s designated entity for more information on the process the state requires to be followed when applying for assistance. States that do not have a designated entity listed on the website have chosen not to participate in the review process.

Download the Application Package linked to this Funding Opportunity on Grants.gov to begin the application process. Downloading and saving the Application Package to your computer makes the required government-wide standard forms fillable and printable. Completed applications may be submitted by mail, by email, electronically through Grants.gov, or as otherwise described in the Grants.gov funding opportunity. Please select ONE of the submission options:

To submit an application by mail:

Number all pages of your printed application. Mail one, single-sided, unbound copy (do not staple or otherwise permanently bind pages) of your complete application to the Service program point of contact identified in the Grants.gov funding opportunity.

The required SF 424 Application for Federal Assistance and Assurances forms and any other required standard forms MUST be signed by your organization’s authorized official. The Signature and Date fields on the standard forms downloaded from Grants.gov are pre-populated with the text “Completed by Grants.gov upon submission” or “Completed on submission to Grants.gov”. Remove this text (manually or digitally) before signing the forms.

To submit an application by e-mail:

Format all of your documents to print on Letter size (8 ½” x 11”) paper. Format all pages to display and print page numbers. Scanned documents should be scanned in Letter format, as black and white images only. Where possible, save scanned documents in .pdf format. E-mail your application to the Service program point of contact identified in the Grants.gov funding opportunity.

The required SF 424 Application for Federal Assistance and Assurances forms and any other required standard forms MUST be signed by your organization’s authorized official. The Signature and Date fields on the standard forms downloaded from Grants.gov are pre-populated with the text “Completed by Grants.gov upon submission” or “Completed on submission to Grants.gov”. Remove this text (manually or digitally) before signing the forms.

To submit an application through Grants.gov:

Go to the Grants.gov Apply for Grants page (http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/apply-for-grants.html) for an overview of the process to apply through Grants.gov. You/your organization must complete the Grants.gov registration process before submitting an application through Grants.gov. Registration can take between three to five business days, or as long as two weeks if all steps are not completed in a timely manner.

Important note on Grants.gov application attachment file names: Please do not assign application attachments file names longer than 20 characters, including spaces. Assigning file names longer than 20 characters will create issues in the automatic interface between Grants.gov and the Service’s financial assistance management system.

VI. Application Review Criteria: To be considered for funding, applications will be evaluated by the Service for specific merits identified in the agreement and in selecting applications for award of funds. This Single Source Award is being awarded in accordance with DOI Policy 505 DM 2.14 B(4). See Additional Information of Eligibility Section.

Review and Selection Process: This Single Source Award is being awarded in accordance with Department of the Interior policy 505 DM 2.14 B(4).

Prior to participating in any review or evaluation process, all staff and peer reviewers, evaluators, panel members, and advisors must sign and return to the program office point of contact the “Department of the Interior Conflict of Interest Certification” form. For a copy of this form, contact the Service point of contact identified in the Agency Contacts section below.

Prior to award, the Service reviews the selected applicant’s statement regarding potential overlap or duplication in terms of activities, funding, or time commitment of key personnel and makes a determination regarding Service funding. Depending on the circumstances, modification of the application, other pending applications, or an active award may be necessary, or the Service might choose to not fund the proposed project.

Each fiscal year, for every entity receiving one or more awards in that fiscal year, the Service conducts a risk assessment based on eight risk categories. The result of this risk assessment is used to establish a monitoring plan for all awards to the entity in that fiscal year. For a copy of the Service’s risk assessment form, go to https://www.fws.gov/grants/atc.html.

Prior to approving an award with a Federal funding amount that exceeds or is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, as adjusted (see 2 CFR 200.88), the Service must review and consider any information about the applicant that is in the designated integrity and performance system accessible through SAM (currently FAPIIS; https://www.fapiis.gov/fapiis/index.action) to determine if, at a minimum, the information found in the system for the applicant demonstrates a satisfactory record of Federal award performance and integrity and business ethics (see 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2)). The Service must also report to FAPIIS if an applicant subject to this review is found not qualified for a particular award due to its prior record of integrity or performance under Federal awards (see 2 CFR 200.212).

VII. Award Administration Award Notices: Following review, applicants may be requested to revise the project scope and/or budget before an award is made. Successful applicants will receive written notice in the form of a notice of award document. Notices of award are typically sent to recipients by e-mail. If e-mail notification is unsuccessful, the documents will be sent by courier mail (e.g., FedEx, DHL or UPS). Award recipients are not required to sign/return the Notice of Award document. Acceptance of an award is defined as starting work, drawing down funds, or accepting the award via electronic means. Awards are based on the application submitted to, and as approved by, the Service. The notice of award document will include instructions specific to each recipient on how to request payment. If applicable, the instructions will detail any additional information/forms required and where to submit payment requests. Applicants whose projects are not selected for funding will receive written notice, most often by e-mail, within 30 days of the final review decision.

Domestic Recipient Payments: Prior to award, the Service program office will contact you/your organization to either enroll in the U.S. Treasury’s Automated Standard Application for Payments (ASAP) system or, if eligible, obtain approval from the Department of the Interior to be waived from using ASAP.

Transmittal of Sensitive Data: Recipients are responsible for ensuring any sensitive data being sent to the Service is protected during its transmission/delivery. The Service strongly recommends that recipients use the most secure transmission/delivery method available. The Service recommends the following digital transmission methods: secure digital faxing; encrypted emails; emailing a password protected zipped/compressed file attachment in one email followed by the password in a second email; or emailing a zipped/compressed file attachment. The Service strongly encourages recipients sending sensitive data in paper copy to use a courier mail service. Recipients may also contact their Service Project Officer and provide any sensitive data over the telephone.

Award Terms and Conditions: Acceptance of a financial assistance award (i.e., grant or cooperative agreement) from the Service carries with it the responsibility to be aware of and comply with the terms and conditions applicable to the award. Acceptance is defined as the start of work, drawing down funds, or accepting the award via electronic means. Awards are based on the application submitted to and approved by the Service and are subject to the terms and conditions incorporated into the notice of award either by direct citation or by reference to the following: Federal regulations; program legislation or regulation; and special award terms and conditions. The Service’s Standard Award Terms and Conditions are available on the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/grants/atc.html. If you do not have access to the Internet and require a full text copy of the award terms and conditions, contact the Service point of contact identified in the Agency Contacts section below.

Recipient Reporting Requirements:

Financial and Performance Reports:

Final Reports: Recipients are required to submit final financial and performance reports no later than 90 calendar days after the award period of performance end date or termination date, whichever comes first. For awards lasting 12 months or less, the final reports will be the only financial and performance reports required, except in unusual circumstances or if waived.

Interim Reports: For awards that last longer than 12 months, recipients are required to submit interim financial and performance reports no less frequently than annually and no more frequently than quarterly, except in unusual circumstances or if waived. Requiring a higher frequency of reporting than annual reporting will be based on the Service’s assessment of higher or other unusual circumstance. Quarterly and semiannual interim reports are due within 30 calendar days of the reporting period end date. Annual interim reports are due within 90 calendar days of the reporting period end date.

Recipients must use the Standard Form 425, Federal Financial Report for financial reporting, available on the Internet at http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/post-award-reporting-forms.html#sortby=1.

Performance reports must contain: 1) a comparison of actual accomplishments with the goals and objectives of the award as detailed in the approved scope of work; 2) a description of reasons why established goals were not met, if appropriate; and 3) any other pertinent information relevant to the project results.

Significant Developments Reports: Events may occur between the scheduled performance reporting dates that have significant impact upon the supported activity. In such cases, recipients are required to notify the Service in writing as soon as the following types of conditions become known:

· Problems, delays, or adverse conditions that will materially impair the ability to meet the objective of the Federal award. This disclosure must include a statement of any corrective action(s) taken or contemplated, and any assistance needed to resolve the situation.

· Favorable developments that enable meeting time schedules and objectives sooner or at less cost than anticipated or producing more or different beneficial results than originally planned.

The Service will specify in the notice of award document the reporting and reporting frequency applicable to the award.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Recipients are responsible for notifying the Service Project Officer in writing of any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise during the life of this award. Conflicts of interest include any relationship or matter which might place the recipient, the recipient’s employees, or the recipient’s subrecipients in a position of conflict, real or apparent, between their responsibilities under this award and any other outside interests. Conflicts of interest may also include, but are not limited to, direct or indirect financial interests, close personal relationships, positions of trust in outside organizations, consideration of future employment arrangements with a different organization, or decision-making affecting the award that would cause a reasonable person with knowledge of the relevant facts to question the impartiality of the Recipient, the Recipient’s employees, or the Recipient’s subrecipients in the matter. Upon receipt of such a notice, the Service Project Officer in consultation with their Ethics Counselor will determine if a conflict of interest exists and, if so, if there are any possible actions to be taken by the Recipient, the Recipient’s employee(s), or the Recipient’s Subrecipient(s) that could reduce or resolve the conflict. Failure to resolve conflicts of interest in a manner that satisfies the Service may result in any of the remedies described in 2 CFR 200.338, Remedies for Noncompliance, including termination of this award.

Other Mandatory Disclosures: The non-Federal entity or applicant for a Federal award must disclose, in a timely manner, in writing to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity all violations of Federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the Federal award. Non-Federal entities that have received a Federal award including the term and condition outlined in 2 CFR 200, Appendix XII—Award Term and Condition for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters are required to report certain civil, criminal, or administrative proceedings to SAM. Failure to make required disclosures can result in any of the remedies described in 2 CFR 200.338 Remedies for noncompliance, including suspension or debarment. (See also 2 CFR Part 180, 31 U.S.C. 3321, and 41 U.S.C. 2313.)

2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XII—Award Term and Condition for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters is applicable to awards with a total Federal share of more than $500,000, except those to individuals and foreign public entities.

VIII. Agency Contacts:

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service William R. Radke, Refuge Manager Post Office Box 3509 Douglas, Arizona 85608 Ph: (520) 364-2104 ext. 101 Email: bill_radke@fws.gov image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it.