noaa-nos-orr-2016-2004578 ffo report.pdf
PDF 185 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FY2016 Community-based Marine Debris Removal
- Opportunity number
- NOAA-NOS-ORR-2016-2004578
- Issued by
-
Department of Commerce
About this file
Full Announcement
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| noaa-nos-orr-2016-2004578 ffo report.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ANNOUNCEMENT OF FEDERAL FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Federal Agency Name(s): National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce
Funding Opportunity Title: FY2016 Community-based Marine Debris Removal
Announcement Type: Initial
Funding Opportunity Number: NOAA-NOS-ORR-2016-2004578
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 11.463, Habitat Conservation
Dates: Full proposals must be received and validated by Grants.gov, postmarked, or provided to a delivery service on or before 11:59 p.m. EST, November 2, 2015. Note: When developing your submission timeline, please keep in mind that the registration process in the online System for Award Management (SAM.gov) and Grants.gov may take between three and five business days or as long as several weeks (see Section IV.F. of this Federal Funding Opportunity). If you submit an application via Grants.gov you will receive a series of e-mail notifications for up to two business days before learning via validation or rejection whether a Federal agency's system has received your application. Please keep this in mind when developing your submission timeline. No fax or email applications will be accepted. Use of U.S. Postal Service or another delivery service must be have a tracking number. Applications not adhering to postmark or submission deadlines will be rejected without further consideration.
Funding Opportunity Description: The NOAA Marine Debris Program, authorized in the
Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act, codified at 33 U.S.C. 1951-1958, provides funding to support locally-driven, marine debris prevention, assessment, and removal projects that will benefit coastal habitat, waterways, and NOAA trust resources. Funding for this purpose comes through the NOAA Marine Debris Program as appropriations to the Office of
Response and Restoration, National Ocean Service. Projects awarded through this grant competition will implement effective, on-the-ground marine debris removal activities, with priority for those targeting medium- large-scale debris, including derelict fishing gear. Projects should also provide benefits to coastal communities, and create long-term ecological habitat improvements for NOAA trust resources. Through this solicitation NOAA identifies marine debris removal projects, fosters awareness of the effects of marine debris to further the conservation of living marine resource habitats, and contributes to the understanding of marine debris composition, distribution and impacts. Successful proposals through this solicitation will be funded through cooperative agreements. Funding of up to $2,000,000 is expected to be available for Community-based Marine Debris Removal Project Grants in FY2016. Typical awards will range from $50,000 to $150,000
FULL ANNOUNCEMENT TEXT
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Program Objective
The NOAA Marine Debris Program (MDP), a division of the Office of Response and
Restoration, leads national efforts to address marine debris. The mission of the NOAA
MDP is to identify and solve the problems that stem from marine debris through research, prevention, and reduction activities, in order to conserve and protect our nation’s marine environment and coastal economy from the impacts of marine debris as well as ensure navigation safety. Marine debris is defined as "any persistent solid material that is manufactured or processed and directly or indirectly, intentionally or unintentionally, disposed of or abandoned into the marine environment or the Great Lakes" (15 C.F.R. §
909.1)
A principal objective of the NOAA MDP is to provide federal financial and technical assistance to organizations with the expertise to identify, evaluate, and execute marine debris removal projects. The activities supported by this solicitation develop impactful, community-driven and cost-effective projects that improve living marine resource habitats through the removal of marine debris. These activities align with NOAA's mission to conserve and manage coastal and marine ecosystems and resources, and promote stewardship and a conservation ethic for NOAA trust resources.
A second objective of the NOAA MDP is to promote marine debris awareness, prevention and tangible project outcomes by collaborating with diverse entities and groups.
These include partnerships with public and nonprofit organizations, citizen and watershed groups, anglers, boaters, industry (e.g. the commercial fishing industry, fishing gear manufacturers, other marine industries, and the plastic and waste management industries), corporations and businesses, youth conservation corps, students, landowners, academics, and local, state, and federal government agencies.
B. Program Priorities
The highest program priorities for this solicitation are the detection and removal of derelict fishing gear and the removal of medium- to large-scale marine debris that have a negative impact on NOAA trust resources and important habitat areas. Derelict fishing gear includes, but is not limited to, such items as abandoned crab or lobster pots, fish nets, and synthetic (e.g., monofilament, polypropylene) line. Such applications must address applicable federal and state laws regarding handling and ownership. Medium and large-scale debris are items that generally cannot be manually removed by an individual.
NOAA trust resources include living marine resources and their habitats, including commercial and recreational fishery resources (marine fish and shellfish); coastal habitats;
diadromous fish species; endangered and threatened marine species; marine mammals and marine turtles; marshes, mangroves, seagrass beds, coral reefs, other coastal habitats;
Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) and Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPCs). NOAA trust resources can also include marine habitats and resources associated with National Marine
Sanctuaries, National Estuarine Research Reserves and areas under state coastal management programs, including Areas of Concern within the Great Lakes. NOAA is also interested in proposals for removal projects in urbanized areas; however, as with all other proposals, such projects must have a primary emphasis on debris removal to benefit NOAA trust resources and must clearly lay out the direct links to such resources.
Other priority activities include, but are not limited to, the following:
- Proposals that pair removal activities with technically-sound, cost-effective habitat monitoring that measures the benefits of debris removal to NOAA trust resources. This may include pre- and post-removal monitoring of the natural resources at the removal site, water quality analyses, or other activities that will provide additional data on the benefits of marine debris removal and how habitats and/or species recover from impacts caused by marine debris. Such monitoring projects may receive higher priority under this funding opportunity, as this is an emerging focal area for the NOAA MDP.
-Derelict vessel removal and associated vessel debris removal activities. Proposals for derelict vessel removal activities must demonstrate direct benefits to the aforementioned habitats. Proposals should also identify specific vessels or discrete target removal areas and utilize existing prioritized inventories of derelict vessels such as those maintained by state regulatory agencies. Proposals with a derelict vessel removal component should indicate that a search for responsible parties, such as the vessel’s owner, has been conducted and that no acceptable responsible party exists.
-Detection and removal from marine, estuarine, or beach environments of debris resulting from hurricanes or other natural disasters.
-Repeated shoreline or riparian cleanup projects are not a high priority for this competition. However, such projects are eligible if they are coupled with a significant, high-quality outreach program or volunteer involvement that aims to reduce or prevent future accumulation of marine debris Such projects may include cleanups of shoreline litter, as well as timed, targeted watershed "hot spot" cleanups to prevent seasonal debris inundation into sensitive habitats utilized by NOAA trust resources. For such activities, NOAA has developed standardized marine debris shoreline survey protocols to facilitate regional and site-specific comparisons of debris loads. If a proposal has a shoreline cleanup component, applicants should contact NOAA to discuss whether it would be appropriate to incorporate NOAA debris data collection protocols, which are posted at http://marinedebris.noaa.gov/research/marine-debris-monitoring-and-assessment-project.
-Derelict piling removal projects should have a meaningful benefit to the resource or a strong debris impact-related reason supporting removal (e.g., derelict pilings that snag marine debris and add to the impact of this debris in that area or pilings that are breaking up and generating more debris). Such projects will be considered only if there is a strong link to habitat impacts and the piling removal is one component of a greater marine debris removal proposal or are recognized as a priority through a regional prioritization process. Strong proposals will integrate innovative, sustainable approaches to disposal of debris (i.e. re-use, backhauling, partnering with local waste management companies, etc.).
Proposals emphasizing general program coordination are discouraged, as are applications that propose to expand an organization's day-to-day activities or that primarily seek support for administration, salaries, overhead, and travel. Because funding is limited, proposals that request funds for large equipment purchases will be a low priority. If a project involves collection facilities, other long-term operations, or equipment purchases, the application should identify how the project will continue and be sustained beyond the award period. Projects focused on removing hazards to navigation or human health, or removals for aesthetic purposes are not a focus of this grant competition, although they are eligible to be sub-components of a removal project.
Prevention, outreach, education, and/or volunteer activities are important aspects of debris removal projects. Proposals are encouraged to include such activities as project components, but should not be the main focus of the project - proposals that focus mainly on prevention through education and outreach are not a priority for this competition. These activities should be tied to, and include substantial interaction with the targeted user groups prioritized in Section I.A. For outreach activities in general, applicants are encouraged to incorporate existing outreach and educational resources into their projects, including those available for download at http://www.marinedebris.noaa.gov/. Similarly, proposals may include any associated habitat restoration costs that may be needed, however such costs must be minimal and directly address habitat impaired by debris removed under the project.
Applicants should also note that the following activities, in general, will not be considered under this competition: (1) activities that constitute legally required mitigation for the adverse effects of an activity regulated or otherwise governed by local, state, or federal law; (2) activities that constitute restoration for natural resource damages under federal, state, or local law; and (3) activities that are required by a separate consent decree, court order, statute, or regulation.
Applications addressing other types of pollution not fitting the definition of marine debris provided in Section I.A are not priorities for this solicitation and may not be considered.
C. Program Authority
Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act (33 U.S.C. 1951-1958)
II. Award Information
A. Funding Availability
Funding of up to $2,000,000 is expected to be available for this grant solicitation. The actual funding amount available is contingent upon FY2016 Congressional appropriations.
Typical project awards range from $50,000 to $150,000; NOAA will not fund proposals for removal activities at less than $15,000 or more than $250,000 under this solicitation. For projects that include monitoring activities, applicants may request additional funds not to exceed $100,000 for such activities, for a project of up to $350,000. In such cases NOAA would work with successful applicants to determine final levels of monitoring effort and funding. There is no guarantee that sufficient funds will be available to make awards for any or all proposals. The number of awards to be made under this solicitation will depend on the number of eligible applications received, the amount of funding requested by recommended applicants, the merit and ranking of the proposals, and the amount of funds made available to
NOAA by Congress.
NOAA anticipates that between 8 and 15 awards will be made under this solicitation. In
FY2014, the latest year for which information is available, 11 projects were funded, ranging from $30,000 to $200,000. The total grant funding level was approximately $1,275,000, which was matched by over $3,000,000 in non-federal cost-share. The exact amount of funds to be awarded and the number of awards made will be at the discretion of NOAA following pre-award negotiations with highly meritorious applicants. NOAA may request that a highly ranked applicant submitting more than one meritorious proposal combine all or parts of its proposals into one award. Publication of this opportunity does not obligate NOAA to award any specific project or obligate all or any part of available program funds. Awards may include funding from other programs or agencies.
B. Project/Award Period
Applications should cover a project period from one to three years in length. However, NOAA expects that removal activities should be completed within two years of the start date of the award, and that the third year would be for monitoring activities only. If monitoring activities are to be conducted before or following removal, NOAA may consider applications with a period of performance beyond 24 months as long as such activities are to be completed within a reasonable timeframe given the characteristics of the resource being monitored. Applications for renewal or supplementation of previously-awarded NOAA MDP projects are allowed, however any proposal to continue work on an existing project will be subject to the competitive process and will not receive preferential treatment. In some cases
NOAA may fund a project with incremental funding, usually in a multi-year format. If incremental or multi-year funding is awarded, NOAA has no obligation to provide any additional prospective funding in connection with that award in subsequent time periods;
additional funding is contingent upon satisfactory performance, continued relevance to program mission and priorities, and the availability of funds. The earliest anticipated start date for projects will be June 1, 2016 - applicants should consider this when developing plans for marine debris removal activities.
C. Type of Funding Instrument
Selected applications will be funded through cooperative agreements since NOAA staff will be substantially involved in aspects of the project. Substantial involvement may include, but is not limited to, activities such as hands-on technical or permitting assistance, support in developing protocols (e.g., for data collection or monitoring), tracking the progress of removal efforts through site visits and progress report evaluation, discussing development of meaningful performance measures to assess project outcomes, and involvement in public meetings and events to highlight marine debris removal activities.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
In accordance with the Marine Debris Act, eligible applicants are state, local, and tribal governments whose activities affect research or regulation of marine debris and any institution of higher education, nonprofit organization, or commercial (for-profit) organization with expertise in a field related to marine debris. Applications from federal agencies or employees of federal agencies will not be considered. Interested federal agencies may collaborate with eligible applicants but may not receive funds through this competition.
Foreign organizations and foreign public entities are not eligible to apply. All projects must take place within the United States or territories or their respective waterways.
NOAA is strongly committed to broadening the participation of veterans, historically black colleges and universities, Hispanic-serving institutions, tribal colleges and universities, and institutions that work in under-served areas. NOAA encourages proposals involving any of the above institutions.
Applications that have been submitted to other NOAA grant programs or as part of another NOAA grant may be considered under this solicitation.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement
A major goal of the NOAA Marine Debris Program is to fund projects that leverage the investment of Federal funds with other contributions from a broad range of public and private partners. To this end, Federal funds may not exceed 50 percent of the total cost of a project under the Marine Debris Act. Applicants must provide a minimum 1:1 ratio of non-Federal matching contributions to NOAA funds requested to conduct the proposed project. In addition to required cost sharing, NOAA encourages applicants to leverage additional investment where possible.
"Cost sharing or matching" is defined by 2 C.F.R. 200.29 as "the portion of project costs not paid by Federal funds (unless otherwise authorized by Federal statute)." Any shared costs or matching funds and all contributions, including cash and third party in-kind contributions, will be accepted as part of an applicant's cost sharing or matching when the contributions meet the criteria listed in 2 C.F.R. 200.306. For example, matching funds may come from a variety of public and private sources and may include third party in-kind goods and services (e.g., private boat use, volunteer labor, etc.). In addition, applicants are permitted to combine contributions for allowable costs from non-Federal partners when they meet the criteria in Section 200.306, such as not being contributed as match for other projects, and being available within the project period stated in the application. Federal contributions cannot be used as match without a specific legal authority, but can be described in the budget narrative to demonstrate additional leverage. Applicants may also choose to designate part or all of their Federally-negotiated indirect costs as match. Refer to
Section IV. E. 2. "Indirect Costs".
If the match requirement cannot be met, the Marine Debris Act allows the NOAA
Administrator to waive all or part of the matching requirement if the applicant can demonstrate the following:
1) no reasonable means are available through which applicants can meet the matching requirement and
2) the probable benefit of such project outweighs the public interest in such matching requirement.
Any applicant wishing to request a match waiver must provide a match waiver request letter or provide other language in the required budget narrative as a part of the application package being submitted. The request must contain a detailed justification explaining the need for the waiver, descriptions of attempts to obtain sources of matching funds, how the benefit of the project outweighs the public interest in providing match, and any other extenuating circumstances preventing the incorporation or local availability of matching contributions.
In accordance with 48 U.S.C. 1469a(d), NOAA has waived the requirement for local matching funds to applicants in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
All applicants should also note that cost sharing is an element considered in Evaluation
Criterion #4. "Project Costs." As such, if available, the inclusion of matching contributions is encouraged.
Applicants whose proposals are selected for funding will be bound by the cost share amount reflected in the award document signed by the NOAA Grants Officer. Successful applicants should carefully document matching contributions, including the names of participating volunteers and the overall number of volunteer or community participation hours devoted to individual marine debris removal projects. Letters of commitment for any secured matching contributions expected for an award should be submitted as an attachment to the application.
The Marine Debris Act also allows the NOAA Administrator to authorize, as appropriate, the non-federal share of the cost of a project to include money paid pursuant to, or the value of any in-kind service performed under, an administrative order on consent or judicial consent decree that will remove or prevent marine debris.
C. Other Criteria that Affect Eligibility
Not Applicable.
IV. Application and Submission Information
A. Address to Request Application Package
Complete application packages, including required federal forms, general instructions, and supplementary instructions specific to the NOAA Community-based Marine Debris
Removal Project Grants competition, can be found on Grants.gov (http://www.grants.gov). If the application forms and instructions for applicants cannot be downloaded from Grants.gov, please contact Tom Barry (tom.barry@noaa.gov, 301-713-4248 x161).
B. Content and Form of Application
Applications should be sufficiently detailed in accordance with the guidelines and information requirements listed in this Federal Funding Opportunity (FFO), and should be able to be completed within the project period specified.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to apply through the Grants.gov website, which is the clearinghouse for federal financial assistance. Applications submitted through the
Grants.gov website should include only three files in addition to the federal application forms noted below:
1) the project summary, project narrative and data sharing plan,
2) the budget justification, and
3) all other attachments combined, including resumes, maps, and support letters. Adobe portable document format (PDF) files are the preferred format.
If Grants.gov cannot reasonably be used, or internet access is not available to the applicant, a paper-copy application must be mailed to the NOAA Marine Debris Program
(see Section IV. F. "Other Submission Requirements" for complete mailing information).
Forms SF-424, SF-424B, and CD-511 paper-copy submissions must be signed by the application's Authorized Representative. IF PAPER COPY APPLICATIONS ARE NOT
SIGNED BY THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, THE APPLICATION WILL
NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. No fax or e-mail applications will be accepted.
Paper applications should be printed on one side only, on 8.5" x 11" paper, and should not be bound or stapled in any manner.
Each application must contain the following documents, unless otherwise noted below:
-required Federal Application Forms (available from Grants.gov), including the following:
- SF-424 - Application for Federal Assistance
- SF-424A - Budget Information, Non-construction Programs
- SF-424B - Assurances, Non-construction Programs
- CD-511 - Certifications Regarding Lobbying
- SF-LLL Disclosure of Lobbying Activities: (if applicable)
- Project Summary (described below, 2 pages);
- Project Narrative (described below, 12 pages);
- Budget Narrative (described below, 4 pages);
- Data Sharing Plan (described below, 2 pages);
- Curriculum vitae or résumé of each of the primary project personnel (as applicable);
- Maps with removal site location(s) highlighted (as applicable);
- Letter(s) documenting private landowner or public land manager support (as applicable);
- Other letters of support (if applicable); and
- Other relevant attachments important to the overall understanding and evaluation of the proposed project, such as summaries of regional marine debris action plans, project site photographs, or design plans are encouraged to be included in the proposal package (20 pages).
Please visit http://marinedebris.noaa.gov/proposal-submission-guidance-applicants for helpful information on putting together and submitting the above documents/information.
1. Project Summary (2 pages):
A brief project summary must include the following components:
1) Applicant Organization;
2) Project Title;
3) Site Location (nearest town or watershed, and geographic coordinates if known);
4) Removal activity Start Date (not the proposed award start date);
5) NOAA Trust Resources to benefit from the project (habitats and species currently using the project area or expected to benefit and the anticipated biological function to be restored by debris removal. This section should also mention any listed threatened or endangered species in the project area or in the vicinity);
6) Project Scope (briefly list specific tasks to be accomplished with requested funds and proposed techniques that will be used);
7) Area to Be Improved (tons of debris to be removed from the marine environment, acreage restored, and other measurable outcome)
8) Project Timeline
9) Permits (identify permits expected to be necessary for this project and current status of applications or consultations)
10) Federal Funds Requested and Non-federal Match Anticipated
11) Overall Project Cost
12) Partner and Volunteer Support Anticipated (hours/tasks)
13) Letters of Support (list those included with the application, particularly those from public agency resource personnel familiar with the issue or project area)
2. Project Narrative (12 pages)
The project narrative should incorporate the components of the evaluation criteria (see
Section V. A. "Evaluation Criteria"). It should be no more than 12 pages long (in 12-point font with 1" margins) and should give a clear presentation of the proposed work. In general, proposals should clearly demonstrate anticipated benefits to specific NOAA trust resource habitats (as described is Section I. A.); describe how these benefits will be achieved through marine debris detection, assessment, and removal; identify the range of species and/or resources expected to benefit, including the anticipated biological function to be restored by debris removal and describe the project location. Applications should list the trust resources currently found in the project site, describe short- and long-term objectives and goals, including specific performance measures, detail the methods for carrying out and monitoring
(if applicable) the project, and clearly explain the project's significance to enhancing habitat to benefit living marine resources with specific examples.
The applicant should indicate whether the proposed project is part of a larger, ongoing effort or is otherwise prioritized in a publicly vetted, published planning document. Proposal narratives should explicitly list or otherwise cite such documents for verification purposes, including the page number if referencing a specific action or issue within the plan.
To protect the federal investment, a letter of commitment is required from relevant landowners for projects on private land or from relevant resource agency personnel for projects on public, permanently protected land. The letter of commitment should provide assurance that the project is supported, and will be maintained for its intended purpose.
Documentation of plans for long-term project management should also be included.
To ensure a basic level of assessment of project success, implementation of marine debris removal projects should have broad, clearly identified goals and specific, measurable objectives. In order to track project success, funded projects will need to be able to report the total amount of debris removed (metric tons), total area or extent cleaned or restored (acres and/or miles), types of debris encountered, and volunteer hours involved.
Proposals should have broad, clearly identified goals and objectives. Applicants must be able to collect and report on the weight of debris removed throughout the duration of the project. Applicants may choose to include other performance measures relevant to demonstrating project success. Such metrics may include: expected footprint (in acres or square-feet) of removed debris; number of volunteers as well as total volunteer hours;
number of removal operations; number of discrete items removed (e.g., crab pots, gill nets, pilings); percent of identified problem areas addressed by removal activities; estimated re-accumulation rate; number of fishers who receive training on the safe removal of derelict gear or specific debris types; expected weight of material recycled, prevented from entering the marine environment, in metric tons. Reporting on project progress and evaluating project objectives for effectiveness (e.g., anticipated biological functions to be restored by the debris removal, comparing initial removal targets to post-removal results) will be required of all accepted applicants.
Not all projects and applicants are expected to include a habitat and/or species monitoring component. Those proposals that incorporate a more in-depth monitoring component in addition to debris removal activities (per Section I.B. above) should describe, in detail, the methodology for monitoring or post-removal evaluation. These studies should be designed in a scientifically rigorous manner to assess factors indicative of habitat or species improvement through project and location specific metrics (e.g., increased presence, abundance, density or other similar metrics). Monitoring protocols should be designed to measure these improvements over a span of time appropriate to the targeted habitat/species
(in some cases, monitoring may take longer than one year). Monitoring proposals should describe the anticipated, long-term ecological and socio-economic outcomes of the project;
describe the approach to planning, developing and implementing the study design; describe rationale for proposed survey techniques and parameters; and advance our scientific understanding of marine debris monitoring by publishing peer-reviewed literature on project accomplishments (if appropriate). Any proposed monitoring is expected to be cost-effective and appropriate to the scope and scale of the project to evaluate a project's benefits. NOAA will work with successful applicants who have included an in-depth monitoring plan to ensure the appropriate metrics are monitored to link removal to habitat or species improvement.
Applicants must demonstrate that they have the legal authority to conduct the project activities within the proposed project area, and understand what permitting requirements exist for work to be conducted as described in the proposal. To provide assurance that the project will expeditiously meet environmental compliance and permitting requirements, projects that would require permits and consultations should list all necessary permits required to complete the project. This should include the appropriate contact information for each permitting agency, permit status, and documentation of all secured permits. Proposals must indicate the project's readiness and should ensure that on-the-ground debris removal activities will begin reasonably soon after the project's start date.
Proposals should also describe the project's disposal arrangements to ensure debris would not potentially be re-introduced. Strong proposals will integrate innovative, sustainable approaches to disposal of debris (i.e. re-use, backhauling, partnering with local waste management companies, etc.).
The project narrative should describe the organizational structure of the applicant group, identify proposed project staff, and detail their experience and qualifications in managing grants and implementing marine debris removal projects. If known, the applicant should state the level of NOAA involvement in and/or support for the project and include contact information of relevant NOAA staff.
The project narrative should also describe community involvement in the project, such as contributions from community partners, volunteer opportunities, citizen participation, education/outreach/stewardship plans, and efforts to disseminate information on project goals, results, and/or the sources of project funding and support. If applicable, the narrative should explain how the proposed project would complement or encourage other local marine debris prevention or removal, restoration or conservation activities.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires NOAA to analyze a project's potential environmental impacts, hence applicants are required to provide detailed information on the project's activities. Details about site locations, species and habitat(s) to be affected, on-the-ground project activities, and any environmental concerns that may exist
(e.g., the use of and/or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances, introduction of non-indigenous species, impacts to endangered and threatened species, impacts to coral reef systems)) should be provided in the project narrative. Successful applications cannot be recommended for funding until NOAA completes the NEPA process. Applicants may be requested to assist NOAA in drafting an environmental assessment if NOAA determines an assessment is required. Applicants may also be required to cooperate with NOAA in identifying and implementing feasible measures to reduce or avoid any identified adverse environmental impacts of their proposal. Failure to accommodate such measures will result in denial of an award. Special award conditions may be imposed limiting the use of funds for activities that have outstanding NEPA compliance requirements. The type of detailed information described above is critical to evaluating the significance of a project and its readiness to use available funding. See Section VI. B.2. of this FFO for more information.
Participant safety is critically-important during project implementation. Proposals should demonstrate meaningful consideration for the safety of project participants during removal activities. It should be noted that all funded projects will be required to have a written safety plan governing all project-related activities, especially regarding the safety and management of volunteers. The safety plan should consider safety at the site during and after project implementation and take into account potential safety concerns for current and future uses of the project site.
If a project requires scuba diving or the use of surface-supplied air, it is the responsibility of the recipient organization to ensure that divers are qualified and trained to a level commensurate with the type and conditions of the diving activity being undertaken.
The organization must have the capacity (appropriate insurance, safety policies, etc.) to effectively oversee all proposed diving activities. All diving activities must meet, or be specifically exempted from, OSHA guidelines. Assuming all other relevant safety conditions are satisfied, divers that are not advanced divers may perform only simple activities, such as underwater surveys and removal of light, non-entangling objects. Advanced divers are divers with advanced diving training for the proposed tasks and in compliance with OSHA guidelines. Snorkeling activities are similarly restricted, in that snorkelers should complete only simple activities such as surveys and removal of light, non-entangling objects.
Furthermore, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that any diving activities under this award meet, at a minimum, all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations pertaining to the type of diving being undertaken.
Activities that should be performed only by advanced divers include but are not limited to the following:
-Using hand tools or moving or lifting heavy objects where the tools or objects weigh more than 25 pounds underwater;
-Performing underwater tasks that require substantial physical exertion;
-Using lift bags; and
-Underwater removal of potentially entangling debris, such as nets, crab or lobster pots, or fishing line.
3. Budget Justification (4 pages)
The narrative budget justification should provide support for the information listed in the applicant's SF 424A budget. It should provide a detailed description of the total project costs, which include both the Federal and non-Federal shares, by SF 424A object class. Each object class should be described in as much detail as possible. The object class breakdown should match those found on SF-424A. Budget Narrative Guidance can be found at:
http://www.ago.noaa.gov/grants/training.html.
The narrative budget justification should also indicate if the proposal has been submitted for funding consideration elsewhere, what amount has been requested or secured from other sources, and whether the funds requested/secured are federal or non-federal. The source of any matching funds, including applicant or third party in-kind contributions, should be explained. If funding will be used to complete part of a larger project, a summary budget for the entire project should be provided; any funding other than the proposal request and match should be considered additional leverage.
Proposals with a monitoring component should clearly describe and separate out all monitoring or post-removal evaluation costs so that NOAA can evaluate the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of such activities. If multiple years of monitoring and evaluation are proposed, those costs should be broken out by year.
The narrative budget justification should also indicate if the applicant is requesting a waiver of all match requirements, as outlined above in Section III. B. "Cost Sharing or
Matching Requirement". As previously stated, in accordance with 48 U.S.C. 1469a(d), NOAA has waived the requirement for local matching funds to the insular areas defined above in Section III. B. "Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement".
NOAA assesses budgets to determine the reasonableness, necessity, and adequacy of proposed costs for accomplishing the project objectives, and performs a cost analysis to assure that costs are reasonable, allowable, and allocable in accordance with applicable federal cost principles.
4. Data Sharing Plan (2 pages)
A data sharing plan is required for all projects. A typical plan may include the types of environmental data and information to be created during the course of the project; the tentative date by which data will be shared; the standards to be used for data/metadata format and content; policies addressing data stewardship and preservation; procedures for providing access, data, and security; and prior experience in publishing such data. See Section VI.C.
for more information on this requirement. A sample Data Sharing Plan may be found at:
http://marinedebris.noaa.gov/proposal-submission-guidance-applicants
5. Other Application Submission Information
Applicants should not assume NOAA has any prior knowledge relative to the merits of the project described in the proposal. As such, proposals should include the relevant level of detail. Inclusion of supplementary materials (e.g., photographs, summaries of project designs, key diagrams, copies of secured permits) are strongly encouraged and do not count toward the project narrative page limit, although supplementary materials should not exceed
20 pages. Letters of support from partners, local and state governments, and Congressional representatives are also helpful in demonstrating support for the project. Such supplementary information should be combined and submitted as a single file in the Grants.gov application.
C. Submission Dates and Times
SUBMIT YOUR APPLICATION EARLY. Full proposals must be received and validated by Grants.gov, postmarked, or provided to a delivery service on or before 11:59 p.m. EST, November 2, 2015. Note: When developing your submission timeline, please keep in mind that the registration process in the online System for Award Management
(SAM.gov) and Grants.gov may take between three and five business days or as long as several weeks (see Section IV.F. of this Federal Funding Opportunity). If you submit an application via Grants.gov you will receive a series of e-mail notifications for up to two business days before learning via validation or rejection whether NOAA's system has received your application. Applications postmarked or provided to a delivery service after
11:59 p.m. EST, November 2, 2015 will not be considered for funding.
PAPER APPLICATIONS RECEIVED LATER THAN 5 BUSINESS DAYS
FOLLOWING THE POSTMARK CLOSING DATE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
Applications submitted via the U.S. Postal Service must have an official postmark;
private metered postmarks are not acceptable. No fax or email applications will be accepted.
IMPORTANT: Applicants are strongly advised to submit in advance of the deadline.
For all applicants, adequate time must be factored into applicant schedules for delivery of the application. Volume on Grants.gov is at times extremely heavy. If Grants.gov is unable to accept applications electronically in a timely fashion, applicants may submit in paper format according to the requirements of this announcement. Paper applicants should allow adequate time to ensure a paper application will be received on time.
Applications that have been submitted to other NOAA grants programs or as part of another NOAA grant may be considered under this solicitation.
D. Intergovernmental Review
Applications for federal financial assistance are subject to the provisions of Executive
Order (EO) 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs." All applications for funding under this competition are required to complete item 19 on the SF-424 regarding clearance by the State Single Point of Contact (SPOC) established as a result of EO 12372.
To find out about and comply with a State's process under EO 12372, the names, addresses, and phone numbers of participating SPOC's are listed in the Office of Management and
Budget's home page at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants_spoc.
E. Funding Restrictions
1. Allowable Costs
Funds awarded cannot necessarily pay for all the costs that the recipient might incur in the course of carrying out the project. Generally, costs that are allowable include salaries, equipment, and supplies, as long as these are "necessary and reasonable" specifically for the purpose of the award. Currently, allowable costs are determined by reference to 2 C.F.R.
200, "Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards." All sub-awards are also subject to these federal cost principles. Award recipients are subject to 2 C.F.R. 200.317-.326 when implementing contracts under an award.
Any pre-award costs incurred before the NOAA Grants Office provides a notice of award are at the applicant's own risk. Typically, the earliest date for receipt of awards will be
June 1, 2016. Applicants should consider this award timing when developing plans for proposed project activities. Consistent with 2 C.F.R. 200.458, pre-award costs are allowable only with the written approval by NOAA.
2. Indirect Costs
The budget may include an amount for indirect costs if the applicant has an established indirect cost rate with the federal government. Indirect costs are essentially overhead costs for basic operational functions (e.g., lights, rent, water, insurance) that are incurred for common or joint objectives and therefore cannot be identified specifically within a particular project. Applicants with approved indirect cost rates may propose a portion or all of their indirect costs as match, since the valuation of such costs has already been
Federally-approved and documentation is readily available.
A copy of the current, approved negotiated indirect cost rate agreement with the federal government should be included with the application. If an applicant has not previously established an indirect cost rate with a Federal agency they may choose to negotiate a rate with the Department of Commerce or use the de minimis indirect cost rate of 10% of MTDC
(as allowable under 2 C.F.R. §200.414). The negotiation and approval of a rate is subject to the procedures required by NOAA and the Department of Commerce Standard Terms and
Conditions Section B.06. The NOAA contact for indirect or facilities and administrative costs is: The NOAA contact for indirect costs is Lamar Revis, Grants Officer, NOAA Grants http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants_spoc
Management Division; lamar.revis@noaa.gov
F. Other Submission Requirements
NOAA WILL NOT ACCEPT LATE SUBMISSIONS. PLEASE PLAN
ACCORDINGLY.
Applications should be submitted through Grants.gov (http://www.grants.gov).
Applicants should note that it may take up to four weeks or even six weeks for first time users to register with Grants.gov and the System for Award Management (SAM.gov). To use Grants.gov, applicants must have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and register with SAM. Applicants should allow a minimum of five days to complete SAM registration; registration is required only once, but must be renewed periodically.
NOTE: Even if an applicant has registered with Grants.gov previously, the applicant's password may have expired or its SAM registration (formerly Central Contractor
Registration [CCR]) may need to be renewed or updated prior to submitting to Grants.gov.
(Note that an old CCR username will not work in SAM; you must create a new SAM User
Account to renew or update your registration). Grants.gov will not accept submissions if the applicant has not been authorized or if credentials are incorrect. Authorizations and credential corrections can take several days. Any applicant awarded in response to this announcement will be required to use SAM. For further information please visit the SAM web portal (http://www.sam.gov). See also 2 C.F.R. 25. Electronic submission is encouraged.
Users of Grants.gov will be able to download a copy of the application package, complete it off line, and then upload and submit the application via the Grants.gov site. If an applicant has problems downloading the application forms from Grants.gov, contact
Grants.gov Customer Support at 1-800-518-4726 or support@grants.gov.
In addition, the Grants.gov validation process for a submitted application can take up to two business days to complete following submission through Grants.gov. Only validated applications are sent to NOAA for review. Please plan your time accordingly to avoid late submissions as such submissions will be rejected.
If Grants.gov cannot reasonably be used, or internet access is not available to the applicant, a paper-copy application package (as outlined in Section IV. B. "Content and
Form of Application") must be postmarked, or provided to a delivery service by 11:59 p.m.
mailto:lamar.revis@noaa.gov
EST, November 2, 2015. Mailed applications must have a tracking number. The mailing address for paper applications is:
Tom Barry, NOAA Office of Response and Restoration, ATTN: MDP Project
Applications, 1305 East-West Highway, SSMC4 Rm. 10239 N/ORR5, Silver Spring, MD
20910
V. Application Review Information
A. Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers will assign scores to proposals ranging from 0 to 100 points based on the following five standard NOAA evaluation criteria and respective weights specified below.
Applications that address the issues contained in these criteria are likely to be more competitive.
1. Importance and Applicability of Proposal (32 points)
This criterion ascertains whether there is intrinsic value in the proposed work and/or relevance to NOAA, federal, regional, state, or local activities. For the Community-based
Marine Debris Removal Project Grants competition, NOAA will evaluate applications based on the following:
-The potential of the project activities to restore, protect, conserve, or enhance coastal and marine habitats and ecosystems vital to self-sustaining populations of living marine resources under NOAA stewardship (including commercial, recreational, threatened, or endangered species) through the removal of high-priority marine debris as defined in
Section I.B. (15 points)
-The project's significance with respect to project area, amount of debris removed, or potential to reduce marine debris, considered in the context of the local environment. (5 points)
-The likelihood that the project will deliver tangible, specific results that are measurable (including expected weight of debris removed, in metric tons, among others).
Those applications that are likely to carry out robust and successful monitoring activities to identify the impacts of debris removal are likely to score higher on this criterion. Those applications that identify parameters and targets (e.g. accumulation and debris prevention rates) or to estimate degree to which NOAA trust resources will no longer be impacted (e.g., number of crabs and fish saved, number of acres restored) are likely to score higher on this criterion. (5 points)
-Whether the proposal addresses a marine debris problem area and/or priority habitat, as evidenced by reference to a regional or national publicly vetted, published planning document. (5 points)
-Whether the proposal included a Data/Information Sharing Plan including descriptions of the types of environmental data and information created during the course of the project; the tentative date by which data will be shared; the standards to be used for data/metadata format and content; policies addressing data stewardship and preservation;
procedures for providing access, sharing, and security; and prior experience in publishing such data. (2 points)
2. Technical/Scientific Merit (20 points)
This criterion assesses whether the approach is technically sound and/or innovative, if the methods are appropriate, and whether there are clear project goals and objectives. For the
Community-based Marine Debris Removal Project Grants…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.