Statement_of_Work.pdf
PDF 418 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Complex Contour Tooling
- Solicitation number
- NNL16588946Q
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration
NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA 23681
Advanced Composites Project (ACP)
Complex Contour Tooling (CCT)
Statement of Work
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION
Section 1.0. SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES
Section 2.0. DESCRIPTION OF TASKS TO BE PERFORMED:
Section 2.1 GOVERNMENT DESIGN SPECIFICATION
Section 2.1.1. TOOLING SPECIFICATION
Section 2.2. ACP - TOOLING DESIGN
Section 2.3. MANUFACTURING
Section 2.3.1 COMPLEX CONTOUR TOOL (CCT)
Section 2.4. QUALITY DATA PACKAGE
Section 2.5. SHIPPING
Section 2.6. PLANNED PRESENTATIONS, MEETINGS, AND
TELECONFERENCES
Section 2.6.1. KICK-OFF MEETING
Section 2.6.2. PROJECT STATUS TELECON Section 2.6.3. DESIGN REVIEW Section 2.6.4. HARDWARE ACCEPTANCE REVIEW
Section 2.7. REPORTS
Section 3.0. DELIVERABLES
Section 4.0. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION (GFI)
Section 5.0. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY (GFP)
Section 6.0. ADDITIONAL DATA RIGHTS
Section 7.0. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, PERFORMANCE METRICS, AND
ACCEPTANCE CRITERA
Section 8.0. SECURITY CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS
Section 9.0. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
Section 10.0. POINTS OF CONTACT ...................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.0
INTRODUCTION
The objective of this portion of the ACP project is to evaluate the ability of the CG Tech
VCP/VCS fiber placement software to accurately predict layup laps, gaps, and wrinkles.
Section 1.0. SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES
The scope of this procurement is to design and manufacture a suitable complex contour tool
(CCT) that is capable of interfacing with the NASA Automated Fiber Placement rotator stand.
Figure 1: ACP Complex Contour Tool (CCT)
*Details from draft drawing 1281895.
Complex Contour Tool (CCT)
Laser Target Locations
Rotator
Automated Fiber
Placement (AFP)
Robotic Head
Clearance 33.5”
Section 2.0. DESCRIPTION OF TASKS TO BE PERFORMED:
The Contractor shall perform the following tasks:
Section 2.1 GOVERNMENT DESIGN SPECIFICATION
Section 2.1.1. TOOLING SPECIFICATION
The Contractor shall design and manufacture a complex contour tool that meets the following
Government requirements. The tool shall at a minimum meet the following requirements.
1. The complex contour tool shall be designed to facilitate the creation of the composite surface and allow for the part to be cured at a 350˚F cure temperature. NASA will provide a CAD Model of the required CCT surface.
2. Tool is required to interface with existing rotator stand. Details shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Rotator Mounting Plate
3. As defined by NASA the layup/cure tool is approximately 55” long x 19” wide x 26” deep.
4. Contractor will compensate tool for coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) to that final part dimensions are accurate.
5. The tool surface shall be smooth and fair with a surface finish of RMS* 32 or better on all surfaces within the edge of part (EOP). (*Root-Mean-Square roughness in micro-inches)
6. The tool shall be identified. Identification shall include the assembly part number and measured weight.
7. The tool shall be capable of tolerating 350˚F during cure without any mold degradation.
This allows for temperature variations during the specified 350˚F cure cycle.
8. The ACP tool shall be capable of withstanding at a minimum five 350˚F cure cycles, each cure cycle will consist of a dwell at 350 ˚F for 4 hours.
9. The tool shall have a lifting provision. This can be a hole in the backup structure to accommodate a properly rated lifting shackle to be provided by the contractor.
10. Fixture shall rest flat on bottom surface to allow for easy storage.
11. ACP tool surface shall be constructed of a carbon laminate. A polyimide topcoat to increase surface hardness and chemical resistance is required.
12. The ACP tool shall have vacuum integrity with a maximum leak rate of 1/4” Hg in 60 minutes at 27” Hg.
13. Tool to have a minimum of 8 laser tracking locations. Locations to accommodate a ¼” post with a 2” minimum face area.
Section 2.2. ACP - TOOLING DESIGN
The Contractor shall develop a complex contour tool that complies with the Government Design
Specifications defined in section 2.1.1. The design shall include at a minimum.
1. 3D CAD models of all proposed hardware in their native file format and in ProE or STEP format. The Tooling assembly files shall be provided such that the individual components can be selected, opened, and modified at a later date by the Government. (i.e., the assembly files shall not be provided in a way that they can only be selected / opened as a single component)
2. Minimal fabrication drawings necessary to describe the design, assembly, and operations completed per contractors internal standards and including a bill of material (BOM) for all purchased material and hardware.
The Government will review the Tool Design at the Tooling Design Review and provide written approval to the Contractor Program Manager (PM) via email.
Section 2.3. MANUFACTURING
The Contractor shall fabricate, inspect, and deliver the following hardware in support of the ACP effort.
Section 2.3.1 COMPLEX CONTOUR TOOL (CCT)
The Contractor shall manufacture one CCT that complies with the specification in section 2.1.1 and the Government approved CCT Tool design. The contractor shall provide all of the materials and equipment required for the fabrication effort. The mold surface and backup structure fabrication shall begin as soon as the Contractor has successfully completed all of the tooling design review requirements and received written authorization from the Government. Early fabrication of specific critical path items / activities may be permitted by the Government on a case-by-case basis. For these items, the Contractor shall receive written authorization from the
Government prior to starting fabrication. The Government reserves the right to witness the tooling fabrication and assembly efforts.
Section 2.4. QUALITY DATA PACKAGE
The Contractor shall assemble and deliver a Quality Data Package that contains the following information.
1. Material specifications and overall certificates of conformance.
2. Surface integrity / verification inspection report to be provided to the Government in the
Contractor format.
3. Room temperature vacuum integrity report.
4. Dimensional inspection of the tool surface shall be recorded. These shall include a graphic tool representation to show location of the inspection data as well as the magnitude of surface deviation.
5. Contractor to provide an as built laser scan of the layup surface relative to the specified coordinate system. Scan format to be compatible with ProEngineer. This scan to be sent immediately upon completion. Coordinate system detailed in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Complex Contour Tool (CCT) Coordinate System
6. Contractor to provide table detailing laser tracker ball positions (1.5” diameter ball with
¼” ball holder) relative to coordinate system shown in Figure 3.
7. Documentation of any anomalies that occurred during the manufacturing process and their impacts on part quality.
8. Surface finish verification (32 RMS).
The content and format of the quality data package shall be coordinated and approved by the government before fabrication begins.
The Government reserves the right to witness all inspection processes.
Section 2.5. SHIPPING
Following a successful Hardware Acceptance Review, the contractor shall ship the Complex
Contour Tool to Langley Research Center (LaRC). The Contractor shall be responsible for all shipping costs, arrangements, and applicable permits required to safely deliver the CCT. The
CCT shall be fully protected from the elements and shock during shipping. The contactor shall have a protection plan for the shipping and handling.
Shipping address:
NASA LANGELY RESEARCH
4 South Marvin Street Bldg 1206
Hampton, VA 23681-2199
Attn: Joe McKenney
Section 2.6. PLANNED PRESENTATIONS, MEETINGS, AND TELECONFERENCES
The Contractor shall be required to participate in and/or travel to the presentations/ meetings/teleconferences as specified below.
MEETINGS:
Task MEETING FREQUENCY/DATE
ESTIMATED
DURATION
PLANNED
LOCATION
2.6.1 Kick-Off
Meeting
Within 1 week from Task Order
Award date.1 ~1 hour Telecon
2.6.2 Project Status
Telecon Bi-Weekly (i.e., every 2 weeks) 1 ~1 hour
Telecon
2.6.3 Design
Review
Prior to starting the manufacturing of the ACP Tool 1 ~1 hour
Telecon
2.6.4
Hardware
Acceptance
Review
Prior to shipping the ACP Tool 1 ~1 hour
Telecon
1Date and time to be mutually agreed upon by the Contractor and the Government.
Table 1. Presentations, Meetings, and Teleconferences.
Section 2.6.1. KICK-OFF MEETING
For the Kick-Off Meeting, the Contractor shall prepare a Kick-off Presentation that facilitates review and discussion of the proposed tooling and fabrication plans. An electronic version of the
Presentation shall be delivered to the Technical Monitor (TM) at the time of the presentation.
Section 2.6.2. PROJECT STATUS TELECON
For the Project Status Telecon, the Contractor shall participate in bi-weekly teleconferences to discuss the ongoing work status. Any issues affecting cost, schedule, or part quality shall be discussed, documented in writing and emailed to the TM.
Section 2.6.3. DESIGN REVIEW
The Contractor shall:
1) Prepare, present, and deliver a Design Review Presentation containing at a minimum a review of:
a. The ACP Fixture design (i.e., CAD models & drawings)
b. The ACP Tool functionality and how the hardware designs meet the specification listed in section 2.1.1.
c. The shipping plans and methods for protecting the hardware.
d. The ACP Tool inspection plans.
2) Deliver the ACP – Tooling Design.
An electronic copy of the Design Presentation shall be delivered to the TM at the time of the briefing.
Section 2.6.4. HARDWARE ACCEPTANCE REVIEW
The Hardware Acceptance Review will take place at the Contractor’s manufacturing facility or via telecon. During this review, the Contractor shall:
1. Present, and deliver the Quality Data Package in an editable Microsoft Word compatible format.
2. Review the shipping arrangements and discuss how the ACP Tool will be protected during transportation to LaRC.
The Quality Data Package shall be delivered to the NASA TM at the time of the briefing.
Section 2.7. REPORTS
No reports are required for this task.
Section 3.0. DELIVERABLES
The Contractor shall deliver the following items FOB Destination. All deliverables shall be delivered with unlimited rights and unrestricted rights.
Item
No.
Task
Ref.
Deliverable Description Qty. Due Date
Delivery
Instructions
3.1 2.6.1 Kick-off Presentation 1 EA Within 2 weeks of
Task Order Award See Task Ref.
3.2 2.6.3 ACP Tool Design 1 EA At the Design
Review See Task Ref.
3.3 2.4 Surface Scan 1 EA At Task Order
Completion See Task Ref.
3.4 2.4 Tracker ball locations 1 EA At Task Order
Completion See Task Ref.
3.5 3.1.1 ACP Tool 1 EA At Task Order
Completion See Task Ref.
3.6 2.6.4 Quality Data Package 1 EA
At the Hardware
Acceptance
Review
See Task Ref.
Section 4.0. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION (GFI)
The Government will provide the following to the Contractor as follows:
Item
No.
Task
Ref.
ITEM
QTY
Date to be Furnished to the
Contractor (on or before)
4.1 2.1.1
ACP Tool Surface Model
(CCT_Surface_1.prt, CCT_Surface_1.igs, CCT_Surface_1.stp)
1 EA Upon Task Award
Section 5.0. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY (GFP)
None
Section 6.0. ADDITIONAL DATA RIGHTS
Reserved
Section 7.0. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, PERFORMANCE METRICS, AND
ACCEPTANCE CRITERA
Quote must be best value for NASA.
Section 8.0. SECURITY CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS
None
Section 9.0. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
All hardware shall be on dock at Langley 8 weeks from date of Purchase Order award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .