Enclosure F - NOMS Demonstration Use Case.pdf
PDF 191 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CIS Capability Studies III: Lunar Surface User Terminals & Network Orchestration and Management Systems (NextSTEP-2 BAA: Appendix Q) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- NNH16ZCQ001K-CIS-Appendix_Q
About this file
This document contains a government file related to a Network Orchestration & Management System (NOMS) Demonstration Representative Use Case, as well as information on a related federal contract opportunity.
The government file provides a structure for demonstrating capabilities to support management and orchestration of space communication services for a set of representative user missions, covering service planning and scheduling, as well as service monitoring and control. It includes details on representative user missions, their orbit characteristics, service requirements, and a list of representative space link providers. Vendors may choose to demonstrate capabilities in one or both sections of the use case.
The related federal contract opportunity is for the Commercialization, Innovation, and Synergies (CIS) Office's third Capability Studies under the Next Space Technologies for Exploration Partnerships-2 (NextSTEP-2) Broad Agency Announcement. NASA is seeking industry studies, system development, and demonstrations for Lunar Surface User Terminals and Network Orchestration and Management Systems to support future lunar surface operations and control of a globally distributed network of Satellite Ground Systems.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Enclosure B - Model Contract.pdf | ||
| Enclosure A - Appendix Q - Lunar User Terminals and NOMS.pdf | ||
| Enclosure D-Corporate Contributions Worksheet.pdf | ||
| Enclosure C - Pricing Template.pdf | ||
| SF33-CIS BAA.pdf | ||
| Enclosure E - Standard FAR Patent and Data Rights Clauses and Provisions.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NETWORK ORCHESTRATION & MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NOMS)
DEMONSTRATION REPRESENTATIVE USE CASE
The representative use case provides a structure to enable demonstration of capabilities to support management and orchestration of space communication services for a set of representative user missions. The desired outcome of the representative use case is a demonstration of integrated service management and orchestration capabilities in a “day-in-the-life” network operations scenario.
The use case is structured in two sections, which cover service planning and scheduling, and service monitoring and control, respectively. A vendor may choose to demonstrate capabilities in one or both sections, as appropriate for their product offering. If both capabilities are being demonstrated, then performance of the use case should begin with the service planning and scheduling section to generate a service schedule that serves as the basis for activity in the other section.
Appendix A contains a list of representative user missions, including LEO, GEO, and Lunar spacecraft. Each entry in the user mission list contains a selection of key characteristics, including orbit, service coverage requirements, and data link specifications. Vendors should use these characteristics as appropriate in their demonstrations. For any mission characteristics not explicitly specified, vendors may assume any reasonable configuration of their choice if necessary for the demonstration
Appendix B contains a list of representative space link providers, including both direct-to-earth (DTE) and space relay (SR) providers. The locations and service types listed for these space link providers should be used when planning and configuring services for the representative user missions. Vendors whose products include a pre-existing catalog of DTE and/or SR providers may choose to utilize that catalog in place of Appendix B.
SECTION 1: SERVICE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
Prior to demonstrating the following functions, vendors should walk through the process by which the representative missions in Appendix A and the representative space link providers in Appendix B (or the vendor’s alternative provider set) have been integrated with the vendor’s product, including any necessary changes to software source code, databases, or static configuration files.
(1) The vendor’s product will receive and process provider availability data and spacecraft acquisition data to create a list of potential visibility / contact opportunities for the representative user missions. Vendors should simulate provider availability based on their choice of provider set, and use the orbital specifications listed in Appendix A for orbit calculations. Vendors may choose to simulate transfer of provider availability data from a simulated provider system (via API, file transfer, or other means).
(2) The vendor’s product will collect manual scheduling inputs (such as mission requests for specific contact opportunities) via an API and/or an interactive user interface. If both API and UI options are supported, vendors should demonstrate both, including any alternative user interfaces for different categories of users or operators.
(3) The vendor’s product will use the collected scheduling inputs and the known mission constraints to generate an integrated service schedule covering a seven-day forecast period.
Demonstration of schedule optimization based on specified criteria (such as service quality or cost) is preferred.
(4) The vendor’s product will distribute generated schedules and corresponding spacecraft acquisition data to providers. Vendors may choose to simulate transfer and provider acceptance/rejection of this data (via API, file transfer, or other means).
(5) The vendor’s product will receive and disposition schedule modifications during the active schedule period. Particular scenarios of interest for this include:
a. A launch delay, including any necessary propagation of launch vehicle acquisition data based on an updated launch time.
b. A spacecraft contingency that results in a need to reallocate a provider that was previously scheduled for a lower-priority mission.
c. An unplanned science event that causes surge demand for services from multiple missions.
d. A provider anomaly or asset failure that results in a need to reallocate a previously scheduled service to a different provider.
SECTION 2: SERVICE MONITORING AND CONTROL
Demonstration Scope Demonstration Scenario Tailoring Vendor is demonstrating both planning / scheduling and monitoring / control capabilities
Configure and monitor simulated resources for the specific service instances identified in the schedule generated in Section 1
Vendor is demonstrating monitoring / control capabilities only
Configure and monitor simulated resources for a sample set of services for the representative missions
Prior to demonstrating the following functions, vendors should walk through the process by which assets to be monitored and controlled are integrated with the vendor’s product, including any necessary changes to software source code, databases, or static configuration files.
(1) The vendor’s product will provision simulated network and provider assets to provide the scheduled services, including any processed schedule modifications.
(2) The vendor’s product will collect, aggregate, display, and distribute status data from the previously provisioned assets. If possible, this capability should be demonstrated both in an in-service state and in an out-of-service state.
(3) The vendor’s product will accept, validate, and execute a representative real-time request for reconfiguration of an active service.
(4) The vendor’s product will detect and respond to network conditions that impact active services, such as network link or asset outage, performance degradation due to environmental or weather conditions, or a similar scenario.
(5) The vendor’s product will generate network status, utilization, and accounting reports corresponding to the state of network resources, assets, and provisioned services. Vendors may additionally demonstrate options for accessing network status data via a database or other storage mechanism, if available.
APPENDIX A: REPRESENTATIVE MISSIONS
The network provides services to five representative missions.
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 Priority 4 2 5 1 3 Type Robotic Human Space
Flight Robotic Human Space
Flight Launch Vehicle
# Spacecraft 3 Identical orbit, 3.2° separation
1 1 1 1
Orbital Regime
LEO LEO GEO Multiple
Launch
Orbit Altitude: 1,336 km Inclination: 66.0° Period: 112.0 min
Altitude: 413 km - 422 km Inclination: 51.64° Period: 92.9 min
Longitude: 75.2° W Altitude 35,780.2 km - 35,793.1 km Inclination:
0.0363° Period: 1,436.1 min
Launch (KSC) to LEO to Lunar Transfer to
NRHO
Launch (KSC) to
LEO
Requested Service
One 10-minute contact per spacecraft per orbit (S-band)
Near-continuous (S-band + Ka-band)
Near-continuous (S-band) 90 minutes per day (Ka-band)
Near-continuous (X-band + Ka-band) during all phases
Near-continuous (S-band) for 300 minutes
Scheduling Preference
Network automatically allocates contacts based on coverage requirement and mission priority
Network automatically allocates contacts based on coverage requirement and mission priority
Mission manually selects from available contact opportunities
Network automatically allocates contacts based on coverage requirement and mission priority
Network automatically allocates contacts based on coverage requirement and mission priority
Forward Link 1
S-band
PCM/PSK/PM
Frame data
(CCSDS TC)
BCH coding 500 kbps
S-band
BPSK
Frame data
(CCSDS AOS)
R/S + Viterbi coding 500 kbps
S-band
BQPSK
Frame data
(CCSDS TC)
BCH coding 100 kbps
X-band
OQPSK
Frame data
(CCSDS AOS)
R/S + Viterbi coding 10 Mbps
N/A
Forward Link 2
N/A Ka-band
OQPSK
Encapsulated video + frame data
(CCSDS AOS)
LDPC coding 300 Mbps
N/A Ka-band
OQPSK
Encapsulated video + file data via CCSDS DTN LDPC coding 200 Mbps
N/A
Return Link
S-band
SQPSK
Frame data
(CCSDS AOS)
R/S + Viterbi coding 1 Mbps
S-band
OQPSK
Frame data
(CCSDS AOS)
R/S + Viterbi coding 1 Mbps
S-band
OQPSK
Frame data
(CCSDS AOS)
R/S + Viterbi coding 1 Mbps
X-band
OQPSK
Frame data
(CCSDS AOS)
R/S + Viterbi coding 10 Mbps
S-band
BPSK
Frame data
(CCSDS AOS)
Viterbi coding 2 Mbps
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 Return Link
N/A Ka-band
OQPSK
Encapsulated video + frame data
(CCSDS AOS)
LDPC coding 300 Mbps
Ka-band
OQPSK
File data via CFDP LDPC coding 400 Mbps
Ka-band
OQPSK
Encapsulated video + file data via CCSDS DTN LDPC coding 200 Mbps
N/A
Requested Interface
LEO-T (frames) VITA-49 BB (frames) IP (video)
CCSDS SLE
(frames) SFTP (files)
CCSDS SLE
(frames) SFTP (files) IP (video)
DTN
CCSDS SLE
(frames)
APPENDIX B: REPRESENTATIVE PROVIDERS
The network consists of 15 direct-to-earth (DTE) SLPs and 4 space relay (SR) SLPs.
DTE Aperture Location Forward Link Capability
Forward Link EIRP (dBW)
Return Link Capability
Return Link G/T (dB/K)
Available Interfaces
DTE-SLP01 64.8° N
147.8° W
S-Band 64.6 S-Band X-Band
22.0 35.2
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
IP
DTE-SLP02 64.7° N
147.5° W
S-Band Ka-Band
87.5
S-Band X-Band Ka-Band
21.4 35.0 41.5
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
IP
DTE-SLP03 25.8° S
27.7° E
S-Band 69 S-Band 22.4 SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
LEO-T (CDH / TFDH)
IP
DTE-SLP04 19.0° N
155.6° W
S-Band 78 S-Band X-Band
23.5 37.7
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
IP
DTE-SLP05 29.0° S
115.3° E
S-Band 68 S-Band X-Band
23.5 37.7
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
IP
DTE-SLP06 32.5°N
106.6°W
S-Band 72 S-Band Ka-Band
29.6 46.9
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
IP
DTE-SLP07 67.8°N
21.0°E
S-Band 69 S-Band X-Band
23.0 33.0
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
IP
DTE-SLP08 77.8° S
166.6° E
S-Band 63 S-Band X-Band
21.0 32.0
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
IP
DTE-SLP09 72.0°S
2.0°E
S-Band Ka-Band
S-Band X-Band Ka-Band
19.4
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
VITA-49 BB
IP
DTE-SLP10 78.2°N
15.3°E
S-Band 63.5 S-Band X-Band
22.1 36.8
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
IP
DTE-SLP11 78.2°N
15.4°E
S-Band 67 S-Band X-Band
23.0 37.8
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
IP
DTE-SLP12 52.9° S
70.9° W
S-Band Ka-Band
88.1
S-Band X-Band Ka-Band
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
IP
DTE-SLP13 33.1° S
70.6° W
S-Band 79 S-Band 24.4 SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
LEO-T (CDH / TFDH)
IP
DTE-SLP14 1.3°N
103.8°E
S-Band 59 S-Band X-Band
20.5 33.4
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
IP
DTE-SLP15 37.9° N
75.4° W
S-Band Ka-Band
S-Band X-Band Ka-Band
21.4 35.0 41.5
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
VITA-49 BB
IP
Relay Node Location Forward Link Capability
Return Link Capability
Available Interfaces
SR-SLP01 Geosynchronous orbit at 46° W, Central Body = Earth
S-Band Ka-Band
S-Band Ka-Band
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
LEO-T (CDH / TFDH)
Relay Node Location Forward Link Capability
Return Link Capability
Available Interfaces
SR-SLP02 Geosynchronous orbit at 167° W, Central Body = Earth
S-Band Ka-Band
S-Band Ka-Band
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
VITA-49 BB
LEO-T (CDH / TFDH)
SR-SLP03 Geosynchronous orbit at 275° W, Central Body = Earth
S-Band Ka-Band
S-Band Ka-Band
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
VITA-49 BB
LEO-T (CDH / TFDH)
SR-SLP04 12-hour Lunar frozen orbit, Central Body = Moon
S-Band Ka-Band
S-Band Ka-Band
SLE (FCLTU / RAF)
| SECTION 1: SERVICE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING |
| SECTION 2: SERVICE MONITORING AND CONTROL |
| APPENDIX A: REPRESENTATIVE MISSIONS |
| APPENDIX B: REPRESENTATIVE PROVIDERS |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .