NM FS 220(1) Plan.pdf
PDF 47 MB Posted
- Attached to
- NM FS 220(1), Romero Creek Bridge Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 6982AF23B000035
About this file
This document provides details on a federal contract opportunity for bridge construction services. The Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration is soliciting proposals under solicitation number 6982AF23B000035 for work on the NM FS 220(1) Romero Creek Bridge. Offerors are to provide construction services to build a new bridge over Romero Creek in New Mexico on Forest Service Route 220(1). Proposals are due by April 15, 2023, with award anticipated by June 1, 2023. The contractor will be expected to complete the bridge within 12 months of the award date.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Interested Vendors List 9.28.2023.pdf | ||
| NM_FS_220(1)_Romero Creek Bridge_Final Hydraulics Report.pdf | ||
| NM.FS.220 (1).Romero Creek Bridge.Geotech Rpt FINAL.March 2023_Shallow Foundation.pdf | ||
| NM FS 220(1) Borrow Pits.pdf | ||
| NM FS 220(1) Romero Creek Bridge - Pavement and Materials Final Tech Memo-V2.pdf | ||
| FP-14_Eng.pdf | ||
| 6982AF23B000035.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N N w w "' Vl
N N
:,: z ct z N a::
ct
COLORADO
TEXAS
MEXICO
Project Location
NM FS 220(1)
Romero Creek Bridge
KEY MAP OF NEW MEXICO
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:
Bridge Replacement
DESIGN DESIGNATIONS:
ADT (2022) ----------- < 100
ADT (2042) ----------- < 100
DHV ------------------ 12
D -------------------- 55% T -------------------- 10% V -------------------- 30 mph e(max) --------------- 6%
U.S. CUSTOMARY DIMENSIONS:
Slopes are expressed as RISE:RUN
SPECIFICATIONS:
I ct
• X ' 11,1 I t-
"STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS
AND BRIDGES ON FEDERAL HIGHWAY PROJECTS, FP-14"
FEDERAL llOOD8 HIOHllAY
COiiiilTiiHT TO EXC!LLEOOCE
Di Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
www.ca1l811.com
PROJECT MANAGER LEAD DESIGNER
M. Daigler J. Keithley
STATE PROJECT
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
NM NM FS 220(1)
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
Eagar, AZ
50.6 mi
N noso
N
PLANS FOR PROPOSED
NM FS 220(1)
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
Tai Wi Wi Lodge� i
I
Escudi//a Mountain
[illI]
Clifton, AZ 118 mi
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
CATRON COUNTY
SCHEDULE A
LENGTH 0.05 miles
[fill
�PeakQ
[ID ffifil
2>10
[ill
Red ButteQ
[ill [fill
Rancho Grande Estate, NM
23.9 mi
Schedule A NM FS 220(1) Romero Creek Bridge Begin 102+52 End 105+18
0 4 8
Scale in Miles
SHEET
Al A2-A3
A4
AS
A6
Bl-B2 B3 B4 Cl
51-513 Tl-T2
T3
T4-TS
T6 Xl-X12
APPROVED:
INDEX TO SHEETS
DESCRIPTION
TITLE SHEET
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SYMBOLS & ABBREVIATIONS
SURVEY CONTROL
SITE MAP
TYPICAL SECTION - MAINLINE
SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES
GRADING AND SURFACING SUMMARY
MISCELLANEOUS SUMMARIES
PLAN AND PROFILE
BRIDGE SHEETS
STANDARD 617-20 31 GUARDRAIL
PROPOSED DETOUR
STANDARD 635 - 1 14 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL
SPECIAL 635-A CONSTRUCTION SIGN
CROSS 5 ECTJONS
PLANS PREPARED BY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
CENTRAL FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION
DENVER, COLORADO
DATE:
CHIEF OF ENGINEERING
CENTRAL FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION
AS PER MEMO DATED 4/17/2023
FOREST SUPERVISOR, GILA NATIONAL FOREST
FOREST SERVICE
DATE:
SHEET
NUMBER
Al
ABBREVIATIONS
tj centerline L L t::,. curve delta lam.
0 diameter lat.
A abut. abutment long.
ADT average daily traffic LPSM aggr. aggregate Lt. or LT AH ahead LW alt. alternate M mag.
appr. approach maint.
asph. asphalt mat/.
B b.f. both faces max.
beg. beginning,begin min.
BK back man.
BM bench mark mtn(s).
BP balance point NN
br. bridge NC brg. bearing neg.
C CBC concrete box culvert no. or# c-c center to center 0 o.c.
cir. clear o.f.
CMP corrugated metal pipe OD Co. county p PC col. column PCC cone. concrete perf.
constr. construction Pl constr. Jt. construction Joint pl.
cont. continuous POC corr. corrugated POS
er. creek POT cs point of curve to spiral pro}.
ctrs. centers psi CTSM contingent sum PT culv. culvert pvmt.
deer. decrement Q quant., Qty DHV design hour volume RR
DI drop inlet R.
dia. or D diameter R/W diag. diagonal rd.
diaph. diaphragm rdwy.
dist. distance reconst.
Dist. district reinf.
DLC donation land claim reqd.
dwg(s). drawing(s) res.
E E east Res.
e superelevation rate ret. wall El. 94.066 elevation with number RH elev. elevation Rt. or RT co emb. embankment rte.
i engr(s). Engineer(s) ss � EOP edge of pavement SADT N
EQ or eq. equation � SC g ER edge of road sec.
,-' et al and others shldr.
� et ux and wife spa.
EW edge of water spec.
z exc. excavation st.
,: exp.ft. expansion joint ST u, ext. exterior � sta.
C
F f. f. fill face std. � Fed. federal stiff.
FES flared end section str.
j fin. finish struc.
u, ftg. footing sym.
G ga. gage (gauge) T T 0 galv. galvanized T.
i gdr. girder tan.
H hdwl. headwall TBM HES homestead entry survey TCE
� hex. hexagon transv.
� horiz. horizontal TS
HW high water typ.
z hwy. highway V V
I ID inside diameter vert.
incl. inclusive,including vph incr. increment VP/ int. interior WW
J jt. Joint length of curve lamination latitude longitudinal lump sum left low water magnetic maintenance material maximum minimum monument mountain(s) north normal crown negative number on centers other face outside diameter point of curve point of compound curve perforate point of intersection plate point on curve point on spiral point on tangent project pounds per square inch point of tangent pavement quantities radius range right-of-way road roadway reconstruction reinforcement required reservoir Reservation retaining wall reference hub right route south seasonal average daily traffic point of spiral to curve section shoulder spacing, Spaces or Spaced specification street point of spiral to tangent station standard stiffener straight structural symmetrical tangent length township tangent temporary bench mark temporary construction easement transverse point of tangent to spiral typical design speed vertical vehicles per hour vertical point of intersection west
DRAINAGE SYMBOLS
Ditch (Existing, Proposed)
Flow Arrow
Drainage or Small Creek
Lake, Pond or Reservoir
Large Creek
Wetland
River
Spring
Bridge (Existing, Proposed)
Box Culvert (Existing, Proposed)
Pipe Culvert (Existing, Proposed)
With End Sections (Existing, Proposed)
With Headwalls (Existing, Proposed)
With Drop Inlet (Existing, Proposed)
Underdrain (Existing, Proposed)
Riprap Apron (Proposed)
I I rr -..t-:r -:i:t!
' .J._ .J._
LL�.,J_, .,u
SPRING
[>-- ---<l f------- -I )
I
---I uo 1------l uo I---
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL SYMBOLS
Bonded Fiber Matrix Mulching �/2'.l Check Dam � Diversion Berm
Rolled Erosion Control Product � Riprap �'-dJ:'.l Fiber Roll (Ditch and/or Cut Slope)
Silt Fence ----t SF 1------l SF 1------l SF 1------l SF 1------l SF f--
Temporary Inlet Protection 0 Fiber Roll (Slope Protection)
FENCE & CATTLEGUARD SYMBOLS
Fence (Existing, Proposed)
Fence w/ Gate (Existing, Proposed) ---S-><:! ►◄
Cattleguard (Existing, Proposed) � � �
GEOLOGIC SYMBOLS
Boring Location (Existing, Proposed) � �
Material Source x
STATE PROJECT
SHEET
NUMBER
NM
NM FS 220(1)
A2
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY
CONVENTIONAL PLAN
SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Sheet 1 of 2
Sheet and Description
B3 B4 S2
Grading and Surfacing
Summaries
Miscellaneous Summaries
General Notes &
Estimates Allowance Bid
Schedule
A0020 15101-0000 MOBILIZATION LPSM ALL
A0040 15214-1000 SURVEY AND STAKING, BRIDGE LPSM All ALL
A0060 15225-0000 SLOPE, REFERENCE, AND
CLEARING AND GRUBBING CONTROL MILE 0.041 0.041
A0080 15236-2000 SURVEY CONTROL, GRADE
FINISHING MILE 0.082 0.082
A0100 15301-0000 CONTRACTOR QUALITY CONTROL LPSM ALL
A0120 15401-0000 CONTRACTOR TESTING LPSM ALL
A0140 15501-0000 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE LPSM ALL
A0160 15701-0000 SOIL EROSION CONTROL LPSM ALL
A0180 20101-0000 CLEARING AND GRUBBING ACRE 0.29 0.03 0.32
A0200 20304-2000 REMOVAL OF BRIDGE LPSM All ALL
A0220 20420-0000 EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION CUYD 242 28 270
A0240 20801-0000 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CUYD 210 210 Contract Quantity
A0260 20803-0000 STRUCTURAL BACKFILL CUYD 70 70 Contract Quantity
A0280 30202-2000 ROADWAY AGGREGATE, METHOD 2 TON 210 10 220
A0300 40301-0100 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT,
TYPE 1 TON 74.0 8.0 82.0
A0320 41201-0000 TACK COAT TON 0.30 0.02 0.32
A0340 55201-0200 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, CLASS A Contract Quantity
(AE) CUYD 46 46
A0360 55401-1000 REINFORCING STEEL LB 4,900 4,900 Contract Quantity
A0380 55504-0000 PRE-FABRICATED STEEL BRIDGE
(14'x48') LPSM All ALL
A0400 60101-0000 CONCRETE CUYD 10 10
A0420 61701-4700 GUARDRAIL SYSTEM MGS, TYPE 2,
CLASS B WOOD POSTS LNFT 50 50
A0440 61702-1500 TERMINAL SECTION, TYPE MGS
TANGENT EACH 4 4
A0460 61707-0000 STRUCTURE TRANSITION RAILING LNFT 50 50 Contract Quantity
A0480 62201-0200 DUMP TRUCK, 8 CUBIC YARD
MINIMUM CAPACITY HOUR 10
A0500 62201-0550 BACKHOE LOADER, 6 CUBIC FOOT
MINIMUM RATED CAPACITY
BUCKET, 24-INCH WIDTH HOUR 10
A0520 62201-0950 WHEEL LOADER, 3 CUBIC YARD
MINIMUM RATED CAPACITY HOUR 10
A0540 62201-2750 MOTOR GRADER HOUR 10
A0560 62201-3350 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR, 1 CUBIC
YARD MINIMUM CAPACITY HOUR 10
MileStone: 100% Estimate Date Completed: 06/06/23 Report Date: 06/07/23
A M E N D
Line Item No.
Pay Item Number
SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES - Schedule A
-J un
-2
3:
P
M
Remarks and/or Determination of Estimated
Quantity Pay Item Description Unit
Estimated Quantities
N
N M
\2
(1
R oa dw ay
\C A D
D _S he et s\ B -S um m su m m ar y2
0.
xl sm
]S he et
PROJECT
B1NM FS 220(1)
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
SHEET
Sheet and Description
B3 B4 S2
Grading and Surfacing
Summaries
Miscellaneous Summaries
General Notes &
Estimates Allowance Bid
Schedule
A0580 62301-0000 GENERAL LABOR HOUR 20
A0600 62302-1100 SPECIAL LABOR, HIRED SURVEY
SERVICES HOUR 20
A0620 62406-0300 PLACING CONSERVED TOPSOIL,
4-INCH DEPTH ACRE 0.26 0.04 0.30
A0640 62510-1000 SEEDING, DRY METHOD ACRE 0.26 0.04 0.30
A0660 62515-1000 MULCHING, DRY METHOD ACRE 0.26 0.04 0.30
A0680 63316-1000 REMOVE AND RESET SIGN EACH 2 2
A0700 63501-0000 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL LPSM ALL
-J un -2
3:
P M
MileStone: 100% Estimate Date Completed: 06/06/23 Report Date: 06/07/23
N
N M
\2
(1
R oa dw ay
\C A D
D _S he et s\ B -S um m su m m ar y2
0.
xl sm
]S he et
2) SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES - Schedule A
A M E N D
Line Item No.
Pay Item Number Pay Item Description Unit
Estimated Quantities
Remarks and/or Determination of Estimated
Quantity
PROJECT
B2NM FS 220(1)
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
Drawing No. Description
BRIDGE DRAWING INDEX
RG3204-A
RG3204-B
TYPICAL SECTION
Elevations are at profile grade @ C Rdwy.L
S ta
.0
B e g in B r id g e
E n d B r id g e
S ta
.0
PROFILE GRADE DIAGRAM
No Scale
8,245
8,240
8,235
8,230
8,225
8,220
8,215
8,210
-6.400%
41’ VC -1.000% 51’ VC
+3.5
13%
V P I
E L
,2
.2
E L
,2
.2
V P I
P C
.6
N
PLAN
ELEVATION
Length of Bridge = 50’-0"
BRIDGE PLAN & ELEVATION
BRIDGE PLAN & ELEVATION
B. ROBINSON AUNLESS NOTED
1"= 10’-0"
El. 8235.07
Sta. 103+68.00
Begin Bridge
El. 8234.57
Sta. 104+18.00
End Bridge
R o m e r o C r e e k
EXP
EXP
Grade = -1.000%
El. 8235.07
El. 8235.07
Gutterline (typ.)
C Rdwy.L
WINGWALL C
WINGWALL A
WINGWALL B
WINGWALL D
El. 8234.57
El. 8234.57 ty p
ABUT. 2
ABUT. 1
Bridge Railing
Thrie Beam steel decking with asphalt fill.
steel girders and structural
Modular steel bridge with
L
L
L
@ 7’ Rt. of C Rdwy.
Approximate existing ground ground @ C Rdwy.
Approximate existing
@ 7’ Lt. of C Rdwy.
Approximate existing ground
Profile Grade at top of asphalt pavement.
Note: Deck elevations shown are
(typ. both sides)
Rail post spa. "2 1" = 46’-102
115 spa. @ 3’-1 "4 31’-6"4
31’-6
GENERAL NOTES & ESTIMATE
Q
Q100
HYDRAULIC DATA
Q
Q200
(cfs)
Q
(ft/s)
V
(ft)
El.WS
(ft)
Scour El.
RG3204-C
RG3204-D
RG3204-E
RG3204-F
RG3204-G
RG3204-H
FOUNDATION PLAN
SUMMARY OF BORING LOGS
TRANSITION RAILING
RG3204-I
REBAR LIST
RG3204-J
ABUTMENT 1
ABUTMENT 2
62 4.6 8222.9
10.0
10.7
11.6
8226.2
8227.1
8228.2
100Q WS El. = 8227.1
RG3204-K
EXCAVATION/BACKFILL DETAILS
min. of freeboard above 100 year water surface elevation.
capacity requirements: Bridge low chord provides 3 feet
= 8227.1 (measured 16 feet upstream of bridge). Hydraulic
100 year water surface elevation used to determine freeboard
Note: Water surface elevations are at upstream face of bridge.
RG3204-L
WINGWALL ABUTMENT 1
WINGWALL ABUTMENT 2
P. CLARK
S1
S. BELCHER
(typ.)
El. = 8231.6
Low chord
El. 8226.0
El. 8222.0 stream bed (typ.).
to be removed to 1’ below
Existing bridge abut.
Finished Grade
10’-0" W ing
(typ. @ Abut. 1)
14’-0" W ing
(typ. @ Abut. 2)
See RG3204-K for details.
(typ. @ all four corners).
Structure transition railing
REBAR LISTRG3204-M
NO.
PROJECTSTATE
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
CENTRAL FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION
DRAWING NO.DATEBRIDGE DRAWINGPROJECT TEAM LEADERSCALECHECKED BYDRAWN BYDESIGNED BYREVISIONS
BY
DATENO.
REVISIONS
N
N M \2
(1
B r id g e \R
G \C
A D
F il e s \D
G N
F il e s \r g p e .d g n
RG3204-
NM
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
KARL EIKERMANN
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
CREEK BRIDGE
NM FS 220(1) ROMERO
of 13 APRIL 2023
NONE BB. ROBINSON
GENERAL NOTES & ESTIMATE
2 P. CLARK S. BELCHER
S2
N
N M \2
(1
B r id g e \R
G \C
A e s \D
G N
F il e s \r g g n .d
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
KARL EIKERMANN
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
CREEK BRIDGE
FOUNDATION PLAN
CUNLESS NOTED
1"= 10’-0"
B. ROBINSON
8,245
8,240
8,235
8,230
8,225
8,220
8,215
8,210
ELEVATION
ABUT. 2
ABUT. 1
L
L
L
@ 7’ Rt. of C Rdwy.
Approximate existing ground ground @ C Rdwy.
Approximate existing
@ 7’ Lt. of C Rdwy.
Approximate existing ground
Profile Grade
LASER Printer dimensions
P C
.6
N
PLAN
El. 8235.07
Sta. 103+68.00
Begin Bridge
El. 8234.57
Sta. 104+18.00
End Bridge
R o m e r o C r e e k
C Rdwy.L
WINGWALL C
WINGWALL A
WINGWALL D
to be removed superstructure
Existing bridge
LASER Printer dimensions
FOUNDATION NOTES:
Location
Abut. 1
Abut. 2
Location
Abut. 1
Abut. 2
Max. Bearing PressureMax. Bearing Pressure
FOUNDATION TABLE
WINGWALL B
S ta
.5
C B r g
A b u t.
L
S ta
.5
C B r g
A b u t.
L
47’-0"
2’-6"2’-6"
5’-0" ty p ty p
1’-6" 1’-6"
(typ.)
ty p
Q WS El. = 8227.1100 ty p
Grade = -1.000%
Finished grade
Berm El. 8227.0
Berm El. 8229.5 ty p ty p
6.39 ksf (Strength I)
7.44 ksf (Strength I)
P. CLARK
6’-6"
(typ.)
S3
3’-6"3’-0"
El. 8226.0
El. 8222.0 stream bed (typ.).
to be removed to 1’ below
Existing bridge abut.
(typ.)
S. BELCHER
Highway Division, Geotechnical Services Branch, Lakewood, Colorado.
by U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Central Federal Lands
See Final Geotechnical Report, dated December 2022, Romero Creek Bridge, prepared
14’-0" W ing
(typ. @ Abut. 2)
(typ. @ Abut. 1)
10’-0" W ing
N
N M \2
(1
B r id g e \R
G \C
A e s \D
G N
F il e s \r g f o u n d a ti o n .d
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
KARL EIKERMANN
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
CREEK BRIDGE
NM FS 220(1) ROMERO
of 13 APRIL 2023
ELEVATION
PLAN
RQD
x x x
Boring No.
Location
Elev.
Ground Water
Depth at time of drilling (ATD)
Graphic material description
Blow count per foot with standard penetration test (SPT) in accordance with AASHTO T206
Unified Soil Classification
Practical refusal SPT
Core Run
% Core Recovery Shaded
Depth Terminated
Plan View
LEGEND
TYPICAL TEST HOLE LOG
TYPICAL TEST
HOLE SYMBOL
Approximate location of any sampled hole
BH20-02
BH20-01
El. 8235.07
Sta. 103+68.00
Begin Bridge
El. 8234.57
Sta. 104+18.00
End Bridge
R o m e r o C r e e k
C Rdwy.L
WINGWALL C
WINGWALL A
WINGWALL B
WINGWALL D
Basalt (Bedrock) gravel (SW-SM)
Sand with silt and gravel (SP-SC)
Sand with clay and
N
8,238
8,236
8,234
8,232
8,230
8,228
8,226
8,224
8,222
8,218
8,220
8,236
8,234
8,230
8,232
8,228
8,226
8,224
8,222
8,220
El. 8235.0
El. 8237.0
STA 103+37, 14.5 ft. LT
STA 105+54, 8.5 ft. RT
BH20-02
BH20-01
El. 8232.5
El. 8221.0
El. 8218.0
El. 8230.0
SUMMARY OF BORING LOGS
D4
S4
RQD
RQD
Lakewood, Colorado.
Central Federal Lands Highway Division, Geotechnical Services Branch, prepared by U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, See Final Geotechnical Report, dated December 2022, Romero Creek Bridge, B. ROBINSON P. CLARK NONEB. MCGARITY
N
N M \2
(1
B r id g e \R
G \C
A e s \D
G N
F il e s \r g b o r in g .d
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
KARL EIKERMANN
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
CREEK BRIDGE
NM FS 220(1) ROMERO
of 13 APRIL 2023
Approx. existing groundr o a d w a y s e c ti o n
1’-6"
Pay Limits for
Structural Backfill
Begin or End Bridge
1’-6"
Pay Limits for
Structure Excavation
1’-6" location.
Estimated bedrock
1’-6" 1’-6"
Grade
Profile Begin or End Bridge
Approx. existing ground
Pay Limits for Structural Backfill
Fill face
Finished grade
Finished grade
WINGWALL STRUCTURAL BACKFILL PAY LIMITS
ABUTMENT STRUCTURAL BACKFILL PAY LIMITS
DETAILS
EXCAVATION/BACKFILL
ABUTMENT STRUCTURE EXCAVATION PAY LIMITS
WINGWALL STRUCTURE EXCAVATION PAY LIMITS
1’-6"
(29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, Excavation)
Per OSHA Safety Regulation.
Short term excavation slope ratios (V:H):
Finished grade
Grade
Profile Approx. existing ground Begin or End Bridge
1’-6"
Pay Limits for
Structure Excavation
1’-6"
Grade
Profile
ALTERNATE FOOTING EMBEDMENT DETAIL
location.
Actual bedrock
Pay Limits for
Structure Excavation
FOUNDATION NOTES:
Fill face b e d r o c k u n d is tu r b e d in to s o u n d m in e m b e d b e d r o c k u n d is tu r b d to s o u n d m in e m b e d surface under footing.
Level, roughened
NONE
may be used.
Recycled excavation material conforming to 704.03.
Backfill material may be used.
Recycled excavation material conforming to 704.03.
Backfill material
601 Concrete
B. ROBINSONP. CLARK 5 E
S5 to construction.
of 601 concrete is found to exceed 3’ notify CO prior shall be included in pay item for "Concrete". If depth footing depths required for placement of 601 concrete
3. Excavation and removal of material below specified
Footing Embedment Detail.
is encountered below specified depths). See Alternate into bedrock requirements can not be met (i.e. bedrock
2. Provide Item 601 concrete where footing embedment foundation preparation requirements.
1. See subsection 208.08 of Special Contract Requirements for
S. BELCHER
N
N M \2
(1
B r id g e \R
G \C
A e s \D
G N
F il e s \r g e x c a v a ti o n d e ta il s .d
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
KARL EIKERMANN
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
CREEK BRIDGE
ABUTMENT 1
(typ.)
1’ -0 ty p.
Fill face
C Brg. & C Abut.L L
Elastomeric bearing pad
& anchor bolts per prefabricated bridge manufacturer (typ.).
8’-0" 8’-0"
1’-0" 1’-0"
7’-2"
C Rdwy.L
7’-2"
Geocomposite sheet drain with
Class 2, Type C geotextile.
Attach to wall per manufacturer’s instructions.
10"
SECTION A-A
Scale 38" = 1’-0"
C Brg.L
Top of Rdwy.
c lr
2’-0"
1’-0"2’-0"
5’-0" pipe wrapped with geotextile.
Provide T-connection @ outlet pipe. Cap ends of pipe.
ABBREVIATIONS:
b.f. = Both faces o.f. = Other face f.f. = Fill face
S6
UNLESS NOTED
" = 1’-0"4 prior to ordering materials and constructing abutments.
Final dimensions & elevations to be coordinated with bridge manufacturer
Other face discharge pipe. Extend to daylight.
sheet drain. (typ.)
Geocomposite
B. ROBINSON
See RG3204-H for wingwall reinforcement details.
’-0
" (ty p
WINGWALL B
WINGWALL A
El. 8235.07
El. 8231.81
El. 8226.00
3’-0"10’-0"3’-0"
30°
ABUTMENT 1 PLAN
ABUTMENT 1 ELEVATION
P. CLARK
2’-1"7’-2"7’-2"2’-1"
16 spa. @ 11"= 14’-8", #4A11’-0" 6" 6"
1’-0"
#4A3 (typ.)
#4A1 (typ.)
(typ.)
#5A4 b.f.
A b .f
#5A2 (typ.)
#5F4 (typ.)
#5A4 (typ.)
#4A3 (6 tot.)
1’-6"1’-6"
Sta. 103+68.00
Begin Bridge s p a
6 F
A
A
1’-4 8"1’-4
8"
C Rdwy.L
#4A1
#5A2
#5F4
#5F1 #5F2
#5F3 (14 tot.)
#5F2 o.f. (typ.)
#5F1 f.f. (typ.)
#5F3
4-#5A4
S. BELCHER
#5A4 (4 tot. top)
Begin Bridge
"2 1217 spa. @ 11" = 15’-7", #5A2, #5F1 f.f., #5F2 o.f. & #5F4"2
N
N M \2
(1
B r id g e \R
G \C
A e s \D
G N
F il e s \r g a b u t.
d
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
KARL EIKERMANN
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
CREEK BRIDGE
ABUTMENT 2
Fill face
C Brg. & C Abut.L L
Elastomeric bearing pad
& anchor bolts per prefabricated bridge manufacturer (typ.).
8’-0" 8’-0"
1’-0" 1’-0"
7’-2"
C Rdwy.L
7’-2"
Geocomposite sheet drain with
Class 2, Type C geotextile.
Attach to wall per manufacturer’s instructions.
10"
L
SECTION A-A
Scale 38" = 1’-0"
C Brg.L
Top of Rdwy.
w/ drain grate C 3" Ø weephole c lr
3’-0"
1’-6"2’-0"
6’-6" pipe wrapped with geotextile.
Provide T-connection @ outlet pipe. Cap ends of pipe.
ABBREVIATIONS:
b.f. = Both faces o.f. = Other face f.f. = Fill face
UNLESS NOTED
" = 1’-0"4 prior to ordering materials and constructing abutments.
Final dimensions & elevations to be coordinated with bridge manufacturer
Other face discharge pipe. Extend to daylight.
2’-1"7’-2"7’-2"2’-1" sheet drain. (typ.)
Geocomposite
See RG3204-I for wingwall reinforcement details.
1’ -0 ty p.
’-0
" (ty p
(typ.)
WINGWALL C
WINGWALL D
3’-0"10’-0"3’-0"
ABUTMENT 2 PLAN
ABUTMENT 2 ELEVATION
El. 8222.00
El. 8231.34
El. 8234.57
30°
P. CLARK B. ROBINSON
-2% s p a
A b .f
#4A3 (6 tot.)
1’-6"1’-6"
#5A4 (typ.)
16 spa. @ 11"= 14’-8", #4A11’-0" 6" 6"
1’-0"
#5A2 (typ.)
#4A3 (typ.)
#4A1 (typ.)
(typ.)
#5A4 b.f.
9"9"
3" Ø weephole (typ.)
#5F4 (typ.)
Sta. 104+18.00
End Bridge
7 G
S7
A
A
1’-4 8" 1’-4
8"
C Rdwy.L
#4A1
#5A2
#5F1
#5F2
#5F4
#5F3 (16 tot.)
#5F1 f.f. (typ.)
#5F2 o.f. (typ.)
#5F3
C Rdwy.L
4-#5A4
= 7’-0", #5F2 o.f. & #5A2 7 spa. @ 1’-0"
3" = 7’-0", #5F2 o.f. & #5A2 7 spa. @ 1’-0"
3"
3"31 spa. @ 6" = 15’-6", #5F1 f.f. & #5F43"
S. BELCHER
End Bridge
#5A4 (4 tot. top)
N
N M \2
(1
B r id g e \R
G \C
A e s \D
G N
F il e s \r g a b u t.
d
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
KARL EIKERMANN
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
CREEK BRIDGE
B. ROBINSON
UNLESS NOTED
"= 1’-0"4
10’-0"
6’-0"
Fill face
L
Provide drain grate recommended by sheet drain manufacturer.
Geocomposite sheet drain with
Class 2, Type C geotextile. Attach to wall per manufacturers recommendations.
A
Measured along f.f.
#4W2 (typ.)
SECTION A-A
Other face
-2%
WINGWALL ELEVATION
A
#5W8 b.f.
"= 1’-0" 8 3Scale:
1’-0" b.f. = Both faces o.f. = Other face f.f. = Fill face
ABBREVIATIONS:
WINGWALL PLAN
#5W bars f.f.
Fill face
10’-0"
El. 8226.00
El. 8235.07 El. 8235.07
"8 510’-4
#4W bars (typ.)
WINGWALL ABUTMENT 1
(WINGWALL A SHOWN, WINGWALL B SIMILAR)
(WINGWALL A SHOWN, WINGWALL B SIMILAR)
P. CLARK
3"1’-3"= 5’-0" 4 spa. @
1’-3"
1’-3"= 2’-6" 2 spa. @
S8
8 H
W a e s p a
W a c s p a
1’-0"
SECTION B-B
#5W bars f.f.
Fill face
#4W bars (typ.)
B B
#4W bars o.f. #4W bars o.f.
#4W bars
#5W bars f.f. (typ.)
#4W bars o.f. (typ.)
#4W2 b.f.
#4W1e b.f.
5W5 f.f.
#4W1a b.f.
#4W1(a-e) b.f.
#4W4c o.f.
#5W3e f.f. &
#4W4a o.f.
#5W3a f.f. &
Geocomposite sheet drain.
Geocomposite sheet drain.
1’-10" min. lap splice
#4W10
W s p a
W s p a
1’-0"1’-3"1’-3"
#4W9 (3 tot.)
#4W10 (4 tot.)
C lr
#4W2 or #4W10
#4W9 or #4W10
#5W6 f.f. & #4W7 o.f. (typ.)
S. BELCHER
Finished grade
N
N M \2
(1
B r id g e \R
G \C
A e s \D
G N
F il e s \r g w g w a ll .d
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
KARL EIKERMANN
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
CREEK BRIDGE
A
SECTION A-A
Fill face Other face
-2%
L
Provide drain grate recommended by sheet drain manufacturer.
Geocomposite sheet drain with
Class 2, Type C geotextile. Attach to wall per manufacturers recommendations.
14’-0"
10’-0"
Measured along f.f.
#4W2 (typ.)
WINGWALL PLAN
b.f. = Both faces o.f. = Other face f.f. = Fill face
ABBREVIATIONS:
A
WINGWALL ELEVATION
#6W8 b.f.
"= 1’-0" 8 3Scale:
1’-0"
#6W bars f.f.Fill face
14’-0"
"8 514’-4
El. 8234.57El. 8234.57
El. 8222.00
#4W bars (typ.)
UNLESS NOTED
"= 1’-0"4
WINGWALL ABUTMENT 2
(WINGWALL C SHOWN, WINGWALL D SIMILAR)
(WINGWALL C SHOWN, WINGWALL D SIMILAR)
B. ROBINSONP. CLARK
#4W2 b.f.
Finished grade
1’-3"= 3’-9" 3 spa. @
1’-3"
7 spa. @ 1’-3"= 8’-9"3"
9 I
S9
SECTION B-B
#6W bars f.f.
Fill face
#4W bars (typ.)
B B
#4W bars o.f. #4W bars o.f.
#4W bars o.f. (typ.)
#4W bars
#6W bars f.f. (typ.)
W o .f s p a
W f .f s p a
6W5 f.f.
#4W1a b.f.
#4W1(a-h) b.f.
#4W1h b.f.
#4W4f o.f.
#6W3k f.f. &
#4W4a o.f.
#6W3a f.f. &
Geocomposite sheet drain.
Geocomposite sheet drain.
1’-10" min. lap splice
C lr
1’-3" 1’-3" 1’-3"
#6W6 f.f. & #4W7 o.f. (typ.)
#4W9 (3 tot.)
#4W10 (4 tot.)
#4W10
W a k f .f s p a
W a f) o .f s p a
#4W9 or #4W10
#4W2 or
#4W10
S. BELCHER
N
N M \2
(1
B r id g e \R
G \C
A e s \D
G N
F il e s \r g w g w a ll .d
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
KARL EIKERMANN
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
CREEK BRIDGE
TYPICAL SECTION
UNLESS NOTED
" = 1’-0"
L
Steel railing post (typ.)
0%Side dam (typ.)
decking (galvanized)
Structural steel
TYPICAL SECTION
splice at diaph.
Optional field bolted
L e m b e d decking crest.
" depth above steel 8 corrugations to provide
Asphalt pavement. Fill pads per bridge manufacturer.
and elastomeric bearing
Anchor bolts, bearing plates, Bridge Railing
Thrie Beam
End guard angle
Gdr./Prefab Bridge Length = 48’-0"
C Brg.
Begin or
End Bridge gdr. clearance 1" min.
1’-6"1’-6"
TYPICAL SECTION @ ABUTMENT
1’-1" 1’-1"3 spa. @ 4’-0" = 12’-0" m a x m in to W-beam.
railing. Thrie Beam
Structure transition
2" gap
10" endwall
B. ROBINSON J
S10
1" (typ.)
"4 137’-0" 7’-0""4
Diaphragm (typ.)
Structural Steel girder (typ.).
Rolled steel
NOTES:
item 40301-0100.
Asphalt pavement and tack coat on bridge deck is included in pay asphalt lifts.
Apply tack coat to entire steel deck surface and between of all foreign material.
Prior to application of tack coat, clean steel decking surface
Galvanized steel decking prior to ordering materials and constructing abutments.
Final dimensions & elevations to be coordinated with bridge manufacturer
(typ.) TL-2 rating min.
(10 ga.) w/ weathering agent coating.
Galvanized Thrie-Beam Bridge Railing
S. BELCHERP. CLARK
C Bridge C Rdwy.L
Asphalt pavement.
See sheet A6.
N
N M \2
(1
B r id g e \R
G \C
A e s \D
G N
F il e s \r g ty p ic a l.
d
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
KARL EIKERMANN
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
CREEK BRIDGE
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW
TYPICAL ELEVATION VIEW
B
3 Spaces 3’-1 �"
1"
6’-3" Non-Symmetrical
Transition to W-Beam
W-Beam
6’-3"
B
37 �"
Rail Section of Splice
Center line
9’- 4 �"
A
A
Direction of Traffic
6’-3"
NON-SYMMETRICAL(10 GA.)
TRANSITION SECTION
37 �"
(10 GA.) ELEMENT SECTION
THRIE-BEAM (3’- 1 �")
bolts w/washers.
Button head splice
12 ~ �" Dia. x 1 �"
8"
6"
CL
W6 x 8.5
W6 X 9.0 or
4 �
1"
STEEL POST & BLOCK
(Showing Standard Block)
SECTION B-B
SECTION A-A
This post location requires a Thrie-Beam
Block (6"x 8"x 22" Nom).
Standard Block
(6"x 8"x 14" Nom)
Low Speed Transition
Button head splice bolts
12 ~ �" Dia. x 1 �"
Button head splice bolts
8 ~ �" x 1 �" nut.
post bolt with washer and
1~ �" Top button head
GENERAL NOTES
TRANSITION RAILING
Bridge
Bridge
NONE
Prefabricated Bridge) (included with Pay Item for
Limit of Steel Bridge Railing
End Bridge Begin or
12’-6" Pay Length for Stucture Transition Railing See Roadway Plans for Approach Railing
Beam Transition TL-2 Mash Compliant, GF(31) TL2-19".
8. Transition is adapted from TxDOT low speed transition "Metal Beam Guard Fence Thrie
See Section 563 of Special Contract Requirements.
7. Apply a weathering agent coating to all exposed steel components of bridge transition railing.
6. Fabricate and construct railing to the horizontal and vertical alignment of the roadway.
5. Posts shall not be set in concrete, of any depth.
4. Material for steel posts shall conform to ASTM A36, and shall be galvanized after fabrication.
galvanized.
Washers shall conform to ASTM F436, Type 1. All attachment hardware shall be
3. Button head bolts shall conform to ASTM A307. Nuts shall conform to ASTM A563.
" double recessed nuts.8 5" with 4
1" x 18 5 Button head "splice" bolts are thickness of the nut and the washer and not more than 1" beyond it.
2. Button head "post" bolts shall be of sufficient length to extend through the full
1. Rail elements shall meet the requirements of AASHTO M180, Type I, Class B.
P. CLARK B. ROBINSON S. BELCHER
S11
11 K
N
N M \2
(1
B r id g e \R
G \C
A e s \D
G N
F il e s \r g tr a n s it io n r a il .d
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
KARL EIKERMANN
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
CREEK BRIDGE
NOTES
b.f. = both faces o.f. = other face f.f. = fill face
Abbreviations:
NONEB. ROBINSON B. ROBINSON
REBAR LIST (1 of 2)
REINFORCING STEEL SCHEDULE DIMENSION TABLE
BAR MK SIZE TYPE PIN SZ LOCATION QTY LENGTH WEIGHT A B C D E F G H J K O R
ABUTMENT 1
V or N
2117 0’-3" 4’-1" 0’-6" 4’-1"8’-8"#4A1 1224 Stirrups
1816 0’-3�" 0’-10" 2’-8" 1’-3�" 2’-0�" 1’-5�" 1’-5�" 2’-8�"6’-9�"#5A2 1285 Stirrups
6STR 18’-2"18’-2"#4A3 734 Horiz. b.f.
12STR 15’-8"15’-8"#5A4 1965 Horiz. b.f.
1817 0’-3�" 5’-3�" 2’-7"7’-11"#5F1 1495 Vert. f.f.
1817 0’-3�" 5’-3�" 3’-7"8’-11"#5F2 1675 Vert. o.f.
14STR 17’-8"17’-8"#5F3 2585 Horiz. top & bot.
22STR 4’-8"4’-8"#5F4 1075 Trans. top
1199 LBSSUBTOTAL
ABUTMENT 2
V or N
2117 0’-3" 4’-1" 0’-6" 4’-1"8’-8"#4A1 1224 Stirrups
1716 0’-3�" 0’-10" 2’-8" 1’-3�" 2’-0�" 1’-5�" 1’-5�" 2’-8�"6’-9�"#5A2 1205 Stirrups
6STR 18’-2"18’-2"#4A3 734 Horiz. b.f.
22STR 15’-8"15’-8"#5A4 3595 Horiz. b.f.
3217 0’-3�" 8’-11" 3’-2"12’-1"#5F1 4035 Vert. f.f.
1717 0’-3�" 8’-11" 4’-8"13’-7"#5F2 2415 Vert. o.f.
16STR 17’-8"17’-8"#5F3 2955 Long. top
36STR 6’-2"6’-2"#5F4 2325 Trans. top
1845 LBSSUBTOTAL
WINGWALL A & B
V or N sets of
STR 3’-3�"
to
6’-7�" at 0’-10"
Incr.
3’-3�" to
6’-7�" at 0’-10"
Incr.
#4W1 664 Vert. b.f.
16STR 7’-2"7’-2"#4W2 774 Vert. b.f.
sets of
2 0’-3�" 0’-10" 6’-8�" to
10’-11�" at 1’-0�"
Incr.
7’-6�" to
11’-9�" at 1’-0�"
Incr.
#5W3 995 Horiz. f.f.
sets of
2 0’-3" 0’-8" 6’-8�" to
10’-11�" at 2’-1�"
Incr.
7’-4�" to
11’-7�" at 2’-1�"
Incr.
#4W4 384 Horiz. o.f.
22 0’-3�" 0’-10" 12’-0"12’-10"#5W5 275 Horiz. f.f.
1052 0’-3�" 9’-8�" 1’-4�" 0’-8�" 1’-2�"11’-1"#5W6 1165 Horiz. f.f.
652 0’-3" 9’-10�" 1’-9�" 0’-11" 1’-7�"11’-8�"#4W7 474 Horiz. o.f.
452 0’-3�" 7’-2" 2’-8�" 2’-3" 1’-6�"9’-10�"#5W8 415 Diagonal b.f.
6STR 3’-11�"3’-11�"#4W9 164 Vert.
82 0’-3" 0’-8" 3’-2"3’-10"#4W10 204 Vert.
548 LBSSUBTOTAL
WINGWALL C & D
V or N sets of
STR 3’-3�"
to
9’-10" at 0’-11�"
Incr.
3’-3�" to
9’-10" at 0’-11�"
Incr.
#4W1 1404 Vert. b.f.
16STR 10’-8"10’-8"#4W2 1144 Vert. b.f.
sets of
2 0’-4�" 1’-0" 6’-8�" to
15’-6" at 0’-10�"
Incr.
7’-9" to
16’-6" at 0’-10�"
Incr.
#6W3 3956 Horiz. f.f.
B
STR
TYPE 2
A G
B A
DB
C
K
H
O
TYPE 16
B
C
D
OPTIONAL LEG
TYPE 17
D
C
B
A
TYPE 52
Dimensions in bending diagrams are out-to-out of bars1.
12 L
S12
S. BELCHER
N
N M \2
(1
B r id g e \R
G \C
A e s \D
G N
F il e s \r g r e b a r .d
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
KARL EIKERMANN
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
CREEK BRIDGE
NONEB. ROBINSON B. ROBINSON
REBAR LIST (2 of 2)
REINFORCING STEEL SCHEDULE DIMENSION TABLE
WINGWALL C & D
V or N
(CONTINUED)
sets of
2 0’-3" 0’-8" 6’-8�" to
15’-6" at 1’-9"
Incr.
7’-5" to
16’-2" at 1’-9"
Incr.
#4W4 944 Horiz. o.f.
22 0’-4�" 1’-0" 16’-6�"17’-6�"#6W5 536 Horiz. f.f.
1052 0’-4�" 13’-11�" 1’-4�" 0’-8�" 1’-2�"15’-4"#6W6 2306 Horiz. f.f.
652 0’-3" 14’-1�" 1’-9�" 0’-11" 1’-7�"15’-11"#4W7 644 Horiz. o.f.
452 0’-4�" 12’-4�" 3’-9�" 3’-0�" 2’-3�"16’-1�"#6W8 976 Diagonal b.f.
6STR 7’-6"7’-6"#4W9 304 Vert.
82 0’-3" 0’-8" 3’-2"3’-10"#4W10 204 Vert.
1244 LBSSUBTOTAL
B
STR
TYPE 2
A G
B
D
C
B
A
TYPE 52
NOTES
b.f. = both faces o.f. = other face f.f. = fill face
Abbreviations:
Dimensions in bending diagrams are out-to-out of bars1.
S13
M13S. BELCHER
N
N M \2
(1
B r id g e \R
G \C
A e s \D
G N
F il e s \r g r e b a r .d
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
KARL EIKERMANN
GILA NATIONAL FOREST
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
CREEK BRIDGE
102+52.00
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
8,230 8,230
8,240 8,240
8,250 8,250
8,241.32 Des Grade =
1:4 -2.0% -2.0% 1:4
1:3 1:3
8,240.57 Subgrade =
8,241.31 Original Grnd =
102+60.00
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
8,230 8,230
8,240 8,240
8,250 8,250
8,240.81 Des Grade =
1:3 1:4
-2.0% -2.0% 1:4 1:3 1:3
8,240.06 Subgrade =
8,240.90 Original Grnd =
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X-SECTIONS
Central Federal Lands Highway Division
FHWA, Office of Federal Lands Highway
:1
P
M
J u n e
B
L
.0
S h e t]
N M
\2 (1
R o a d w a y \C
A D
D S h e e ts
\X -M
L X s e c \X
S S
(R O
M E
R O
)N M
(1 d g n
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
NM FS 220(1)
X1
STATE PROJECT
102+80.00
8,230 8,230
8,240 8,240
8,250 8,250
8,239.53 Des Grade =
1:3 1:3 1:4
-2.0% -2.0% 1:4 1:3 1:3
8,238.78 Subgrade =
8,239.86 Original Grnd =
103+00.00
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
8,230 8,230
8,240 8,240
8,238.25 Des Grade =
1:4 -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% 1:4
1:3 1:3
8,237.50 Subgrade =
8,238.70 Original Grnd =
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X-SECTIONS
Central Federal Lands Highway Division
FHWA, Office of Federal Lands Highway
:1
J u n e
B
L
.0
S h e
N M
\2 (1
R o a d w a y \C
A D
D S h e e ts
\X -M
L X s e c \X
S S
(R O
M E
R O
)N M
(1 d g n
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X2
103+20.00
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,240 8,240
8,250 8,250
8,236.97 Des Grade =
1:3 1:3
1:4 -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% 1:4
1:3 1:3
8,236.22 Subgrade =
8,237.42 Original Grnd =
103+30.00
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,240 8,240
8,236.34 Des Grade =
1:4 -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% 1:4
1:3 1:3
8,235.59 Subgrade =
8,236.79 Original Grnd =
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X-SECTIONS
Central Federal Lands Highway Division
FHWA, Office of Federal Lands Highway
:1
J u n e
B
L
.0
S h e
N M
\2 (1
R o a d w a y \C
A D
D S h e e ts
\X -M
L X s e c \X
S S
(R O
M E
R O
)N M
(1 d g n
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X3
103+40.00
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,240 8,240
8,235.82 Des Grade =
1:4 -1.4% -1.4% -1.4% -1.4% 1:4
1:3 1:3
8,235.07 Subgrade =
8,236.18 Original Grnd =
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X-SECTIONS
Central Federal Lands Highway Division
FHWA, Office of Federal Lands Highway
:1
J u n e
B
L
.0
S h e
N M
\2 (1
R o a d w a y \C
A D
D S h e e ts
\X -M
L X s e c \X
S S
(R O
M E
R O
)N M
(1 d g n
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X4
103+60.00
8,210 8,210
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,240 8,240
8,235.18 Des Grade =
1:4 -0.2% -0.2% -0.2% -0.2% 1:4
1:2
8,234.43 Subgrade =
8,235.36 Original Grnd =
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X-SECTIONS
Central Federal Lands Highway Division
FHWA, Office of Federal Lands Highway
:1
J u n e
B
L
.0
S h e
N M
\2 (1
R o a d w a y \C
A D
D S h e e ts
\X -M
L X s e c \X
S S
(R O
M E
R O
)N M
(1 d g n
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X5
103+63.00
8,210 8,210
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,235.13 Des Grade =
1:3 1:3
1:4
1:2
8,234.38 Subgrade =
8,235.27 Original Grnd =
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X-SECTIONS
Central Federal Lands Highway Division
FHWA, Office of Federal Lands Highway
:1
J u n e
B
L
.0
S h e
N M
\2 (1
R o a d w a y \C
A D
D S h e e ts
\X -M
L X s e c \X
S S
(R O
M E
R O
)N M
(1 d g n
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X6
103+68.00
8,210 8,210
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,235.07 Des Grade =
1:4.
1:4 1:4
1:2
8,234.32 Subgrade =
8,235.13 Original Grnd =
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X-SECTIONS
Central Federal Lands Highway Division
FHWA, Office of Federal Lands Highway
:1
J u n e
B
L
.0
S h e
N M
\2 (1
R o a d w a y \C
A D
D S h e e ts
\X -M
L X s e c \X
S S
(R O
M E
R O
)N M
(1 d g n
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X7
104+18.01
8,210 8,210
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,240 8,240
8,234.57 Des Grade =
1:
1:4 1:4
1:2
8,233.82 Subgrade =
8,234.65 Original Grnd =
104+20.00
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
8,210 8,210
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,234.55 Des Grade =
1:
1:4 1:4
1:2
8,233.80 Subgrade =
8,234.62 Original Grnd =
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X-SECTIONS
Central Federal Lands Highway Division
FHWA, Office of Federal Lands Highway
:1
J u n e
B
L
.0
S h e
N M
\2 (1
R o a d w a y \C
A D
D S h e e ts
\X -M
L X s e c \X
S S
(R O
M E
R O
)N M
(1 d g n
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X8
104+23.00
8,210 8,210
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,240 8,240
8,234.52 Des Grade =
1:
1:4 1:4
1:2
8,233.77 Subgrade =
8,234.58 Original Grnd =
104+40.00
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
8,210 8,210
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,234.45 Des Grade =
-1.0% -1.0% -1.0% -1.0% 1:4
1:3
8,233.70 Subgrade =
8,234.56 Original Grnd =
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X-SECTIONS
Central Federal Lands Highway Division
FHWA, Office of Federal Lands Highway
:1
J u n e
B
L
.0
S h e
N M
\2 (1
R o a d w a y \C
A D
D S h e e ts
\X -M
L X s e c \X
S S
(R O
M E
R O
)N M
(1 d g n
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X9
104+56.00
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,240 8,240
8,234.59 Des Grade =
1:3
1:4 -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% 1:4
1:3
8,233.84 Subgrade =
8,234.66 Original Grnd =
104+60.00
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,234.66 Des Grade =
-2.0% -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% 1:4
1:3
8,233.91 Subgrade =
8,234.75 Original Grnd =
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X-SECTIONS
Central Federal Lands Highway Division
FHWA, Office of Federal Lands Highway
:1
J u n e
B
L
.0
S h e
N M
\2 (1
R o a d w a y \C
A D
D S h e e ts
\X -M
L X s e c \X
S S
(R O
M E
R O
)N M
(1 d g n
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X10
104+80.00
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,240 8,240
8,235.18 Des Grade =
1:3
1:4 -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% 1:4
1:3
8,234.43 Subgrade =
8,235.20 Original Grnd =
105+00.00
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,235.80 Des Grade =
1:6
-2.0% -2.0% 1:4
1:3
8,235.05 Subgrade =
8,235.76 Original Grnd =
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X-SECTIONS
Central Federal Lands Highway Division
FHWA, Office of Federal Lands Highway
:1
J u n e
B
L
.0
S h e
N M
\2 (1
R o a d w a y \C
A D
D S h e e ts
\X -M
L X s e c \X
S S
(R O
M E
R O
)N M
(1 d g n
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X11
105+18.00
8,220 8,220
8,230 8,230
8,236.36 Des Grade =
1:6
-2.0% -2.0% 1:4 1:6
8,235.61 Subgrade =
8,236.36 Original Grnd =
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X-SECTIONS
Central Federal Lands Highway Division
FHWA, Office of Federal Lands Highway
:1
J u n e
B
L
.0
S h e
N M
\2 (1
R o a d w a y \C
A D
D S h e e ts
\X -M
L X s e c \X
S S
(R O
M E
R O
)N M
(1 d g n
ROMERO CREEK BRIDGE
X12
| A1.pdf |
| NM FS 220(1) Plan.pdf |
| A1.pdf |
| A2.pdf |
| A3.pdf |
| A4.pdf |
| A5.pdf |
| A6.pdf |
| B1.pdf |
| B2.pdf |
| B3.pdf |
| B4.pdf |
| C1.pdf |
| rg3204 100%.pdf |
| rg3204 pe |
| rg3204 gn |
| rg3204 foundation |
| rg3204 boring |
| rg3204 excavation details |
| rg3204 abut |
| rg3204 abut |
| rg3204 wingwall |
| rg3204 wingwall |
| rg3204 typical |
| rg3204 transition rail |
| rg3204 rebar |
| rg3204 rebar |
| T1.pdf |
| T2.pdf |
| T3.pdf |
| T4.pdf |
| T5.pdf |
| T6.pdf |
| X.pdf |
| X-Sections |
| X1 |
| X2 |
| X3 |
| X4 |
| X5 |
| X6 |
| X7 |
| X8 |
| X9 |
| X10 |
| X11 |
| X12 |
| 2023-09-06T16:41:22-0600 | |
| CURTIS R SCOTT |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .