Attachment_-Past_Performance_Info._Customer_Survey_ATT_8.doc

DOC document 46 KB Posted

Attached to
White Multipurpose Copier Paper
Solicitation number
NIHOD2015064
Issued by

About this file

Attachment -Past_Performance_Info._Customer_Survey_ATT 8

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
AmendmentNo.1PSF_30.pdf PDF
Amend_1_Attachment.docx DOCX document
SF_1449_Sol_Paper.pdf PDF
Paper_IFB_NIHOD2015064_2015.doc DOC document
AIMBC1_Att_2-1.pdf PDF
FedStd123g_att_3.pdf PDF
JCP-065Att_5.pdf PDF
Cover_Letter_IFB2015064.doc DOC document
Invoice_Instructions-Att_7.pdf PDF
MILSTD1189b_Att_2-2.pdf PDF
Justificationfor_Samples_Att_6.doc DOC document
MILSTD1189BAtt_4.pdf PDF
NIH_STD_6D_Att_1.doc DOC document
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 8 SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

NIH CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1Please complete the following questionnaire and return via email to the contract specialist, Mrs. Aseia Chaudhry at Aseia.Chaudhry@.nih.gov by July 9, 2015 at 1 PM EST.

This survey pertains to (service received title):

Department/Component:

Contract Number: Date of Survey:

Name of Person Completing Survey:

Your Company/Agency:

Your Role in this Contract (circle one):

Contracting Officer Contract Specialist Project Officer Other Contract Value (including options): $ Performance Period:

(including option periods) Type of Contract: ( firm fixed price, labor hours, time and materials, cost reimbursement, etc?)

Approximate percentage of work being performed (or completed) by subcontractor(s): %

General description of products/services required under the contract:

RATINGS

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Commentary to support rating shall be noted on page 4.

Assign each area a rating of 0 (Unsatisfactory), 1 (Poor), 2 (Fair), 3 (Good), 4 (Excellent), or 5 (Outstanding). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Highlight the appropriate rating. If you do not have enough personal knowledge or feedback from internal customers who directly received products and services from the contractor to make a determination on any of the performance criteria below, please circle "N/A" (not applicable/no opinion).

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1.

Compliance with contract requirements

N/A

Customer comments:

2.

Accuracy of reports

N/A

Customer comments:

3.

Effectiveness of personnel

N/A

Customer comments:

4.

Technical Excellence

N/A

Customer comments:

COST CONTROL

Record of forecasting and controlling target costs

N/A

Customer comments:

2.

Current, accurate and complete billings

N/A

Customer comments:

3.

Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals

N/A

Customer comments:

4.

Cost efficiencies

N/A

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

Met interim milestones

N/A

Customer comments:

2.

Reliability

N/A

Customer comments:

3.

Responsive to technical direction

N/A

Comments:

4.

Completed on time including wrap-up and contract administration

N/A

Customer comments:

5.

Met delivery schedules

N/A

Customer comments:

6.

Liquidated damages assessed: Yes No (circle one)

BUSINESS RELATIONS

Effective management, including management of subcontracts

N/A

Customer comments:

2.

Reasonable/cooperative behavior

N/A

Customer comments:

3.

Responsive to contract requirements

N/A

Customer comments:

4.

Notification of problems

N/A

Customer comments:

5.

Flexibility

N/A

Comments:

6.

Pro-active vs reactive

N/A

Customer comments:

7.

Effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program

N/A

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction.

Yes No Customer comments:

2.

Would you recommend selection of this firm again?

Yes No

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .