Technical_Evaluation_Criteria.doc
DOC document 27 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Animal Feed and Bedding
- Solicitation number
- NIHOD2015060
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Final_RFP.docx | DOCX document | |
| past_performance_questionnaire.doc | DOC document | |
| Invoicing_Instructions_NIH(RC)-1.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_SFLLL.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Technical Evaluation Criteria The technical proposal will receive paramount consideration in the selection of the contractor for this acquisition. The evaluation will be based upon the demonstrated capabilities of the prospective contractor in relation to the needs of the project as set forth in the RFP. The merits of the proposal will be evaluated carefully, based upon responsiveness to the RFP, the thoroughness and feasibility of the technical approach taken, and past performance of the contractor on similar requirements.
The evaluation criteria below will be used by the technical evaluation committee to evaluate the technical proposal. The evaluation will take into consideration the scientific, technical, and administrative capabilities of the Offeror’s in relation to the requirement. The criteria below are listed in the order of relative importance with weights assigned for evaluation purposes.
Based on technical excellence, cost, and the consideration of other factors, the Government reserves the right to make an award that will be of best value to the Government. Failure to provide the information required to evaluate the proposal may result in rejection of that proposal in its entirety without further consideration.
Cost reasonableness and the probable cost to the Government will be evaluated separately in conjunction with the proposed approach.
Evaluation Criteria
Total Points
1. Understanding of and capability to meet requirements
The Offeror’s understanding of the requirement will be assessed based on demonstrated comprehension of the specific objectives, intent, and requirements of the work; the soundness, practicality and feasibility of the proposed approach and work plans.
The following information will be evaluated as part of this criterion:
a. Technical/Management Approach (35pts) – Demonstrate the understanding of the requirement, exhibits, and thoroughly explains both the technical and managerial approach to meeting and/or exceeding all requirements as listed within the RFP.
b. Qualifications of Staff (5pts) – Please demonstrate the qualifications of staff, plans to retain employees, letters of commitment, and resumes as applicable.
c. Rapid Reaction (15pts) – Please describe how you plan to meet or exceed response times as stated in the SOW.
d. Reports/Service Documentation (5pts)
2. Past Performance
The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s past performance in the management of projects similar to Task Orders that may be issued under this contract. The evaluation will focus on the capability as demonstrated by the size, scope, complexity, and results achieved in the completion of actual contracts/task orders similar to those expected under this contract.
b. Criteria.
Highly qualified vendors will have a minimum of three years’ of experience performing similar work.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .