Clarification Quesion.doc
DOC document 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- NIHOD2011269
About this file
Clarification to Question 21 in Amendment 1
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Answers to Questions RFP 9_13_11 | — | |
| AmendmentPrice sche(3).docx | DOCX document | |
| AmendmentPriceTravelCost(3).docx | DOCX document | |
| AmendmentNo.1COOPSF 30.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 Invoice Instructions-SAT.doc | DOC document | |
| RFQ COOP2011_6_11(3).docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3Disclose lobbying.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation # NIHOD2011269 Question:
The government's has stated that the vendor can modify the pricing schedule based on our own estimate on the number of hours for each FTE. This puts every other bidder at a disadvantage except the incumbent. Is this the government's intent? Kindly advice.
Clarification:
Offerors were advised in the answer to Question# 21 to propose the hours and labor categories provided by Amendment #1. That way everyone is evaluated on the same basis. However, if you feel there is a better way of handling this requirement, you may also propose a different labor mix but you would have to provide rationale regarding your reasons. This question was actually asked by an offeror other than the incumbent. It is always NIH’s intent to maximize competition.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .