nfwo selection process criteria.docx
DOCX document 36 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fish and Wildlife Management Assistance
- Opportunity number
- F15AS00239
- Issued by
-
Department of the Interior
About this file
Selectrion Process Criteria - basic information
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Selection Process Criteria for Competitive Posting on Grants.Gov Notice of Funding Opportunity #_________
Each proposal was scored by reviewers using five review criteria:
1. Scientific merit of proposed project;
2. Vendor’s unique qualifications;
3. Soundness of budget and work plan;
4. Project significance related to FWS priorities;
5. Potential success of project with coordination with FWS staff, and potential funding leverage with other partners;
6. Past experience on previous projects with the FWS.
Project Proposal Scoring Overview Using the criterion below, reviewer scores were averaged to give a final score for each criterion.
Technical Score - 50 pts
| Criteria |
| Weight |
| Scientific merit and quality of proposed research |
| 30 |
| Vendor’s unique qualifications |
| 10 |
| Soundness of budget and work plan |
| 10 |
Management and Mission Alignment Score - 50 pts
| Criteria |
| Weight |
| Potential significance related to FWS priorities |
| 30 |
| Potential success of project with coordination with FWS |
| 10 |
| Past experience on previous projects with FWS |
| 10 |
The scored proposals are then charted into one of four quadrants based on their relative score in both technical and management categories. Only proposals scoring well in both technical and management (top right quadrant) will be considered for the funding. The management team will determine which proposals will be funded.Proposals in this quadrant are considered for funding
High technical score, low management score High technical score, high management score
Low technical score, high management score Low technical score, low management score
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .