New JA - Signed_Redacted.pdf

VHAPM Part 813.106 Simplified Acquisition Procedures: Soliciting from a Single Source Attachment 1: Single Source Justification for SAP under the SAT

VHAPM Part 813.106 Original Date: 08/30/17 Revision 02 Eff Date: 03/31/2020

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Justification for Single Source Awards IAW FAR 13.106-1 For

Over Micro-Purchase Threshold but Not Exceeding the SAT ($250K)

Acquisition Plan Action ID: 36C255-23-AP-0619

1. Contracting Activity:

Network Contracting Office (NCO) 15, 3450 S 4th Street Trafficway, Leavenworth, KS. 66048

Department of Veterans Affairs, Robert J. Dole VA Medical Center, 5500 E. Kellogg Avenue, Wichita, KS. 67218-1607

Funding:

2. Brief Description of Supplies/ Services required and the intended use/Estimated Amount:

The estimated value of the proposed action is

1. The CT scanner shall be the Mobile Toshiba/Canon Aquilion Prime SP 80/160 CT Scanner

2. The CT equipment shall include the AQUILION SP PLUS CONFIGURATION

(80 ROW / 160 SLICE) WITH HIGH CAPACITY

3. Medical Trailer

Supports Regulatory Compliance. Allows quick access to medications for immediate administration. Increased Medication Security. Gives visibility into medication inventory and utilization. Size will accommodate future needs as RJDVAMC expands the availability of specialty care at the CBOCs. Drawer Shortage Sizes for Variety of Medications including depot IM injections for in clinic administration. Supports Regulatory Compliance.

Standardizes Medication Management. Eliminates need to remove larger supply. Increased Medication Security. Gives visibility into medication inventory and utilization. Controlled Accessed Drawers for Controlled Substances

3. Unique characteristics that limit availability to only one brand, with the reason no other supplies or services can be used:

The Robert J. Dole VAMC currently utilizes Canon as their current CT and it is required to be the same brand during the brief time of the upgrade so the clinicians do not have to be retrained on a new system for the short period of time while the upgrade takes place.

Introducing a different brand during this short time would place undue burden on the clinicians to be proficient on a new system for no longer than the unit would be temporarily used onsite. Most substantially, this could introduce avoidable errors to patient care.