NASRF Hatchery Buildings Q_A1.pdf
PDF 106 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- IFB1 PMAA 2017000250 3
- Issued by
- Alamosa County, Denver City, Colorado
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document from a state and local contract opportunity involving Colorado Parks and Wildlife and the NASRF Hatchery Buildings project, with participation from project officials including Bob D. Brosche, John Howard, Bill Kane, Dale Pizel, James Pribyl, and Robert W. Bray. The document addresses clarifications related to Invitation for Bid (IFB) 201 7*250 dated May 8, 20[17], concerning the construction and renovation of hatchery buildings. Key questions addressed structural excavation requirements, bid item specifications for foundation work, slab construction, and backfill procedures; trench spacing and isolation building specifications; building material manufacturer approvals; and structural height measurements for an 8-foot wall component. The document clarifies that trenches shall be spaced at 10-foot centers, that alternative approved manufacturers may be used if their products meet project specifications, and that wall height measurements are taken 8 feet above the finished floor or per drawing specifications without requiring formal acknowledgment in the bid.
The document does not provide specific pricing information, contract award dates, renewal options, or detailed funding sources. No set-aside provisions, incumbent contractor information, or specific response deadlines are stated in this Q&A document. The content focuses primarily on technical clarifications and construction specification details rather than contract terms or financial arrangements.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Bob D. Brosche John Howard, Vice
May 8, 20
IFB1: 201
Question
A
Question
A
Question
A
Question
A
Note thi package eid, Director, Colora e-Chair Bill Kane • D
Nat
17*250 n: Why is ex Item 2 an
Answer: Stru performe whereas B n: Can you
Answer: The n: Is the con
Answer: An may be manufact (though n n: Is the 8’ wall?
Answer: Th specificat s is not an ado Parks and Wildlif Dale Pizel James Pr tive Aquatic xcavation, b nd Bid Item uctural exc d associate Bid Item 2 re verify the s trenches sh ntractor req alternative approved b turer it can not necessar
’ height of is height s tions.
Addendum fe • Parks and Wildlif ribyl, Chair James
PROJEC
cs Species R backfill, and 3?
cavations re ed with the efers to all o spacing betw hall be space quired to us e building m by the Proj be submitte ry).
FRB measu shall be m and does n fe Commission: Robe Vigil Dean Wingfie
CT QUESTIO
Restoration d compactio eferenced in e foundation other neces ween trenc ed at 10’ on se one of th manufacturer ject Manage ed to the Pr red from ab measured 8 not need to ert W. Bray • Chris C ld Michelle Zimme
ONS
Facility – H on listed in n Bid Item n, slab and sary site wo hes in the I center typi e listed bui r that meets
er. If there roject Manag bove the fl
8’ above fi o be acknow
Castilian Jeanne Ho erman, Secretary A
Hatchery Bu the descrip
3 refer to d other str ork.
solation bu ical for all d ilding manu s the buildin e is concer ger prior to oor or the inished floo wledged as orne Alex Zipp ildings ption of both o any earth uctural fea ilding?
drains.
facturers?
ng specifica rn of a spe the bid ope top of the or per dra such in the h Bid hwork tures ations ecific ening stem awing e bid
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .