Past_Performance_Questionnaire.rtf

Section J Attachment 2

Past Performance Questionnaire Referenced Contractor (contractor you are providing past performance information about): Name:_ Type of Contract Work Performed by the referenced contractor:

file_0.wmf file_1.wmf file_2.wmf

Contract Value: Date of Award:_ If not complete provide status:

Date Completed:

Complexity of Work Performed: Difficult Routine file_3.wmf file_4.wmf

Name of Company and Point of Contact Providing this Past Performance Information: Company Name:_ Point of Contact:_ Telephone Number: Performance Elements How was the Contractor rated in the following areas:

Excellent Good Marginal None Poor Quality of Work

Timely Performance

Effective Management

Contract Compliance

Rating Scale:

Excellent: Performance is superior and as a customer, would unhesitatingly do business with the offeror again. There is little or no room for improvement. Offeror performs in accordance to specifications, etc. Complaints are negligible, or the record is old and the offeror has demonstrated by more recent performance that corrective action has made the likelihood of such conduct in the future highly improbable.

Good: Offeror's performance is better than average, and the customer, would willingly do business with the offeror again. Complaints are few and relatively minor. Complaints are negligible, or the record is old and the offeror has demonstrated by more recent performance that corrective action has made the likelihood of such conduct in the future highly improbable.

Marginal: Unfavorable reports regarding the offeror's performance have been made. Serious doubt is expressed as to whether or not as the customer business would be done again. However, some favorable reports are given, and some sources state they would do business with the offeror again. Much improvement is needed to bring performance level up to a manner that is acceptable.

NEITHER UNFAVORABLY NOR FAVORABLY - (None) No record exists or sources of information are roughly divided over the quality of the offerors performance. The offeror has no record of criminal conduct, civil fraud, negligence, or the record is old. In the case of an offeror with respect to which there is no information on past contract performance or with respect to which information on past contract performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably nor unfavorably on the factor of past performance. These vendors will be evaluated on specification and price only.

Poor: Performance is unsatisfactory and the customer would no longer do business with the offeror again. Complaints are substantial or numerous. The offeror either has presented no persuasive evidence of having taken appropriate corrective action that will guard against such conduct in the foreseeable future, or it appears unlikely that the corrective action will be effective. Constantly corresponding with vendor to get the vendor to perform by issuing "Cure Notice(s)" and/or "Show Cause" Notice(s) consideration taken to re-establish delivery dates and any other adverse action such as "Termination for Default" Performance History 1.) Did the Contractor adhere to the contract schedule?

COMMENT:

file_5.wmf file_6.wmf file_7.wmf

2.) Were any problems experienced in the Contractor’s performance? If so, to what extent was the Contractor able to resolve the problems without extensive help from your staff?

file_8.wmf file_9.wmf file_10.wmf

3.) How well do you think the Contractor interfaced with your staff?

file_11.wmf file_12.wmf file_13.wmf

4.) Based on past experience with this Contractor, would you consider using them again if there was a need?

file_14.wmf file_15.wmf file_16.wmf

5.) Based on the above information, what is your overall rating of the Contractor?

Excellent ( ) Good( ) Marginal( ) None(__) Poor(__)

Printed and signature of person who completed this questionnaire:

file_17.wmf

Printed Name file_18.wmf

Signature