Draft_PWS.docx

DRAFT

PERFORMANCE BASED STATEMENT OF WORK (PBSOW)

LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES (LSS) FOR THE INDUSTRIAL AND LOGISTICS MAINTENANCE PLANNING/SUSTAINMENT DEPARTMENT

FLEET READINESS CENTER SOUTHWEST

SAN DIEGO, CA

31 March 2017

1.0. INTRODUCTION

1.1. BACKGROUND. The Industrial and Logistics Maintenance Planning/Sustainment Department (AIR-6.7) of the Naval Air Systems Command is a National Organization with Headquarters being located on-board the Naval Air Station at Patuxent River, MD and is responsible for providing acquisition logistics management integration across all logistics support elements. The acquisition of these services is required in order to ensure consistency in the procurement of logistics support services across all sites. National Sites include the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Divisions at Patuxent River, MD, Lakehurst, NJ and Orlando, FL; the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Divisions located at China Lake, CA and Point Mugu, CA; the In-Services Support Centers located at Jacksonville, FL, Cherry Point, NC, and North Island, CA; and the Naval Air Technical Data and Engineering Command located at San Diego, CA.

1.2. Collectively these sites provide the people, skills, knowledge, equipment, tools, facilities, and technical data to establish and maintain policies, processes, and procedures for an integrated Naval Aviation Logistics and Industrial support packages for all NAVAIR supported systems. AIR-6.7 is responsible for design interface, industrial and maintenance planning, integrated Warfighter support, training and training support, support equipment management and integration. They integrate Naval Aviation Enterprise (NAE) maintenance and supply functions, and maintenance scheduling and management in accordance with NAE constructs. They provide overarching industrial business operations planning and analysis to ensure continuous logistics engineering services and support from concept refinement and technology development through disposal to ensure maintainability, readiness, supportability, and affordability. These logistics management services apply to all weapons systems and subsystems including all engines, avionics, and support equipment procured by the Naval Air Systems Command.

1.3. SCOPE: the Contractor shall provide logistics and technical support services in the areas of planning, analysis, development, training, support equipment management, facilities and execution that includes, but is not limited to AIR-6.7 at Fleet Readiness Center Southwest San Diego, CA, Program Manager (PMA)-231, PMA-260, PMA-265, Commander Naval Air Forces (CNAF) and Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program.

2.0. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS:

2.1. Applicable documents will be identified at the task order level.

3.0. REQUIREMENTS:

3.1. GENERAL SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS. This section provides information pertaining to Government and Contractor requirements and responsibilities including information regarding the level of expertise and resources required by the Government in support of this contract. The contractor shall provide the following logistics and technical support/service tasks:

3.1.1. Level of Repair Analysis (LORA) - The contractor shall:

3.1.1.1. Identify the data element inputs for development of the LORA (These inputs may become the basis for a contractor conducted LORA or provided to the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) developed LORA).

3.1.1.2. Conduct an economic LORA, apply sensitivities to identify the most economical repair level and provide results and recommendations.

3.1.1.3. Conduct an economic LORA to determine possible costs of all maintenance support options and then identify least cost solution.

3.1.1.4. Conduct a non-economic LORA to identify reasons maintenance at the Organizational, Intermediate, or Depot level should or should not be performed and provide recommendations.

3.1.1.5. Evaluate LORA of systems, equipment, and associated hardware and provide recommendations for improvements.

3.1.1.6. Perform audits to verify existing system repair performance against identified repair specification or goal objectives are met. Determine the difference between results of the LORA and the programs planned maintenance concept. Provide recommended rationale for changing the programs’ maintenance concept.

3.1.1.7. Perform Configuration Management (CM) reviews to ensure repair operations are optimally maintained.

3.1.2. Design Interface/Maintenance Planning (DI/MP) - Design Interface – the contractor shall:

3.1.2.1. Assess and provide recommendations for establishing or changing the maintenance programs for new or existing systems and equipment, which includes:

3.1.2.1.1. Assessing and evaluating available maintenance data

3.1.2.1.2. Identifying and/or developing a Baseline Comparison System (BCS).

3.1.2.1.3. Conducting a Comparative Analysis of new systems/equipment to the BCS

3.1.2.1.4. Identifying potential problems.

3.1.2.1.5. Conduct independent, technical and systems engineering assessments of logistics data for affordability, reliability, maintainability, supportability, supply support, maintenance concepts and warranty considerations.

3.1.2.2. Perform database research and analyses of impacts of any proposed engineering changes that would affect the Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) and operational readiness.

3.1.2.3. Review and analyze naval aviation and weapon systems maintenance engineering, logistics, technical, financial and schedule data to support ILS and maintenance policy development.

3.1.2.4. Identify the underlying quantitative and qualitative data necessary to support new policy initiatives required in response to changing/evolving technical, acquisition and operational logistics needs.

3.1.2.5. Identify ILS and maintenance policy options and conduct cost/benefit trade-off analyses of policy options.

3.1.2.6. Identify and apply alternative Life Cycle Cost (LCC) model procedures, validation approaches and tracking procedures for incorporation into LCC management plans.

3.1.2.7. Assess alternatives and identify advantages and disadvantages of LCC planning and maintenance concepts for the selected end items and support items.

3.1.2.8. Provide recommendations to update the LCC program objectives and technical information requirements.

3.1.2.9. Develop and conduct general and specialized tests and analyses related to specification and material certifications, process specifications, maintenance task developments, failure analyses, process controls, verifications of material tasks, material processes, specifications and standards.

3.1.2.10. Investigate and evaluate new and existing technologies and manufacturing processes for application to design updates, inspections, maintenance concepts, repair and rework tasks.

3.1.2.11. Assess and report on in-service aircraft and equipment composite materials and recommend areas for improving the development of composite repair programs.

3.1.2.12. Evaluate Navy industrial capability, Depot capability and engineering data for the systems and equipment to establish and revise the depth and scope of maintenance requirements.

3.1.2.13. Evaluate technical manuals, local engineering specifications, local process specifications, engineering investigations and manual change releases for technical adequacy and accuracy.

3.1.2.14. Develop weapon system Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Management Plans that identify the Government’s plan to manage and support DMSMS efforts.

3.1.2.15. Evaluate and provide recommendations in the resolution of weapon systems DMSMS issues.

3.1.3. Design Interface/Maintenance Planning (DI/MP) - Maintenance Planning – the contractor shall:

3.1.3.1. Determine and analyze the Organizational, Intermediate and Depot (O/I/D) levels of maintenance regarding overall reliability, maintainability, and availability characteristics and determine their projected availability, specifically with the following metrics:

3.1.3.1.1. Direct Maintenance Man-Hours / Flight Hours (DMMH/FH)

3.1.3.1.2. Mean-Time-To-Repair (MTTR)

3.1.3.1.3. Mean-Time-Between-Removals (MTBR)

3.1.3.1.4. Mean-Time-Between-Failures (MTBF)

3.1.3.1.5. Mean-Flight-Hours-Between-Failures (MFHBF)

3.1.3.2. Assess the interface between weapon systems, Government Furnished Equipment (GFE), aircraft systems and other Government furnished systems and provide recommendations for improving operating/maintenance procedures.

3.1.3.3. Investigate maintenance concepts, storage and handling requirements and procedures for composite materials.

3.1.3.4. Recommend improvements to existing maintenance concepts, procedures and handling requirements.

3.1.3.5. Provide recommendations for the assignments of composite maintenance and repair capabilities among Organizational, Intermediate and Depot level activities.

3.1.3.6. Assess and review the maintenance planning programs and compare the maintenance engineering aspects of the programs with projected requirements for transition of maintenance capabilities.

3.1.3.7. The contractor shall perform the following Remove and Replace (R&R) tasks:

3.1.3.7.1. Verify the accuracy and completeness of the maintenance plans, assuring traceability with interfacing documents

3.1.3.7.2. Assess and document the Remove and Replace (R&R) tasks and ensure the scheduled and preventive inspection requirements are complete

3.1.3.7.3. Review the replaceable items appearing on the Inspect and Repair (I&R) working lists

3.1.3.7.4. Develop complete data for each replaceable item on the aircraft

3.1.3.7.5. Rank the failure rates and repair levels of systems, subsystems and equipment on in-services aircraft similar to those on the advanced development aircraft

3.1.3.7.6. Determine the impacts of each replaceable item on the supportability of the aircraft. Include manpower, cost, spares, maintenance capability and operational readiness impacts

3.1.3.7.7. Review the difference in recovery rates between interchangeable and replaceable items

3.1.3.8. Develop and evaluate maintenance tasks, requirements and concepts and evaluate new or revised, improved concepts and techniques.

3.1.3.9. Assess the impact to maintenance planning for alternative maintenance concepts and provide recommendations for enhancements.

3.1.3.10. Identify and recommend areas for changes and improvements for optimizing maintenance intervention and tactics to meet predetermined affordability and reliability goals.

3.1.3.11. Research and provide recommendations for ILS fleet maintenance procedures, techniques and requirements to ensure adequacy of maintenance tasks and the system fleet logistic support posture to satisfy operational requirements under stationary and mobilization conditions.

3.1.3.12. Conduct engineering analyses and studies of maintenance/support disciplines. Recommend ILS planning alternatives and courses of action to meet fleet readiness requirements in response to Product Quality Deficiency Reports or Engineering Investigations.

3.1.3.13. Develop and maintain maintenance plans, supportability analyses, maintenance tasks and LORA. Review supportability analysis worksheets for analytical correctness and element integration.

3.1.3.14. Develop, evaluate and recommend changes to maintenance plans for systems, equipment, subsystems, Weapon Replaceable Assemblies and Shop Repairable Assemblies. This includes the following:

3.1.3.14.1. Analyze the data/techniques and source of data used in generating data (and identified in) the maintenance plans

3.1.3.14.2. Evaluate failure modes, design feature comparisons, support experience, and operational environments

3.1.3.14.3. Track the full integration of logistic support elements

3.1.3.14.4. Monitor logistic elements and data required to support end items

3.1.3.14.5. Determine compliance with maintenance policies and philosophies

3.1.3.14.6. Document analytical processes with supportability analysis procedures

3.1.3.15. Perform sustainment assessment/identification of Life Cycle Management opportunities for system and subsystems.

3.1.3.16. Identify the quantitative and qualitative data necessary to support new policy initiatives required in response to changing/evolving technical, acquisition and operational logistic needs utilizing Naval Aviation and/or Weapons maintenance, engineering, technical, financial and schedule data to support ILS policies/conceptualizations and the development and/or implementation of ILS documentation.

3.1.3.17. Identify ILS support and maintenance policy options and related forecasts and projections of the options impact on Fleet support. Conduct cost/benefit tradeoff analyses of policy options.

3.1.4. Logistic Support Analysis (LSA) Database and Reports – the contractor shall:

3.1.4.1. Provide analyses, technical studies and reports in support of task analyses and ILS resource requirements.

3.1.4.2. Identify LSA output report requirements and provide support in developing the data element selection sheet.

3.1.4.3. Establish and maintain an LSA database compliant with GEIA-STD-0007 data transfer protocol and provide output reports as required.

3.1.4.4. Conduct a maintenance task analysis, identify maintenance task requirements that complement the maintenance concept, identify sequential subtasks and task resource requirements.

3.1.4.5. Assess prime and OEM contract documentation for tailored maintenance task analyses for specified Airborne Weapon Systems, Subsystems and Support Systems. This includes tailoring LSA requirements and objectives and developing required contract documentation.

3.1.4.6. Conduct logistics engineering evaluations of selected components of the weapon systems to identify variances in the actual performances versus logistic support analysis projections and recommend changes to the LSA databases.

3.1.4.7. Develop and verify Bill of Materials (BOMs) and perform sustainability/obsolescence assessment on a system or subsystem to evaluate supply, reliability, logistics and readiness constraints and/or impacts.

3.1.4.8. Identify and investigate possible options for corrective and/or mitigation options of system(s)/subsystem(s) or the individual components, as the analysis dictates.

3.1.4.9. Provide Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) that provides costs, resolution cost, trade-off studies and solution options and produce report summarizing findings and recommendations.

3.1.4.10. Provide engineering, technical and programmatic support relating to Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) issues.

3.1.4.11. Develop recommendations to analyze and track deployment discrepancies regarding support resources and spares.

3.1.4.12. Prepare Post-Deployment Maintenance, Engineering and Logistics Review Management Plans 1

3.1.5. Environmental Logistics – the contractor shall:

3.1.5.1. Conduct environmental reviews & analyses during the design interface and maintenance planning process to ensure compliance with Federal, DoD, Navy, state and local environmental regulations and policies.

3.1.5.2. Collect, analyze, evaluate and report on emergent technologies and their attendant processes, storage and disposal requirements.

3.1.5.3. Participate in the LSA process, ECP reviews, RCM, planning/analysis, technical publication and manual reviews in order to:

3.1.5.3.1. Identify and review impacts of new designs/design changes on existing support systems relative to environmental policies, regulations, and laws.

3.1.5.3.2. Ensure support of the Aviation Hazardous Materials Control and Management Program by identifying hazardous materials and making recommendations for eliminating/minimizing their use.

3.1.5.3.3. Promote cost effective environmental technology solutions to reduce LCC and environmental impact.

3.1.5.4. Plan and coordinate the integration of maintenance pollution prevention and hazardous material technology alternatives.

3.1.5.5. Identify hazardous materials as an analysis report or as data elements in the LSAR output report.

3.1.5.6. Provide analyses and technical studies in support of Environmental Compliance initiatives.

3.1.5.7. Review and identify life cycle support requirements and their effects on environmental policies, regulations and laws.

3.1.6. Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) – the contractor shall:

3.1.6.1. Perform RCM analysis on new and/or existing systems in accordance with the germane RCM Program Plan and the NAVAIR 00-25-403 RCM Process or the MIL-P-24534A (for Aircraft Launch and Recovery Equipment).

3.1.6.2. Update existing RCM analyses, to include data gathering and analysis, input and maintenance of the IRCMS database, providing recommendations for PM tasks and other actions as a result of the RCM analysis, Age Exploration and recommendations for improvement of the IRCMS database and RCM process. As requested, the contractor shall also perform Weibull and related reliability analyses and root cause analysis related to the failure modes tracked in IRCMS.

3.1.6.3. Participate in reviews of RCM programs, as requested by the particular FST being supported. This is to include interface with fleet maintainers, FRC personnel and OEMs as needed to update and support the RCM efforts.

3.1.6.4. Track and monitor degraders and trends related to RCM metrics, as requested by the particular FST being supported.

3.1.7. Air/Ship Integration – the contractor shall:

3.1.7.1. Review ship, aviation and weapons program acquisition documentation to identify areas of aviation and weapons interface and possible logistics concerns for both new and in-service ships and new and legacy aircraft and weapons. Provide recommendations to promote the integration of evolving Navy goals and priorities such as manpower reduction, distance support, etc.

3.1.7.2. Collect and analyze aviation maintenance and support requirements. Deliver consolidated evaluation of aviation requirements across the proposed Carrier Air Wing, Aviation Combat Element or aviation detachment. Develop ship design recommendations regarding the location and design of effective and efficient aviation maintenance and support activities.

3.1.7.3. Provide analysis of aviation maintenance and support processes for both current and future systems.

3.1.7.4. Develop shipboard aviation logistics footprints addressing all aviation and weapons requirements, capabilities, and issues aboard a single ship or ship class.

3.1.7.5. Support shipboard weapons integration analysis and testing efforts.

3.1.7.6. Conduct trade studies of specific ship, aviation and weapons interface issues including in-depth analysis of aircraft operations, maintenance and maintenance support functions such as supply operations.

3.1.7.7. Collect and analyze data extracted from Navy and related data systems.

3.1.7.8. Produce and reproduce formal, bound report products.

3.1.8. SUPPLY SUPPORT- the contractor shall:

3.1.8.1. Support the Direct Vendor Delivery (DVD) and Requirements Determination programs by coordinating overall Fleet Support Team (FST) actions for DVD programs. Provide recommendations on the hardware development prime contractor’s statements of work and provide preliminary repair data to prospective vendors. Ensure milestone efforts that require Naval Inventory Control Point (NAVICP) actions are completed on time. Provide both consultative and active support in the adaptation of provisioning tasks (e.g. item selection, cataloging, classification, etc.) to the DVD program through independent research and analyses of findings. Document the points of both synergy and counteraction between perceived logistic functions and weapon systems.

3.1.8.2. Perform Requirements Determinations of aircraft initiatives by collecting and validating relevant data to support specific item reviews for possible Logistics Engineering Change Proposals (LECP) and DVD programs and determine which require further investigations and those that do not meet specified selection criteria. Input information in the requirement determination calculation programs and store calculations into databases.

3.1.8.3. Continuously monitor the supply support posture for a given system. This may include, but not be limited to work such as, administering Requirements Based Forecasting Model (RBFM), forecasting efforts, parts call support, quarantine issues, DLA/NAVICP critical parts reviews, etc.

3.1.8.4. Using a working knowledge of Cataloguing requirements in accordance with NAVSUP P-724, Chapter 8, and knowledge in maintaining logs, matrices, websites, and other cataloguing tools, the Contractor shall:

3.1.8.4.1. Prepare, submit and coordinate National Stock Number (NSN)/Naval Ammunition Logistics Code (NALC) submittals using NOLSC-724/6, Cataloguing/Identification/Disposition Request.

3.1.8.4.2. Obtain technical documentation for explosive items (AUR or Component Item) for cataloguing purposes (i.e., HERO, ESD, Packaging, Certification and Final Hazard Classification documentation).

3.1.8.4.3. Prepare weekly highlights and keep Government Team Lead current on status of any/all cataloguing efforts.

3.1.8.5. Provide a working knowledge of Provisioning requirements using the ICAPS Version 5.1 database. The Interactive Computer-Aided Provisioning System is used to prepare a Provisioning Parts List (PPL) which will be prepared using the production contractor-originated baseline based upon the Technical Data Package.

3.1.8.5.1. Draft PPL – Prepare a draft PPL using the baseline and a Provisioning Requirements Statement (PRS) and then distribute to the technical activities as specified by the APML, for their review. Upon a Desk Top Provisioning Conference lead by the Supply Support Lead, a PPL shall be entered into the ICAPS program.

3.1.8.5.2. Final PPL – Submit the final PPL to NAVICP for final APL (Allowance Parts List) preparation by NAVICP. The APL will be used by the 'users' and Fleet for ordering purposes and maintenance by NAVICP.

3.1.8.6. Prepare and submit Support Equipment Recommendation (SERD) efforts for cataloging purposes IAW a SEMS AUTOSERD Template and a top level signed drawing. Submit to Code 6600E, 575 I Avenue, Suite 1, Point Mugu, CA 93042-5049. The contractor shall complete cataloging assignment upon receipt of NSN assignment from NAWCAD/LKE and NAVICP.

3.1.9. FACILITIES – the contractor shall:

3.1.9.1. Provide support to the Facilities Logistics Element Manager (LEM):

3.1.9.1.1. Serve as Subject Matter Expert (SME) for Ship/Shore facilities policy and process input. Collect and analyze aviation maintenance and support facility requirements.

3.1.9.1.2. Support SSAR configuration control board.

3.1.9.1.3. Coordinate in the development of Facility LEM Training.

3.1.9.1.4. Perform ILA assessments and provide recommendations for ILA policy changes.

3.1.9.1.5. Review Program facilities documentation (e.g., SDDs, SOWs, ALSPs, LRFS, etc.) and provide inputs.

3.1.9.1.6. Develop shore aviation logistics footprints addressing all aviation requirements, capabilities, and issues.

3.1.9.2. Provide support to the Facilities LEM in support of PEOs:

3.1.9.2.1. Attend APEO(L) meetings and Program facility meetings.

3.1.9.2.2. Monitor program milestone status.

3.1.9.2.3. Participate in and ensure that Site Evaluations are performed and gaps have been identified and documented.

3.1.9.2.4. Participate in Site/Unit Activation planning schedules.

3.1.9.2.5. Identify, support, and monitor Military Construction (MILCON) and modification projects.

3.1.9.2.6. Provide Subject Matter Expertise (SME) for Ship/Shore facilities policy and processes.

3.1.9.2.7. Perform Facility LEM inventory tracking.

3.1.9.2.8. Provide Facility LEM training.

3.1.9.2.9. Function as ILA assessor.

3.1.9.2.10. Liaison to the Facilities Enterprise Team (FET).

3.1.10. NAVAL AVIATION MAINTENACE PROGRAM (NAMP) – the contractor shall :

3.1.10.1. Manage, use, update and maintain the Change History And Review Tracking System (CHARTS).

3.1.10.2. Maintain liaison within NAVAIR and externally with other organizations, to include but not limited to, COMNAVAIRFOR, HQMC ASL, COMFRC, NATEC and SPARWARSYSCEN, to assist with coordination of maintenance and logistics policy development and changes.

3.1.10.3. Provide support as required to the NAMP Working Committee.

3.1.11. MAINTENANCE SCHEDULING/MANAGEMENT – the contractor shall:

3.1.11.1. Review ship, weapons and aviation program acquisition documentation to identify areas of aviation interface and possible logistics concerns for both new and in-service ships and new and legacy aircraft and weapons. Provide recommendations to promote the integration of evolving Navy goals and priorities such as manpower reduction, distance support, etc.

3.1.11.2. Provide analyses on current and future depot/intermediate capabilities/capacity requirements and issues.

3.1.11.3. Develop metrics, track progress, and provide status reports on depot capability establishment against required capability plans.

3.1.11.4. Develop metrics, monitor progress and support analyzing depot and intermediate production in support of department, COMFRC, NAVAIR and NAE goals. Provide reasons for late work-in-process and late deliveries. Coordinate in process improvement identification and the development of production recovery plans.

3.1.11.5. Provide analyses, technical studies and reports in support of organizational, intermediate, and depot level maintenance tasks and maintenance scheduling and management efforts.

3.1.11.6. Provide analyses on current and future Workload Standards (WLS).

3.1.11.7. Provide Readiness improvement status evaluations and other status reports, identifying current fleet readiness problems, mission capabilities and full mission capability factors causing readiness degradations, corrective actions, and get well dates.

3.1.11.8. Conduct Industrial Source of Repair process tasks in support of depot capability establishment.

3.1.11.9. Perform analyses of current processes and procedures/document recommended improvements.

3.1.11.10. Provide data input and data base administration for Maintenance and Scheduling Management data bases.

3.1.12. SUPPORTABILITY TEST AND EVALUATION (ST&E) - the contractor shall:

3.1.12.1. Develop, evaluate and provide input to requirements, contracts and documentation to ensure ST&E requirements are included.

3.1.12.2. Develop Supportability Test Plans to ensure systems (ship, weapons, and aircraft) products go through appropriate Test and Evaluation processes. Execute Supportability Test Plans and provide Supportability Test Plan results and reports.

3.1.12.3. Evaluate, plan, coordinate and provide logistics support of the test program.

3.1.12.4. Respond to Program Office, HQ and other agency data calls/requests with documented information, briefings, meetings and/or guidance for ST&E.

3.1.13. INTEGRATED WARFIGHTER SUPPORT COMMUNITY (IWSC) / WARFIGHTER RESPONSE CENTER (WRC) - the contractor shall:

3.1.13.1. Perform in-depth analyses and capture the As-Is state, perform Gap Analysis and develop the To-Be state for various aviation logistics/maintenance processes, business processes and associated data applications/systems.

3.1.13.2. Develop and integrate functional requirements and design of an enterprise architecture that supports the Integrated Warfighter Support Community future state.

3.1.13.3. Develop policy/procedures that address the Integrated Warfighter Support processes.

3.1.13.4. Develop metrics/methods to measure/monitor ability to deliver reactive, predictive and proactive support to the Warfighter to include emergent requirements/ capabilities.

3.1.13.5. Support the implementation, operation and enhancement of the Integrated Warfighter Support Services systems and supporting systems/components.

3.1.14. TRAINING/TRAINING SUPPORT – the contractor shall:

3.1.14.1. Analyze Manpower, Personnel and Training (MPT) effectiveness to determine interim and follow-on training requirements, recommended method of training, manpower and personnel impacts, rate/Navy Enlisted Code (NEC) changes or recommendations, increase/decrease of manning and other MPT information. The contractor shall request and review Navy System Training Plans (NTSP). The contractor shall review manpower projections, research training courses and NEC rate applicability as part of the NTSP development/update. Provide input to and review Front End Analysis and skill sets. Review maintenance tasks to align to the proper rate/NEC.

3.1.14.2. Define training requirements and associated support strategies for new and modified weapon systems, and support Logistics Managers (LM) with training in the preparation of input to acquisition milestone schedules, ILS SOWs, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), Configuration Control Board forms and other logistic element planning documents. The contractor shall coordinate, track and review curriculum and training data development.

3.1.14.3. Perform cost-benefit analyses and logistics training support impact assessments on new and modified and pre-planned improvements, ECPs, Technical Directives and other documentation detailing recommendations for correction of performance and logistics deficiencies.

3.1.14.4. Participate in logistics-related meetings including NTSP review meetings, logistics reviews, ILS Management Teams meetings and provide coordination with other government or fleet personnel. Additionally, the contractor shall coordinate training events, meetings and conferences; prepare and deliver briefing materials, charts, viewgraphs, document meeting minutes and other items needed to facilitate logistics presentations.

3.1.14.5. Review Human Systems Integration (HSI) Plans and Documents, and participate in meetings where applicable to evaluate impacts among the Systems applicable HSI Elements (i.e., Human Factors, Safety, Manpower & Personnel, Training, etc.).

3.1.14.6. Review and evaluate Training Strategies/Plans, Training assessments, including but not limited to Integrated Learning Environment, Web Based Training and Embedded Training.

3.1.14.7. Review, analyze, and assess manpower estimates, to include maintenance and operations manpower determinations, calculation and methodologies.

3.1.14.8. Review current systems Watch Stations requirements and assess impacts driven by new or differing positions for future PQS revisions.

3.1.14.9. Perform a Front End Analysis (FEA). The FEA may include but not be limited to a Mission Analysis, Job Analysis, Task Analysis, Collective and/or Individual Task Analysis, Learner Analysis and Needs Assessment.

3.1.14.10. Develop Initial and Full Navy Training Systems Plans.

3.1.14.11. Develop maintenance and operator/aircrew analysis deliverables using the specifications and format specified in the task order CDRLs:

3.1.14.12. Prepare, document and deliver course modules for Continuous Process Improvement (CPI) curriculum that meet or exceed Naval Education and Training Command requirements. Support includes, but is not limited to: assistance and coaching in content establishment, construction of training simulations/exercises, revision of existing course content, graphics support for training materials using standard structured templates and techniques, drafting of instructor's guides and testing/construction of material via pilot classes.

3.1.15. SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) - the contractor shall:

3.1.15.1. Identify the SE quantitative and qualitative data necessary to support new policy initiatives required in response to changing/evolving technical, acquisition and operational logistics support. Identify SE Naval Aviation, weapons and ship, maintenance engineering, technical, financial and schedule data. Identify SE ILS maintenance policies and concepts. Develop and implement SE ILS documentation in support of aircraft, weapon and ship programs. Identify SE ILS and SE Maintenance policy options and related forecasts and projections of the options' impact on fleet support. Conduct cost/benefit trade-off analyses of policy options.

3.1.15.2. Develop, review and update SE Integrated Logistics Support Documentation.

3.1.15.3. As part of the REI process, evaluate and recommend material and hardware substitutions to engineering (4.0) Department for their approval.

3.1.15.4. Conduct engineering assessments of approved systems and equipment ECP’s. This includes:

3.1.15.4.1. Determining changes to engineering elements and associated engineering requirements data

3.1.15.4.2. Developing Technical Directives (TD) to meet Fleet introduction of the proposed engineering changes

3.1.15.4.3. Recommending baseline engineering modification schedules to incorporate each ECP into the applicable systems

3.1.15.4.4. Evaluating engineering parameters and logistics support requirements to support the systems engineering aspects of the ECP

3.1.15.5. Assess and review ECP’s, TD’s and Publication changes, and related documents to assure that ILS requirements are properly addressed and are consistent within known program constraints. Identify their impacts on life cycle logistics planning. These evaluations shall include identifying changes to logistic support elements, associated requirements dates and impacts on delivery and deployment schedules. Identify problems and provide recommendations for their correction.

3.1.15.6. Validate Technical Publications and Manuals against the Maintenance Plans and Supportability Analyses and report the findings.

3.1.15.7. Conduct technical investigations of the Operational, Intermediate and Depot level transition requirements and provide recommendations for specified systems, subsystems and equipment transition plans and schedules for transition from contractor to Navy capability. This includes analyses of Maintenance Plans, Supportability Analyses, technical publications, training plans, support equipment, Test Program Sets, facilities, support personnel and supply support for the purpose of analyzing Integrated Logistics Support requirements for transitioning plans and schedules.

3.1.15.8. Conduct independent assessments of logistics data for affordability, reliability, maintainability, supportability, supply support, maintenance concepts and warranty considerations. Perform data base research and analyses of impacts for the proposed engineering changes on Integration Logistics Support and operational readiness.

3.1.15.9. Review and analyze Naval Aviation Maintenance engineering/technical, financial and schedule data to support ILS and maintenance policy conceptualization, development, and implementation of ILS documentation. Identify the underlying quantitative and qualitative data necessary to support new policy initiatives required in response to changing/evolving technical, acquisition and operational logistics needs resulting from experiences gained during program executions, fleet operations, tests and evaluations and in response to directions by higher authorities. Identify ILS and Maintenance options and related forecasts/projections of the options’ impacts on fleet support. Conduct cost/benefit trade-off analyses of options.

3.1.15.10. Research and provide recommendations for Integrated Logistics Support fleet maintenance procedures, techniques and requirements to ensure adequacy of maintenance tasks and the system fleet logistic support posture to satisfy operational requirements under stationary and mobilization conditions.

3.1.15.11. Evaluate systems and equipment to identify obsolete/out-of-production components. Assess Government-owned inventory of obsolete/out-of-production components, usage rates and remaining service life of used-on systems/equipment. Perform analyses to determine the severity of problems and recommend alternatives.

3.1.15.12. Recommend methods for identifying and assessing the principal factors impacting the supportability of systems and equipment to quantify the scope and nature of logistic support required to affordably, efficiently and effectively meet specific operational mission requirements.

3.1.15.13. Assess Integrated Logistics Support planning and management data and documentation to identify supportability problem areas. Recommend quantitative and qualitative methodologies to evaluate the impact of Integrated Logistics Support shortfalls. Recommend actions to correct and alleviate identified support problems.

3.1.15.14. Conduct on-site quantitative and qualitative analyses of the Integrated Logistics Support elements, assessing support prior to and during the introduction of systems and equipment at selected test and evaluation sites, training sites and operational ashore and afloat sites. Identify variances from the documented plans, recommend corrective actions and track implementation to meet site/unit activation planning milestones.

3.1.15.15. Conduct assessment of approved systems and equipment Engineering Change Proposals. This includes: developing Technical Directives to meet fleet introduction of the proposed engineering changes; recommending modification schedules to incorporate each Engineering Change Proposal into the applicable systems and evaluating logistics support requirements.

3.1.15.16. Define SE requirements and associated support strategies for new and modified weapon systems, and support Logistics Managers (LM) in the preparation of input to acquisition schedules, Life Cycle Supportability Plans (LCSP), User’s Logistics Support Summaries (ULSS), Logistics Requirements Funding Summaries (LRFS), ILS SOWs, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)/obsolescence Plans, Unique Identification (UID) Plans, Support Equipment Recommendation Data (SERD), Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), Configuration Control Board forms, and other logistic element planning documents. Provide inputs for the preparation, review and management of acquisition documents such as SOWs, Request for Proposals (RFPs) and/or Integrated Logistics Support Detail Specification (ILSDS).

3.1.15.17. Support LMs in the identification of, impact of, and implementation of all SE ILS elements.

3.1.15.18. Perform cost-benefit analyses, supportability analyses and logistics impact assessments on new and modified and pre-planned improvements, SE ECPs, Technical Directives, Design Change Notices, Source Maintenance & Recoverability (SM&R) Code changes and other documentation detailing recommendations for correction of SE performance and logistics deficiencies.

3.1.15.19. Originate, update and review SE information used in Support Equipment Recommendation Data (SERD), AUTOSERD, Support Equipment Requirements Management Information System (SERMIS) and other Government SE-related databases in consonance with the appropriate Weapon System Manager. The contractor shall submit database inputs and provide review comments. The contractor shall secure the proper level of SEMS access.

3.1.15.20. Access Government SE databases to generate SE ILS Management Reports.

3.1.15.21. Support SE LMs in developing Repair of Repairable and spare/material forecasts while utilizing Navy Inventory Control Point models to forecast dollar requirements.

3.1.15.22. Conduct site surveys and review available data to evaluate SE requirements, capabilities, availability, and supportability capabilities to provide logistics, maintenance planning, MPT, and supply support recommendations and accompanying documentation.

3.1.15.23. Review and assess contractor proposed changes in SE component reliability, maintainability, obsolescence or performance characteristics and develop or provide recommended changes to SE ILS planning documents such as Support Material Lists, Gross Requirements Lists, and Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD).

3.1.15.24. Participate in logistics-related meetings including logistics reviews, ILS Management Teams meetings, LSA/LMI reviews, Provisioning Guidance Conferences, telephone conferences, program reviews, procurement review planning conferences, site activation meetings and initial outfitting meetings and provide coordination with other government, Fleet users, FMS customers and industry representatives while providing inputs to ensure complete SE logistics support. The contractor shall participate in “Team Building” and Coordination Meetings, Briefings and other Information Exchanges to include specialized Government unique training, as directed by competent Government Authority in support of Acquisition Logistics requirements. Additionally, the contractor shall prepare and deliver briefing and presentation materials, charts, viewgraphs, document meeting minutes and other items needed to facilitate logistics presentations.

3.1.15.25. Analyze in-service SE reliability, maintainability and availability characteristics, project availability, identify Fleet readiness problems and supply support deficiencies. Associated metrics for SE shall be tracked and reported on to assist in Cost-Wise Readiness Improvements. This shall include preparing data base queries from NALDA and OARS, reports and briefings as required.

3.1.15.26. Conduct investigations and technical studies to identify the current status of pertinent Integrated Logistics Support elements affecting the overall maintenance programs for the systems and equipment. Identify problem areas and recommend corrective actions.

3.1.15.27. Review, assess and provide recommendations for possible changes to site support Integrated Logistics Support readiness including: Maintenance planning; Phased support; Manpower and personnel requirements; Initial provisioning and material support; Support equipment including Automatic Test Equipment; Training and training devices; Technical Data including computer resources support; Packaging, handling, storage and transportation; and Facilities, both Shore and Ship.

3.1.15.28. Review technical manuals and instructions for compliance with environmental policies, regulations and laws.

3.1.15.29. Provide technical support for the management of Support Equipment Recommendation Data (SERD) efforts. Includes but is not limited to creating, revising and reviewing SERDs, entering applicable data into AUTOSERD, tracking excess/deficit SE in Support Equipment Resources Management Information System (SERMIS) and creating unique queries in ACQ Access for program management, engineering and logistics personnel.

3.1.15.30. Review Source Data Revision Recommendations (SODARRS) and provide disposition recommendations.

3.1.15.31. Provide technical support for system/design requirements determination and SE acquisition. Support preparation of all acquisition documents for the procurement of new and modified SE end-items including technical specifications and Statements of Work (SOWs).

3.1.15.32. Provide on-site representative (OSRs) to support acquisition, site activation and design and development logistics tasks.

3.1.15.33. Attend and participate in design reviews, program reviews, Technical Coordinating Meetings (TCMs) and other designated meetings. The Contractor shall assist in the support of aircraft platform Fleet Support Team (FST) meetings, SE meetings, aircraft maintenance plan reviews and tool vendor meetings.

3.1.15.34. Be proficient in the utilization of information systems including LSA, APIMS, NATEC Website, NAVICP Asset Visibility and SERMIS.

3.1.15.35. Acquire and maintain access to both Government and prime contractor websites and databases as necessary to perform his/her duties.

3.1.15.36. Support the distribution of Support Equipment including the initial outfitting of Peculiar Support Equipment for Aircraft Platform Site Activations.

3.1.15.37. Support site standup requirements support in the design or evaluation of kitting and container layouts, compare tool list requirements and screen for stock numbered equivalents, assist in the design or evaluation of modified tool requirements, conduct vendor research, determine etching needs, develop and update schedules.

3.1.15.38. Provide personnel and support to assure the timely delivery of designated SE for Initial Outfitting / Site Activation purposes. Tasks shall include (but are not limited to):

3.1.15.39. Provide Technical Services for existing and future Foreign Military Sales Cases in support of ongoing Security Assistance Programs. Participate as Expert Technical Advisor to NAVAIR representatives at domestic and in country FMS Program meetings, reviews and site surveys.

3.1.15.40. Provide Pricing and Availability (P&A) data in System List Model (SLM) order for prospective Foreign Military Sales Cases. The Support Equipment Management System (SEMS) Database will be the principle criteria employed to develop P&A estimates.

3.1.15.41. Provide acquisition management support for items not conforming to standard Navy stocked items for existing and future Foreign Military Sales Cases, Site Activation and Stand-up.

3.1.15.42. Research, compile and correlate the technical data required to populate and update the Advanced System for Support Equipment Tracking (ASSET) Database. Extract, publish and distribute the ASSET Master Support Equipment Requirements List (MSERL) and the ASSET Acquisition Tracking Report (AATR). Prepare and provide a FMS Case sensitive Technical Data Package for all items contained within the ASSET database. This includes SERDs, Technical Manuals, Drawings, Vendors Catalogs and Item Descriptions.

3.1.15.43. Provide detailed “Technical Evaluation” of new and/or revised Support Equipment Recommendation Data (SERD) as it relates to FMS supported Weapon Systems acquisition.

3.1.15.44. Review, analyze and determine the depth and range of Engineering Change Proposals on FMS CASE Support Plans and provide documentation of completed analyses.

3.1.15.45. Prepare “Rough Draft” correspondence to answer inquiries, establish, and confirm FMS Case unique “Maintenance Philosophy” and to provide (Workaround) solutions for long-term situations that adversely influence FMS SE operational capabilities.

3.1.15.46. Research, evaluate and recommend alternate sources of procurement for Original Equipment Manufacturer “Out of Production” or “No Bid” Items and for developmental / prototype Items necessary to support unique FMS Case specific requirements.

3.1.15.47. Access and operate various computer programs resident on the Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI) and other remote database resources such as the Navy International Logistics Control Office, Master Information for International Logistics (MISIL) and Naval Inventory Control Point, Master Data File (MDF) resident on the Navy Logistics Network, to update and maintain current FMS related data.

3.1.15.48. Perform studies, analyses and evaluations related to computer software programs in use for the management of FMS database development and the configuration of automated computerized management.

3.1.16. MOBILE FACILITIES (MF) – the contractor shall:

3.1.16.1. Develop, integrate, test and evaluate Mobile Facilities (MF's) to include comprehensive technical support for the configuration, design, inventory, workload management and sustaining logistics/logistics engineering for all mobile facilities.

3.1.16.2. Design, develop and integrate new systems and/or components. Inventory management, tracking and life cycle management of these new systems and/or components worldwide shall be included.

3.1.17. METROLOGY AND CALIBRATION – the contractor shall:

3.1.17.1. Monitor, evaluate, track and report on Engineering Investigations, Product Quality Deficiency Reports, Hazardous Material Reports, Aircraft Inspection Discrepancy Reports, Depot work/rework and trouble reports.

3.1.17.2. Collect, analyze, evaluate and report on Local Engineering Specifications and Local Process Specifications.

3.1.17.3. Evaluate and recommend calibration and measurement requirements and implement Calibration and Measurement Requirements Summary reports.

3.1.17.4. Collect, analyze, evaluate and report on engineering specifications and local process specifications related to metrology and calibration requirements/support.

3.1.17.5. Interface with, liaison and assist elements of metrology/calibration in all phases of acquisition planning, estimating, requisitioning and tracking of reference Calibration Standards/equipment required to support aviation calibration activities.

3.1.17.6. Review, assess and provide support for development of, and possible changes to, calibration standards related documents, analyses, algorithms, data, inventory objectives, range/depth and technical measurement capabilities.

3.1.17.7. Evaluate reference calibration standards, calibration equipment, infrastructure, support processes and policies in terms of their effectiveness in meeting aviation readiness goals. Provide recommendations and methods of improvement.

3.1.17.8. Provide technical support for the management of commercial and organic technical data, documents and manuals which support the metrology and calibration program, including effective liaison with supporting organizations responsible for distribution to aviation activities (and others as required). This task includes electronic media and digitization of current and legacy documents.

3.1.17.9. Provide analysis, recommendations and implementation assistance for product line organizational structure and process reengineering required to meet high-level METCAL policy/guidance as required to support naval aviation engineering, logistics and maintenance.

3.1.17.10. Assess, develop, provide, review and evaluate metrology and calibration training strategies/plans, conduct skill assessments and training; including but not limited to, Integrated Learning Environment, Web Based Training, and Embedded Training.

3.1.17.11. Provide metrology technical support in program reviews. Propose technical program improvements based on engineering expertise, experience and judgment when appropriate or as opportunities arise. Contribute to strategic planning and identify initiatives when experience gained from participating in technical issue resolutions dictates. Provide support in planning and managing the execution of the metrology and calibration engineering and logistics programs.

3.1.17.12. Schedule equipment into global service centers and calibration laboratories for calibration and repair using MEASURE and direct interface with customer activities to determine…