N6833522R00960003_Proposal Submission Extension 2.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See Summary of Changes.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 14

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 14-Sep-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N6833522R0096

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

25-Jul-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Sep-2022

CODE

NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AD (LKE)

CODE 2.5.2.2 BLDG 562-3

HWY 547

LAKEHURST NJ 08733-5082

N68335 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6833522R0096

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0003

The purpose of this amendment is to provide responses to potential Offerors for the following:

1. Extend the proposal submission deadline until 24 October 2022 at 12:00 PM Eastern.

2. All CLINS (1016,2010,3010,4010,5010) and references (Section C Statement of Work, Section M) containing SERD 3982 P/N: 201415865-10 MPC/ NIPCU Fault Download Cable Set are hereby removed in their entirety from the solicitation.

3. Drawing(s) for Part Number 4055AS2500 were erroneously included in the Technical Data Package issue and is not a part of this solicitation.

4. Clarify the following questions:

a. Question: Can the government please provide drawings for PN: 950-002-40102-04 BAG,CABLE STORAGE, End article P/N:4055AS4700 and PN: 950-002-40105-04 BAG,CABLE STORAGE, End article P/N:4055AS2700?

Response: There is no stand-alone drawing for the bags. The bags are a piece-part of the entire cable set and are rendered on each of the assembly level drawings.

b. Question: There are three different delivery methods described in both solicitations – email, PIEE upload, and physical CD-ROMs via mail carrier. Can the government please confirm which delivery method Offerors should utilize?

Response: PIEE upload is the primary method of delivery for solicitation responses as per Section L Paragraph 4.1.

c. Question: Attachment 1- Past Performance Contract Data block 4 requires a contract number and block 6 references all related DOs/TOs. If utilizing an IDIQ as past performance, are Offerors to use the main IDIQ as its reference and incorporate all DOs under that past performance reference instead of referencing a single DO?

Response: If utilizing an IDIQ where all orders are recent and relevant for past performance for this effort, identify IDIQ number and specify ALL ORDERS, including order numbers. If only specific orders apply, identify by individual order.

d. Question: Can the government please clarify if there is a minimum and maximum number of past performance references that offers can utilize?

Response: Past Performance references minimum and maximum are at the discretion of the Offeror.

e. Question: Can we use a later version of MS Office then 2016 for the proposal format?

Response: Responses shall be submitted in MS Office 2016 IAW SECT L Para 2.1.2.

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 1016

The CLIN description has changed from MIPC/NIPCU FAULT DATA DOWNLOAD CABLE SET to

RESERVED.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

YEAR 1 PRICING: SERD 3982; P/N 201415865-10; Domestic Units-IAW the Statement of Work. Orders for this line item may be placed at any time at the discretion of the Government between date of contract award and one (1) year from date of contract award.QTY / PRICE1-5 / $6-10 / $11+ / $

To:

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 12.00 from 12.00 to 0.00.

The manufacturer part number 201415865-10 has been deleted.

CLIN 2010

RESERVED.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

YEAR 2 PRICING: SERD 3982; P/N 201415865-10; Domestic Units-IAW the Statement of Work. Orders for this line item may be placed at any time at the discretion of the Government between date of contract award and one (1)

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 1.00 from 1.00 to 0.00.

CLIN 3010

RESERVED.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

YEAR 3 PRICING: SERD 3982; P/N 201415865-10; Domestic Units-IAW the Statement of Work. Orders for this line item may be placed at any time at the discretion of the Government between date of contract award and one (1)

CLIN 4010

RESERVED.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

YEAR 4 PRICING: SERD 3982; P/N 201415865-10; Domestic Units-IAW the Statement of Work. Orders for this line item may be placed at any time at the discretion of the Government between date of contract award and one (1)

CLIN 5010

RESERVED.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

YEAR 5 PRICING: SERD 3982; P/N 201415865-10; Domestic Units-IAW the Statement of Work. Orders for this line item may be placed at any time at the discretion of the Government between date of contract award and one (1)

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

STATEMENT OF WORK

SERD 3982 P/N: 201415865-10 MPC/ NIPCU Fault Download Cable Set are hereby removed in their entirety from the Statement of Work.

STATEMENT OF WORK

FOR CABLES

FOR THE V-22 AIRCRAFT

1.0 SCOPE

This Statement of Work (SOW) covers the requirement for the manufacture, assembly, inspection, and delivery of various cables for the V-22 Aircraft identified in paragraph 2.0 Applicable Documents, below. Technical data items shall be on an as required basis and consist of Engineering Change Proposals, Request for Deviations, and Request for Waivers.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

Drawing Package for:

SERD P/N NOMENCLATURE NIIN

3718 3998AS100-1 1553 DBNT Interface Cable Set 01-599-1274

4053 4055AS7510-1 Blade Deice Distributor, AWTS TPS 01-673-1920

3978 3449AS520-2 Cable Set, Ice Protection 01-642-5610

4177 4055AS2700-1 Wiring Integration Assy 50, AWTS TPS 01-686-8567

4194 4055AS2800-1 Wiring Integrated Assembly (WIA) 56 01-686-8411

4241 4026AS870-1 Interface Adapter Cable Set, BLOS DBNT 01-692-1163

4159 4055AS2900-1 Wiring Interface Assy 57, AWTS TPS 01-676-6737

3999 4104AS0100-1 1553 Supplemental Interface Cable Set 01-643-5233

4234 4055AS4700-1 Wire Integration Assembly, 76-79 AWTS TPS 01-684-1279

3.0 REQUIREMENTS

3.1 General

The contractor shall manufacture, assemble, inspect/test as required in accordance with the drawings, and deliver various quantities of ten (10) items of SE in accordance with Government furnished drawing packages.

3.2 Production Deliveries Inspection

The contractor shall notify the NAVAIR Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to planned DCMA inspection/acceptance the opportunity to inspect, at the discretion of the NAVAIR TPOC, a quantity of one (1) of each item identified in Section B from every production delivery order to ensure continued compliance with the drawings and requirements of the contract.

3.3 Data Deliverables

All deliverable data items shall be provided in accordance with this SOW Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL), Exhibit A, Form DD1423, A001 through A003.

3.3.1Engineering Change Proposals (ECP), Deviations, and Waivers

When identified, the contractor shall submit to the government for approval recommendations for Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), CDRL A001, Request for Deviations, CDRL A002, and Request for Waivers, CDRL A003. The contractor is advised to consult MIL-HDBK-61 Configuration Management when contemplating submitting one of these configuration change requests. These change requests shall be prepared and submitted to the government IAW CDRLs.

3.4 Quality Assurance Program

The Contractor shall maintain a quality system that ensures that each piece of SE is manufactured in accordance with ISO 9001.

3.5 Item Unique Identification (IUID) Marking of US Military Property

In accordance with DFARS Clause 252.211-7003 Item Identification and valuation, the contractor is required to mark and register all end items and their components meeting the requirements called out in MIL-STD-130N. These include components for which the Governments unit acquisition cost is $5,000 or greater, or any component, subassembly or embedded part that is serially managed, mission essential or a controlled inventory item.

3.5.1 Construct and Method

Details on creating the UID and the marking method are contained in MIL-STD-130N. The UID may be either UID Construct #1 or Construct #2 with Construct #2 being the preferred method.

3.5.2 UID Location and Marking

The locations and marking methods selected should bear no impact on the performance of the part and minimal configuration change(s) to the part. The UID (including 2D Matrix) should be incorporated onto the data plate, in accordance with drawing 3909AS9999 Rev B. If the 2D matrix can't be incorporated onto the data plate, a 2D matrix sticker can be applied onto the main data plate provided it can be done without covering any critical data. When the 2D Data Matrix is placed directly onto the data plate, the Part Number, Serial Number and CAGE human readable characters are not required. If the above cannot be accomplished, a separate data plate can be attached which contains the 2D Matrix plus the human readable characters for the Part Number, Serial Number and CAGE. This added data plate should be attached in close proximity to the main data plate.

3.5.3 Permanency and Legibility

The UID marking and identification plates, tags, or labels when used on equipment, parts, assemblies, subassemblies, units, sets, or groups shall be permanent during the normal life expectancy of the item and be capable of withstanding the environmental test and cleaning procedures specified for the item. Legibility shall be as required for ready readability as per MIL-STD-130N.

3.5.4 UID Registration

The prime contractor has the responsibility to furnish Item Unique Identification (IUID) data to the IUID registry.

Data submission of IUID data and acquisition cost should be via Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF), IUID XML file, IUID flat file or web entry. Additional information regarding data submission as well as the actual marking can be found at <http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/UID/>.

3.5.5 Records

The contractor shall maintain an accurate, current list of UIDs for all manufactured items on this contract and supply to the government upon request. The list shall include P/N, Serial #, CAGE, UID Location, Construct used, how it was marked and the registration method used.

3.6 Packaging, Handling, Storage and Transportation

Packaging Requirements The contractor shall preserve and pack each item in accordance with ASTM D3951-18 (excluding paragraphs 4.2- 4.3) and require same by vendors and subcontractors (for materiel being shipped to the government).The use of loose fill materials, asbestos, excelsior, newspaper and shredded paper (all types) is prohibited. In addition, all Wood Packaging Materials (WPM) shall be heat treated or chemically treated in accordance with the requirements of the International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM) 15:2009, "Regulation of Wood Packaging Material in International Trade."

Marking Marking shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-129R. Additionally, special marking labels (fragile, delicate, etc.)

shall be applied to all unit, intermediate and shipping containers as an integral part of the total pack. The contractor shall select the appropriate special marking label (s) as additional means to protect the items during packaging, handling, storage, transit, and removal from the pack.

Transportation Transportability issues shall be identified and addressed to ensure all shipments can be transported with unrestricted movement via over-the-road transport. Transportability problem items shall be identified in accordance with MIL- STD-1366E criteria. Requirements for shipment of DOD materiel shall meet, as a minimum, the requirements of the following rules and regulations, as applicable to the mode of transportation in the Defense Transportation Regulation, DTR DOD 4500.9-R, Part II, Uniform Freight Classification Rules, National Motor Freight Classification Rules, and American Trucker’s Association Rules.

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1016 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

12 mths. ADC 12 DLA DISTRIBUTION SUSQUEHANNA PA

MV, RIC 5V2 MARK WESLEY

MECHANICSBURG RECEIVING WEST

5450 CARLISLE PIKE BLDG 402

MECHANICSBURG PA 17050-0789

732-323-1843 FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

SW310N

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

12 mths. ADC 0 DLA DISTRIBUTION SUSQUEHANNA PA

MV, RIC 5V2 MARK WESLEY

MECHANICSBURG RECEIVING WEST

5450 CARLISLE PIKE BLDG 402

MECHANICSBURG PA 17050-0789

732-323-1843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2010 has been changed from:

CAGE

12 mths. ADC 1 DLA DISTRIBUTION SUSQUEHANNA PA

MV, RIC 5V2 MARK WESLEY

MECHANICSBURG RECEIVING WEST

5450 CARLISLE PIKE BLDG 402

MECHANICSBURG PA 17050-0789

732-323-1843

CAGE

12 mths. ADC 0 DLA DISTRIBUTION SUSQUEHANNA PA

MV, RIC 5V2 MARK WESLEY

MECHANICSBURG RECEIVING WEST

5450 CARLISLE PIKE BLDG 402

MECHANICSBURG PA 17050-0789

732-323-1843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3010 has been changed from:

CAGE

12 mths. ADC 1 DLA DISTRIBUTION SUSQUEHANNA PA

MV, RIC 5V2 MARK WESLEY

MECHANICSBURG RECEIVING WEST

5450 CARLISLE PIKE BLDG 402

MECHANICSBURG PA 17050-0789

732-323-1843

MECHANICSBURG RECEIVING WEST

5450 CARLISLE PIKE BLDG 402

MECHANICSBURG PA 17050-0789

732-323-1843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 4010 has been changed from:

CAGE

12 mths. ADC 1 DLA DISTRIBUTION SUSQUEHANNA PA

MV, RIC 5V2 MARK WESLEY

MECHANICSBURG RECEIVING WEST

5450 CARLISLE PIKE BLDG 402

MECHANICSBURG PA 17050-0789

732-323-1843

CAGE

12 mths. ADC 0 DLA DISTRIBUTION SUSQUEHANNA PA

MV, RIC 5V2 MARK WESLEY

MECHANICSBURG RECEIVING WEST

5450 CARLISLE PIKE BLDG 402

MECHANICSBURG PA 17050-0789

732-323-1843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 5010 has been changed from:

CAGE

12 mths. ADC 1 DLA DISTRIBUTION SUSQUEHANNA PA

MV, RIC 5V2 MARK WESLEY

MECHANICSBURG RECEIVING WEST

5450 CARLISLE PIKE BLDG 402

MECHANICSBURG PA 17050-0789

732-323-1843

MECHANICSBURG RECEIVING WEST

5450 CARLISLE PIKE BLDG 402

MECHANICSBURG PA 17050-0789

732-323-1843

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION FACTORS

SERD 3982 P/N: 201415865-10 MPC/ NIPCU Fault Download Cable Set are hereby removed in their entirety from Section M.

PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION

1.0 GENERAL

The Government expects to select one Offeror on the basis of its proposal providing the “best value” to the Government using the lowest price technically acceptable method. "Best value" means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government's estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit(s) in response to the requirement.

The Offeror is advised that the Offeror proposing the lowest price and meeting the acceptability standards specified in the solicitation for non-price factors will be selected for award.

The proposal must demonstrate to the Government’s satisfaction that the Offeror will provide a program that will ensure the successful accomplishment of the solicitation requirements and overall program objectives.

Proposal information provided for one factor may be used to assess other factors if the Government deems it appropriate.

2.0 EVALUATION PROCESS

The Government intends to evaluate each proposal and award a contract without discussions. Therefore, Offerors are cautioned that their initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a technical, past performance and price standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions and request proposal revisions if it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government. When a competitive range is established, the Government may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. The Government may use information other than that provided by the Offeror in its evaluation, including past performance information and the results of questionnaires or site surveys.

Non-compliance with the terms, conditions, or requirements set forth in the solicitation will be considered a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. The Government may consider any exception or deviation to any term or condition of the RFP that is not expressly authorized by the RFP to be a deficiency. Additionally, any approach that relies on Government resources or operations (e.g., Government Furnished Property, Government Furnished Equipment, Government personnel/actions, Government Concept of Operation changes, etc.) in order to comply with a requirement, unless otherwise allowed, may be considered a deficiency. A proposal assessed with a deficiency or receives an Unacceptable rating will make the offer ineligible for award.

3.0 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Proposals shall be evaluated using the factors, which are listed below.

A. Technical B. Past Performance C. Cost/ Price

For the Technical factor, a Technical Rating will be assigned. If the proposed approach does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements it will result in the entire proposal being found unacceptable and ineligible for award based on initial proposals. The Technical Rating is an assessment of compliance with the solicitation requirements. For this solicitation there is no benefit to the Government of exceeding a requirement or by providing merit that enhances performance or operations. Therefore, no strengths will be assigned and only the Technical Rating definitions of Acceptable and Unacceptable will be used to relate the results of the evaluation. Offerors are advised that during the evaluation process, a technical factor with an “Unacceptable” Technical Rating will result in the entire proposal being found unacceptable and eliminated from the competition. A technical proposal must be found to be satisfactory in all areas to be considered technically acceptable and eligible for award.

For the Past Performance factor, a past performance rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable will be assigned. The past performance rating will address the probability that the Offeror will successfully accomplish the contract requirements based on the Offeror’s relevant past performance. In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “Acceptable.” Under Past Performance, the Government will evaluate how well an Offeror has performed similar work before. When proposals are received from contractor entities (e.g. teams, joint ventures) specifically formed to propose on a particular acquisition, the past performance evaluation will consider each individual team member.

Part B: SPECIFIC INFORMATION

1.0 TECHNICAL

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposal to determine if the Offeror’s proposal meets the minimum requirements specified under Technical in Section L of the solicitation.

Volume 1 Technical will be rated as follows: For the Technical factor, a Rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable will be assigned.

TECHNICAL EVALUATION RATINGS

Offerors are advised that during the evaluation process, a factor with an “Unacceptable” Rating will result in the entire proposal being found unacceptable and eliminated from the competition.

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Rating Description Acceptable The proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable The proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

2.0 PAST PERFORMANCE

There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy, and quality. The first aspect of the past performance is to evaluate the recency of the Offeror’s past performance being evaluated. Past performance will be considered recent if the contract/order has been performed within five years of the solicitation release date. Past Performance that is not recent will not be considered in the evaluation.

The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to evaluate how relevant the Past Performance being evaluated is to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will use the following aspects to determine relevancy for this evaluation: similarity between the support effort, complexity, scope, contract type, or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the source solicitation requirements; and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance.

The third aspect of the past performance evaluation is to evaluate the overall quality of the Offeror’s recent, relevant, past performance. The Government will evaluate the Offeror, principal subcontractors, and JV team members’ performance and focus its evaluation on the following areas:

1. Meeting technical requirements, i.e., the quality of technical performance;

2. Meeting schedule requirements, e.g., on time or late delivery;

3. Controlling contract cost;

4. Managing the contracted effort;

5. Regulatory compliance, and

6. The demonstrated systemic improvement actions taken to resolve past problems.

A separate quality rating will not be assigned, rather the past Performance Confidence Assessment rating is based on the Offeror’s overall record of past performance taking into account the recency, relevancy, and quality of performance.

2.1 EVALUATION RATINGS DEFINITIONS AND ASSESSMENT DEFINITIONS

Past Performance Ratings: The Government will employ the Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method described in the table below. In the case of an Offeror without a record of recent relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown or neutral past performance. In the context of acceptable/unacceptable, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

Past Performance Ratings Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

For the Past Performance factor, the Performance Confidence Assessment rating assignments reflect the Government’s confidence that the Offeror will successfully perform the solicitation’s requirements based on the Offeror’s recent, relevant past performance and systemic improvement.

3.0 COST/PRICE

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Price Volume for its proposed total price; price reasonableness; whether the total price and CLIN prices are within the anticipated budget; whether the Offeror’s proposed CLIN prices are balanced; and whether the Offeror completed the information requested in Section L.

Price Reasonableness: The techniques outlined in FAR 15.404-1(b)(2) will be utilized to ensure price reasonableness. Adequate price competition is expected. If, after receipt of a proposal, the Procuring Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition does not exist and a determination is made that none of the exceptions in FAR § 15.403-1(b) apply, the Offeror may be requested to provide certified cost and pricing data in accordance with FAR § 15.403-4.

Unbalanced Pricing: As required by FAR § 15.404-1(g)(2), the Government may determine that a proposal is unacceptable if the prices proposed are materially unbalanced between line items or subline items. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. A proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

This is not a cost or price realism analysis.

CLIN(s) PART

NUMBER

NOMENCATURE

1001, 2001, 3001, 4001, 5001

3998AS100-1 1553 DBNT INTERFACE CABLE SET

1002 3998AS100-1 FMS 1553 DBNT INTERFACE CABLE SET

1003, 2002, 3002, 4002, 5002

4055AS7510-1 BLADE DEICE DISTRIBUTOR, AWTS TPS

1004 4055AS7510-1 FMS BLADE DEICE DISTRIBUTOR, AWTS TPS

1005, 2003, 3003, 4003, 5003

3449AS520-2 CABLE SET, ICE PROTECTION

1006 3449AS520-2 FMS CABLE SET, ICE PROTECTION

1007, 2004, 3004, 4004, 5004

4055AS2700-1 WIRING INTEGRATED ASSY 50, AWTS TPS

1008 4055AS2700-1 FMS WIRING INTEGRATED ASSY 50, AWTS TPS

1009, 2005, 3005, 4005, 5005

4055AS2800-1 WIRING INTEGRATION ASSEMBLY (WIA) 56

1010 4055AS2800-1 FMS WIRING INTEGRATION ASSEMBLY (WIA) 56

1011, 2006, 3006, 4006, 5006

4026AS870 INTERFACE ADAPTER CABLE SET, BLOS DBNT

1012, 2007, 3007, 4007, 5007

4055AS2900-1 WIRING INTERFACE ASSY 57, AWTS TPS

1013 4055AS2900-1 FMS WIRING INTERFACE ASSY 57, AWTS TPS

1014, 2008, 3008, 4008, 5008

4104AS0100-1 1553 SUPPLEMENTAL INTERFACE CABLE

1015, 2009, 3009, 4009, 5009

4055AS4700-1 WIRE INTEGRATION ASSEMBLY, 76-79 AWTS

For evaluation purposes, the total evaluated price shall be the sum of all CLINS. The CLIN value will be based on the sum of the maximum quantity identified for each CLIN. The evaluation will not bind the Government to purchase any quantities beyond the minimum identified in the solicitation.

Part C: DEFINITIONS

1.0 OTHER EVALUATION DEFINITIONS

Recency

A measure of the time that has elapsed since the past performance or corporate experience reference occurred. Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance or corporate experience references are considered relevant. Past performance or corporate experience references that are older than 5 years from the due date of the proposal is not considered recent and therefore is not considered relevant. As it pertains to recent past performance, the more recent past performance references are considered better indicators of future performance.

Relevancy

A measure of the extent of similarity between the service/support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract/teaming or other comparable attributes of past performance or corporate experience examples and the source solicitation requirements; and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance or corporate experience is an indicator of future performance.

Completeness The adequacy of the price proposal, in relation to the SOW, considering whether all costs are included or accounted for. All SOW requirements must be included.

Deficiency A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. (FAR 15.001)

(End of Summary of Changes)