N6817118Q0013-0002.pdf

NAVSUP FLC SIGONELLA NAPLES OFFICE SHORE

BOX 50

VIALE F. RUFFO DI CALABRIA

CAPODICHINO

NAPOLI 80144

N6817118291C103

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment 0002 is to:

(a) Provide answ ers to questions received in response to RFQ N6817118Q0013 as follow s.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 25-Jun-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6817118Q0013

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

18-Jun-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

25-Jun-2018

CODE

NAVSUP FLC SIGONELLA NAPLES OFFICE SHORE

BOX 50

VIALE F. RUFFO DI CALABRIA

CAPODICHINO

NAPOLI 80144

N68171 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6817118Q0013

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Answers to potential offerors questions are attached herewith; they are provided for clarification and informational purposes only and do not amend the solicitation. If there is an inconsistency between the answers to these questions and the specification, the specification will prevail.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions, including the closing date of the solicitation remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

1. QUESTION: Can the Government confirm that this is a “best value” procurement as that term is define under the

FAR?

1. ANSWER: This is not a “best value” procurement but a comparative analysis procurement and will be evaluated in accordance with FAR Part 13.106-2(b)(3).

The Government will Utilize a Comparative evaluation process that:

(1) compares one quote with another in a uniform and fair manner to determine which quote best provides the

Government what it needs; and,

(2) assesses which quote is best as a whole.

(3) once a quote is found acceptable, it is compared side by side to the remaining ones, and the “best” one is chosen for award.

2. QUESTION: Of the 3 weighted evaluation factors: Can the Government identify the weight attributed to each factor?

2. ANSWER: None of the evaluation factors is weighted.

The following factors and Sub-Factors will be used to evaluate the quotes:

(i) Factor 1 – Technical Acceptability (Minimum Requirements)

Sub-Factor (1) – Current Company Certification of Employees’ Regular Contribution (Documento

Unico Regolarita` Contributiva (DURC));

Sub-Factor (2) – A Current Company certificate from the Chamber of Commerce for Dry Cleaning and

Laundry Services; and, Sub-Factor (3) - Written schedule of Italian Holidays which may affect normal delivery of laundry.

(ii) Factor 2 - Capabilities

N6817118Q0013

(iii) Factor 3 – Past Performance & Experience

(iv) Factor 4 – Price

Factors 1 will be evaluated for acceptability only. The comparative evaluation will include factors 2, 3, and 4.

3. QUESTION: Are the Factors each weighted equally, or is one factor more important than the others?

3. ANSWER: Evaluation factors are not weighted.

The following factors and Sub-Factors will be used to evaluate the quotes:

(i) Factor 1 – Technical Acceptability (Minimum Requirements)

Sub-Factor (1) – Current Company Certification of Employees’ Regular Contribution (Documento

Unico Regolarita` Contributiva (DURC));

Sub-Factor (2) – A Current Company certificate from the Chamber of Commerce for Dry Cleaning and

Laundry Services; and, Sub-Factor (3) - Written schedule of Italian Holidays which may affect normal delivery of laundry.

(ii) Factor 2 - Capabilities

(iii) Factor 3 – Past Performance & Experience

(iv) Factor 4 – Price

Factors 1 will be evaluated for acceptability only. The comparative evaluation will include factors 2, 3, and 4.

4. QUESTION: Must the Quoter/selected Contractor demonstrate his capabilities in performing 100% of all required contract services (i.e.: dry cleaning, minor repairing, laundering, ironing, wet washing, dyeing, pickup and delivery, etc.) with its own industrial laundry facility and staff personnel in accordance with the Statement of Work and best commercial practices?

4. ANSWER: This is a performance based contract for commercial services and Quoters shall use its best commercial practices in the performance of this contract.

5. QUESTION: Can the Quoter/selected Contractor enter a Subcontracting Agreement (Outsourcing) for the performance of all or portions of the required contract services? If so, please also advise and confirm the maximum allowed percentage of contract services that may be performed under Subcontracting (Outsourcing).

5. ANSWER: : 100% usage of subcontractors is allowable, this is a performance based contract for commercial services and Quoters shall use its best commercial practices in the performance of this contract.

(End of Summary of Changes)