J-13. Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).docx

DOCX document 30 KB Posted

Attached to
Site Visit Instructions for 1:00 PM ET Wednesday 16 Mar 2022. Construction - Warehouse Interior Modification. Demolish and construct walls, replace personnel and service doors, provide through-wall exhaust fans and louvers, and electrical.
Solicitation number
N66604-22-R-0230
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
J-11. DD Form 3150_Certification of Vaccination_v2_BLANK.pdf PDF
J-14. Indication of Interest_Optional.docx DOCX document
J-8. Use of Masks and Other Public Health Measures_OSD_2021-02-04.pdf PDF
J-1. Wage Determination RI20220001_Mod 3_2022-02-25.pdf PDF
J-9. Updated Mask Guidance for all DoD Installations_OSD_2021-07-28.pdf PDF
J-7. SECNAV Form 5512_NSNPT_2019-07.pdf PDF
J-5. List of Key Personnel_Fill-in by Offeror.docx DOCX document
J-4. Submittal Register_B47 R119_2021-03-10.xls XLS spreadsheet
J-10. DOD Guidance for COVID-19 Vaccination_2021-12-20.PDF PDF
J-12. COVID-19 Screening Questionnaire_NUWCDIVNPT_2022-02-10.pdf PDF
J-6. Visitor Request Instructions and Information Needed_2021-08.pdf PDF
J-2. B47 Rm 119_Specifications_2021.03.10.pdf PDF
J-1. Wage Determination RI20220001_Mod 0_2022-01-07.pdf PDF
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

N66604-22-R-0230

Source Selection Past Performance Questionnaire

Building 47 Room 119 Warehouse Modifications

Solicitation (or Contract Number) N66604-22-R-0230

[WHEN FILLED IN]

Controlled By: Department of the Navy Controlled By: NUWCDIVNPT Code 02 CUI Category: SSEL Distribution/Dissemination Control: FED ONLY POC: Joseph Scarpa, NUWCDIVNPT, Code 0232

Past Performance Questionnaire

[TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR ON N66604-22-R-0230:]

Contract/ Order Information:

Name of Firm/Contractor:

Contract/ Order Number:

Prime Contractor or Subcontractor on Reference:

Pricing Arrangement (Firm Fixed Price, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, etc.):

Project Title/Description of Work:

Value/Dollar Amount of Contract/ Order or Subcontract:

Period of Performance/Completion Date(s):

[TO BE COMPLETED BY THE EVALUTING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE:]

1. Respondent/Agency Information:

Firm/Agency:

Name of Respondent/ Agency Representative:

Title:

Phone No:

Email:

2. Past Performance: In order for the Government to review and assess the contractor’s past performance rating, please use the following ratings when filling out this questionnaire to describe the offeror’s performance on the referenced contract/ order:

Rating
Definition
Note
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify multiple significant events and state how they were of benefit to the Government. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the Government. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract/order. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. A fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be evaluated with a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract/order.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
To justify Marginal performance, identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency report or letter).
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency reports, or letters).
Unknown
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

If you have rated this contractor on this particular contract or project in CPARS or some other evaluation system accessible to the Government, you may indicate the past performance information on this contract/ order is available in the appropriate system and include a copy of that rating in lieu of the following questionnaire.

3. Technical (Quality of Product or Service)

a. Overall performance of the contractor.

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

NARRATIVE:

b. Overall quality of the product/service delivered.

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

c. Contractor meet the original specification/performance requirements?

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

d. Contractor was cooperative and receptive to customer concerns affecting production and/or performance requirements (i.e. addressed problems in a timely manner, corrective action requires and quality deficiency reports were answered, etc.)

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

4. Schedule/Timeliness

a. Contractor managed scheduling and deadlines of the contract (i.e. reports due, meeting attendance, delivery or services, etc.)

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

b. Identified problems in a timely manner (i.e. to avoid unnecessary schedule delays, impacts to schedule performance or delivery)

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

c. Contractor responded to emergency/surge requirements in a timely manner.

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

5. Cost Control

a. Contractor was effective in controlling costs.

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

6. Management

a. Overall performance of the management team.

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

b. Contractor provided competent program/project manager, supervisors and workers.

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

c. Contractor effectively managed requirements (i.e. weapons, uniforms, training material, etc. per the Statement of Work)

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

d. Contractor effectively managed documentation (i.e. planning documentation, instructions, policies, training, certifications, etc.)

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

e. Contractor successfully managed subcontractors?

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

7. Other Areas of Consideration

a. Contractor maintained a professional working relationship.

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

b. Contractor was committed to customer satisfaction.

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

c. Overall customer satisfaction.

|_| Exceptional
|_|

Very Good

|_|Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_|Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown
|_| N/A

d. Would your organization recommend this contractor for other contracts?

|_| Yes |_| No

e. Additional Comments:

v1.2_ JUNE 2021 Page 7 of 7

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .