N6660420Q0048 Amendment 1.pdf

1300817314

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to extend the closing date of the soliciation.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 11-Dec-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N6660420Q0048

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Oct-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

11-Dec-2019

CODE

NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER

ALEXANDER OLARTE, CODE 0224,

CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT

1176 HOWELL STREET, BLDG. 1258

NEWPORT RI 02841-1708

N66604 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6660420Q0048

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The performance period code Mandatory has been added.

The contractor period of performance end date has decreased by 30 days from 120 days to 90 days.

The required performance has changed from Project Title: Removal and Replacement of Fire, Flood, and H2S systems.Project Description: he contractor shall provide all materials, equipment, labor and supervision required for the removal and replacement of fire, Flood, and H2S systems as indicated in the Statement of Work, drawings, and specifications. The magnitude of the requirement per FAR 36.204, is between $100,000 and $250,000.The proposal is due by 29 November 2019, 2:00 PM Local Time. This project is a total small business set aside. NAICS Code 236220 with a corresponding size standard of $39.5 Mil and FSC of Z2AZSite visit is schedule for 12 November @ 11:00 AM local time. See base requirements located in the supplemental instructions of this solicitation.Award will be made to the offeror submitting the lowest price technically acceptable quote. In order to be determined technically acceptable, offeror must submit a technical capability statement outlining their experience and capability to complete the project identified in the Statement of Work (SOW). Additionally, offeror must provide a brief narrative describing how they will accomplish the SOW task.IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT YOU ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR VISIT REQUEST AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE POSSIBLE. SEE PAGE 37.

to Project Title: Removal and Replacement of Fire, Flood, and H2S systems.Project Description: he contractor shall provide all materials, equipment, labor and supervision required for the removal and replacement of fire, Flood, and H2S systems as indicated in the Statement of Work, drawings, and specifications. The magnitude of the requirement per FAR 36.204, is between $100,000 and $250,000.The proposal is due by 07 January 2020, 2:00 PM Local Time.

This project is full and open. NAICS Code 236220 with a corresponding size standard of $39.5 Mil and FSC of Z2AZSite visit is schedule for 24 December 2019 @ 11:00 AM local time. See base requirements located in the supplemental instructions of this solicitation.Award will be made to the offeror submitting the lowest price technically acceptable quote. In order to be determined technically acceptable, offeror must submit a technical capability statement outlining their experience and capability to complete the project identified in the Statement of Work (SOW). Additionally, offeror must provide a brief narrative describing how they will accomplish the SOW task.IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT YOU ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR VISIT REQUEST AS SOON AS

PRACTICABLE POSSIBLE. SEE PAGE 37..

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

L-237-W001 PREBID/PREPROPOSAL SITE VISIT (NAVSEA) (DEC 2018)

(a) The Contracting Officer will conduct a site visit at SENECA LAKE SONAR TEST FACILITY DRESDEN, NY. All prospective offerors are urged to attend this site visit. Offerors attending the site visit will meet at the following time and location to be escorted to the site:

location to be escorted to the site:

Date: 24 December 2019 Time: 11:00 AM Location: 50 Main Street Dresden, NY 14441

See attachment (2) for site visit instructions. Access requests missing Name, DOB, or SSN will not be processed. Use Dobbertin Englebert, englebert.dobbertin@navy.mil, (315) 536-4280, as “Sponsor”. Send requests 5 business days in advance (for 24 December 2019 site visit, send requests by no later than 17 December 2019).

Pre Site Visit requirements: All visitors must show valid photo identification to enter. (see visit request instruction). All visitors must be U.S. citizens. All site visitors are required to be approved by the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Security for entry. (see visit request instruction, provided as an attachment 2).

(b) Offerors who plan to attend shall submit a visit request at least 5 days prior to the visit. Offerors shall comply with the base access requirements specified elsewhere specified in the solicitation to gain access to the site.

(c) A copy of the visit request shall be forwarded to the Contract Negotiator via e-mail at: alexander.olarte@navy.mil

(d) Offerors shall not ask questions relative to the solicitation during the site visit. All questions shall be submitted as specified elsewhere in this solicitation.

(e) Attendees shall abide by the following rules:

(1) No cameras, tape recorders, or other reproduction devices are allowed. Cell phones with camera capability are permitted in unclassified areas only. The WiFi and Bluetooth must be disabled. No photography is permitted at any time. No hard copies of any Government documents (maps, hand-outs, etc.) shall be provided to offerors. Offerors are restricted to note-taking.

(2) No explanation, remarks, or replies made by Government representatives in response to any inquiries during the Site Visit shall be construed as changing the terms or conditions of the solicitation. The definitive treatment of any such problems or questions shall be by formal solicitation amendment. Only the Contracting Officer can change the solicitation requirements.

(3) Each visitor shall be required to sign in and sign out on the visit, and must stay with the site visit group at all times. No other meetings or discussions with Government personnel shall be permitted.

(4) The Government reserves the right to inspect all material, briefcases, etc., entering or leaving Government facilities.

(5) Only advance substitutions of offeror personnel are permitted.

OFFERORS NOT COMPLYING WITH THESE RULES AND PROCEDURES MAY BE PRECLUDED FROM

FURTHER SITE VISIT PARTICIPATION.

ATTACHMENTS TO THIS SOLICITATION

Attachment 1 – Statement of Work / Specification Attachment 2 – FY20 Base Access Request

Attachment 3 – General Decision

Attachment 4 - Navy Issuances

4A. NAVSEA Drawing 436-8797656 Fire/Flood ALM SYS INSTL 4B. NAVSEA Drawing 436-8797657 H2S Alarm INSTL

Attachment 5 – Industry Standards 5A. MIL-STD-1310H, Shipboard Bonding, Grounding, and Other Techniques for Electromagnetic

Compatibility, Electromagnetic Pulse (Emp) Mitigation, and Safety 5B. NAVSEA STD Item 009-32, Cleaning and Painting Requirements 5C. COE-EM-385-1-1, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Safety and Health Requirements Manual

(End of provision)

PROPOSAL DUE DATE: 07 January 2020 AT 2:00 PM(ES) ALL PROPOSALS WILL BE SENT VIA EMAIL

TO:

Alexander Olarte Contract Specialist, Code 0221 Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Newport Newport, RI 02841 Alexander.olarte@navy.mil 401.832.2648

QUESTIONS/INQUIRIES:

SECONDARY POC:

Leslie Brazil Contract Specialist, Code 0221 Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Newport Newport, RI 02841 leslie.brazil@navy.mil 401.832.2907

NOTE: Deadline for Questions in regards to RFP is 31 December 2019 at 11:00 am, Eastern local time. Inquiries Shall Be Addressed to Alexander Olarte

IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT YOU ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR VISIT REQUEST PROCESSING AND

RECOMMEND THAT YOU BEGIN THE PROCESS AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE UPON RECEIPT OF THIS

SOLICITATION.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION FACTORS

1.0 BASIS FOR AWARD

1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION

(a) Award will be made to the responsible Offeror whose proposal meets all requirements of the solicitation (technically acceptable) and presents the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP) within each of the two lots. The Government will separately evaluate each of the Lots on an Lowest Price Techically Acceptable (LPTA) basis which might result in a split award with award of Lot 1 to one offeror and an award of Lot 2 to a different offeror, if different offerors are the LPTA offeror for each lot.

(b) The Government intends to award a contract without discussions (except for clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)), as permitted by FAR 15.305(a) (3) and FAR 52.215-1. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions to permit Offerors to revise their proposals.

1.2 FACTORS

The following table establishes all significant factors that will be considered in awarding the Contract:

FACTORS

1. Technical Capability

2. Past Performance

The source selection will be made on a Low Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) basis. Award will be made to the lowest priced offeror that is technically acceptable.

2.0 NON-PRICE FACTORS

2.1Technical Factors

The Government will evaluate offers and assign one of the adjectival ratings indicated in provision UW M-2-0001 for each of the following non-price factors, included in Section L? provision UW L-2-0001.

2.2 Factor 1: Technical Capability:

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s capability in producing Underwater Fiber Optic SONAR cables that meet the following minimum evaluation considerations:

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s capability statement outlining their experience in removal and replacement of fire, Flood, and H2S system.

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s brief narrative describing how they will accomplish the SOW task.

2.2 Factor 2: Past Performance:

Past performance is a measure of the degree to which the Offeror satisfied its customers in the past. The past performance evaluation assesses the degree of confidence the Government has in an Offeror’s ability to supply products and services that meet users’ needs based on a demonstrated record of performance. The Government may consider past performance information contained in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) and the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). The Government may also use other information such as Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or other data available from Government sources to evaluate an Offeror’s past performance. The Government reserves the right to limit or expand the number of references it decides to contact, and contact references other than those provided by the Offeror. The Government may consider past performance information obtained from sources other than those identified by the Offeror, including Federal, State, and local Government agencies, Better Business Bureaus, published media and electronic databases. In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

4.0 ADJECTIVAL RATINGS

(a) The Government will perform an evaluation of the non-cost evaluation factors and subfactors based on the Offeror’s proposal. This evaluation focuses on aspects of the offerors proposal that meets or fails to meet the government’s minimum requirements, resulting in the assignment of an adjectival rating for each factor. Price will not be assigned an adjectival rating.

(b) Technical Rating: The following combined technical ratings include consideration of aspects of the offeror’s proposal that meet or do not meet the government’s minimum requirements.

The following adjectival ratings/descriptions in Table 1 shall be used for the Technical Capability evaluation factors and subfactors:

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

(c) Past Performance Evaluation.

(1) The past performance evaluation results in an assessment of the Offeror's probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each Offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract’s requirements. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a) (2), the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor’s performance shall be considered. These are combined to establish one performance confidence assessment rating for each offeror.

There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy (including context of data), and quality (including general trends in contractor performance and source of information).

The first is to evaluate the recency of the Offeror’s past performance as defined in Section 2.2 above. Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant, and is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information.

The second is to determine how relevant a recent effort, accomplished by the offeror, is to the effort to be acquired, through the source selection. In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration should be given to those aspects of an Offeror’s history of contract (or subcontract) performance that would provide the most context and give the greatest ability to measure whether the offeror will successfully satisfy the current requirement.

Common aspects of relevancy include, but are not limited to, the following: similarity of product/service/support, complexity, dollar value, contract type, use of key personnel (for services), and extent of subcontracting/teaming.

There are two (2) levels of relevancy as shown below. With respect to relevancy, more relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

Rating Description Relevant Present/past performance effort involved aspects of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

The third aspect of the past performance evaluation is to establish the overall quality of the Offeror’s past performance (see FAR 15.304(c) (2)). The past performance evaluation conducted in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the Offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts. The Government will review all past performance information collected and determine the quality of the Offeror’s performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information and incorporate these into the performance confidence assessment. The past performance confidence assessment rating is based on the Offeror’s overall record of recency, relevancy, and quality of performance.

For an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonable assigned, the offeror shall be determined to have a neutral rating and shall be considered “acceptable.”

Past Performance Adjectival Rating.

Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Definitions:

Relevancy, as it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the extent of similarity between the service/support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract/teaming or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the solicitation requirements; and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance.

(End of Summary of Changes)