r_17-01915.pdf

..fl'llW~

JUSTIFICATION FOR AN EXCEPTION TO FAIR OPPORTUNITY T#'

SysJem$ Cen/G'

ATLANTIC

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING JUSTIFICATION, AS Contracting Officer, SP A WARSYSCEN Atlantic, , I HEREBY

APPROVE THE EXCEPTION TO FAIR OPPORTUNITY (FOE) PURSUANT TO FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i) (D) Minimum Guarantee

CONTRACT NUMBER(S) I CRM RESERVATION# I TASK ORDER (TO) NUMBER(S) I ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUE

N65236-13-D-4895 17-01915 TBD $143,000.00

1. AGENCY AND CONTRACTING ACTIVITY. Department of the Navy, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center (SPAWARSYSCEN) Atlantic.

2. NATURE/DESCRIPTION OF ACTION(S).

This is a Fair Opp01tunity Exception (FOE) which supports SPAW AR Atlantic Code 521BO technical refresh and accreditation for LENEL ONGUARD Access Control and Intrusion Detection System equipment and integration into the Local and Regional Alarm Monitoring Automation Systems (LAMAS/RAMAS) for . This FOE will satisfy the minimum guarantee against contract N65236-13-D-4895.

3. DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES/SERVICES.

This request is for BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services (BAE Systems) to provide the follow on effort to complete LENEL OnGuard syste1n installation and cutover, training, and System Operation and Verification Testing (SOVT) in accordance with 100% installation design package. Per recent NA VF AC validation protocol changes, the system will require three additional sets of scans, STIGs, and windows updates to support the Risk Management Framework paperwork updates for an Authority to Operate (ATO). The LENEL OnGuard system servers, workstations, and components have been procured, integrated, scanned, and hardened with the RMF paperwork for submission to NA VF AC. The LENEL On Guard system will integrate into NAS Jacksonville's I~ocal Alatm Monitoring Auton1ation System (LAMAS) to receive intrusion detection alarms from per Commander of Naval Installations Command Security Forces requirements. If the system is not allowed to connect to the LAMAS system, then potentially put the at a security risk. This effort is for a Period of Perfonnance of 9 months.

4. IDENTIFICATION OF EXCEPTION TO FAIR OPPORTUNITY.

D (a) The agency's need for supplies or services is so urgent that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays.

D (b) Only one awardee is capable of providing the supplies or services at the level of quality required because the supplies or services ordered are unique or highly specialized.

D (c) The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency, because it is a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order.

[Z] (d) It is necessary to place an order to satisfy a minimum guarantee.

JUSTIFICATION:

The JPS contract N65236-12-D-4814 task order 0011 was awarded 29 September 2016 with a 1 year Period ofperformance (PoP.

The N65236-12-D-4814 base contract expired 31 March 2017 without a PoP extension to exceed 29 October 2017. Work that can not be completed under N65236-12-D-4814 will be descoped and issued as a new order under N65236-13-D-4895. This Task Order is installing, scanning, training, system integration and cut-over, and SOVT of the LENEL OnGuard for building 934 restricted areas. Also, the system has been procured, configured, scanned, risk 1nitigations, and approved in support of completing the STEPS for an Authority to Operate per Risk Management Framework instruction. BAE Systems, Inc developed, configured, supported, and completed the actions as the Information Security System Engineer (ISSE), NA VF AC RMF team member, to. support Naval validator per task order 001 l as well as the configuration and operation ofLENEL equipment for integration into the existing LAMAS System.

5. DETERMINATION OF FAIR AND REASONABLE COST.

The proposals will be analyzed in accordance with FAR 15.404. It is anticipated that the government \Vill use various cost/price analysis techniques, including but not limited to: (1) comparison of proposed prices to historical prices paid; (2) cornparisori of proposed prices with independent government cost estimate amounts; and (3) comparison of proposed prices obtained through market research for the same or similar items, such that the anticipated cost to the government will be fair and reasonable.

6. ANY OTHER FACTS SUPPORTING THE JUSTIFICATION.

None.

EXCEPTION TO FAIR OPPORTUNITY (Rev. 08/17) Adobe L1veCycle Designer ES4 v11.0 CMID#: SSCA_20_ TEMPL_00009_JustificationExceptionFair0pportunity _ 1.00

I I I ll i

II

:1 Ii

I

FAIR OPPORTUNITY EXCEPTION

CONTRACT NUMBER(S)

N65236-13-D-4895 I

CRM RESERVATION#

17-01915 I

TASK ORDER (TO) NUMBER(S) I ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUE

TBD $143,000.00

7. ACTIONS TAKEN TO REMOVE OR OVERCOME BARRIERS THAT LEAD TO THE EXCEPTION TO FAIR OPPORTUNITY.

SPAW ARSYSCEN Atlantic is continuously reviewing data on the industry and commercial products that provides similar products/ services. Should other acceptable sources become known that meet the Government's unique needs, appropriate action to ensure full and open competition will be taken. The solicitation that was used to av.,rard the base contract was publicized on FedBizOpps and awarded on a competitive basis. Other than the situation described herein, future orders under the multiple award contract will be competitive to the maximum extent possible.

TECHNICAL AND REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION

! certify that the facts and representatioris under my cognizance, which are included in this justification, and which form a basis for the justification, are complete and accurate.

SUB-PORTFOLIO LEAD /TIER 2 OR DELEGATE (Last, First, M0 SUB-PORTFOLIO LEAD /TIER 2 OR DELEGATE SIGNATURE

NOTE: If FOE is for services, COR must acknowledge by signing this document.

COR NAME (Last, First, Ml)

CONTRACTING OFFICER:

I certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(i,'. Approval I (',Disapproval (Requirement is S$700K) (",: Review Only (Requirement is >$700K)

CONTRACTING OFFICER SIGNATURE CONTRACTING OFFICER NAME (Last, First, M0

Luna, Jacqueline M. LUNAJACQUELINE.M.122985951 ---·--·-.. .. 6 ;::;:~;-;~:.~~-- .......... ._.,,...,""'"'"""'~"'"'''"

ACTIVITY COMPETITION ADVOCATE (SSC Atlantic 2.012.0A)

(':·.Approval I (':i Disapproval (Requirement is :S$13.5M)

CONTRACTS TIER I or DEPUTY NAME (Last, First, Ml)

2.0 DIRECTOR OF CONTRACTS

(>Approval I C, Disapproval (Requirement is S$93h1)

2.0 DIRECTOR OF CONTRACTS NAME (Last, First, M0

EXCEPTION TO FAIR OPPORTUNITY (Rev. 08/17)

("'Review Only (Requirement is >$13.5M)

CONTRACTS TIER I or DEPUTY SIGNATURE

{,, Review Only (Requirement is >$93M)

2.0 DIRECTOR OF CONTRACTS SIGNATURE

CMID#: SSCA_20_ TEMPL_00009_JustificationExceptionFair0pportunity _ 1.00 Page 2 of4

N65236-13-D-4895

NAVY SENIOR PROCUREMENT EXECUTIVE

I

CRM RESERVATION#

17-01915

('1 Approval J C-\ Disapproval (Requirement is >$93M)

NAVY SENIOR PROCUREMENT EXECUTIVE NAME (Last, First. MD

EXCEPTION TO FAIR OPPORTUNITY (Rev. 08/17)

ITASK ORDER (TO) NUMBER(S) I ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUE

TBD $143,000.00

NAVY SENIOR PROCUREMENT EXECUTIVE SIGNATURE

Page 3 of4 CMID#: SSCA_20_ TEMPL_00009_JustificationExceptionFair0pportunity _ 1.00

N65236-13-D-4895 I

CRM RESERVATION#

17-01915

TASK ORDER (TO) NUMBER(S) !ESTIMATED DOLLAR VALUE

TDD $143,000.00

INSTRUCTION PAGE

Purpose of Form: Pursuant to FAR 16.505, each order exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold shall be placed on a competitive basis, unless there is justification for an exception to fair opportunity and is supported by a written determination. The SW4200/10 Fair Opportunity Exception serves as the written determination approved at the appropriate signature level determined by FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i).

Who Signs the Form I Form Required Signatures:

- Contracting Officer Representative (COR) signature required on Services FOEs certifying the facts and representations included in the justification, which form a basis for the justification, are complete and accurate. Per the SPAWAR Contracts Policy Procedure Manual (SCPPM), the COR recommends the FOE.

- Sub-Portfolio Leadffier II (or delegate) signature required certifying the facts and representations included in the justification, which form a basis for the justification, are complete and accurate. Per the SPAWAR Contracts Policy Procedure Manual (SCPPM), the individual with technical and requirements cognizance is required to sign approving the FOE. If the FOE is for Competency Work, the Competency Tier II (or delegate) is required to sign approving the FOE.

- $0 - $700,000: Contracting Officer, (cite activity).

- - The Contracting Officer signature is required on all FOEs serving as the approval of the FOE for all actions procurement actions up to $700K.

Form Conditional Signatures:

- Over $700,000 - $13.5 million: Activity Competition Advocate (SSC Atlantic 2.0/2.0A). The Procuring Activity Competition Advocate signature is required on all FOEs serving as the approval of the FOE for all procurement actions up to $13.5M.

- Over $13.5 million - $93 million: 2.0 Director for Contracts, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command.

- - The Director for Contracts, Space and Nava! Warfare Systems Command signature is required on all FOEs serving as the approval of the FOE for all procurement actions up to $93M.

- Over $93 million: Navy Senior Procurement Executive.

- - The Navy Senior Procurement Executive signature is required on all FOEs serving as the approval of the FOE for all procurement actions up to $93M.

Number of Copies Required: 1

When and Where To Submit: Submit after Sub-Portfolio Leadffier ll(Or Delegate) reviews to the Deputy Executive Director (OED) for approval.

EXCEPTION TO FAIR OPPORTUNITY (Rev. 08117) Page 4 of 4 CMID#: SSCA _20 _ TEMPL_ 00009 _Justification Exception FairOpportu nity _ 1.00