Amendment 0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to (1) respond to vendor questions and note Government responses and (2) extend the proposal due date to 11 May 2023.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 18-Apr-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N6449822R4066

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17-Jun-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

18-Apr-2023

CODE

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER PHILA

CODE 0232, FRANCIS BRADY

215-897-7821, FRANCIS.J.BRADY@NAVY.MIL

5001 SOUTH BROAD STREET

PHILADELPHIA PA 19112

N64498 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6449822R4066

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 27-Apr-2023 05:00 PM to 11-May-2023 05:00 PM.

The following have been added by full text:

RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS

1. Vendor Question:

Our interpretation is a single First Article inspection is required for each assembly per AS9102. Please confirm that this item and SOW section 3.1.4 is First Article Inspection and not an AS9102 inspection of each unit.

Government’s Response: The government confirms there will be a single First Article inspection for each assembly per AS 9102.

2. Vendor Question:

Language in 3.1.5.2 conflicts with language in Procedure. Section 3.1.5.2 states “acceptance Testing based on procedures as outlined in Attachment 1 Hardware Design Verification Test (DVT) Procedure”. The Hardware Design Verification Test (DVT) Procedure defines the recurring production testing as:

“Shaded cells in Table 3-1” while the SOW section 3.1.5.2 language indicates that the recurring acceptance testing shall be the entire DVT test, that is, all tests in Table 3-1.

The Hardware Design Verification Test (DVT), Section 3, ETCU Test Procedure, 3.1 Table of Tests states:

Table 3-1 provides a list of the regression tests to be performed on the GEN 2 system. Formal testing may follow the sequence listed in this table although the individual tests have been designed to allow tests to be run in any order selected. Shaded cells in Table 3-1 indicate tests performed during both GEN 2 and recurring production test.”

Are we correct in our understanding that the ETCU and LRU Sled Assembly acceptance testing is as specified in the Gen 2 (N64498-19-D-4016 IDIQ) Regression Hardware Test Procedure, as indicated by the grey shaded sections in table 3-1, and NOT intended to be full DVT testing on each unit?

Government Response: Paragraph 3.1.5.2 of the SOW (Acceptance Testing) shall be used.

3. Vendor Question: Please confirm section 3.2 of the statement of work is “N/A”

Government’s Response: The government confirms this paragraph is not applicable

4. Vendors Question:

CLIN0002 and CLIN0003:

Inspection at destination is not practical as shipping time, transfer time from loading dock to lab, and scheduling of personnel to perform inspection and testing would dramatically add to individual delivery schedule times. Wo8iuld the government consider changing the Inspection and acceptance criteria to the following?

FROM: Inspect at Destination, Accept at Destination TO: Inspect at Origin, Accept at Origin

Government Response: The government revised the requirement to be inspect at origin and accept at destination

5. Vendors Questions:

The TDPs provided are not the latest revs for the part numbers solicited. Please confirm if we should provide a proposal based on the below TDP revs instead of what was provided with the solicitation:

ETCU: TK2013200, Rev P Sled: TK2013201, Rev G

Governments Response: TDP Revisions for TK2013200, Rev P and Sled: TK2013201, Rev G are redline revisions that the government has not finalized. The TDP reference in the solicitation is the latest revision to date and should be utilized when developing a proposal.

SECTION E - INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

The Acceptance/Inspection Schedule for CLIN 0002 has been changed from:

INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

Destination Government Destination Government

To:

Origin Government Destination Government

The Acceptance/Inspection Schedule for CLIN 0003 has been changed from:

Destination Government Destination Government

To:

Origin Government Destination Government

(End of Summary of Changes)