BNJ_Redacted.pdf
PDF 248 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Michell Transmitter Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6426725Q4200
About this file
This document is a Brand Name/Sole Source Justification form for procuring specific transmitters for a Navy project. The procurement involves two Michell brand transmitters: SF82-TX-B3-C2-D1-E2 (Transmitter, SF82) and EA2-TX-M12-B3-C1-D1 (Transmitter, EA2), along with shipping. The justification is based on the specific design requirements of the 123SFL90110-1 Pressure Swing Adsorber (PSA) Test Bench, which was originally designed to use these exact transmitter models. The Corona Division indicates that deviating from these specific transmitters would compromise the test stand's approved specifications and configuration. The existing transmitters, owned by the Navy, are no longer functional and beyond economical repair. The document also notes that procuring alternative brands would result in unacceptable delays and potential waste of government funds, and the division has no current plans to compete future contracts for these supplies.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Combined Synopsis Solicitation N6426725Q4200_Redacted.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1 | 4
REV 11-2023
BRAND NAME/SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION (SAM)≤ SAT
LIMITED-SOURCES JUSTIFICATION (GSA)≤ SAT
JUSTIFICATION FOR AN EXCEPTION TO FAIR OPPORTUNITY
(ID/IQ TASK ORDER/DELIVERY ORDER)≤ SAT
1. Description of Supplies/Services.
PART # DESCRIPTION
SF82-TX-B3-C2-D1-E2 Transmitter, SF82 EA2-TX-M12-B3-C1-D1 Transmitter, EA2 N/A Shipping
The requested supplies services represent the minimum requirements of the Government, which have been verified by the certifying technical and requirements personnel.
2. Regulatory Authority Permitting Other Than Full and Open Competition.
SAM
FAR 13.106-1(b)(i) Soliciting from a single source
FAR 13.106-1(b)(ii) Particular brand-name item
GSA
FAR 8.405-6(a)(i)(1)(A) An urgent and compelling need exists
FAR 8.405-6(a)(i)(1)(B) Only one source is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized
FAR 8.405-6(a)(i)(1)(C) In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a logical follow-on to an original Federal Supply Schedule order provided that the original order was placed in accordance with the applicable Federal Supply Schedule ordering procedures (the original order or BPA must not have been previously issued under sole-source or limited-sources procedures).
FAR 8.405-6 (b) Items peculiar to one manufacturer (brand-name item)
ID/IQ Task Order/Delivery Order (e.g. NASA SEWP or ARMY CHESS) FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(A) The agency need for the supplies or services is so urgent that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays.
FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(B) Only one awardee is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services ordered are unique or highly specialized
2 | 4
FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(C) The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency because it is a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order. [When utilizing this exception, the rationale shall describe why the relationship between the initial order and the follow-on is logical (e.g., in terms of scope, period of performance, or value).]
FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(D) It is necessary to place an order to satisfy a minimum guarantee.
FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(E) For orders exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, a statute expressly authorizes or requires that the purchase be made from a specified source.
FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(F) In accordance with section 1331 of Public Law 111-240 ( 15 U.S.C.
644(r)), contracting officers may, at their discretion, set aside orders for any of the small business concerns identified in 19.000(a)(3). When setting aside orders for small business concerns, the specific small business program eligibility requirements identified in part 19 apply.
FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(G) For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, the order satisfies one of the exceptions permitting the use of other than full and open competition listed in 6.302 ( 10 U.S.C.
3406(c)(5)). The public interest exception shall not be used unless Congress is notified in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 3204(a)(7).
3. Rationale Justifying Use of Cited Regulatory Authority.
a.) The Items Described in Paragraph 1 Must Be Compatible In All Aspects (Form, Fit And Function) With Existing Systems Presently Installed.
b.) A Patent, Copyright, or Proprietary Data Limits Competition.
c.) The Items Described in Paragraph 1 are “Direct Replacements” Parts/Components for Existing Equipment.
d.) Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Supported By A Case Letter.
The 123SFL90110-1 Pressure Swing Adsorber (PSA) Test Bench have been designed to have the temperature readings from the Michell SF82-TX-B3-C2-D1-E2 and the EA2-TX-M12-B3-C1-D1 Dew Point transmitters. Deviation from these models will be suspect and going against the intended design of the test stand’s approved specifications and configuration. This procurement will replace the existing transmitters, owned by the Navy, that are no longer working and are beyond economical repair.
4 | 4
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance, which are included in this justification and its supporting data/documentation, are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
CUSTOMER:
APPROVALS
I certify that the Customer representations above have been verified, and are complete and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the processing of this brand name/sole-source justification precludes the use of full and open competition.
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR/SPECIALIST:
I certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that completing this purchase as a brand name/sole source is in the best interest of the Government.
CONTRACTING OFFICER:
Name, Title, Code Phone No. Date
BLAKELY.JAMES.LADANI
EL.
Digitally signed by
BLAKELY.JAMES.LADANIEL
Date: 2025.08.22 13:35:42 -07'00'
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .