Brand Name Justification_Redacted.pdf

PDF 497 KB Posted

Attached to
1100 Watt (XP Series) Pure Sine Wave Power Inverters
Solicitation number
N6426725Q4188
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Brand Name/Sole Source Justification (SAM) form for procuring 15 Exeltech XP1100 Sinewave Inverters, DC to AC Power Inverter, 1100Watt, 120VAC, 24VDC, 60HZ. The procurement is specifically for the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Corona Division's Weapons Impact Scoring Set (WISS) system, which is deployed across training ranges to provide objective scoring and assessment of air support proficiencies.

The justification emphasizes that Exeltech equipment has been specifically selected, tested, and verified to operate reliably in harsh environments where WISS systems are installed. The equipment has been proven to integrate seamlessly with existing systems, and continuing its acquisition is advantageous due to compatibility, minimized operational costs, and the fact that range operations and maintenance personnel are already trained on Exeltech equipment. The document notes that identifying and validating an alternative would require extensive testing, including developing new software drivers and undergoing a rigorous approval process, which is estimated to involve significant labor and associated costs.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Combined_Synopsis Solicitation_N6426725Q4188.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

2 |

REV 11-2023

contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order. [When utilizing this exception, the rationale shall describe why the relationship between the initial order and the follow-on is logical (e.g., in terms of scope, period of performance, or value).]

FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(D) It is necessary to place an order to satisfy a minimum guarantee.

FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(E) For orders exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, a statute expressly authorizes or requires that the purchase be made from a specified source.

FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(F) In accordance with section 1331 of Public Law 111-240 ( 15 U.S.C.

644(r)), contracting officers may, at their discretion, set aside orders for any of the small business concerns identified in 19.000(a)(3). When setting aside orders for small business concerns, the specific small business program eligibility requirements identified in part 19 apply.

FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(G) For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, the order satisfies one of the exceptions permitting the use of other than full and open competition listed in 6.302 ( 10 U.S.C.

3406(c)(5)). The public interest exception shall not be used unless Congress is notified in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 3204(a)(7).

3. Rationale Justifying Use of Cited Regulatory Authority.

a.) The Items Described in Paragraph 1 Must Be Compatible In All Aspects (Form, Fit And Function) With Existing Systems Presently Installed.

b.) A Patent, Copyright, or Proprietary Data Limits Competition.

c.) The Items Described in Paragraph 1 are “Direct Replacements” Parts/Components for Existing Equipment.

d.) Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Supported By A Case Letter.

e.) Unusual and Compelling Urgency.

f.) Other: If required, discuss any other rationale that supports the use of a brand name/sole source for this effort.

3 |

REV 11-2023

4. Implication of Procuring Another Brand/Manufacturer.

a.) Unacceptable Delays in Fulfilling the Agency’s Requirements.

b.) Substantial Duplication Of Cost To The Government That Is Not Expected To Be Recovered Through Competition.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .