N6426723R0033-0001 Conformed Copy.pdf

CODE

(Hour)

PAGE(S)

until 09:00 AM local time 20 Jul 2023

X

A

X B

X C X D

EX

X

G

F 56 - 61

62 - 66

H 67 sabrina.mazumder@navy .mil

RATING PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUED BY

(Date)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

1 67

(If other than Item 7)

15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

AND

ADDRESS

SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

OF

OFFEROR

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS

IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER

SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

18. OFFER DATE

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

2. CONTRACT NO.

N64267 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

See Item 7

9. Sealed offers in original and 1 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and

Section L conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)

SABRINA M MAZUMDER

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS

2 - 3

X I CONTRACT CLAUSES

DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X

PACKAGING AND MARKING

4 - 22

23 - 24

J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

25 - 26

27 - 28 X K

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA 29 - 36 X

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

X M

L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

FACILITY

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

X

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE

EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)

CODE CODE

B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

PART IV - REPRESENTATIO NS AND INSTRUCTIO NS

PART III - LIST O F DO CUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND O THER ATTACHMENTS

37 - 54

PART II - CO NTRACT CLAUSES

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CORONA DIV.

1999 FOURTH STREET BLDG 510

NORCO CA 92860

FAX:

TEL:

FAX:

TEL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.5. DATE ISSUED

20 Jun 2023

4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

[ X ]

3. SOLICITATION NO.

N6426723R0033

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 4 Kit

MAGNETIC INTRINSIC CALIBRATION SYSTEM

CPFF

TWO (2) LOW GAUSS KITS, TWO (2) MID GAUSS KITS.

FOB: Destination

BRAND NAME/SOLE SOURCE: SS

PSC CD: 6625

ESTIMATED COST

FIXED FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

0002 Lot

DD1423 - CDRL A001-A011

CPFF

Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) DD1423s, in accordance with the

Statement of Work (SOW) This CLIN is Not Separately Priced (NSP)

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: 6625

ESTIMATED COST

FIXED FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

OPTION Magnetometer Warranty

FFP

10 Year warranty for parts only. See Section C SOW 5.1.14

NET AMT

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

B-232-H003 PAYMENTS OF FEE (S) (COMPLETION) (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) For purposes of this contract, "fee" means "target fee" in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, "base fee" in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, or "fixed fee" in cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts.

(b) The Government shall make payments to the Contractor, subject to and per the clause in this contract entitled

"Fixed Fee" (FAR 52.216-8) or "Incentive Fee", (FAR 52.216-10), as applicable. Such payments shall be equal to TBD percent (TBD%) of the allowable cost of each invoice submitted by and payable to the Contractor pursuant to the clause of this contract entitled "Allowable Cost And Payment" (FAR 52.216-7), subject to the withholding terms and conditions of the "Fixed Fee" or "Incentive Fee" clause, as applicable (percentage of fee payable is based on fee dollars divided by estimated cost dollars including facilities capital cost of money). Fee shall not be applied on Facilities Capital Cost of Money per FAR 15.404-4(c)(3) and DFARS 215-404-71-4.

Total fee(s) paid to the Contractor shall not exceed the fee amount(s) set forth in this contract.

(c) In the event of discontinuance of the work under this contract, or any specified phase of the contract, per the clause of this contract entitled "Limitation of Funds" (FAR 52.232-22) or "Limitation of Cost" (FAR 52.232-20), as applicable, the fee shall be equitably adjusted by mutual agreement to reflect the diminution of work. If the adjusted fee is less than the sum of all fee payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall repay the excess amount to the Government. If the adjusted fee exceeds all payments made to the

Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall be paid the additional amount, subject to the availability of funds. In no event shall the Government be required to pay the Contractor any amount in excess of the funds obligated under this contract at the time of the discontinuance of work.

(d) Fee(s) withheld pursuant to the terms and conditions of this contract shall not be paid until the contract has been modified to reduce the fee(s) per paragraph (c) above, or until the Procuring Contracting Officer has advised the paying office in writing that no fee adjustment is required.

(End of Text)

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

STATEMENT OF WORK

Magnetic Intrinsic Calibration Systems Follow-on

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC), Corona Division, Measurement Science Department, U.S. Navy Metrology

Research and Development Program Code MS00 requires research, testing and various training development scenarios. The Program Manager (PM) for the Navy and Marine Corps Metrology and Calibration (METCAL)

Research Development Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) Program requires Metrology and Calibration engineering support at the highest possible level. Provide cost-effective, uniform, and adequate Quality Assurance and measurement accuracy of Magnetics as it pertains to Magnetometry to support the most accurate types of precision coils, solenoids, magnetometers, reference magnets, and gauss meters that use direct current field calibration services using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) or quantum metrology techniques.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on a chip quantum metrology intrinsic, national and international standards development is required to meet this measurement requirement and provide electrical quantities to be determined in units that do not change with time and that are reproducible in any laboratory. The standards when coupled with various training scenarios and technologies to support of an unbroken chain of measurement and quality traceability for all applicable Test and Monitoring Systems used throughout the Navy and

Marine Corps, industry, government industry, and academia needing the highest level of accuracy for DC

Magnetics. This level of effort shall establish the most accurate intrinsic national and international commercial and military standard in the world.

2.0 BACKGROUND

The Navy and Marine Corps METCAL R&D Program is responsible for ensuring its products strictly adhere to the technical and engineering rigor as set forth by NIST measurement traceability requirement as it pertains to qualitative and quantitative traceability, analytics, metrics, measures, and standards as set forth and as directed by the Navy Technical Agent for METCAL. To maintain at least the four to one (4:1) Test Accuracy Ratio (TAR), appropriate Test Uncertainty Ratio (TUR), and when possible, acceptable derived Uncertainty Budgets (UB) between the unit under test, Test and Monitoring Systems (TAMS), and the calibration standards used in the calibration process. When industry, both national and international, is involved, then standards following the ISO

17025 and GUM shall be adhered too. The NAVAIR METCAL program currently has a 4:1 TAR deficiency, TUR deficiency and is unable to derive Uncertainty Budgets required in the Magnetics measurement area to fulfill the mandated requirements for a NIST traceable calibration system for low and midrange measurement types of magnetics. A new system is required to calibrate magnetometers and magnetics workload. This new system shall be installed at the Navy Primary Standards Laboratory (NPSL) in San Diego, CA. NIST does not offer a calibration service for magnetometers; however, the country’s need in this measurement area can be met. The solution provider shall coordinate between affected laboratories and work together to provide a system at NPSL and other designated

Navy, NIST, and DoD laboratories in which magnetic calibrations can be traced to NIST through Nuclear Magnetic

Resonance (NMR) measurements or quantum mechanics metrology. This requirement directly impacts operational, combat readiness, life safety, and flight safety for NAVAIR and NAVSEA METCAL supported weapon systems

(drones – airborne – sea skimmer – underwater), Submarines, Surface Ships, Aircraft Carriers, Air Craft, and equipment within the Department of Defense (DoD) to include national and international commercial testing laboratories and calibration laboratories.

3.0 SCOPE

The scope of tasks required are in specific areas of concentration for this level of effort and are focused on four major tasks to produce a new state-of-the-art Magnetics intrinsic (through NMR NIST on a chip techniques) calibration system. The focus will be a Mid-Gauss Prototype helium-3 sensor system with the main emphasis on fabricating the needed helium-3 cell technology. At the same time, helium-3 sensors shall be developed and fabricated. As these two efforts are advanced and matured, they will simultaneously coincide with the cell and sensor development efforts to produce a support control system. The estimated total time for this developmental effort is approximately 23 months with a one-month final configuration integration and testing period for a total of

24 months.

Various types of training shall be developed throughout the period of performance. This shall set the technology stage for verifying the uncertainty and accuracy as a national standard for commercial high gauss system performance and will complete the total requirement for the total requirement for 100nT (low and mid gauss 50uT-

50mT) to 1.5T. This new system shall serve as the new National Standard for the United States in the low and midrange Magnetics measurement area. The system shall adhere to evolving metrological science to develop quantum metrology standards are universal, allowing electrical quantities to be determined in units that do not change with time, and are reproducible in any laboratory. Through this approach, the focus is on products and techniques that use optically pumped magnetometers. These sensors report magnetic field based on measurement of the precession frequency of atomic spins in vapor.

The spin populations are polarized using light, hence the term, ‘optically pumped.’ This category includes scalar and vector magnetic field sensors. The system shall also directly support the Measurement Assurance Program

(MAP) using Navy METCAL procedures using the round robin methodology. In order to use the MAP, matching

Helmholtz and electromagnet solenoids or appropriate check or artifact standards shall be manufactured along with matching power supplies, software products, cables, connectors, and any required ancillary equipment needed to make a totally matched magnetics magnetometer calibration system.

4. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

Document Type Title Attachment Date

DOD 5220.22-C2 National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual DOD

5200.1-R, Information Security Program Regulation

Attachment 1 2020

DOD 5200.1-R Information Security Program Regulation Attachment 2 1997

DOD 5220.22-R Industrial Security Program Attachment 3 1985

DOD 5400.11-R DOD Privacy Program DoD 5400.11-R, May 14, 2007

(whs.mil)

DOD i 5000.56 Programming Unique Mapping, Charting, and Geodesy (MC&G)

Requirements for Developing Systems Privacy Act of 1974 (As

Amended) Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 08-003

DoDI 5000.56, "Programming

Geospatial-

Intelligence

(GEOINT),

Geospatial

Information and

Services (GI&S), and Geodesy

Requirements for

Developing

Systems," July 9, 2010; Incorporating

Change 2 on

August 26, 2020

(whs.mil)

SECNAV M-

5510.36

DON Information Security Program 5510.36B.pdf

(navy.mil)

SECNAVINST

5211.5E

DON PRIVACY PROGRAM 5211.5F.pdf

(navy.mil)

DOD

INSTRUCTION

5200.48

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI) DoDI 5200.48, "Controlled

Unclassified

Information (CUI),"

Effective March 6, 2020 (whs.mil)

DoD Instruction

(DoDI) 5200.39

Critical Program Information (CPI) Identification and Protection

Within Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)

DoDI 5200.39, "Critical Program

Information (CPI)

Identification and

Protection Within

Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation

(RDT&E)," May

28, 2015;

Incorporating

Change 3 on

October 1, 2020

(whs.mil)

NIST SP 800-171 Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal

Systems and Organizations

Protecting

Controlled

Unclassified

Information in

Nonfederal Systems

(nist.gov) https://www.esd.whs.mil/portals/54/documents/dd/issuances/dodm/540011r.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/portals/54/documents/dd/issuances/dodm/540011r.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/portals/54/documents/dd/issuances/dodm/540011r.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500056p.pdf?ver=2020-08-26-105159-840 https://www.secnav.navy.mil/doni/Directives/05000%20General%20Management%20Security%20and%20Safety%20Services/05-500%20Security%20Services/5510.36B.pdf https://www.secnav.navy.mil/doni/Directives/05000%20General%20Management%20Security%20and%20Safety%20Services/05-500%20Security%20Services/5510.36B.pdf https://www.secnav.navy.mil/doni/Directives/05000%20General%20Management%20Security%20and%20Safety%20Services/05-200%20Management%20Program%20and%20Techniques%20Services/5211.5F.pdf https://www.secnav.navy.mil/doni/Directives/05000%20General%20Management%20Security%20and%20Safety%20Services/05-200%20Management%20Program%20and%20Techniques%20Services/5211.5F.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520048p.PDF https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520048p.PDF https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520048p.PDF https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520048p.PDF https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520048p.PDF https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520048p.PDF https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520039p.pdf https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-171r2.pdf https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-171r2.pdf https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-171r2.pdf https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-171r2.pdf https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-171r2.pdf

CMMC V2.0 Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Chief Information

Officer > CMMC

(defense.gov)

NSWCCORDIVIN

ST M-5510.2

Information and Personnel Security Program Attachment 4 2022

NSWCCORDIVIN

ST 5530.2D

Physical Security Plan Attachment 5 2022

NIST 800-171 rev 2

Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal

Systems and Organizations

Protecting

Controlled

Unclassified

Information in

Nonfederal Systems

(nist.gov)

ISO 9001 Quality Management Standard Industry Document

ISO 10012 Quality Assurance Standards for Measuring Equipment Industry Document

ISO 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories

Industry Document

ISO ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement

(GUM)

Industry Document

DI-QCIC-80278 Calibration And Measurement Requirements Summary (CMRS)

Industry Document

NAVEDTRA 130 series Navy Training Standards Policy Attachment 6 2014

NAVEDTRA 134 series Navy Training Standards Policy

Attachment 7 2009 https://dodcio.defense.gov/CMMC/ https://dodcio.defense.gov/CMMC/ https://dodcio.defense.gov/CMMC/ https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-171r2.pdf https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-171r2.pdf https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-171r2.pdf https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-171r2.pdf

5. REQUIREMENTS

5.1 MAGNETIC INTRINSIC CALIBRATION SYSTEMS

5.1.1 The Contractor will provide intrinsic NMR and quantum technical engineering for designing, modeling, building, and testing with the required services solutions to provide a low, midrange, and, as design capabilities permit, a mid-to-high range magnetics new national standard for magnetometer calibration. There are additional requirements for support using the help desk, web-based, virtual, and augmented reality; classroom instructor-led, blended training (web-based and instructor-led); DVD/Blue Ray training, software systems, software engineering, and software reengineering in support of all current and future calibration support packages to be transitioned to all

Navy METCAL support facilities designated Government installations. The current intrinsic standard maintained by the Navy Primary Standards Laboratory (NPSL) is a flowing water NMR Teslameter that uses pure, distilled water as the Proton NMR sample. This is the current intrinsic standard for magnetic field calibration measurements with an absolute accuracy of 300 ppm or better. It features a measurement range from

0.1 µT – 1.5T (14mG to 21.6kG) with a single small probe enabling precision NMR measurement to very low fields. Since the NMR probe measures the total amplitude of the magnetic field vector (rather than a single field component), the final reading is independent of accurate orientation. For measurement stability, the frequency source is a Direct Digital Synthesizer (DDS) with an oven-controlled crystal oscillator as a reference. The current solution has an RS-232-C interface. The new desired configuration will be an IEEE-488 and USB interface as an option. (CDRL’s A002, A003, A004, A005, A006)

5.1.2 The Contractor shall provide written technical data packages and deliver to the government how the level of effort outlines the feasibility of achieving the requirements for the proposed Navy Primary Standards Laboratory sensor development, as shown in Table 1. Here, the required operating range is from 100 nT (with 30 pT uncertainty) to 0.15 T (with 75 uT uncertainty). An additionally desirable operational range is up to 1.5 T, with

750 uT uncertainty. (CDRL’s A010, A011)

Table 1: NPSL Specifications 8-30-16

5.1.3 The Contractor shall provide the design and development of automated calibration capabilities with a user manual mode of operation for testing and calibration of TAMS with the proposed solution. Table 2 outlines the technical requirements for a new intrinsic NMR magnetometer. The new intrinsic NMR magnetometer shall exhibit properties as a sensor that reports a magnetic field based on measuring the precession frequency of atomic spins in vapor. The spin populations are polarized using light. Hence the term ‘optically pumped.’ Fundamental physical principles of measuring magnetic fields with optically pumped spin-polarized atomic species in a vapor state are well established. The Contractor shall deliver the second and final magnetics calibration systems (qty. 2) for the low gauss each for the low gauss calibration (final configured systems with changes). The Contractor shall also deliver (2) calibration system each for the mid band gauss ranges as depicted in table 1, with all associated hardware suites in accordance with the tasks, and phase options selected by the government, as listed in Table all associated hardware suites to include the following minimum specifications (Table 2):

SAM-HF Magnetometer anticipated specifications: (10-2016)

1. Electronic features and functions:

Range 0.1 µT – 1.5T

100 nT (with 30 pT uncertainty) to 0.15 T (with 75 uT uncertainty). An additionally desirable operational range is listed as up to 1.5 T, with 750 uT uncertainty.

Absolute Accuracy 300 ppm

Display 6 digits or better

Display Units Tesla / Gauss e.g. µT, mT, or T, depending on range

Operating Temperature 10°C to +40°C

Power Requirements 110/220V, 50/60Hz

Fuse 2.5A or appropriate to design

2. Communications Interfaces

USB data cable

LabVIEW interface Current most stable version

Python Interface Current most stable version

3. Physical Case 1 U standard 19” rack mount

Meter dimensions 370 x 360 x 150mm (or 470 x 440 x 150mm)

Probe dimensions 2 cm x 3 cm x 20 cm

Sample Active Volume 10mm x 10mm x 10mm

Probe Cable Length 2.0 meters standard

Weight 200 g (sensor)

Storage Temperature +5°C to +60°C

4. Connectors (rear)

Power Input IEC standard AC power input socket with fuse holder

USB Mini B 3.0 SS downward compatible 2.0

NMR Signal Output BNC, Raw NMR Signal

Calibration Port BNC, 10 MHz reference frequency input

5. System components (standard)

Magnetometer Control Unit

Sensor head with 2 m cable

AC Power cord

User’s manual

6. System Check Standards and Artifacts

Matching Helmholtz’s Coils / Solenoids– applicable ranges with appropriate matching ancillary items.

ISO 17025 compliant uncertainty budget software algorithms supporting all test point measurements between standards and unit under test. Results captured in local database

7. Training of all system components

DVD and web based training supplied

System Check Standards and Artifacts (Cont.) Matching Electromagnet Solenoids – applicable ranges

Matching Power and current supplies – applicable ranges

Marching oscillator frequency generation hardware

Ancillary matching hardware and cables including an earth magnetic shielding system to shield out the earth’s magnetic interference (Low gauss)

8. Uncertainty Budget Software

ISO 17025 / GUM-compliant uncertainty budget software algorithms support all test point measurements between standards and the unit under test (UUT). Results are captured in a local database. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and

Machine Learning algorithm (ML) solutions are acceptable

9. Training Navy METCAL RDT&E

DVD/ AR/VR and web-based training as required, augmented with AI acceptable

5.1.4 The Contractor shall provide monthly (administrative and burn rate info) and quarterly technical reports of the risk, design progress, modifications, and any technical development difficulties per Table 3. The Contractor shall perform the following four tasks with subtasks as annotated in the task description table. If there are any deviations from any tasks listed in Table 3, the Contractor shall contact the Project Management Office (PMO) to discuss risk mitigations. The Contractor will deliver two (2) magnetics calibration systems each for the low and mid band gauss ranges as depicted in table 1, with all associated hardware suites in accordance with the tasks and phase options selected by the government, as listed in Table 3. (CDRL A001)

Task Description

FY23 FY24 FY25

Quarter

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

0. Continuation of project

Start CY - Mar 2023 END CY – Mar 2025

1. 2024-02 (Q4 / 11 months) Prototype helium-3 sensor system

2. 2025-02 (Q8 / 23 months) Final helium-3 sensor system

M A

R

M A

R

1. Task 1 (Δ progress symbol)

Design, build, and test atomic vapor cell sensor prototypes for low and moderate fields in the smallest practical footprint that technology allows using advanced computing and microfabrication techniques and overlapping range capability as described in table 1.

1A). Helium-3 cell fabrication.

For the cell fabrication task, we propose a program of quarterly fabrication, processing, and testing with a focus on using new, low-diffusion glass cell envelope material:

- Q1: Fabricate cells.

- Q2. Helium diffusion stress test.

- Q3. Fabricate improved cells.

- Q4: Helium diffusion stress test.

- Q5. Fabricate final cells.

- Q6. Helium diffusion stress test.

1.B.) Build compact sensors using atomic elements that can be manufactured to provide optically pumped cell sensors for a wider range of field values.

1.C) Build prototype compact sensors for direct electron spin precession measurement for low and intermediate field operation

1.D) Physics model for candidate atomic elements spectra in cell conditions up to

100 Gauss, to be used for data analysis, 1.E) Test at Contractor facility over 100 nT to 0.01 T (100 G) field range and report. Bring system to NPSL for initial tests in coil facility.

1.F) Configure a combination of control electronics and test equipment to operate at a wider range of frequencies, and test operation in fields down to 100 nT, where

Δ the atomic vapor cell performance can accommodate a frequency of about 350

Hz, and higher fields.

1.G) Configure the system to operate up to at least 35 MHz, corresponding to a field of 100 G in appropriate vapor cells technology along with a 50 G design.

1.H) Initial design for round-robin / testing of check standards with validation and verification of Helmholtz coils and electromagnets for high and low field check standards

2. Task 2: (Ɵ progress symbol)

Design, model, build and test the required hybrid laser excited gas cells, complementary probes, and sensor technologies.

For the higher field range, design, build and test a compact sensor containing selected atomic elements. The best-performing element may serve as the active element for magnetometry at lower fields and as the means for spin-exchange optical pumping of the appropriate atomic element chosen for use at higher fields.

2.A) Helium-3 sensor fabrication:

Build two helium-3 sensors for use in this program.

- Q1: Sensor design complete

- Q2. Component fabrication

- Q3. Sensor assembly.

- Q4: Sensor testing.

- Q5. Second sensor fabrication

- Q6. Second sensor testing

2.B) Compact chosen atomic element selected sensor designed, built, and demonstrated in a shielded, controlled environment. Spin-exchange polarization of element used characterized and reported.

2.C) Sensor demonstrated in laboratory noise environment. Integrated field coil and compact current supply to be

Ɵ Ɵ

Ɵ

Ɵ Ɵ Ɵ incorporated to set optimal field environment for selected element performance for spin polarization.

2.D) Demonstration of atomic element chosen for NMR signal detection for high field measurement. Bring system to

NPSL for initial tests in coil facility.

3. Task 3: (X progress symbol)

Design, model and test the required software and control electronics:

Custom compact control electronics and operation software. It is anticipated that the proof-of-principle sensor demonstrations performed in Tasks 1 and

2 will use test equipment (Lock-in amplifiers, laser drivers, function generators, etc.). To deliver a compact and user-friendly probe system, there will be a need to develop some custom control electronics appropriate for this measurement system. Also, develop and deliver custom LabVIEW vi’s that allow the user to collect and analyze frequency data directly. This task will progress in parallel with Tasks 1 and 2.

3A). Helium-3 control system: For the mid-gauss optical sensor control system task, we propose the following development program with multiple iterations of the control system design and testing:

- Q1: Complete controller design.

- Q2: Fabrication and assembly of controller

- Q3. Write controller software.

- Q4. Sensor integration and system testing

- Q5. Revise controller design, fabrication, and assembly of the controller.

- Q6. Sensor integration and system testing

- Q7 & Q8. Final system testing, documentation, and delivery.

3. B) Necessary electronics and software

X X

X to demonstrate Task 1 prototype chosen atomic vapor sensor.

3. C) Necessary electronics and software to demonstrate Task 2 prototype chosen best atomic vapor sensor.

3. D) Demonstration of control electronics suitable for system operation over a range of required frequencies and dual (best-performing atomic vapor cells) measurement techniques. Maximum overlap range available to be delivered for self-cross-calibration.

3. E) Optimization and integration of control unit with prototype sensor.

3. F) Test sensors with custom-built

Helmholtz and electromagnet solenoids, including matching power supplies and ancillary required equipment.

4. Task 4: (▲ progress symbol)

Finalize all designs and models, and perform final integration testing and evaluation for delivery of all components of each system.

In this final task, perform any necessary re-design based on results from previous tasks. Build, test, and deliver a sensor system meeting or exceeding all requirements stated in all Tables herein.

All control software allowing direct access to atomic frequency measurement will be included.

4. A) Finalize testing of sensors with custom-built Helmholtz and electromagnet solenoids, including matching power supplies, and ancillary required equipment to ensure MAP, CMRS, and GUM procedures are thoroughly vetted using SI artifacts or

NIST level intrinsic standards equivalents. The Navy shall supply the appropriate DIDs for the MAP, the

CMRS and the GUM.

4. B) System delivery and successful demonstration at NPSL and remaining systems delivered to government-designated laboratories.

4. C) Technical data, training, and post-deployment support.

Table 3

5.1.5 Process Measurement Assurance Program (PMAP). The Process Measurement Assurance Program

(PMAP) consists of methodology and software to determine, control, and improve measuring processes. PMAP uses check (control) standards that represent the calibration output (or product) to evaluate the total measurement process, including the equipment, standards, personnel, procedure, and environment.

Measurements made with check standards that duplicate the process are called control measurements. Data from the control measurements are used to develop control charts and calculate measurement uncertainties as calibrations are produced. PMAP methodology calls for modeling the measurement process so that the data from control measurements realistically evaluate the uncertainty, which allows measuring the uncertainty rather than theorizing about or estimating uncertainties. The PMAP methodology includes the following components described in this section; modeling the process, selecting check standards, establishing values for check standards with independent reference standards, installing at the time of calibration for standards and equipment.

Controlling the accuracy of all standards, measurement process, assisting in determining calibration needs, and using statistical tests to make decisions on the process performance. Modeling the process requires knowledge of the measurement instrument and standards to determine which measurements will evaluate maximum process variability and potential bias in the range of use. The objective of each PMAP application is determined before selecting the required check standard or standards. When possible, the objective includes controlling the measurement process uncertainty and controlling the accuracy (established at calibration) of the working standards used. Control measurements are made to duplicate the measurement of the unknown artifacts or product. In a calibration laboratory, the control measurements must represent the type of standards that are submitted for calibration. Control measurements are made continually throughout the year at various times of the day; therefore, they evaluate environmental influences on the measurement uncertainties. Each metrologist who performs calibrations makes control measurements. Data can be used to evaluate how the operator’s skill and performance influence measurement uncertainty. Check (control) standards are selected to evaluate process variability and systematic errors in the range of use. They are chosen to evaluate the same variables that influence the calibration of a customer’s artifacts. Check standards should be calibrated with a sufficiently small uncertainty to help detect changes in the working standards by comparing each calibrated value with the history of measurements on the check standard. The value of the check standard should be established with a reference standard that is independent of the working standard and the reference standard used to calibrate it in the controlled process. If the check standards and working standards do not have independent calibrations, the program will probably not detect a bias or error, in the measurement process, although it may be detected during an outside calibration or a round robin exercise. After modeling the measurement process and selecting the check standard(s), the PMAP software evaluates and controls the measurement uncertainties. Four screens, called pages, are used to set up the software control program. The first page sets up the control file, the recall date for data analysis, archive file, measurement equipment and units of measure. The second page is used to input information about the standards used. This screen includes input for check standard identification number, uncertainties of standards used, calibration and expiration of working or reference standards used, and the established value of the check standard. The third page contains information on limits for the measurement process, including coverage factor (k) confidence intervals desired for uncertainty calculation, information for scaling the control chart, reference data, and other limits that can either be calculated by the program or entered manually. The fourth page allows input for titles and labels desired on each control chart. The Contractor shall deploy a similar PMAP program for use with MAP along with coordination with the Navy METCAL RDT&E program office, which will establish uncertainty budget analysis and risk to tools to use for uncertainty budget analysis of the system. The results shall be reported out as either an electronic or a paper product as to the performance of each Magnetics calibration systems uncertainty budget results.

5.1.6 The Contractor will provide Transitional Post Deployment Support (TPDS) for the new Magnetics calibration system for hardware and software. (CDRL A009)

5.1.7 The Contractor will provide a help desk function during TPDS to facilitate technical support as required for the new Magnetics calibration system. The help desk hours shall be normal hours of operation, 8:00 am – 5:00 pm (during regular business hours, Eastern Standard Time).

5.1.8 The Contractor will provide web-based, classroom instructor-led, blended training (web-based with instructor live support), DVD/Blue Ray, and Virtual, Augmented Reality training during any METCAL RDT&E required TPDS scenarios.

5.1.9 The Contractor will provide the latest user manual and training videos and interactive courseware that can be hosted by the Navy METCAL R&D support portal. (CDRL’s A007, A008, A011)

5.1.10 The Contractor will provide post-deployment knowledge transfer to the government to the level that the government can effectively and efficiently manage the new Magnetics calibration system life cycle support.

5.1.11 The Contractor will provide post-deployment knowledge transfer to the government to the level that the government can effectively and efficiently manage the new Magnetics calibration system life cycle support.

5.1.12 The Contractor will employ the Capability Maturity Model Cybersecurity (CMMC) level II/III conformances and certifications during the period of performance in order to reduce risk to CUI and CPI to include the TPDS support term.

5.1.13 The Contractor shall provide project management assistance and program support functions within the scope and guidelines of this SOW to the PM and COR.

5.1.14 The new Magnetometer shall have a 10-year warranty for parts only, with labor being an extra cost to the government. (Option Item see CLIN 003), use MIL-STD-129, Marking for Shipments and Storage, and MIL-STD-

130, Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property, when marking warranty items. If found to be in the

Governments best interest, it is anticipated that the Government may exercise the option at time of award. Also, see

52.246-18. If this option is NOT exercised at award FAR Clause 52.246-18 will be removed.

6. DELIVERABLES

CDRL # DESCRIPTION DID Pages

A001 Monthly Progress Reports DI-MGMT-81928 5

A002 Software Transition Plan DI-IPSC-81429 6

A003 Software Requirements Specification DI-IPSC-81433 11

A004 Software Design Description DI-IPSC-81435 8

A005 Software Product Specification DI-IPSC-81488 1

A006 Software Version Description DI-PPSC-81442A 4

A007 Software User Manual DI-IPSC-81443A 7

A008 Computer Software Product DI-IPSC-81488 7

A009 Final Developer and Data Dictionary DI-MGMT-81740A 16

A010 Calibration and Measurement Requirements Summary DI-QCIC-80278C 18

A011 The Training Equipment Summary (TES) DI-MISC-81184A 7

C-202-H001 ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS–BASIC (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) Department - means the Department of the Navy.

(b) Commander, Naval Sea Systems Command - means the Commander of the Naval Sea Systems Command of the

Department of the Navy or his duly appointed successor.

(c) References to The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) - All references to the FAR in this contract shall be deemed to also reference the appropriate sections of the Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS), unless clearly indicated otherwise.

(d) National Stock Numbers - Whenever the term Federal Item Identification Number and its acronym FIIN or the term Federal Stock Number and its acronym FSN appear in the contract, order or their cited specifications and standards, the terms and acronyms shall be interpreted as National Item Identification Number (NIIN) and National

Stock Number (NSN) respectively which shall be defined as follows:

(1) National Item Identification Number (NIIN). The number assigned to each approved Item

Identification under the Federal Cataloging Program. It consists of nine numeric characters, the first two of which are the National Codification Bureau (NCB) Code. The remaining positions consist of a seven digit non-significant number.

(2) National Stock Number (NSN). The National Stock Number (NSN) for an item of supply consists of the applicable four-position Federal Supply Class (FSC) plus the applicable nine-position NIIN assigned to the item of supply.

(End of text)

C-204-H001 USE OF NAVY SUPPORT CONTRACTORS FOR OFFICIAL CONTRACT FILES (NAVSEA)

(OCT 2018)

(a) NAVSEA may use a file room management support contractor, hereinafter referred to as "the support contractor", to manage its file room, in which all official contract files, including the official file supporting this procurement, are retained. These official files may contain information that is considered a trade secret, proprietary, business sensitive or otherwise protected pursuant to law or regulation, hereinafter referred to as “protected information”. File room management services consist of any of the following: secretarial or clerical support; data entry; document reproduction, scanning, imaging, or destruction; operation, management, or maintenance of paper-based or electronic mail rooms, file rooms, or libraries; and supervision in connection with functions listed herein.

(b) The cognizant Contracting Officer will ensure that any NAVSEA contract under which these file room management services are acquired will contain a requirement that:

(1) The support contractor not disclose any information;

(2) Individual employees are to be instructed by the support contractor regarding the sensitivity of the official contract files;

(3) The support contractor performing these services be barred from providing any other supplies and/or services, or competing to do so, to NAVSEA for the period of performance of its contract and for an additional three years thereafter unless otherwise provided by law or regulation; and,

(4) In addition to any other rights the contractor may have, it is a third party beneficiary who has the right of direct action against the support contractor, or any person to whom the support contractor has released or disclosed protected information, for the unauthorized duplication, release, or disclosure of such protected information.

(c) Execution of this contract by the contractor is considered consent to NAVSEA's permitting access to any information, irrespective of restrictive markings or the nature of the information submitted, by its file room management support contractor for the limited purpose of executing its file room support contract responsibilities.

(d) NAVSEA may, without further notice, enter into contracts with other contractors for these services. Contractors should enter into separate non-disclosure agreements with the file room contractor. Contact the Procuring

Contracting Officer for contractor specifics. However, any such agreement will not be considered a prerequisite before information submitted is stored in the file room or otherwise encumber the government.

C-211-H016 SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) Definitions.

(i) A "zero-tier reference" is a specification, standard, or drawing that is cited in the contract (including its attachments).

(ii) A "first-tier reference" is either: (1) a specification, standard, or drawing cited in a zero-tier reference, or (2) a specification cited in a first-tier drawing.

(b) Requirements. All zero-tier and first-tier references, as defined above, are mandatory for use. All lower tier references shall be used for guidance only unless specifically identified below.

None

C-211-H018 APPROVAL BY THE GOVERNMENT (NAVSEA) (JAN 2019)

Approval by the Government as required under this contract and applicable specifications shall not relieve the

Contractor of its obligation to comply with the specifications and with all other requirements of the contract, nor shall it impose upon the Government any liability it would not have had in the absence of such approval.

C-215-H002 CONTRACTOR PROPOSAL (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) Performance of this contract by the Contractor shall be conducted and performed in accordance with the detailed obligations to which the Contractor committed itself in Proposal TBD dated TBD in response to Solicitation No.

N6426723R0033.

(b) The technical volume(s) of the Contractor's proposal is(are) hereby incorporated by reference and made subject to the "Order of Precedence" (FAR 52.215-8) clause of this contract. Under the "Order of Precedence" clause, the technical volume(s) of the Contractor's proposal referenced herein is (are) hereby designated as item (f) of the clause, following

"the specifications" in the order of precedence.

C-227-H006 DATA REQUIREMENTS (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

The data to be furnished hereunder shall be prepared in accordance with the Contract Data Requirements List, DD Form

1423, Exhibit(s) A, attached hereto.

C-233-H001 DOCUMENTATION OF REQUESTS FOR EQUITABLE ADJUSTMENT--BASIC (NAVSEA) (OCT

2018)

(a) For the purposes of this special contract requirement, the term "change" includes not only a change that is made pursuant to a written order designated as a "change order" but also (1) an engineering change proposed by the

Government or by the Contractor and (2) any act or omission to act on the part of the Government in respect of which a request is made for equitable adjustment.

(b) Whenever the Contractor requests or proposes an equitable adjustment of $100,000 or more per vessel in respect to a change made pursuant to a written order designated as a "change order" or in respect to a proposed engineering change and whenever the Contractor requests an equitable adjustment in any amount in respect to any other act or omission to act on the part of the Government, the proposal supporting such request shall contain the following information for each individual item or element of the request:

(1) A description (i) of the work required by the contract before the change, which has been deleted by the change, and (ii) of the work deleted by the change which already has been completed. The description is to include a list of components, equipment, and other identifiable property involved. Also, the status of manufacture, procurement, or installation of such property is to be indicated. Separate description is to be furnished for design and production work.

Items of raw material, purchased parts, components and other identifiable hardware, which are made excess by the change and which are not to be retained by the Contractor, are to be listed for later disposition;

(2) Description of work necessary to undo work already completed which has been deleted by the change;

(3) Description of work not required by the terms hereof before the change, which is substituted or added by the change. A list of components and equipment (not bulk materials or items) involved should be included. Separate descriptions are to be furnished for design work and production work;

(4) Description of interference and inefficiencies in performing the change;

(5) Description of each element of disruption and exactly how work has been, or will be disrupted:

(i) The calendar period of time during which disruption occurred, or will occur;

(ii) Area(s) aboard the vessel where disruption occurred, or will occur;

(iii) Trade(s) disrupted, with a breakdown of manhours for each trade;

(iv) Scheduling of trades before, during, and after period of disruption;

(v) Description of measures taken to lessen the disruptive effect of the change;

(6) Delay in delivery attributable solely to the change;

(7) Other work attributable to the change;

(8) Supplementing the foregoing, a narrative statement of the direct "causal" relationship between any alleged

Government act or omission and the claimed consequences therefor, cross-referenced to the detailed information provided as required above; and

(9) A statement setting forth a comparative enumeration of the amounts "budgeted" for the cost elements, including the material costs, labor hours and pertinent indirect costs, estimated by the Contractor in preparing its initial and ultimate proposal(s) for this contract, and the amounts claimed to have been incurred and/or projected to be incurred corresponding to each such "budgeted cost" elements.

(c) Each proposal in excess of $100,000 submitted in support of a claim for equitable adjustment under any requirement of this contract shall, in…