Attachment_4_Present_Past_Performance_Evaluation_Questionaire_Form.docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Force Calibration Press
- Solicitation number
- N64267-16-R-0113
About this file
Attachment 4 Present Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_3_Past_Performance_Evaluation_Data_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| QA_FCP_SOL.docx | DOCX document | |
| amendment_to_solicitation_FCP.pdf | ||
| DI-SESS-80567b_Design_Analysis.pdf | ||
| CSS_06-2175_Force_Calibration_Press_02242016_-_MD.docx | DOCX document | |
| CDRL_A001_FCP_CALCert_CDM_Cert_061416.doc | DOC document | |
| CDRL_E001_FCP_DesignAnalysisV0_CDM_Cert_062416.doc | DOC document | |
| CDRL_A003_FCP_Software-Frimeare_VersionDescv2_CDM_Cert_061416.doc | DOC document | |
| CDRL_T001_FCP_TechMan_CDM_Cert_061516.doc | DOC document | |
| DI-TMSS-80527C_TechMan.pdf | ||
| DI-IPSC-81442A_SoftwareVersionDescription.pdf | ||
| DI-MISC-81807_SoftwareFirmwareChangeRequest.pdf | ||
| FCP_Sol_with_Sec_A_8.17.16.pdf | ||
| DI-QCIC-80798B 1 _A001_CalRpt.pdf | ||
| CDRL_A004_FCP_Software-Frimeare_ChangeRequestv1_CDM_Cert_061416.doc | DOC document | |
| CDRL_A002_FCP_ICP_CDM_Cert_061416.doc | DOC document | |
| DI-QCIC81007_ICP.pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Present/Past Performance Evaluation Form
1. Contractor:
2. Customer:
| 3. Contract Number: | Period of Performance: | |||
| 4. Contract Type: Negotiated______________ | Sealed Bid_________________ | |||
| Fixed Price_______________ | Cost Reimbursement________________ | |||
| IDIQ____________________ | Other____________________________ |
5. Complexity of Work: Difficult_____________ Routine:____________________
Ratings: Summarize contractor performance and circle the appropriate performance risk rating for each category.
Quality of Product and Processes Rating: Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Satisfactory, Highly Satisfactory, Outstanding (Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, technical excellence, Quality Awards) Comments:
Timeliness of Performance Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Outstanding (Met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, completed on time, including wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed)
Business Professionalism
(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, technical excellence, response to customer inquiries, problem resolution time and efficiency.)
Customer Satisfaction
(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, technical excellence, satisfaction of customers with the Contractor’s service)
Would you select this firm again? Please explain.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .