MUET-2-Performance Spec (p-Spec) 11 Mar 2024 DRAFT.pdf

Unclassified

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION

FOR THE

MULTI-USE EGRESS TRAINERS (MUET)

11 MAR 2024

PROGRAM MANAGER, TRAINING SYSTEMS (PM TRASYS)

MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS COMMAND (MARCORSYSCOM)

(PMM 130)

Controlled By: United States Marine Corps Controlled By: MARCORSYSCOM, PM TRASYS CUI Category: PROCURE, OPSEC Limited Distribution Control: FEDCON POC: breon.j.williams2.civ@us.navy.mil

DRAFT

This page is intentionally left blank.

MUET Performance Specification Unclassified 11 MAR 2024 ii

Submitted By

Breon Williams Lead Systems-Engineer Multi-Use Egress Trainer Range Training Systems Program Manager, Training Systems Marine Corps Systems Command

Thomas Sikora Project Manager Multi-Use Egress Trainer Range Training Systems Program Manager, Training System Marine Corps Systems Command

Concurrence

Jeffrey Petrusky Ranges Team Lead Range Training Systems Program Manager, Training Systems Marine Corps Systems Command

Rachael Germansky Product Manager Lead Engineer Range Training Systems Program Manager, Training System Marine Corps Systems Command

LtCol Rory Hermann Jr.

Product Manager Range Training Systems Program Manager, Training System Marine Corps Systems Command

Approval

Paul Bourgeois Assistant Program Manager - Engineering Program Manager, Training Systems Marine Corps Systems Command iii

RECORD OF CHANGES

Date Paragraph Inserted By Change Description

13SEP2022 All Barkdoll Updates from MAT Review

11MAR2024 3.1.1.1, 3.5.1.1, 3.5.1.2, 3.5.2,

3.6.1, 3.6.4.1, 4.3.5.2, and Table A-1

Williams, Breon Updates reflecting SRR event held (29FEB2024); clarifies and updates requirements

Refer questions concerning this P-SPEC to:

Breon Williams Family of Egress Trainer Engineer Team Lead Jeff Petrusky Product Manager LtCol Rory Hermann Jr.

Program Manager, Training Systems Marine Corps Systems Command 12211 Science Drive Orlando, Florida 32826

(407) 381-8828 breon.j.williams2.civ@us.navy.mil iv

Table of Contents

1. Scope

2. Applicable Documents

2.1. General

2.2. Government Documents

2.3. Non-Government Documents

2.4. Order of Precedence

3. Requirements

3.1. Performance Characteristics

3.1.1. Reconfiguration

3.1.2. Capacity

3.1.3. Egress Ports

3.1.4. Harness/Seatbelts

3.1.5. Rotation

3.1.6. Interior Emergency Lighting

3.2. Interoperability

3.2.1. Lifting Device

3.2.2. Facilities

3.3. Safety

3.3.1. Warning Labels

3.3.2. Non-Skid Surfaces

3.3.3. Emergency Access Points

3.3.4. Hazards

3.4. Power Characteristics

3.4.1. Batteries

3.5. Environment

3.5.1. Temperature

3.5.2. Shock and Vibration

3.5.3. Salt-Fog/Corrosion

3.5.4. Chlorinated Water Exposure

3.5.5. Ultra-Violet Rays

3.5.6. Storage

3.6. Maintenance

v Unclassified

3.6.1. Mean Time to Repair

3.6.2. Operational Availability

3.6.3. Life Cycle

3.6.4. Tools

4. Verification

4.1. Verification Methods

4.1.1. Analysis (A)

4.1.2. Demonstration (D)

4.1.3. Inspection (I)

4.1.4. Test (T)

4.2. Requirements Verification Testing

4.3. Requirement Verification Procedures

4.3.1. Performance Characteristics Verification Procedures

4.3.2. Interoperability Verification Procedures

4.3.3. Safety Verification Procedures

4.3.4. Power Characteristics Verification Procedures

4.3.5. Environment Verification Procedures

4.3.6. Maintenance Verification Procedures

APPENDIX A Verification Matrix ............................................................................................ A-1

APPENDIX B Acronyms .......................................................................................................... B-1

APPENDIX C References ......................................................................................................... C-1

List of Tables

Table A-1. Verification Matrix .................................................................................................. A-1DRAFT

Unclassified

1. Scope

This Performance Specification (PSPEC) establishes the performance parameters and characteristics for the Multi-Use Egress Trainer (MUET), which is a subsystem of the larger Underwater Egress Trainers (UET) Program. The UET training platforms simulate the cabin layout of Marine air and amphibious/ground vehicles. The UET systems include the Modular Amphibious Egress Trainer (MAET), the Submerged Vehicle Egress Trainer (SVET), and the Shallow Water Egress Trainer (SWET). The new Multi-Use Egress Trainer (MUET) will be a one-for-one replacement for the SVET, which currently replicated vehicles that are no longer in operational use or service in the Fleet Marine Force. The MUET will replicate the next generation of vehicles that are in current operational use and/or planned for delivery.

2. Applicable Documents

2.1. General

The following documents, of the exact issue, listed form a part of this specification to the extent specified herein. This specification is designated as a first tier document. The documents referenced directly in this specification are designated as second tier documents and are considered part of this specification to the extent specified herein. Documents referenced in successive tiers are not part of this specification and are to be used for guidance only.

2.2. Government Documents

MILITARY STANDARDS

MIL-STD-882E DoD Standard Practice – System Safety MIL-STD-1472H DoD Design Criteria Standard – Human Engineering MIL-STD-810H DoD Test Method Standard Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests

OTHER GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

MIL-PRF-24667C Coating System, Non-Skid, For Roll, Spray, or Self- Adhering Application

2.3. Non-Government Documents

AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI)

ANSI Z535.2-2002 Environmental and Facility Safety Signs ANSI Z535.4-2002 Product Safety Signs and Labels

AMERICAN SOCITIEY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS (ASTM)

ASTM B117 Standard Practice for Operating Salt Spray Apparatus ASTM G154 Standard Practice for Operating Fluorescent Ultraviolet (UV) Lamp Apparatus for Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials

Unclassified

2.4. Order of Precedence

Unless otherwise noted herein or in the contract, in the event of a conflict between the text of this document and the references cited herein, the text of this document takes precedence. Nothing in this document, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

3. Requirements

3.1. Performance Characteristics

3.1.1. Reconfiguration

The MUET shall be capable of reconfiguration to provide operable egress ports (hatches, latches, doors, windows) relative to the trainees’ seats in the actual vehicle or platforms. The MUET shall be capable of reconfiguration to provide representative obstacles found in the actual vehicle or platforms. The MUET shall be able to be variant specific reconfigurable and Ready For Training (RFT) within 1 hour of scheduled practical application training.

3.1.1.1. Simulated Platforms

The MUET shall provide a configuration that replicate the basic configuration (hatches, doors, locking mechanisms, seats, and harness-types) and egress obstacles of the Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV), specifically the ACV-Personnel (ACV-P) variant.

The MUET shall provide a configuration that replicate the basic configuration (hatches, doors, locking mechanisms, seats, and harness-types) and egress obstacles of the Light Armored Vehicle (LAV), specifically the LAV-25 A3 variant.

The MUET shall provide a configuration that replicate the basic configuration (hatches, doors, locking mechanisms, seats, and harness-types) and egress obstacles of the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV), specifically the JTLV-Combat Tactical Vehicle (JLTV-CTV) variant.

3.1.2. Capacity

The MUET shall have the capacity to accommodate at least four (4) MUET trainees and two (2) instructors during a MUET training event.

3.1.3. Egress Ports

The MUET shall replicate the egress ports (hatches, latches, doors, windows) of the actual vehicle or platform. The MUET egress ports shall replicate form, fit, and function of the egress ports and latches resembling the actual vehicle or platform.

3.1.3.1. ACV Egress Ports

Unclassified

The MUET ACV configuration shall provide egress ports replicating, including but is not limited to, the driver’s hatch, commander’s hatch, gunner’s hatch, troop hatches, and the ramp door.

3.1.3.2. LAV Egress Ports

The MUET LAV configuration shall provide egress ports replicating, including but is not limited to, the driver’s hatch, emergency hatch, turret hatches, troop hatches, and the rear doors.

3.1.3.3. JLTV Egress Ports

The MUET JLTV configuration shall provide egress ports replicating, including but is not limited to, the driver’s door, the front passenger’s side door, the rear passenger’s side door, the rear driver’s side door, and the turret hatch.

3.1.4. Harness/Seatbelts

The MUET shall provide functional harnesses/seatbelts that are representative in size, weight, and locking mechanism to that of the actual vehicle or platform.

3.1.5. Rotation

The MUET shall be capable of physical rotation of 360-degree rotation in both directions along the longitudinal axis (front to rear of vehicle/platform).

The MUET shall have the ability to be paused at 45-degree increments along the entire rotation range and locked in place for egress.

The MUET shall be able to self-right by returning to the upright position of the trainer while being raise out of the water to allow for water draining.

3.1.6. Interior Emergency Lighting

The MUET shall provide functional lighting representative of actual vehicle or platform emergency lighting that is used during underwater egress.

3.2. Interoperability

3.2.1. Lifting Device

The MUET shall be interoperable with the existing lifting devices (Cross Gantry Hoist Model 10000/12000) and MILCON locations (SmartJib), including but not limited to, the lifting point interface, emergency retraction, emergency stops, and braking controls. A MUET fully loaded with trainees, instructors and equipment shall be able to be lifted by the existing lifting devices (Cross Gantry Hoist Model 10000/12000) and MILCON locations (SmartJib) without exceeding the rated lifting capacity.

3.2.2. Facilities

Unclassified

The MUET shall be designed for operation (including but not limited to: setup, reconfiguration, training, maintenance, building/pool area ingress & egress and storage) in the existing UET facilities and as shown on the MILCON Design Drawings for CPEN & Guam.

3.2.2.1. Pool Edge Clearance

The MUET shall be designed to allow for a clearance of at least 6 feet between the MUET and pool edge during training to allow for trainee egress.

3.3.Safety

3.3.1. Warning Labels

Warning labels or placards (signs) shall be attached to or adjacent to any equipment that presents a hazard to personnel (e.g., high voltage, heat, toxic vapors, explosion, radiation, or other bodily hazards).

3.3.1.1. Visibility

Warning placards and labels shall be legible from a safe distance. For guidance on minimum text size for placards and labels, see 5.4.7.2, ANSI Z535.2, and ANSI Z535.4, as applicable.

3.3.1.2. No-Step

NO-STEP markings shall be placed at locations where personnel would likely step but doing so could cause equipment damage or personnel injury.

3.3.1.3. Exclusionary Area

Exclusionary areas of the MUET where personnel should not enter or interact with shall be marked and have barriers preventing personnel from entering the excluded area.

3.3.2. Non-Skid Surfaces

The MUET system shall possess non-skid traction surfaces where personnel must step to ingress or egress the MUET.

3.3.3. Emergency Access Points

The MUET system shall possess emergency access points in enclosed locations where safety divers do not have direct physical access to trainees. These emergency access points shall allow safety divers to view the trainees in the enclosed area and to be quickly removed to allow for real world emergency egress from the MUET. The emergency access points shall be unobstructed and free of fixtures, hinges, or equipment that might snag or impinge upon successful egress or rescue.

3.3.4. Hazards

Unclassified

The MUET components or subsystems shall not present additional hazards than that in the actual vehicle or platform that would result in the occupant being impeded or trapped while attempting to egress the MUET.

3.4. Power Characteristics

3.4.1. Batteries

3.4.1.1. Battery Indicator

All batteries shall be paired with an indicator that displays the battery power level.

3.5. Environment

3.5.1. Temperature

3.5.1.1. Operating Temperature

The MUET systems shall withstand exposure across the operating temperature range from 0 °F (-18 °C) to 120 °F (49 °C) throughout the designed lifecycle of the MUET, without damage or degradation in performance.

3.5.1.2. Storage Temperature

The MUET systems shall withstand exposure across the storage temperature range from -6 °F (- 21 °C) to 160 °F (71 °C) throughout the designed lifecycle of the MUET, without damage or degradation in performance.”

3.5.2. Shock and Vibration

The MUET shall be resistant to shock in the vertical direction which would result in mechanical deformation. The minimum shock environment MUET shall be resistant to for daily operation is 92 ft/min (falling) and 32.8 ft/min (raising). The MUET shall be resist to transportation vibration during shipping and day-to-day operations.

3.5.3. Salt-Fog/Corrosion

The MUET shall be able to withstand salt-fog throughout the designed lifecycle of the MUET, without damage or degradation in performance.

3.5.4. Chlorinated Water Exposure

The MUET shall withstand routine exposure to chlorinated water throughout the designed lifecycle of the MUET, without damage or degradation in performance.

3.5.5. Ultra-Violet Rays

Unclassified

The MUET shall withstand routine exposure to sunshine and ultra-violet rays throughout the designed lifecycle of the MUET, without damage or degradation in performance.

3.5.6. Storage

The MUET shall be capable of being stored in the existing UET storage facilities and spaces allocated in the two new MILCONs.

3.6. Maintenance

3.6.1. Mean Time to Repair

The Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) MUET to operational condition shall be 24 hours or less. The MUET operational condition shall be a minimum of 50% training capacity.

3.6.2. Operational Availability

The MUET system shall be capable of operations for eight-hours a day, five-days a week, with a 99% operational availability level.

3.6.3. Life Cycle

The MUET shall be designed for a minimum 15-year life cycle.

3.6.4. Tools

The MUET shall be designed to conduct reconfiguration, repair, part replacement, and maintenance using standard tools.

3.6.4.1. On-Site Transportation

The MUET shall be equipped with the required equipment to allow the MUET to be transported to and from training locations and storage locations. The MUET shall interface with the form, fit, and function of existing push/ pull equipment.

4. Verification

4.1. Verification Methods

4.1.1. Analysis (A)

Analysis is a method of verification that uses established technical or mathematical models, simulations, algorithms, charts, graphs, or other scientific principles and procedures to provide evidence that state requirements were met.

4.1.2. Demonstration (D)

Unclassified

Demonstration is a method of verification that involves the operation of an item or the system to provide evidence that the required functions were accomplished under the specified conditions.

The items may be instrumented and performance monitored.

4.1.3. Inspection (I)

Inspection is a method of verification in which visual examination of the system and associated deliverable items is used; this shall determine whether the system shall conform to the specified requirements.

4.1.4. Test (T)

Testing is a method of verification in which scientific principles and procedures are applied to quantitatively measures to determine the functional capabilities of items.

4.2. Requirements Verification Testing

Unless otherwise specified by this Performance Specification, the contract, or purchase order, verification summarized in Appendix A, Table A-1 will be performed using verification procedures detailed within Section 4.3.

4.3. Requirement Verification Procedures

4.3.1. Performance Characteristics Verification Procedures

4.3.1.1. Reconfiguration

Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) will visually inspect the MUET system and drawings to verify compliance with Section 3.1.1 to ensure the MUET can be reconfigured between the required simulated platforms.

An analysis will verify that a MUET can be reconfigured within the timeframe provided in Section 3.1.1.

4.3.1.1.1. Simulated Platforms

The MUET system and drawings will be visually inspected by SMEs to verify compliance with Section 3.1.1.1.

4.3.1.2. Capacity

A demonstration of MUET systems, showing their ability to be submerged in water and have the required capacity for MUET trainees and instructors to egress will be performed to verify compliance with Section 3.1.2.

4.3.1.3. Egress Ports

Unclassified

The MUET system and drawings will be visually inspected by SMEs to verify compliance with Section 3.1.3.

4.3.1.3.1. ACV Egress Ports

The MUET system and drawings for the ACV platform will be visually inspected by SMEs to verify compliance with Section 3.1.3.1.

4.3.1.3.2. LAV Egress Ports

The MUET system’s drawings for the LAV platform will be visually inspected by SMEs to verify compliance with Section 3.1.3.2.

4.3.1.3.3. JLTV Egress Ports

The MUET system’s drawings for the JLTV platform will be visually inspected by SMEs to verify compliance with Section 3.1.3.3.

4.3.1.4. Harness/Seatbelts

The MUET system and drawings for the each platform will be visually inspected by SMEs to verify compliance with Section 3.1.4.

4.3.1.5. Rotation

A demonstration will verify that the MUET is capable of controlled rotation in and out of water in compliance with Section 3.1.5.

4.3.1.6. Interior Emergency Lighting

A demonstration will verify that the MUET provides interior emergency lighting for the each platform to verify compliance with Section 3.1.6.

4.3.2. Interoperability Verification Procedures

4.3.2.1. Lifting Device

A demonstration will verify that the MUET is capable of interoperating with the existing lifting devices (Cross Gantry Hoist Model 10000/12000 and SmartJib) in compliance with Section 3.2.1.

An analysis will verify that a fully loaded MUET will not exceed the rated lifting capacity of the lifting devices in compliance with Section 3.2.1.

4.3.2.2. Facilities

A demonstration will verify that the MUET is fully interoperable with existing systems and new MILCON locations (CPEN-DelMar and Guam) In Accordance With (IAW) Section 3.2.2.

Unclassified

4.3.2.2.1. Pool Edge Clearance

An inspection will verify that the MUET provides a clearance of at least 6 feet between the MUET and pool edge in compliance with Section 3.2.2.1.

4.3.3.Safety Verification Procedures

4.3.3.1. Warning Labels

An inspection will verify that warning labels are properly located on MUET in compliance with Section 3.3.1.

4.3.3.1.1. Visibility

An inspection will verify that warning labels are properly sized, and located on MUET, in compliance with Section 3.3.1.1.

4.3.3.1.2. No-Step

An inspection will verify that ‘No-Step’ warning labels are properly located on MUET in compliance with Section 3.3.1.2.

4.3.3.1.3. Exclusionary Area

An inspection will verify that exclusion areas have barriers and warning labels on MUET in compliance with Section 3.3.1.3.

4.3.3.2. Non-Skid Surfaces

The MUET systems will be inspected to ensure that surfaces are non-skid according to MIL- PRF-24667C IAW Section 3.3.2.

4.3.3.3. Emergency Access Points

A demonstration will verify that the MUET possess emergency access points that allow safety divers to view trainees and may be quickly removable in compliance with Section 3.3.3.

An analysis will verify that emergency access points are located in the proper areas of the MUET in compliance with Section 3.3.3.

An inspection will verify that the emergency access points are unobstructed and free from snag-causing obstacles in compliance with Section 3.3.3.

4.3.3.4. Hazards

Verification of the MUET systems’ compliance with Section 3.3.4 will be performed by analysis of the systems’ compliance with MIL-STD-882E and MIL-STD-1472GH.

Unclassified

4.3.4. Power Characteristics Verification Procedures

4.3.4.1. Batteries

4.3.4.1.1. Battery Indicator

A demonstration will verify that, when powered, a power life indicator indicates the battery level in compliance with Section 3.4.1.1.

4.3.5. Environment Verification Procedures

4.3.5.1. Temperature

4.3.5.1.1. Operating Temperature

Verification of the MUET systems’ compliance with Section 3.5.1.1 will be performed by analysis of the systems’ compliance to using components that can meet the testing procedures outlined in MIL-STD-810H, High Temperature, Method 501.7 Procedure II – Operation, Conditions (1) and MIL-STD-810H, Low Temperature, Method 502.7 Procedure II – Operation.

4.3.5.1.2. Storage Temperature

Verification of the MUET systems’ compliance with Section 3.5.1.2 will be performed by analysis of the systems’ compliance to using components that can meet the testing procedures outlined in MIL-STD-810H, High Temperature, Method 501.7 Procedure I – Storage and MIL- STD-810H, Low Temperature, Method 502.7 Procedure I – Storage.

4.3.5.2. Shock and Vibration

Verification of the MUET systems’ compliance with Section 3.5.2 will be performed by a test, following procedures from MIL-STD-810H Method 514.8 Procedure III (Large Assembly Transportation).

4.3.5.3. Salt-Fog/Corrosion

Verification of the MUET systems’ compliance with Section 3.5.3 will be performed by analysis of the systems’ compliance to using components that can meet the testing procedures from MIL- STD-810H Method 509.7 and standard ASTM B117.

4.3.5.4. Chlorinated Water Exposure

Verification of the MUET systems’ compliance with Section 3.5.4 will be performed by analysis to verify compliance.

4.3.5.5. Ultra-Violet Rays

Unclassified

Verification of the MUET systems’ compliance with Section 3.5.5 will be performed by analysis of the systems’ compliance to using components that can meet the testing procedures from MIL- STD-810H Method 505.7 Procedure 1, climate conditions A1 and standards ASTM G154.

4.3.5.6. Storage

An inspection shall verify that the MUET system is capable of being stored in the existing UET facilities IAW Section 3.5.6.

4.3.6. Maintenance Verification Procedures

4.3.6.1. Mean Time to Repair

Verification of the MUET systems’ compliance with Section 3.6.1 will be performance by analysis.

4.3.6.2. Operational Availability

Verification of the MUET systems’ compliance with Section 3.6.2 will be performance by analysis.

4.3.6.3. Life Cycle

Verification of the MUET systems’ compliance with Section 3.6.3 will be performance by analysis.

4.3.6.4. Tools

A demonstration shall verify that that the MUET system can be reconfigured and maintained using standard tools in compliance with Section 3.6.5.

4.3.6.4.1. On-Site Transportation

An inspection shall verify that the MUET system was provided with any necessary equipment for on-site transportation in compliance with Section 3.6.5.1.

A demonstration shall verify that the MUET system can interface with the on-site push cart for on-site transportation of difficult terrain in compliance with Section 3.6.5.1. DRAFT

A-1

CUI

APPENDIX A Verification Matrix

Table A-1. Verification Matrix

Requirement Description Requirement

Paragraph Verification Paragraph

Verification Method

A D I T Reconfiguration 3.1.1 4.3.1.1 X X Simulated Platform 3.1.1.1 4.3.1.1.1 X Capacity 3.1.2 4.3.1.2 X Egress Ports 3.1.3 4.3.1.3 X ACV Egress Ports 3.1.3.1 4.3.1.3.1 X LAV Egress Ports 3.1.3.2 4.3.1.3.2 X JLTV Egress Ports 3.1.3.3 4.3.1.3.3 X Harness/Seatbelts 3.1.4 4.3.1.4 X Rotation 3.1.5 4.3.1.5 X Interior Emergency Lighting 3.1.6 4.3.1.6 X Lifting Device - Interoperability 3.2.1 4.3.2.1 X X Facilities - Interoperability 3.2.2 4.3.2.2 X Pool Edge Clearance 3.2.2.1 4.3.2.2.1 X Warning Labels 3.3.1 4.3.3.1 X Visibility – Warning Labels 3.3.1.1 4.3.3.1.1 X No-Step – Warning Labels 3.3.1.2 4.3.3.1.2 X Exclusionary Area 3.3.1.3 4.3.3.1.3 X Non-Skid Surfaces 3.3.2 4.3.3.2 X Emergency Access Points 3.3.3 4.3.3.3 X X X Hazards 3.3.4 4.3.3.4 X Battery Indicator 3.4.1.1 4.3.4.1.1 X Operating Temperature 3.5.1.1 4.3.5.1.1 X Storage Temperature 3.5.1.2 4.3.5.1.2 X Shock and Vibration 3.5.2 4.3.5.2 X Salt Fog / Corrosion 3.5.3 4.3.5.3 X Chlorinated Water Exposure 3.5.4 4.3.5.4 X Ultra-Violet Rays 3.5.5 4.3.5.5 X Storage 3.5.6 4.3.5.6 X Mean Time To Repair 3.6.1 4.3.6.1 X Operational Availability 3.6.2 4.3.6.2 X Life Cycle 3.6.3 4.3.6.3 X Tools 3.6.4 4.3.6.4 X On-Site Transportation 3.6.4.1 4.3.6.4.1 X XDRAFT

B-1 Unclassified

APPENDIX B Acronyms

Acronym Definition

A ACV Amphibious Combat Vehicle ANSI American National Standards Institute ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials B C D DoD Department of Defense E F FET Family of Egress Trainers G H

I J JLTV Joint Light Tactical Vehicle K L LAV Light Armored Vehicle M MAET Modular Amphibious Egress Trainer MARCORSYSCOM Marine Corps Systems Command MCO Marine Corps Order MIL-HDBK Military Handbook MIL-PRF Military Performance Standard MIL-STD Military Standard MTTR Mean Time To Repair MUET Multi-Use Egress Trainer N O

P PM Program Manager PSPEC Performance Specification Q R S SME Subject Matter Expert SVET Submerged Vehicle Egress Trainer SWET Shallow Water Egress Trainer

B-2 Unclassified

T TRASYS Training Systems U UET Underwater Egress Trainer V W X

XGH Cross-Gantry and Hoist Y Z

C-1 Unclassified

APPENDIX C References

Capabilities Production Document (CPD) for the Family of Egress Trainers (FET), 2010.

Capability Requirement Change (CRC) for the Family of Egress Trainers (FET), 2022.