AMENDMENT_007_FINAL.pdf

N40027-20-R-0001

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

RFP: N40027-20-R-0001 NPTU BARGE SSP: SERM-016-20 AMENDMENT 0007

SEE SF30 CONTINUATION PAGE FOR CHANGES

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 30-Oct-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4002720R0001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

30-Aug-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

30-Oct-2019

CODE

COMMANDER SOUTHEAST REGIONAL MAINTENANCE

P.O. BOX 280057 MAYPORT NAVAL STATION

JACKSONVILLE FL 32228-0057

N40027 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4002720R0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 007

The purpose of this Amendment is to answer Bidder’s Questions 004, 005, 006, and 007.

Bidders Question No. 004 –

Question: CONMACO, the OEM of the subject work item, respectfully request an extension for submitting a bid and the issuance of a revised request for complete turnkey replacement in kind consisting of all new equipment. The Winch and HPU were delivered to the end user in 1988 and it have been determined that, the model 1100 is no longer made, it’s obsolete and most if not all of the parts are also no longer available.

Answer: The work item is deleted in its entirety. Work specification will be revised to incorporate deletion as a separate Amendment.

Bidders Question No. 005 –

Question:

1. Specifications call for a new coating application over the existing insulated metal panel system. In order to coat the roof, the surface must be prepared to receive the coating. This process, whether it be by power washing, sand blasting, or scarifying, will create debris which cannot be contained. Coating debris, possibly asbestos laden, will be uncontained creating debris runoff into the surrounding waterway. Removal by mechanical means will create airborne debris.

How is containment of this debris to be accomplished?

2. Reference MIL-PRF-24667C dated 22 May 2008. This is a specification for a flight deck on an ocean-going vessel. The “weather deck” on IX-516, is in fact a pre-engineered metal building, which happens to be affixed to a barge. The roof composition is an insulated metal roof panel with lap seams comprised of 22-20-gauge galvanized steel skin sandwiching approximately 2-inch-thick polyisocyanurate core. Is this specification compatible with the roof assembly of IX-

516?

3. In lieu of the specified coating system, is the following scope of work permissible? Inspect the existing roof panel system for structural deterioration, apply rust-inhibiting coating to any surface rust, install expanded polystyrene insulation chamfered to fit within the existing metal panel ribs, install exterior gypsum core roof protection board, install poly-vinyl chloride roof membrane mechanically attached to the existing purlin structure at a rate to satisfy local wind uplift pressures. This is a code-enforcement body tested roof assembly eligible for a twenty-year water tightness warranty (in traditional ground-based applications) and it will encapsulate the existing coating system eliminating the discharge of harmful coating debris from entering the surrounding waterway.

Answer:

1. NSI 009-06 requires containment of all contaminants by the Contractor. Work item 077-11-

001 tells the Contractor how to resolve any hazardous waste issues created by the operation.

This is in addition to OSHA, federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations.

2. No. MIL-PRF-24667 Rev C is applicable to exterior steel surfaces including flight decks, hangar decks, vertrep areas, walk areas, aircraft elevator platform areas, all other deck areas and any other applications specified by the Manufacturer. Repair, sealing and preservation of the exterior steel surface will be covered by the revised work specification.

3. SERMC Engineering has determined that the Contractor’s recommended method of repair and preservation as listed in question number 3 above is acceptable. Work specification will be revised to incorporate any changes.

Bidders Question No. 006 –

Question: In Amendment 002, Section L, Paragraph 5.3.B it states “Relevant contracts are as set forth in Section M.” Section M, Volume III, Factor 3, states “These CPARS will be retrieved using the offeror’s CAGE Code, name, address and division identified on SF33 or SF30”. It is our understanding / interpretation from reading Section M, that a company can only submit a

CPAR for a specific division for it to be considered for award. : If a CPAR was issued to a specific division of a parent company with several divisions (each with its own CAGE code) can a different division from the same parent company use the CPAR that was issued to a different division as a valid past performance for award?

Answer: No, a division of a parent company can not use the CPARs from another division with a different CAGE code. Only CPARs for your CAGE code will be evaluated.

Bidders Question No. 007 –

Question: It is our understanding that Past Performance Questionnaires (PPG) are to be filled out and submitted by the agency submitting the questionnaire. Per Amendment 002, Section L, paragraph 5.3.B which states the PPQ must be and submitted directly to SERMC by the Project

Manager/Contracting Officer or an authorized agent of the customer who oversaw the effort” If

PPQ’s are required, does the offeror fill it out as a self-assessment, or does the Government representative who monitored the work performed on behalf of the customer (SWRMC or other

Navy command) fill it out and submit?

Answer: PPQs are not required. PPQs MAY be submitted for actions completed that are not in the CPARS database. The potential offeror does not fill out or submit the form. The offeror sends the blank PPIR form to the Government representative who oversaw the effort. That

Government person fills out the data and submits to Anderson, Heidi Leigh CIV SERMC

(heidi.anderson@navy.mil) and Oconnor, Chris CIV Southeast RMC Mayport FL, 400

(chris.oconnor1@navy.mil) by the proposal due date.

The Proposal due date is extended to 2:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, November 13, 2019.

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

t is our understanding that Past Performance Questionnaires (PPG) are to be filled out and submitted by the agency submitting the questionnaire. Per Amendment 002, Section L, paragraph 5.3.B which states the PPQ must be and submitted directly to SERMC by the Project

Manager/Contracting Officer or an authorized agent of the customer who oversaw the effort”

Question: If PPQ’s are required, does the offeror fill it out as a self-assessment, or does the

Government representative who monitored the work performed on behalf of the customer

(SWRMC or other Navy command) fill it out and submit?

The required response date/time has changed from 04-Nov-2019 02:00 PM to 13-Nov-2019 02:00 PM.

(End of Summary of Changes)