Vendor Questions - Government Answers 2.pdf
PDF 62 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Naval Base New London, Groton, CT Rental (1) 100 HP, (1) 200 HP (3) 400 HP LPACs with support services
- Solicitation number
- N3904025Q0011
About this file
This document is a vendor questions and answers file for Naval Base New London's solicitation (N3904025Q0011) for leasing Low Pressure Air Compressor (LPAC) systems. The Q&A addresses two key technical queries: first, clarifying that E-stop cable routing is distinct from power cables and may require extended cabling to a manned location; second, addressing lifting requirements for equipment pad eyes, with riggers indicating preliminary acceptance of spreader bar and sling lifting methods contingent on providing detailed lifting diagrams and load test proof. The responses suggest technical flexibility in implementation, with the government seeking detailed documentation to validate proposed equipment handling and installation approaches.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Question: My question is on Section 3.2.11.1, is the E-stop cable being referred to the same as the power cable to the compressor? Meaning that would there need to 500FT of power wire for each compressor, with the expectation that we have 1500FT available?
I see the 3 IN and 2IN Air Hose has lengths, but the E-stop and cabling just say to refer to the Paragraph for each LPAC System SOW.
Answer: 3.2.11 is referring to the E-stop cabling only, not power cables. The E-stop gets routed to a location that is manned. This may be farther than the planned power supply location, which could necessitate extended E-stop cabling
Question: Does the 200% load test for 2 minutes requirement apply only to ILAs (pad eyes) that are welded directly on to frame of a unit? Does the test requirement apply to pad eyes that are bolted to frame of a unit?
If an ILA (pad eye) is not designed to handle WLL 6,000 lbs, is providing design details / drawings / calculations the only requirement to receive technical approval? IE A compressor weighing 10,000 lbs with 4 pad eyes in corners (2,500 lbs load anticipated for each).
Can PNSY support lifting units utilizing spreader bars and slings if lifting diagrams are provided?
Answer: The riggers would need to see this diagram prior to giving a 100% yes but preliminary they don’t see any issues as long as there is proof of load test.”
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .