PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (V1.1, 7-23-13).doc
DOC document 659 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MSC Material Management Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N3220522R0004
About this file
This document contains a contractor performance questionnaire template to be used for evaluating past performance on a material management services contract opportunity. The Military Sealift Command is soliciting proposals for material management services under solicitation N3220522R0004, with questions due by December 13, 2021 and proposals due by January 7, 2022. The questionnaire requests ratings and comments on quality, timeliness, business relations, key personnel, and cost control (for cost contracts) for a given contractor and contract. An overall rating is also requested, with exceptional and unsatisfactory ratings requiring explanations. The respondent is asked if they would hire the contractor in the future. Signature and contact information are required for the completed questionnaire.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
MSC Material Management has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
TO:
FACSIMILE:
PHONE:
EMAIL:
INFORMATION REQUEST
Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:
a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)
In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION 24 January 2022 to Brent Frost/ James Van Natta to brent.w.frost.civ@us.navy.mil and james.m.vannatta.civ@us.navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.
Thank you, Brent Frost
Contract Specialist
For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing is provided below.
| Military Sealift Command |
| Attn: Brent Frost/ James Van Natta |
471 East C Street Bldg. SP-64
Norfolk, VA 23511
From:
(Name and Address of Organization)
(Point of Contact Name)
(Facsimile/Phone Number)
(E-mail Address)
To (Point of Contact Name)
Brent Frost/ James Van Natta
(E-mail Addresses) brent.w.frost.civ@us.navy.mil/ james.m.vannatta.civ@us.navy.mil
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACTOR NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
EVALUATION PERIOD:
DELIVERY ORDER NO.:
1.
Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organization.
2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.
a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.
c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.
d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.
e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings
3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.
Signed:__________________________________
DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
MSC V1.1 (23 July 2013)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .