ATT_P-5_PPQ.doc

DOC document 108 KB Posted

Attached to
Aircrew Scheduling and Ground Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N00421-17-R-0066
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command Naval Air Warfare Center

About this file

P-5

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Aircrew Scheduling and Ground Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
ATT_6_Base_Acc_Req.doc DOC document
ATT_13_OPSEC_DI-MGMT.pdf PDF
N00421-17-R-0066.docx DOCX document
ATT_9_SAAR-N_Instructions.pdf PDF
ATT_10_SAAR-N_Guidance_2016Oct19.docx DOCX document
ATT_12_Travel_Req.xls XLS spreadsheet
ATT_P-4_Past_Performance.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_P-6B_Cost_Summary_Spreadsheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_P6-A_-_Cost_Summary_Spreadsheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
ATT_16_CDRLS_5-8.pdf PDF
ATT_19_CDRLS__17-20.pdf PDF
ATT_17__CDRLS__9-12.pdf PDF
ATT_15__CDRLS__1-4.pdf PDF
ATT_23_COR_Functions__Duties.doc DOC document
ATT_P-3_PastPerformMatrix.doc DOC document
ATT_24_OCI_List.doc DOC document
ATT_18_CDRLS__13-16.pdf PDF
ATT_8-TASS-Reg_Req.pdf PDF
ATT_11_SAAR-N_Form_Rev_9_11.pdf PDF
ATT_1_SOW_Final.docx DOCX document
ATT_3_CONTRACT_SURVEILLANCE_PLAN.doc DOC document
ATT_7_SECNAV_BaseVisitReq.pdf PDF
ATT_5_Funds_Expenditure_Report.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment P5

From: Naval Air Systems Command Aircraft Support Contracts Department

21983 Bundy Road Unit 7 Building 441 Patuxent River, MD 20670-1127

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE PACKAGE FOR SERVICES

FOR SOLICITATION:

Submit completed past performance questionnaire package by 2 Week Prior to Proposal Due Date to: Contract Specialist Melody Baron

By Facsimile at:
N/A
Email to:
melody.baron@navy.mil

(1) Name of Contractor questionnaire is being completed for:

(2) Contract Number:

(3) Role Contractor played in Prior Contract

Prime

Joint Venture Team Member

Subcontractor

(4) Proposed Role in Pending Contract

Prime

Joint Venture Team Member

Subcontractor

(5) Length of time your agency/firm has been involved with the Offeror:

(6) Contract type:

(7) Contract value:

(8) Description of service:

(9) Is Performance on this contract being reported in CPARS

No, complete page 2 of questionnaire

Yes, answer question (i) below

(i) Has the scope of work significantly changed since the last CPAR?

No

Yes, provide details in (iv) below

(ii) Have there been any significant changes in contractor performance between the last CPAR and now?

No

Yes, answer question (iii) below

(iii) Has an out-of-cycle CPAR been initiated to document changes in performance?

No, provide details of changes in (iv) below

Yes

(iv) Comments to support answers to questions (i), (ii) and (iii):

(10) Name of agency/company completing questionnaire:

(11) Name of person completing questionnaire:

(12) Email address of person completing questionnaire:

(13) Title of person completing questionnaire:

(14) Phone number of person completing questionnaire:

(15) Date questionnaire is being completed:

RATING SCALE: Please use the following ratings to answer the questions on page 2.

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Neutral
No record exists.
N/A
(Not applicable) should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation

NOTE: For statements indicating less than “Satisfactory”, please provide a brief explanation in the comments section of the survey.

CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY FOR SERVICES
N/A
Neutral
Unsatisfactory
Marginal
Satisfactory
Very Good
Exceptional

a.) QUALITY OF SERVICE:

(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(3) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

b.) COST CONTROL:

(1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(3) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

(4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

c.) SCHEDULE:

(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

d.) BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and/or Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(3) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(4) The Contractor promptly notified the COR, TPOC, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(5) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(6) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.

(7) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

e.) MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:

(1) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.

(2) The Contractor proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.

f.) CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

(1) The services provided adequately met the needs of the program.

(2) The Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or the TPOC.

(3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.

COMMENTS:

AIR- 2.5.1 PPQ FORM

VERSION D1 07/2008

File details come from the government source that posted it.