N00421-16-R-0088.pdf

CODE

(Hour)

PAGE(S)

until 10:00 AM local time 05 Jun 2017

X

A

X B

X C X D

EX

X

G

F 61 - 66

67 - 83

X H 84 - 94 jeffrey .t.smith6@navy .mil

RATING PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUED BY

(Date)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

1 94

(If other than Item 7)

15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

AND

ADDRESS

SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

OF

OFFEROR

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS

IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER

SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

18. OFFER DATE

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

2. CONTRACT NO.

N00421 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

See Item 7

9. Sealed offers in original and 1 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)

JEFFREY T. SMITH 301-757-1996

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS

1 - 2

3 - 8

X I CONTRACT CLAUSES

DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X

PACKAGING AND MARKING

9 - 31

32 - 33

J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

34 - 35

36 - 38 X K

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA 39 - 42 X

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) 43 - 50 X M

L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

FACILITY

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

X

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE

EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)

CODE CODE

B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

PART IV - REPRESENTATIO NS AND INSTRUCTIO NS

PART III - LIST O F DO CUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND O THER ATTACHMENTS

51 - 59

PART II - CO NTRACT CLAUSES

NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AD (PAX)

CODE 2.5.1.5

22473 MILLSTONE ROAD

BLDG 505

PATUXENT RIVER MD 20670

FAX:

TEL:

FAX:

TEL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.5. DATE ISSUED

05 May 2017

4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

[ X ]

3. SOLICITATION NO.

N00421-16-R-0088

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

POINTS OF CONTACT

POINTS OF CONTACT

CONTRACT SPECIALIST: Jeffrey Smith

TELEPHONE NUMBER: 301-757-1996

EMAIL ADDRESS: jeffrey.t.smith6@navy.mil

CONTRACTING OFFICER: Melinda Stann

TELEPHONE NUMBER: 301-757-0008

EMAIL ADDRESS: melinda.stann@navy.mil

CONTRACTING OFFICER REPRESENTATIVE:

TO BE DETERMINED AT CONTRACT AWARD

SUMMARY

(1) This acquisition is a Small Business Set-Aside that will result in a Single Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite

Quantity (IDIQ) contract.

(2) NAVAIR clause 5252.211-9503 LEVEL OF EFFORT (COST REIMBURSEMENT)(NAVAIR)(DEC 2012) will be included in all LOE Task Orders.

(3) The NAICS for this procurement is 541330.

(4) The Product Service Code (PSC) for this procurement is R425.

(5) The resulting Single Award IDIQ contract will have an ordering period of five (5) years.

(6) This contract will have cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) and cost reimbursement (non-fee bearing) line items.

(7) It is anticipated that the Government will issue a stand-alone order for each PMA or competency utilizing the services under this IDIQ contract. It is further anticipated that Task Orders issued under this contract award will reflect CLINs based on the tasking by fund type.

(8) The Government anticipates issuing twelve (12) Task Orders at the time of award.

mailto:jeffrey.t.smith6@navy.mil mailto:melinda.stann@navy

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Lot

LABOR Ceiling for CLINs 0002-0006

CPFF

(LOE - SOW 3.1 through 3.2.12) Ceiling for CLINs 0002 through 0006.

FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

FIXED FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

0002 1 Lot

NSP LABOR - Procurement

Not Separately Priced Labor in support of CLIN 0001.

0003 Lot

NSP LABOR - RDT&E

0004 1 Lot

NSP LABOR - O&M

0005 1 Lot

NSP LABOR - Working Capital Funds (WCF)

0006 1 Lot

NSP LABOR - FMS

0007 1 Lot OTHER DIRECT COST (ODC) Ceiling

COST

Travel & Material Ceiling for CLINs 0008 through 0012.

Travel & Material in accordance with Section C, Statement of Work.

0008 1 Lot NSP ODCs - Procurement

COST

Not Separately Priced Labor in support of CLIN 0007.

0009 1 Lot NSP ODCs - RDT&E

COST

0010 1 Lot NSP ODCs - O&M

COST

0011 1 Lot NSP ODCs - Working Capital Funds (WCF)

COST

0012 1 Lot NSP ODCs - FMS

COST

ITEM

NO

SUPPLIES/SERVICES AMOUNT

0013 TECHNICAL DATA

NSP

COST

Technical Data in support of CLINs 0001 through 0006, Contract Data

Requirements List (CDRLs), Exhibit A, Not Separately Priced.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

5252.211-9503 LEVEL OF EFFORT (COST REIMBURSEMENT) (NAVAIR)(DEC 2012)

(a) The level of effort estimated to be ordered during the term of this contract is 835,200 man-hours of direct labor including authorized subcontract labor, if any. The contractor shall not, under any circumstances, exceed one hundred (100%) percent of the total level of effort specified in this basic contract. The estimated composition of the total man-hours of direct labor by classification is as follows:

CLIN 0001 – 835,200 Labor Hours

(b) FAR Clause 52.232-20, "Limitation of Cost" applies to fully funded orders and FAR Clause 52.232-22, "Limitation of Funds" applies to incrementally funded orders. Nothing in this clause amends the rights or responsibilities of the parties hereto under either of those two clauses. In addition, the notifications required by this clause are separate and distinct from any specified in either FAR Clause 52.232-20 or FAR Clause 52.232-22.

(c) In the event that less than one hundred (100%) percent of the established level of effort of the contract/order is actually expended by the end of the performance period, the Government shall have the option of:

(1) Requiring the Contractor to continue performance, subject to the provisions of the FAR Clause 52.232-20 or

52.232-22, as applicable, until the effort expended equals 100% of the established Level of Effort; or

(2) Effecting a reduction in the fixed fee by the percentage by which the total expended man-hours is less than one hundred (100%) percent of the established Level of Effort.

(d) The contractor agrees that effort performed in fulfillment of level of effort obligations under this contract shall include only verifiable effort in direct support of the work specified. It shall not include efforts such as work performed in transit to or from an employee's usual workplace, work during lunchtime activities, or effort performed at other non-work locations.

(e) In performing the contract/order, the contractor may use any reasonable combination of hours for the labor categories in support of section C of this contract/order.

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

STATEMENT OF WORK

SECTION C DESCRIPTION

Item 0001-0006 – The contractor shall provide SERVICES in accordance with Sections 3.1 through 3.2.12 of the

Statement of Work (SOW) as detailed in individual task orders. Each task order will include a SOW that details which tasks within the scope of the basic contract that are to be performed.

Item 0007-0012 – The contractor shall provide TRAVEL & MATERIAL as follows: TRAVEL shall be provided in accordance the SOW and NAVAIR Clause 5252.232-9509. MATERIAL shall be provided in accordance with the

SOW and H Clause 5252.242-9515 “Restriction on The Direct Charging of Material”.

Item 0013 – The DATA reports to be furnished hereunder shall be in accordance with Exhibit A, DD Form 1423, Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs), CDRLs A001-A007, and the SOW as required by the individual Task

Order.

STATEMENT OF WORK

SYSTEMS SPECIALTY ENGINEERING SERVICES

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAWCAD) Code AIR-4.1 is tasked to perform systems specialty engineering, analysis, development, integration, testing and fleet introduction and support of warfare systems into

Naval Aircraft. This includes direct systems engineering support throughout the full life cycle of a weapon system from concept development to disposal and is applied to all Naval Aircraft (Tactical, Vertical Lift, Maritime, UAV's, Targets and advanced weapons), Foreign Military Sales (FMS) and support systems.

Aircraft Programs supported under this solicitation will include, but not be limited to, programs such as the Joint

Strike Fighter (JSF), F/A-18, EA-6, AV-8, V-22, Navy Commercial Derivative Aircraft, Tactical Reconnaissance

Unmanned Air Systems (UAS), Aerial Targets Systems, E-2, C-130, KC-130, P-3, P-8, H-1, H-60, H-53, Scan

Eagle UAS, Fire Scout UAS, Triton UAS, Shadow UAS, Joint Tactical Combat Training Systems, Night Vision

Devices, Integral Cockpit Lighting, Mission Planning, Advanced Avionics Technology Demonstration, Common

Avionics, Electronic Warfare (EW) Systems, Communication, Navigation, Advanced Tactical Surveillance, Integrated Tactical Decision Aids, Weapon Engagement Rehearsal Aids (E&RA), Theater Ballistic Missile Defense and Aircraft/Weapon Integration, Joint Precision Approach Landing System (JPALS), Electro-Magnetic Aircraft

Launch Systems (EMALS) and other Externally Directed Programs. NAWCAD also supports Joint Service

Programs in addition to JSF, such as LH-X, Advanced Tactical Airborne Reconnaissance System and Operations

Aircraft.

2.0 SCOPE

The Systems Engineering Department (AIR-4.1) requires systems specialty engineering and technical efforts to be performed under this contract in the following functional areas: Air/Ship Integration, Systems Safety, Mass

Properties, Survivability, Manufacturing & Quality, Air Platform Stores Integration, Metrology and Systems

Security Engineering. These efforts are focused across a broad business base comprised of Integrated Program

Teams (IPT's), Externally Directed Teams (EDT's) and Enterprise Teams (ET's), which support all Naval Air

Programs.

The mission of AIR-4.1 is to apply systems engineering knowledge and skills to provide support to Program

Executive Offices (PEOs) and Program Manager, Air (PMAs) by providing assessments of Aircraft, Weapon and

Integrated Systems’ technical performance, mission suitability and associated acquisition risks throughout the full acquisition process and life cycle of a program.

The Contractor shall support the Government by providing a multi-discipline, integrated technical baseline evaluation, engineering assessment of the programs’ progress towards demonstrating and confirming completion of required developmental tasks and confidence that the technical baseline is mature enough for the next stage of development. Systems specialty engineering support will include an overall technical assessment of cost, schedule, emerging technology and maturity of design in support of the acquisition programs.

3.0 REQUIREMENTS

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the overarching scope for AIR-4.1 Systems Specialty Engineering efforts.

Each Task Order (TO) awarded under this contract will include a unique SOW with the detailed requirements that fit within the scope of the basic contract.

The following matrix outlines per SOW paragraph the anticipated CLINs to be established on contract for these efforts.

Paragraph Number

CLIN

CLIN

CLIN

CLIN

CLIN

3.1: Contract Project Management X X X

X

3.2.1: Air & Ship Systems Integration X X X

3.2.2: Systems Safety X X X

3.2.3: Mass Properties X X X

3.2.4: Survivability Engineering X X X

3.2.5: Manufacturing and Quality

3.2.5.1: Manufacturing and Quality X X

3.2.5.2: Critical Item Management

3.2.6: Air Platform Stores Integration

3.2.6.1: Aircraft Integration Analysis X X X

3.2.6.2: Aircraft Systems / Subsystems Integration X X X

3.2.6.3: Weapons and Weapons Control Analysis X X X

3.2.7: Metrology

X X X

3.2.8: Anti-Tamper X X X

3.2.9: System Security Engineering X X X

3.2.10: Commercial Derivative Aircraft Support X X X

3.2.11: Progress, Status and Management Report X X X X X

3.2.12: Status Reviews X X X X X

Information security classifications ranging from unclassified up to and including TOP SECRET shall be supported and appropriately protected.

All Contractor personnel under this SOW shall maintain an up to date Common Access Card (CAC) to ensure access to the Naval Systems Engineering Resource Center (NSERC) and Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI) services.

3.1 CONTRACT PROJECT MANAGEMENT

The Program Manager shall be the primary point of contact within the company for the contract and shall establish a working relationship with the Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO), Contracting Officer (KO), Contracting

Officer’s Representative (COR), AIR-4.1 Lead Business Financial Manager (BFM) and Contracts Specialist. The

Program Manager is cognizant of the contract and aspects of the contract implementation within the prime

Contractors’ organization. This role is not intended to circumvent company policy and when prime contract administrator to PCO / contract administer communication is required this does not seek to alter that. However, the

Program Manager shall be cognizant, conversant and up-to-date in the details of the contract. The Program Manager shall be the Governments source for financial and technical progress data and status. The Program Manager shall call upon other departments within the company for data and status and will maintain and report this data to the

Government.

The Program Manager shall provide monitoring, tracking and reporting progress required by the monthly status reports for technical and financial progress. In addition, processes for the annual transition of Task Order years shall be established. A new process, when identified shall be established, executed and improved as required. The

Contractor shall prepare and deliver Scientific and Technical Reports (CDRL A002) as needed. The Program

Manager shall provide reporting documents as specified by Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL). (CDRLA004)

The Program Manager shall present a robust project management process which tracks obligations and expenditures by customer, funding type, fiscal year, SOW paragraph, subcontractor and person.

3.2 SYSTEMS SPECIALTY ENGINEERING

The Contractor shall provide systems specialty engineering functions to support the requirements of various projects in support of Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Activities. The systems specialty engineering functions include performance of the system analysis, functional allocations, synthesis and evaluation efforts necessary to transform an operational need into an effective and affordable operational system throughout the system life cycle.

Included is the overall integration of all requirements in a manner that optimizes total system performance, quality, cost-effectiveness and supportability. In support of the AIR-4.1 Division Head, the Contractor, using provided data, shall be required to perform the following systems specialty engineering functions:

3.2.1 Air and Ship Systems Integration. The Contractor shall develop / document requirements and interfaces, analyze systems and establish processes to effectively manage the integration of ship and aviation systems. The

Contractor shall resolve issues, tasks and action items; manage, archive and organize program-related engineering information and documentation; and utilize joint Contractor / Government best practices to vet and resolve aviation-specific engineering challenges in concert with program management and logistics personnel.

3.2.2 Systems Safety. The Contractor shall perform and document System Safety hazard analyses on aircraft and weapons systems, subsystems, support systems and components, including hardware and software, for all life cycle phases. The Contractor shall review and conduct System Safety evaluations of engineering change proposals

(ECPs), specifications, test reports and test data provided from flight, ground and laboratory tests. The Contractor shall participate in and support program meetings, technical interchange meetings, planning conferences and various related working group meetings. These meetings include but are not limited to System Safety Working Groups, design reviews, program status reviews, Weapon System Explosive Safety Review Boards (WSESRBs), test planning coordination meetings, test and evaluation working groups and technical interchange meetings. The

Contractor shall maintain and update the Government database of safety action records, hazard material reports, incident reports, CDRL status and specific platform / weapon data requirements. The Contractor shall prepare and deliver Technical Reports (CDRL A003).

3.2.3 Mass Properties. The Contractor shall provide support for management and control mass properties during system development, test, production and operational use. During system development, test and production the efforts shall include, but not be limited to, design analyses, mass properties estimates and mass properties control techniques. During systems operation and support the efforts shall include support of operational mass properties control tasks per NAVAIR 01-1B-50 (Joint Service Technical Manual - Aircraft Weight and Balance). This manual details the specific details and associated procedures for analyzing Mass Properties of the air platforms and associated systems. The Contractor shall prepare and deliver Technical Reports (CDRL A003).

3.2.4 Survivability Engineering. The Contractor shall provide survivability engineering support and technical expertise in the assessment of systems, subsystems and technologies of various Systems Engineering Competency projects. These survivability functions shall include survivability analyses, dynamic survivability testing and incorporation of signature reduction technologies (radio frequency (RF), infrared (IR), visual and acoustic), static and dynamic signature testing, incorporation of vulnerability reduction technologies and vulnerability testing including live fire testing. Survivability engineering efforts will require support to the functions of various projects.

In support of these projects the Contractor shall be required to perform the following engineering functions:

1) Survivability Analyses Support: Support the verification, validation and accreditation (VV&A) process on the survivability analysis models. Review threat documentation and projections, provide inputs to survivability analyses, review assumption, input and data output of the analyses. Assess mission requirements, seeker and sensor capabilities, suppression techniques and countermeasures effectiveness (jammers, decoys) for aircraft systems in development and in service. Support modeling and simulation; collaborate with Program Managers, Navy labs, fleet representatives and other services to optimize platform survivability. Perform vulnerability assessments for ballistics, conventional warheads, directed energy; chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threat systems.

2) Survivability and Signature Dynamic Testing: Plan and execute flight testing for dynamic signature measurements. Plan and execute flight testing against simulated threat systems to assess survivability improvements to airborne systems and to ascertain weak points that need improvement.

3) Incorporation of RF Signature Technologies: Provide support in the development of RF signature specification levels. Track RF signature development throughout the life of the platform. Support the incorporation of signature reduction technology into the aircraft, including transferring technology from other programs or from technology development programs. Support the testing of component and full scale models.

4) Incorporation of IR Signature Technologies: Provide support in the development of IR signature specification levels. Track IR signature development throughout the life of the platform. Support the incorporation of IR signature reduction technology into the aircraft, including transferring technology from other programs or from technology development programs.

5) Incorporation of Visual Signature Reduction: Provide technical guidance on the latest techniques for visual paint schemes. Support the development of reduced visual signature technology and guide its incorporation into tactical aircraft programs.

6) Incorporation of Vulnerability Reduction: Support vulnerability test planning. Oversee vulnerability testing and data reduction. Support the incorporation of vulnerability reduction technologies into air vehicles, including transferring technology from other programs or from technology development programs. Support the development and execution of live fire test programs.

The Contractor shall prepare and deliver Technical Reports (CDRL A003).

3.2.5 Manufacturing and Quality (M&Q)

3.2.5.1 Manufacturing and Quality. The Contractor shall provide engineering support in the area of M&Q in order to support the M&Q Division and associated NAVAIR programs. The M&Q Division includes the disciplines of quality assurance, production engineering and manufacturing management / planning and supports the aircraft / weapon systems and equipment developed, produced and maintained by NAVAIR. In support of these areas the

Contractor shall be required to perform the following engineering functions:

1) The Contractor shall provide support directly to division leadership, or to one or more assigned programs. In the case of program support, the Contractor shall be assigned to support one or more systems engineers and/or

IPTs in a program office throughout the acquisition life cycle, including requirements formation, development, manufacturing and deployment phases for the air platforms, weapons systems and associated subsystems of the program they are supporting.

2) The Contractor shall provide support in the establishment of M&Q requirements and management of M&Q efforts through all acquisition phases, from concept formulation to fleet operation. These efforts include support in establishing M&Q contractual requirements, assessing contractor design, development and manufacturing/quality planning activities, ensuring that production and producibility considerations are being appropriately integrated into the systems engineering process and reviewing and approving contractor M&Q deliverables.

3) The Contractor shall evaluate design producibility, manufacturing planning and proposed or actual production/quality processes in light of program affordability needs and with respect to established schedules and production plans. The Contractor shall support the preparation of risk assessments for decision meetings and related briefings and help to ensure that all related action items are satisfactorily resolved.

4) The Contractor shall support the division and/or IPT in planning and leading design, manufacturing and quality risk reduction efforts, producibility assessments and Production Readiness Reviews (PRRs). The Contractor shall provide technical support for producibility and manufacturing discussions in design reviews and program/technical meetings and provide design and process oriented technical inputs.

5) The Contractor shall use industry and fleet data to assess trends, determine when processes or systems are out of control and assess the effectiveness of continuous improvement efforts. In performing all the aforementioned activities, the Contractor shall identify the causes of potential or actual manufacturing, producibility, or quality problems and recommend solutions to IPT management via briefing or written correspondence.

6) The Contractor shall provide support to the M&Q lead during the conduct of Physical Configuration Audits

(PCAs), Manufacturing Readiness Assessments (MRAs), Quality System Evaluations (QSEs) and other M&Q reviews.

3.2.5.2 Critical Item Management (CIM). The Contractor shall provide analyses and recommendations regarding Operations and Maintenance of aviation components whose consequence of failure involves catastrophic or critical safety mishaps or mission performance implications. Actions can range from identification of critical parts, evaluation and approval techniques for manufacturers of critical items and their supply chain, identification and analysis of suspect parts, evaluation or development of technical data guidelines, recommendations for acquisition controls, engineering support assistance to the DoD supply and contract management communities, assessments of manufacturing and in-service problems, quality assurance practices and other similar activities.

The Contractor shall provide analysis, oversight, technical data support and Operations and Maintenance sustainment support (including Help Desk functions) for software and data comprising the CIM module in the Joint

Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS) automated information system. The Contractor shall provide analyses, evaluations, metrics reporting and recommendations on actions related to CIM performance across NAVAIR sites.

The Contractor shall provide program management support for meetings, briefings, teleconferences and associated actions.

The Contractor shall provide engineering and technical analyses, evaluations, metrics and recommendations concerning critical items used in the manufacture and production of the assigned air platform or weapon system program (e.g., analysis and comparison of processes used to ensure adequacy of critical parts used in the production and support of the F/A-18, processes or determining acceptability of manufacturing sources for critical items, assessment and update of quality and criticality data in JDRS and other DoD databases, etc.). The Contractor shall collect data, analyze, develop and report findings on Critical Safety Item (CSI) Management. The Contractor shall develop and recommend process improvements. The Contractor shall prepare and deliver Technical Reports (CDRL

A003).

3.2.6 Air Platform Stores Integration

3.2.6.1 Aircraft Integration Analysis. The Contractor shall perform engineering analysis of government furnished information pertaining to physical integration of avionics, sensors, weapons, weapon control systems or aerial targets. The analysis shall include:

1) Physical Integration – Form, Fit and Weights.

2) Provisioning – Cooling, Power, Shock and Vibration.

3) Thermal – Including internal and external loads and the impact on reliability of internal components.

4) Physical Design Adequacy – Relative to design criteria, test plans and test reports for purposes of qualification.

5) Interface Electrical Compatibility – Including signal interfaces and electrical characteristics.

3.2.6.2 Aircraft Systems / Subsystems Integration. The Contractor shall perform engineering analysis pertaining to systems and system controls considered for inclusion into the various platforms. This analysis shall provide prediction data relative to the anticipated performance of the platform with the system and system controls. The analysis shall also provide a definition of the required new or upgraded system functions.

The Contractor shall perform engineering reviews and analyses of government furnished data pertaining to new or modified avionics and/or sensors to determine the optimal approach to incorporate changes, enhancements, planned product improvements and new capabilities into test bed and production platforms. This shall include, but not limited to, combining independent components or subsystems on particular configurations of aircraft. The review and analysis shall include interfaces, modes of operations of equipment, mission computers, protocols, power, signal conditioning, sensors, controls and displays and electromagnetic interference (EMI) issues. The Contractor shall provide prediction data relative to the anticipated platform performance configured with the new or modified avionics/sensor suite. The analysis shall also provide a definition of the required new or upgraded system functions.

3.2.6.3 Weapons and Weapons Control Analysis. The Contractor shall perform engineering analysis of government furnished data pertaining to weapon and stores management subsystems. This shall include, but not limited to, analysis of weapon control and targeting functions, interfaces and integration requirements of Phoenix, Sparrow, Sidewinder, Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM), Advanced Air-to-Air Missile

(AAAM), Harpoon, High-Speed Anti-Radiation Missile (HARM), Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM), Joint

Standoff Weapon (JSOW) and other future weapon requirements. This analysis shall provide prediction data relative to the anticipated performance of the platform configured with the weapon or weapon control subsystem and shall define any potential impact to weapon performance. The analysis shall also provide the definition of the new or upgraded systems function requirements. The Contractor shall prepare and deliver Technical Reports (CDRL

A003).

3.2.7 Metrology. The Contractor shall provide engineering support and technical expertise to support the

NAVAIR Metrology and Calibration (METCAL) Management Team in the area of metrology and calibration in order to support the Metrology Division and associated NAVAIR programs. In support of these areas the Contractor shall be required to perform the following functions:

1) The Contractor shall perform calibration, repair, modification, quality assurance and maintenance of general purpose electronic test equipment, support equipment and special purpose test sets, calibration workload coordination and scheduling, pick-up and delivery of equipment to be serviced and general management of laboratory operations.

2) The Contractor shall perform calibrations in accordance with approved NAVAIR Instrument Calibration

Procedures, Equipment Manuals and/or, approved scientific and metrological processes. Calibrations are performed either in a laboratory environment or on-site at the customer location. Calibrations are performed using government furnished equipment and facilities. Calibration Intervals are assigned in accordance with

NAVAIR 17-35MTL-01 (Metrology Requirements List).

3) The Contractor shall repair and correct faults in equipment to bring unit to required accuracy using manufacturer specifications. Repairs are accomplished in a laboratory environment and are accomplished using government furnished equipment, materials and tools.

4) The Contractor shall provide support in the timely acquisition and delivery of intermediate- and depot-level

Calibration Standards (CALSTDS) that will be shipped to U.S. Navy Calibration laboratories and FMS

Customers. Other responsibilities will include supporting the NAVAIR METCAL Acquisition Team by managing and maintaining data elements in the NAVAIR ERPSIGMA financial system and managing and maintaining FMS data base elements.

5) The Contractor shall document by equipment serial number and shipping document number and file all outgoing equipment delivery and related correspondence.

6) The Contractor shall maintain laboratory tool control in accordance with laboratory procedures and NAVAIR policy and handle and store Hazardous Materials used in the laboratory in accordance with laboratory procedures, NAVAIR policy and Federal, State and Local laws and regulations.

7) The Contractor shall develop, write and conduct bench verification of Instrument Calibration Procedures (ICP) in accordance with NAVAIR 17-35TR-04 (Requirements for Preparation of Instrument Calibration Procedures

(ICP)) and NAVAIR 17-35TR-50 (Requirements for the Preparation of NAVAIR 17-50 ICP).

8) The Contractor shall provide Fleet Data Analysis of Requirements and workload to sponsors per inputs from sponsors on format and layout using the Measure database.

9) The Contractor shall support the NAVAIR METCAL Chief Engineer providing technical support of in-service engineering investigations, calibration standards modernization, interval analysis, uncertainty analysis and other metrology engineering studies.

10) The Contractor shall provide support to the NAVAIR METCAL Quality Manager and participate in audits of

Navy Calibration facilities as required.

3.2.8 Anti-Tamper (AT). The Contractor shall provide AT engineering support and technical expertise in the assessment of systems, subsystems and technologies of various Systems Engineering Competency projects. These

AT functions shall include Critical Program Information (CPI) identification, AT requirements development, proposal of AT architectures, Attack Tree analysis, AT solution trade studies, vulnerability risk analysis, preparation of AT concurrence letters, white papers, assisting with Verification & Validation (V&V) technical reviews, attending Systems Engineering Technical Review (SETR) events in support of AT and in general analyze, coordinate, develop and manage engineering design techniques necessary to assess and ensure consistent implementation of AT solutions throughout the life cycle of a program. The Contractor shall prepare and deliver

Technical Reports (CDRL A003).

3.2.9 System Security Engineering. The Contractor shall provide system security engineering support and technical expertise in the assessment of systems, subsystems and technologies of various Systems Engineering competency projects. These functions shall include conducting program reviews and assessments, implementing

NAVAIR's Cyber policies and instructions, management of external cyber security audits and inspections, development of standard operating procedures/processes, subject matter expertise on the Cyber Safe process, Cyber

Risk Assessments and Platform Information Technology (PIT) Authority to Operate (ATO). The Contractor shall prepare and deliver Technical Reports (CDRL A003).

3.2.10 Commercial Derivative Aircraft Support. The Contractor shall provide Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) certified Designated Engineering Representatives (DERs) in the fields of Acoustical Engineering, Engine

Engineering, Flight Analyst, Flight Test Pilot, Power plant Engineering, Propeller Engineering, Radio Engineering, Structural Engineering, System and Equipment Engineering in accordance with 14 CFR 183.29 in support of continued airworthiness, consultation on new acquisition programs and management support for monitoring of on-going certification programs for Navy Commercial Derivative fixed and rotary wing aircraft. The Contractor shall provide FAA certified Designated Airworthiness Representatives (DARs) in the fields of Manufacturing and

Maintenance in accordance with 14 CFR 183.33 to support continued airworthiness, consultation on new acquisition programs and management support for monitoring of on-going certification programs for Navy Commercial

Derivative fixed and rotary ring aircraft.

3.2.11 The Contractor shall support the identification of any technical problems associated with performance of requested systems specialty engineering services. The Contractor shall document such issues and identify potential solutions in the Contractor's Progress, Status and Management Report (CDRL A004).

3.2.12 The Contractor shall support routine status reviews with the appropriate program Technical Point of

Contact (TPOC) regarding overall progress, status, risks, issues, travel and financials and also document the findings in the Contractor's Progress, Status and Management Report (CDRL A004).

3.3 DELIVERABLES AND DOCUMENTATION

Deliverables shall be task dependent and may include one or more of the following:

A001 Management Plans

A002 Scientific and Technical Reports

A003 Technical Report – Study/Services

A004 Contractor’s Progress, Status and Management Report

A005 Non-Disclosure Agreement (Company)

A006 Non-Disclosure Agreement (Individual)

A007 Program Protection and Implementation Plan

3.4 OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC): TRAVEL AND MATERIAL

ODCs necessary for performance of this contract shall be reimbursed in accordance with NAVAIR clauses

5252.232-9509 (Reimbursement for Travel, Per Diem and Special Material Costs) and clause 5252.242-9515

(Restrictions on the Direct Charging of Material). ODCs may include general and administrative (G&A) expenses as allowed by the Contractor’s accounting standards, but shall not include profit. Any material remaining after completion of the contract, the cost of which has been reimbursed by the Government, will remain Government property and the Contractor will seek disposition instructions from the PCO.

3.4.1 Travel. Continental United States (CONUS) and Outside the Continental United States (OCONUS) travel may be required in support of this contract to perform services at other DoD, industry and related locations as approved by the government in individual task orders. OCONUS travel may be required to the following countries:

Canada, England, France, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Greece, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, Turkey, Japan, Taiwan, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Pakistan and South Korea.

The number and types of trips, including the number of persons traveling, shall be limited to the minimum required to accomplish work requirements and shall be coordinated with and approved by the Government TPOC and the

COR for each individual trip prior to travel. Costs associated with travel and lodging shall be reimbursed in accordance with Federal Joint Travel Regulations (JTR).

3.4.2 Material. Per NAVAIR clause 5252.242.9515 (Restriction on the Direct Charging of Material), Material may be purchased incidental to the tasking. The material costs may include such items as: photocopying, postage, office supplies, briefing materials and video and voice conferencing services. COR approval shall be obtained for all material purchases.

4.0 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT)

The Contractor may be required to access Government IT Systems. Contractor personnel requiring access to

Government IT Systems shall comply with NAVAIR clause 5252.204-9505 (System Authorization Access Request

Navy). The Government will provide all necessary obsolete reference documents and those not generally available to the Contractor as requested.

4.1 CLINGER-COHEN ACT (CCA)

4.1.1 The Contractor shall conduct analysis of program/project needs, acquisition strategy and program artifacts to identify and capture specific factors required to satisfy the 11 elements of CCA compliance listed in DoDI

5000.02, Enclosure 1, Table 9. Using Microsoft Word, the Contractor shall prepare a CCA compliance matrix following the organization and appearance of Table 11 with additional separate columns for the display of artifact:

titles, date(s) of approval, page number(s) and paragraph or section number(s). The right-hand column shall include an embedded object permitting the reader to open unclassified artifacts. The column shall identify classified artifacts and shall describe approved classified channels for access of classified artifacts. The Contractor shall support the program manager during CCA compliance review and assist in responding to reviewer comments if and when additional supporting information or revisions are required.

4.1.2 Updating approved CCA compliance packages: For updates of approved CCA compliance packages, the

Contractor shall conduct analysis of program/project needs, acquisition strategy and program artifacts to identify and to determine if each of the Eleven Elements of CCA has changed and if no change has occurred, a notation stating

“no change” shall be entered in the CCA compliance matrix. If changes have been found, the Contractor shall update the CCA compliance matrix to reflect the changes.

4.1.3 The Contractor shall support the program manager during CCA compliance review and assist in responding to reviewer comments if and when additional supporting information or revisions are required.

4.2 SYSTEM SOFTWARE / APPLICATION COMPLIANCE

All Information Technology systems or software/application development, modification or support shall be performed in accordance with Defense Business Transformation guidance (formerly Business Management

Modernization Program (BMMP)), Department of the Navy (DON)/NAVAIR Functional Area Manager (FAM)

Policies and Guidance, Network and Server Registration and Web Enablement mandates.

4.3 WEB SITES, WEB ENABLEMENT AND APPLICATION / SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT,

MODIFICATION AND MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES

All Information Technology systems, software and website development, modification or support shall be performed in accordance with all applicable Federal, DoD, DON and NAVAIR policy, guidance, standards and strategies, and should be integrated within the NAVAIR Enterprise portal and collaboration environment whenever possible. Any

Web sites/servers hosted/located in Contractor facilities, or outside NAVAIR enclave, will transition to NAVAIR architecture and infrastructure in accordance with Legacy Shutdown guidance. Potential policies include, but are not limited to:

a. Office of Management and Budget Management of Federal Information Resources, OMB CIRCULAR NO. A-

130 Revised. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a130_a130trans4

b. OMB Policies for Federal Agency Public Websites, OMB M-05-04.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-04.pdf

c. Section 508 Amendment to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. https://www.section508.gov/ content/ learn/ laws-and-policies

d. Department of Defense Web Policies and Guidelines. http://dodcio.defense.gov/dodwebpolicy

e. Navy Information Operations Command (NIOC) Norfolk Web Risk Assessment Team Website.

http://www.public.navy.mil/fcc-c10f/niocnorfolk/Pages/AboutWRA.aspx

f. DON Policy for Content of Publicly Accessible World Wide Web Sites SECNAVINST 5720.47B.

http://www.navy.mil/navydata/internet/secnav5720-47b.pdf

g. NAVAIR CIO Website (NAVAIR specific policy and guidelines). To request this policy contact the NAVAIR

CIO office – 7.2.2 Applications Integration team – Web Manager: Shane Malamphy at 301- 342-1825.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a130_a130trans4 https://www.section508.gov/ http://dodcio.defense.gov/dodwebpolicy http://www.public.navy.mil/fcc-c10f/niocnorfolk/Pages/AboutWRA.aspx http://www.navy.mil/navydata/internet/secnav5720-47b.pdf

h. Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Hosting of All Navy Websites (NAVADMIN 061/08).

http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/reference/messages/Documents/NAVADMINS/ NAV2008/NAV08061.txt

i. Consolidation of Navy Web Sites - Reduction of IM/IT Footprint NAVADMIN 145/07.

http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/reference/messages/Documents/NAVADMINS/ NAV2007/NAV07145.txt

j. DON Web Presence Policy: The Registration, Compliance of, and Investment in, All Unclassified Web Sites and Uniform Resource Locators. http://www.doncio.navy.mil/ContentView.aspx?ID=577

k. Policy and Procedures for Web Risk Assessment (WRA) of Publicly Accessible Navy Sites (ALCOM 129/09).

www.public.navy.mil/fcc-c10f/niocnorfolk/Documents/NTD-08-09.txt

4.4 SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT / SERVER PROCUREMENT

Any tools developed that will be hosted by the Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI) or run on NMCI workstations will be certified for NMCI and comply with NMCI policy. Additionally, any servers supporting this effort will be transitioned to meet the requirements of the current NAVAIR Server Consolidation effort.

4.5 CYBERSECURITY

4.5.1 The Contractor shall conduct investigation and analysis of acquisition program artifacts such as, but not limited to, Initial Capabilities Document (ICD), Capability Description Document (CDD), Capability Production

Document (CPD), Navy urgent operational need (UON) and Marine Corps urgent universal need statement (UUNS), joint urgent operational needs (JUONs), threat assessments and acquisition strategies (AS). Knowledge gained from this analysis shall be used when developing the Cybersecurity Strategy (CS) needed to steer and inform the program’s development of a Security Plan (SP) in accordance with DoDI 8510.01, of 12 March 2014.

4.5.2 As a minimum, hardware, firmware, software, documentation (data deliverables) and/or Information

Technology (IT) services delivered by this contract shall be in compliance with the following References:

a. DoDI 8500.01 Cybersecurity, 14 March 2014.

b. DoDI 8510.01, Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information Technology (IT), 12 March 2014.

c. Committee on National Security Systems Instruction 1253, “Security Categorization and Control Selection for

National Security Systems,” March 15, 2012, as amended.

d. DoDD 8570.01 Information Assurance Training, Certification and Workforce Management, 15 August 2004, Certified Current as of 23 April 2007.

4.5.3 The Contractor shall conduct investigations and perform analysis including; criticality analysis, threat assessment and vulnerability assessments. All findings and recommendations shall be reported to the government in technical reviews and submitted as written reports or documents as listed in CDRLs A002 and A003. The

Contractor shall support government efforts needed for Information systems (IS) (enclaves or major applications), PIT or PIT systems to successfully categorize the system, achieve favorable assessment for selection, implementation and testing of security controls and authorization (approval to operate) before use or interconnection in an operating environment in accordance with references (a), (b) and (c) listed in 4.5.2 above. This includes IT that is standalone and IT that is connected to other systems, networks or enclaves. Information systems (IS) (enclaves or major applications), Platform Information Technology (PIT) or PIT systems delivered prior to award of this contract but included in the performance of this contract may have been delivered in compliance with Department of Defense

Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process (DIACAP) and as such shall require transition to

Risk Management Framework cybersecurity compliance. Transition planning proposed or performed under this contract shall be in compliance with the above paragraph 4.5.2 reference (b) Enclosure 8, Figure 2 and all hardware, http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/reference/messages/Documents/NAVADMINS/ http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/reference/messages/Documents/NAVADMINS/%20NAV2007/NAV07145.txt http://www.doncio.navy.mil/ContentView.aspx?ID=577 http://www.public.navy.mil/fcc-c10f/niocnorfolk/Documents/NTD-08-09.txt firmware and software deliverables shall be capable of receiving Authorization to Operate in accordance with the above paragraph 4.5.2 reference (b).

4.5.4 Information technology services shall only be performed by personnel who are qualified and certified in accordance with the above paragraph 4.5.2 reference (d). Personnel proposed and/or used in the performance of this contract as certified personnel shall be limited to those whose specifically assigned duties and responsibilities require certification.

4.5.5 The Contractor shall investigate and conduct analysis in order to provide technical reviews to make a recommendation with data supporting the proposal(s) for the need for designation (or not) of the system, network or enclave as PIT or a PIT system in accordance with DoDI 8500.01, Cybersecurity, 14 March 2014. The proposal shall include all technical data required to engage in collaboration with the security control assessor, the authorizing official (staff) and PIT designating official(s). In the event the collaboration results in redesign or follow-up action after collaboration requiring additional or revised documentation, the Contractor shall continue to assist the collaboration process.

4.5.6 The Contractor shall investigate and conduct analysis in order to provide technical reviews to make a recommendation with data supporting characterization and selection of security controls in accordance with DoDI

8500.01, Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information Technology (IT), 12 March 2014, National

Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-53, Security and Privacy Controls for

Federal Information Systems and Organizations, Revision 4, April 2013, NIST SP 800-37 Revision 1, Guide for

Applying the Risk Management Framework to Federal Information Systems, February 2010, Federal Information

Processing Standards Publication (FIPS 199, February 2004. Contractor performed analysis shall include; criticality analysis, threat assessment and vulnerability assessments. The Contractor shall propose characterization of the system and selection of security controls use Committee on National Security Systems Instruction (CNSSI) 1253, Security Categorization and Control Selection for National Security Systems, 27 March 2014 to tailor the NIST guidance.