3.03_Amendment(1)_24234-0379.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

N00383

See following pages for details

NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT PHILADELPHIA

700 ROBBINS AVENUE

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19111-5098

CREATOR OFC CD: N721.09

24234-0379

N00383-25-R-D049

10/14/2025

10/10/2025

Attachment A below is hereby incorporated into the solicitation. For instructions (section L) and evaluation criteria (section M), please see the pages below.

Evaluation Factors in compliance with the solicitation requirements and an acceptable small business participation strategy include: capacity / delivery, past performance and price.

Please complete the attached Past Performance Information Form (Attachment B) or affirmatively state that you do not possess any relevant past performance.

WSSTERMMZ01 is hereby removed from the solicitation.

The solicitation offers due date is hereby extended to 11/14/2025 at 2:00pm EDT.

ATTACHMENT A

SECTION L – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS

L01 – SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

CLAUSE

NUMBER

CLAUSE TITLE CLAUSE

DATE

52.204-7 System for Award Management NOV 2024 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Reporting AUG 2020 52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 52.214-34 Submission of Offers in the English Language APR 1991 52.214-35 Submission of Offers in U.S. Currency APR 1991 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors-Competitive Acquisition NOV 2021

52.215-5 Facsimile Proposals (The telephone number of receiving facsimile equipment is: 215-697- 1227)

OCT 1997

52.215-16 Facilities Capital Cost of Money JUN 2003 52.215-22 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges-Identification of Subcontract Effort OCT 2009

52.222-24 Preaward On-Site Equal Opportunity Compliance Evaluation FEB 1999 52.232-13 Notice of Progress Payments APR 1984 52.247-46 Shipping Point(s) Used in Evaluation of F.O.B.—Origin Offers APR 1984 252.215-7010 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing

Data-Basic

MAY 2024

252.215-7011 Requirements for Submission of Proposals to the Administrative Contracting Officer and Contract Auditor

JAN 2018

252.215-7012 Requirements for Submission of Proposals Via Electronic Media JAN 2018 252.215-7013 Supplies and Services Provided by Nontraditional Defense Contractors JAN 2023 252.239-7017 Notice of Supply Chain Risk (Orders for information technology that is a covered system, is part of a covered system, or is in support of a covered system, as defined in DFARS 239.7301).

DEC 2022

252.246-7005 Notice of Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items MAR 2016

L02 - FAR 52.211-14 - NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY

PREPAREDNESS, AND ENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008)

Any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation will be [ ] DX rated order; [ ] DO rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) (15 CFR 700), and the Contractor will be required to follow all of the requirements of this regulation.

(End of provision)

L03 - FAR 52.216-1 - TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a firm-fixed price contract resulting from this solicitation.

L04 - FAR 52.233-2 - SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from:

Contracting Officer (identified on Page 1)

Building 1, Code N7 (identified on Page 1) 700 Robbins Avenue Philadelphia, PA 19111-5098

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

L05 - DFARS 252.215-7009 - PROPOSAL ADEQUACY CHECKLIST (MAR 2023)

(proposals for Delivery Orders requiring the submission of certified cost or pricing data) The offeror shall complete the following checklist, providing location of requested information, or an explanation of why the requested information is not provided. In preparation of the offeror’s checklist, offerors may elect to have their prospective subcontractors use the same or similar checklist as appropriate.

PROPOSAL ADEQUACY CHECKLIST

REFERENCES SUBMISSION

ITEM

PROPOSAL

PAGE No.

If not provided

EXPLAIN

(may use continuation pages)

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section I Paragraph A

Is there a properly completed first page of the proposal per FAR 15.408 Table 15-2 I.A or as specified in the solicitation?

2. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section I Paragraph A(7)

Does the proposal identify the need for Government-furnished material/tooling/test equipment? Include the accountable contract number and contracting officer contact information if known.

3. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph A(8)

Does the proposal identify and explain notifications of noncompliance with Cost Accounting Standards Board or Cost Accounting Standards (CAS); any proposal inconsistencies with your disclosed practices or applicable CAS;

and inconsistencies with your established estimating and accounting principles and procedures?

4. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section I, Paragraph C(1) FAR 2.101, “Cost or pricing data”

Does the proposal disclose any other known activity that could materially impact the costs?

This may include, but is not limited to, such factors as—

(1) Vendor quotations;

(2) Nonrecurring costs;

(3) Information on changes in production methods and in production or purchasing volume;

(4) Data supporting projections of business prospects and objectives and related operations costs;

(5) Unit-cost trends such as those associated with labor efficiency;

(6) Make-or-buy decisions;

(7) Estimated resources to attain business goals; and

(8) Information on management decisions that could have a significant bearing on costs.

5. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section I Paragraph B

Is an Index of all certified cost or pricing data and information accompanying or identified in the proposal provided and appropriately referenced?

6. FAR 15.403-1(b) Are there any exceptions to submission of certified cost or pricing data pursuant to FAR 15.403-1(b)? If so, is supporting documentation included in the proposal? (Note questions 18-20.)

7. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph C(2)(i)

Does the proposal disclose the judgmental factors applied and the mathematical or other methods used in the estimate, including those used in projecting from known data?

8. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph C(2)(ii)

Does the proposal disclose the nature and amount of any contingencies included in the proposed price?

9. FAR 15.408 Table 15-2, Section II, Paragraph A or B

Does the proposal explain the basis of all cost estimating relationships (labor hours or material) proposed on other than a discrete basis?

10. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraphs D and E

Is there a summary of total cost by element of cost and are the elements of cost cross-referenced to the supporting cost or pricing data? (Breakdowns for each cost element must be consistent with your cost accounting system, including breakdown by year.)

11. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraphs D and E

If more than one Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) or sub Contract Line Item Number (sub-CLIN) is proposed as required by the RFP, are there summary total amounts covering all line items for each element of cost and is it cross-referenced to the supporting cost or pricing data?

12. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph F

Does the proposal identify any incurred costs for work performed before the submission of the proposal?

13. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph G

Is there a Government forward pricing rate agreement (FPRA)? If so, the offeror shall identify the official submittal of such rate and factor data. If not, does the proposal include all rates and factors by year that are utilized in the development of the proposal and the basis for those rates and factors?

COST ELEMENTS

MATERIALS AND SERVICES

14. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section II Paragraph A

Does the proposal include a consolidated summary of individual material and services, frequently referred to as a Consolidated Bill of Material (CBOM), to include the basis for pricing? The offeror’s consolidated summary shall include raw materials, parts, components, assemblies, subcontracts and services to be produced or performed by others, identifying as a minimum the item, source, quantity, and price.

SUBCONTRACTS (Purchased materials or services)

15. DFARS 215.404-3 Has the offeror identified in the proposal those subcontractor proposals, for which the contracting officer has initiated or may need to request field pricing analysis?

16. FAR 15.404-3(c)

FAR 52.244-2

Per the thresholds of FAR 15.404-3(c), Subcontract Pricing Considerations, does the proposal include a copy of the applicable subcontractor’s certified cost or pricing data?

17. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Note 1;

Section II Paragraph A

Is there a price/cost analysis establishing the reasonableness of each of the proposed subcontracts included with the proposal?

If the offeror’s price/cost analyses are not provided with the proposal, does the proposal include a matrix identifying dates for receipt of subcontractor proposal, completion of fact finding for purposes of price/cost analysis, and submission of the price/cost analysis?

EXCEPTIONS TO CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA

18. FAR 52.215-20

FAR 2.101,

“commercial item”

Has the offeror submitted an exception to the submission of certified cost or pricing data for commercial items proposed either at the prime or subcontractor level, in accordance with provision 52.215-20?

a. Has the offeror specifically identified the type of commercial item claim (FAR 2.101 commercial item definition, paragraphs (1) through (8)), and the basis on which the item meets the definition?

b. For modified commercial items (FAR

2.101 commercial item definition paragraph (3)); did the offeror classify the modification(s) as either—

i. A modification of a type customarily available in the commercial marketplace (paragraph (3)(i)); or

ii. A minor modification (paragraph (3)(ii)) of a type not customarily available in the commercial marketplace made to meet Federal Government requirements not exceeding the thresholds in FAR 15.403- 1(c)(3)(iii)(B)?

c. For proposed commercial items “of a type”, or “evolved” or modified (FAR

2.101 commercial item definition paragraphs (1) through (3)), did the contractor provide a technical description of the differences between the proposed item and the comparison item(s)?

19. [Reserved]

20. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section II Paragraph A(1)

Does the proposal support the degree of competition and the basis for establishing the source and reasonableness of price for each subcontract or purchase order priced on a competitive basis exceeding the threshold for certified cost or pricing data?

INTERORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFERS

21. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section II Paragraph A.(2)

For inter-organizational transfers proposed at cost, does the proposal include a complete cost proposal in compliance with Table 15-2?

22. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph A(1)

For inter-organizational transfers proposed at price in accordance with FAR 31.205-26(e), does the proposal provide an analysis by the prime that supports the exception from certified cost or pricing data in accordance with

FAR 15.403-1?

DIRECT LABOR

23. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section II Paragraph B

Does the proposal include a time phased (i.e.; monthly, quarterly) breakdown of labor hours, rates and costs by category or skill level? If labor is the allocation base for indirect costs, the labor cost must be summarized in order that the applicable overhead rate can be applied.

24. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph B

For labor Basis of Estimates (BOEs), does the proposal include labor categories, labor hours, and task descriptions, (e.g.; Statement of Work reference, applicable CLIN, Work Breakdown Structure, rationale for estimate, applicable history, and time-phasing)?

25. FAR subpart 22.10 If covered by the Service Contract Labor Standards statute (41 U.S.C.

chapter 67), are the rates in the proposal in compliance with the minimum rates specified in the statute?

INDIRECT COSTS

26. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section II Paragraph C

Does the proposal indicate the basis of estimate for proposed indirect costs and how they are applied? (Support for the indirect rates could consist of cost breakdowns, trends, and budgetary data.)

OTHER COSTS

27. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section II Paragraph D

Does the proposal include other direct costs and the basis for pricing? If travel is included does the proposal include number of trips, number of people, number of days per trip, locations, and rates (e.g. airfare, per diem, hotel, car rental, etc)?

28. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph E

If royalties exceed $1,500 does the proposal provide the information/data identified by Table 15-2?

29. FAR 15.408, Table

Paragraph F

When facilities capital cost of money is proposed, does the proposal include submission of Form CASB-CMF or reference to an FPRA/FPRP and show the calculation of the proposed amount?

FORMATS FOR SUBMISSION OF LINE ITEM SUMMARIES

30. FAR 15.408, Table

15-2, Section III Are all cost element breakdowns provided using the applicable format prescribed in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 III? (or alternative format if specified in the request for proposal)

31. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section III Paragraph B

If the proposal is for a modification or change order, have cost of work deleted (credits) and cost of work added (debits) been provided in the format described in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2.III.B?

32. FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, Section III Paragraph C

For price revisions/redeterminations, does the proposal follow the format in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2.III.C?

OTHER

33. FAR 16.4 If an incentive contract type, does the proposal include offeror proposed target cost, target profit or fee, share ratio, and, when applicable, minimum/maximum fee, ceiling price?

34. FAR 16.203-4 and

FAR

15.408 Table 15-2, Section II, Paragraphs A, B, C, and D

If Economic Price Adjustments are being proposed, does the proposal show the rationale and application for the economic price adjustment?

35. FAR 52.232-28 If the offeror is proposing Performance- Based Payments did the offeror comply with FAR 52.232-28?

36. FAR 15.408(n)

FAR 52.215-22

FAR 52.215-23

Excessive Pass-through Charges– Identification of Subcontract Effort: If the offeror intends to subcontract more than 70% of the total cost of work to be performed, does the proposal identify:

(i) the amount of the offeror’s indirect costs and profit applicable to the work to be performed by the proposed subcontractor(s); and (ii) a description of the added value provided by the offeror as related to the work to be performed by the proposed subcontractor(s)?

L06 - DFARS 252.217-7026 - IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCES OF SUPPLY (JAN 2023)

(applicable to all Delivery Orders when the acquisition is being conducted under Other Than Full and Open Competition)

(a) The Government is required under 10 U.S.C. 2384 to obtain certain information on the actual manufacturer or sources of supplies it acquires.

(b) The apparently successful Offeror agrees to complete and submit the following table before award:

TABLE

Line Items

National Stock Number

Commercial Item (Y or N)

Source of Supply Company Address Part No.

Actual Mfg?

(1) (2) (3) (4) (4) (5) (6)

(1) List each deliverable item of supply and item of technical data.

(2) If there is no national stock number, list “none.”

(3) Use “Y” if the item is a commercial item; otherwise use “N.” If “Y” is listed, the Offeror need not complete the remaining columns in the table.

(4) For items of supply, list all sources. For technical data, list the source.

(5) For items of supply, list each source’s part number for the item.

(6) Use “Y” if the source of supply is the actual manufacturer, “N” if it is not; and “U” if unknown.

L07 - WSSTERMLZ05 - REVIEW OF AGENCY PROTESTS

(applicable when FAR clause 52.233-2 and/or 52.233-3 are included).

In accordance with FAR Subpart 33.103(d)(4), interested parties may request an independent review of their protest at a level above the contracting officer. The request for an independent review may be made in lieu of a protest to the contracting officer, or as an appeal of a contracting officer decision on a protest. If an agency appellate review of the contracting officer’s decision on a protest is requested, it will not extend GAO’s timeliness requirements.

Any subsequent protest to the GAO must be filed within 10 days of knowledge of the initial adverse agency action.

The individual who will conduct the independent review is the Chief of the Contracting Office (CCO). Interested parties requesting to have an independent review of a protest or to appeal a contracting officer protest decision shall address their correspondence to:

For solicitations or contracts issued by DODAAC N00104--

Independent Protest Review Official

NAVSUP WSS Code N7 Building 312, Bay E16 5450 Carlisle Pike Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-2411

For solicitations or contracts issued by DODAAC N00383--

Independent Protest Review Official NAVSUP WSS Code N7 Building 1, Rm. 2209 700 Robbins Avenue Philadelphia, PA 19111-5098 (02-13)

L08 - WSSTERMLZ06 - CONSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Consignment Addresses are readily available electronically at the DoD Activity Address Codes (DODAAC) website https://home.daas.dla.mil/daashome/daasinq.asp.

Contractors are to enter a specific DODAAC Code (i.e. N63126), then select "Scan Query."

Three addresses will appear:

TAC1=Mailing Address TAC2=Shipping Address TAC3=Billing Address

The TAC2 Shipping Address should always be used.

If it is missing for whatever reason, the contractor is authorized to use the TAC1 Mailing Address.

For Mobile Units and Ships, call the Naval Operational Logistics Support Center (NOLSC) Fleet Locator at:

Commercial 757-443-5434 or DSN 646-5434.

(10-22)

L09 – SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS (BEST VALUE/TRADE-OFF)

I. GENERAL

In addition to instructions to offerors contained elsewhere in this solicitation, the following instructions are provided.

Proposals are to be submitted to the Contracting Officer on or before the closing date/time cited elsewhere in this Request for Proposals.

Offerors shall submit the following information on their proposal:

- Non-price Proposal Information

- Small Business Participation Strategy

- Price/Cost Proposal Information

In addition, offers consist of and shall include the following items:

• Solicitation cover sheet with appropriate blocks completed by the offeror or a quote containing substantially similar information such as:

o Name of quoter o Address or CAGE of quoter o Date of quotation o Unit Price o Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) o Throughput Constraint

• Past Performance Information Form (Attachment B) completed by the offeror.

- The offeror shall provide relevant past performance information on this form (see Section M for definition of relevant past performance information) or affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant past performance.

• Representations and certifications completed by the offeror in accordance with instructions contained elsewhere in the solicitation. If the offeror has completed all of the representations and certifications required by this solicitation in SAM.gov in accordance with FAR 52.204-8 and DFARS 252.204-7007 ALT A, then the offeror need not submit the hardcopy Representations and Certifications.

• Acknowledgement of solicitation amendments pursuant to FAR 52.215-1 (if not previously acknowledged).

• The offeror’s Small Business Subcontracting Plan (this Plan not required for Small Business offerors).

• An offer may be presented as a quote so long as it presents substantially the same information as is requested here.

The completion and submission of the above as called for herein will constitute an offer (proposal) and will be considered the offeror’s unconditional assent to the terms and conditions of this solicitation and any attachments and/or exhibits hereto. Alternate proposals are not authorized. An objection to any of the terms and conditions of the solicitation will constitute a deficiency (see FAR 15.001) which will make the offer unacceptable.

Non-price Proposal Information

This portion shall address compliance with solicitation factors, capacity/delivery, relevant Past Performance and include all information required for proposal evaluation.

In making such submission the offeror shall utilize Attachment B Past Performance Information Form. This portion of the proposal shall exclude any reference to the price aspects of the proposal.

Capacity should be presented in the form of Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) and Throughput Constraint.

Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) definition: The contractual delivery requirement is measured from asset acceptance under the terms of the contract. For purposes of this section, Return is defined as physical receipt of the F-condition asset at the contractor’s facility as reflected in the Action Date entry in the Commercial Asset Visibility (CAV) system. In accordance with the CAV Statement of Work, the contractor is required to accurately report all transactions by the end of the fifth regular business day after receipt and the Action Date entry in CAV must be dated to reflect the actual date of physical receipt. RTAT day count begins on the date of induction.

Throughput Constraint: Total assets to be repaired monthly after initial delivery commences.

Small Business Participation Strategy Information This portion should contain all information related to the Small Business Participation Strategies and Small Business Subcontracting Plans. The PCO reserves the right to validate past performance. All offerors, including small businesses, are required to submit a Small Business Participation Strategy. Do not include unit pricing information in this portion.

Price/Cost Proposal Information This portion shall include the completed solicitation documents or a quote containing substantially similar information.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

(1) The price / cost proposal shall support the Non-price proposal. Offerors are cautioned not to alter the solicitation.

(2) In the event any person who is not a bona fide employee of the offeror participated in the creation, formulation, or writing of any portion of the proposal, a certificate to this effect shall be included in the proposal which shall be signed by an officer of the offeror. Such certificate shall identify the name of the person who is not a bona fide employee, that person’s employment capacity, the name of the person’s firm, the relationship of that firm to the offeror, and the portion of the proposal in which the person participated.

II. REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSAL CONTENT

(1) Any offeror who will be submitting CLASSIFIED data in its Non-price proposal shall first notify the Contracting Officer by contacting the point of contact in the solicitation. CLASSIFIED data that is forwarded as part of an offeror’s proposal shall be housed in its own binder, separate from the unclassified portion.

(2) Introduction and Purpose - This section specifies the format that offerors should use in proposals submitted in response to this solicitation. The intent is not to restrict the offerors in the manner in which they will perform their work but rather to ensure a certain degree of uniformity in the format of the proposals for evaluation purposes.

(3) Requirements for Style: Each offeror shall submit a proposal that clearly and concisely sets forth the contractor’s response to the requirements of the solicitation. Unnecessary elaboration or other presentations beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal are not desired and may be construed as an indication of the offeror’s lack of cost consciousness. Elaborate artwork, expensive paper or bindings, and expensive visual or other presentation aids are neither necessary nor desired. The proposal shall contain all the pertinent information in sufficient detail in the one area of the proposal where it contributes most critically to the discussion. When necessary, the offeror shall refer to the initial discussion and identify its location within its proposal.

III. PROPOSAL CONTENT

1. Non-price Proposal Information

The non-price proposal is based on compliance with the solicitation requirement, capacity/delivery, past performance and Small Business Participating Strategy.

The following Technical Factors will be used to evaluate offers: Compliance with the solicitation requirement, Capacity/Delivery, Past Performance, and Small Business Participation Strategy

The Non-price evaluation factors are listed in detail below:

(a) Compliance with the Solicitation Requirements

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s proposal and determine whether it complies with the requirements of the solicitation. Please note, compliance with terms of the solicitation includes, but is not limited to:

(1) Demonstrate Government Source Approval prior to award.

(2) Demonstrates an unconditional offer to perform. A proposal that offers alternative terms or takes exceptions to a solicitation requirement will be considered “technically unacceptable.”

Compliance with solicitation requirements will be as either acceptable or unacceptable. The proposal will only be further evaluated if it is rated as acceptable.

(b) Capacity/Delivery:

The offeror shall indicate its capacity / throughput constraint and repair turn-around time (RTAT) to do the repairs hereunder in terms of number of repairs per month for throughput constraint and calendar days for RTAT.

Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) definition: The contractual delivery requirement is measured from asset acceptance under the terms of the contract. For purposes of this section, Return is defined as physical receipt of the F-condition asset at the contractor’s facility as reflected in the Action Date entry in the Commercial Asset Visibility (CAV) system. In accordance with the CAV Statement of Work, the contractor is required to accurately report all transactions by the end of the fifth regular business day after receipt and the Action Date entry in CAV must be dated to reflect the actual date of physical receipt. RTAT day count begins on the date of induction.

Contractor must notify the government in writing (including electronic commerce methods, such as email) when assets have been received upon physical receipt of the assets.

Throughput Constraint: Total assets to be repaired monthly after initial delivery commences.

The offeror shall indicate its capacity and repair turnaround time (RTAT) to do the repairs hereunder in terms of output of RFI or “A” condition items per month for each line item. The contractor shall do so by indicating such output figures in the chart below to this amendment. For example, if from a capacity standpoint, for Year 1, the first month’s throughput is estimated at 4 units, insert “4” in the corresponding block.

NIIN Throughput Constraint

Government’s Desired Throughput

RTAT Government’s Desired RTAT

016017106 01 per month 200 days

(c) Past Performance

The offeror should complete a “Past Performance Reference Information Sheet” (Attachment B) for each reference submitted. The form is an attachment to the solicitation. For additional information regarding a particular reference beyond that which will fit on the form, the offeror may continue onto another sheet of paper. The offeror shall demonstrate relevant past performance or affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant past performance. Relevant past performance is performance under contacts or efforts (within the past three years) that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to that which is described in the solicitation.

3. Price/Cost Information

Price / Cost Information shall include the completed solicitation documents or a quote containing substantially similar information. The price/cost proposal shall support the Non-price proposal. If the price/cost proposal does not support the Non-price proposal, the offeror’s overall technical proposal rating may be downgraded. The price/cost proposal shall include all elements of cost and such other cost information as considered appropriate to support the offeror’s proposal. The evaluation of proposals will consider the offeror’s Non-price proposal more important than the offeror’s Price proposal.

(a) Each offeror shall identify in its pricing proposal if the offeror intends to obtain engineering support services from the government for efforts related to this procurement. NAVSUP WSS intends to identify the level of support, if any, provided to an offeror by the government in the past fiscal year and assign the appropriate monetary value associated with any engineering support provided to an offeror during that fiscal year. This value will then be added accordingly to the unit price per repair in order to ensure that each offeror’s price is evaluated equally.

L10 – FAR 52.216-27 SINGLE OR MULTIPLE AWARDS (OCT 1995)

The Government may elect to award a single contract or to award multiple contracts for the same or similar supplies to two or more sources under this solicitation.

SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M01 – FAR 52.247-47 EVALUATION – F.O.B ORIGIN (JUN 2003)

This clause of the Federal Acquisition Regulation set forth at FAR 52.247-47 is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part hereof with the same force and effect as if set forth in full.

M02 - EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS FOR AWARD – MULTIPLE

The Government intends to award contracts resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors in the solicitation. The offeror’s proposal shall be in the form prescribed by, and shall contain a response to each of the areas identified in the Section L solicitation provision entitled “Submission of Proposals.” The evaluation of proposals will consider the offeror’s non-price factors more important than the offeror’s price factor.

The non-price evaluation factors are compliance with the solicitation requirements, capacity/delivery, past performance and small business participation strategy.

The evaluation of proposals will be as follows.

A. Factors and Evaluation

(1) Compliance with the Solicitation Requirements

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s proposal and determine whether it complies with the requirements of the solicitation. Please note, compliance with terms of the solicitation includes, but is not limited to:

1. Demonstrates Government Source Approval prior to award.

2. Demonstrates an unconditional offer to perform. A proposal that offers alternative terms or takes exceptions to a solicitation requirement will be considered “technically unacceptable.”

Compliance with solicitation requirements will be rated as either acceptable or unacceptable as shown in the table below The proposal will only be further evaluated if it is rated as acceptable.

Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

(2) Capacity/Delivery

Desired RTAT is 200 calendar days. RTAT is subject to negotiation if deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer. Justification for RTAT values exceeding 200 calendar days is strongly recommended and will be considered in evaluation.

Desired throughput is 01 per month. Throughput is subject to negotiation if deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer. Justification for throughput constraint values below those desired is strongly recommended and will be considered in evaluation.

Contractor must notify the government in writing (including electronic commerce methods, such as email) when assets have been received upon physical receipt of the assets. Assets must be inducted within 5 business days of physical receipt.

(3) Past Performance

In determining the rating for the Past Performance evaluation factor, the Government will give greater consideration to the contracts or efforts which the Government considers most relevant to the RFP. Relevant past performance is performance under contracts or efforts (within the past three years) that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to that which is described in the solicitation.

Relevancy will be rated based on the ratings in the table below:

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

The Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. However, the proposal of an offeror with no relevant past performance history, while not rated favorably or unfavorably for past performance, may not represent the most advantageous proposal to the Government and thus, may be an unsuccessful proposal when compared to the proposals of other offerors.

The offeror should provide the information requested above for past performance evaluation, or affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant directly related or similar past performance. If an offeror fails to provide any past performance information which is similar in scope, magnitude and complexity to that which is detailed in the RFP or fails to affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant directly related or similar past performance, the offer may not be awardable.

The Government will consider the quality of offeror’s past performance. This consideration is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the relative capability of the offeror and other competitors to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

When an offeror is determined to have relevant past performance, the quality of its past performance will be evaluated; an offeror whose past performance demonstrates either a low expectation or no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort will be considered ineligible for award. The ratings shown in the table below will be used:

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(4) Small Business Participation Strategy

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s proposal to determine whether it has an acceptable small business participation strategy. The proposal will be rated as either acceptable or unacceptable. The proposal will only be further evaluated if it is rated acceptable.

(5) Price

Price is a secondary evaluation factor after delivery/past performance. Price will be evaluated on the basis of price analysis. The method of evaluation used by the Contracting Officer is solely within the discretion of the Contracting Officer and will be based on the evaluated standard repair price of all items listed. The Government reserves the right to award the contract to other than the lowest priced offeror.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror’s initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and non-price standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later it is determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary or in the Government’s best interest.

The Contracting Officer reserves the right to determine that the offeror’s overall firm fixed price proposal represents an unacceptable level of risk, based on the information submitted by the offeror.

A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.

Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(END OF CERTIFICATE

Page 1 of 4 RFP # N00383-25-R-D049

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FORM (PPIF)

Provide the information requested in this form for each one of the present or past contracts you have identified. Provide a separate completed form for each contract identified. Attach a separate sheet if additional space is needed.

A. Current Offeror (Company/Division):

CAGE Code:

DUNS Number:

(NOTE: If the company or division performing this past or present effort is different from the current Offeror, note this fact below. Refer to the "Organizational Structure Change History" you provided as part of your Past Performance Volume).

B. Program Title:

C. Contract Specifics:

1. Complete Name of Customer:

2. Customer Address and Telephone #:

3. Contract Number or Citation:

4. Type of Contract:

5. Period of Performance:

6. Initial Contract Price/Cost and Fee: $

7. Final Amount Invoiced/Amount Invoiced to Date: $

8. Original completion date:

9. Current scheduled completion date:

10. Estimated completion date:

11. Number of contract changes:

12. Enter primary cause for contract changes below:

ATTACHMENT B

D. Description of Work as Prime or Subcontractor.

E. Describe how the work under this contract relates to the experience cited by the Offeror in its present proposal.

F. Self-Assessment of past performance record. Provide information of any problems encountered and your corrective actions.

RFP # N00383-25-R-D049

G. Current Status of Contract (Choose One):

[ ] Work Continuing – On Schedule

[ ] Work Continuing – Behind Schedule

[ ] Work Completed – Litigation Pending or Underway

[ ] Work Completed – No Further Action Pending or Underway

[ ] Work Completed – Routine Administrative Action Pending or Underway

[ ] Work Completed – Claims Negotiations Pending or Underway

[ ] Terminated for Convenience

[ ] Terminated for Default

[ ] Other (Explain)

H. Primary customer points of contact. (For Government contracts/orders, provide current information on all three individuals. For commercial contracts, provide points of contact filling these same roles.)

1. Program Manager and/or Site Manager

2. Procurement Contracting Officer

3. Administrative Contracting Officer

Name:

Office:

Address:

Telephone:

FAX #:

E-Mail:

I. Address below any technical (or other) issues about this contract considered particularly relevant to the current solicitation.

J. Include below relevant information concerning compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, under the cited earlier contract.

K. Subcontracting Plan Requirements.

1. Was a subcontracting plan required? ____________ If YES, go to # 2.

2. Planned goal (%) Achieved goal (%)

3. Explain below why any goals were not met.