1.02 PWS DRAFT.pdf
PDF 245 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Aviation Climate Assessment Survey System (ACASS) Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N00244-26-R-S004
About this file
This is a Performance Work Statement (PWS) for Aviation Climate Assessment Survey System (ACASS) Administration and Support Services for the Commander Naval Air Forces (CNAF). The contract covers a base year (03 January 2026 – 02 January 2027) plus four option years, with an estimated 1,857 man-hours of direct labor annually and 9,285 total man-hours across the contract if all options are exercised.
The contractor must provide maintenance, upgrades, and administration of ACASS, which assesses safety and risk management perceptions among Navy aviation personnel through 14 different surveys. Key contractor responsibilities include: online survey development and administration; software architecture using ASP.NET, MSSQL Server, and Visual C#; process modeling and computer interface design; server hosting and virus protection; and providing operational safety strategies to Navy/Marine leadership. Specific tasks require processing unit survey requests within two working days, providing feedback to Commanding Officers within seven working days, developing new surveys within 20 working days, conducting monthly analysis with issue papers, delivering approximately 12 academic-level presentations annually, and traveling to CNAP, CNAL, CNAFR, CNATRA, and NAVAIR as needed. The government has budgeted $8,478.96 annually for travel. Labor categories include Prime/Senior Subject Matter Experts (requiring a PhD in Organizational or Applied Management and Decision Science with direct Naval Aviation experience), Prime/Functional Analysts (mid-level), and Subcontractor positions at both expert and analyst levels. Monthly status and financial reports are due by the 15th of the subsequent month. Services will be provided at the contractor's place of business and funded through Operations & Maintenance, Navy (OMN) and Research Development Test & Evaluation (RDTE) accounts depending on the customer command.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT
Aviation Climate Assessment Survey System (ACASS) Administration and Support Services
1.0 BACKGROUND. Commander Naval Air Forces (CNAF) continues to invest resources toward maintaining, upgrading, and administering the Aviation Climate Assessment Survey System (ACASS), as well as conducting analysis of the aggregate data.
ACASS assesses the perceptions of Navy aviation personnel regarding issues associated with operational safety and risk management. ACASS is composed of the Command Safety Assessment (CSA), Maintenance Climate Assessment Survey (MCAS), Fleet Readiness Center Maintenance Climate Assessment Survey (FRC MCAS), Contractor Maintenance Survey (CTR), Administrative Support Personnel Assessment Survey (ASPA), Higher Headquarters Survey (HHQ), Air Traffic Control Survey (ATC), Flight Meteorology Survey (FLT MET), Private Motor Vehicle Survey (PMV), Motorcycle Survey (MTRCYCL), Drinking & Driving Survey (D&D), Off Duty & Recreational Activities Survey (OD&R) ), CVN Maintenance to Operation Survey (CMOS), and Hazing Survey
(HS).
ACASS serves two primary purposes: (1) it provides unit commanders with real-time feedback on safety issues so they may better focus their mishap prevention efforts, and (2) it collects survey data which is analyzed in the areas of human factors and organizational behavior which could lead to the development of more effective mishap-potential metrics. The ACASS process includes: (1) survey log-in management, (2) collection of survey responses,
(3) real-time display of comparison data, (4) warning indications of data outside sponsored-established tolerances,
(5) Intervention strategy interface, (6) assessment activity chart, and (7) in-depth analysis.
The Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force are currently employing web-based safety assessment systems that are compatible with ACASS. This will allow for joint analysis of data across the military services.
2.0 SCOPE. The contractor shall provide maintenance, upgrades, and administration of ACASS as well as publish results regarding the analysis of ACASS data. The government will use a combination of Operations & Maintenance, Navy (OMN) and Research Development Test & Evaluation (RDTE) funds, dependent upon Contract Line Item Number (CLIN). The CLINs for ACASS services provided to the operational, training/fleet readiness squadrons, and reserve squadrons reporting to Commander Naval Air Force U. S. Pacific Fleet (COMNAVAIRPAC/CNAP), Commander Naval Air Force U. S. Atlantic Fleet (COMNAVAIRLANT/CNAL), and Commander Naval Air Force Reserves (CNAFR), will cite OMN lines of accounting. The CLINs for ACASS services provided to test squadrons and commands reporting to Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIRSYSCOM) will cite RDTE line of accounting. Attachment (1) to the contract provides a detailed breakdown of squadrons by COMNAVAIRPAC, COMNAVAIRLANT, CNAFR, and NAVAIRSYSCOM and corresponding CLINs for the base year and each option year thereafter.
3.0 CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS. The contractor is responsible for the following:
(a) On-line survey development
(b) On-line survey administration and debriefing survey results
(c) Software architecture (ASP.NET, MSSQL Server, Visual C# programming, & web development)
(e) Process modeling and computer interface design
(f) Server hosting process/procedures
(g) Keeping written/electronic documentation of previous organizational culture assessments, including feedback loops from the assessments from PhD level.
(h) Providing operational safety strategies and interventions to Navy/Marine leadership
4.0 TASKS. The contractor shall complete the following tasks:
4.1 Provide administration of ACASS, to include:
- Processing unit requests to participate in the survey process
- Tracking ACASS requests through survey completion
4.2 Provide feedback of survey results to Commanding Officers (COs)/Officers In Charge (OICs), to include:
- Identify weaknesses and provide recommendations supported by statistical and trend analysis of empirical data, and case studies
- Discuss results and potential intervention strategies
- Demonstrate display of organizational results
4.3 Provide software refinements, to include:
- Ability to compare intra-squadron survey results (e.g., day crew vs. night crew)
- Ability to aggregate results using multiple parallel hierarchies (e.g., carrier air wing (CVW) as well as type wing or Marine Air Group (MAG), as well as Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU))
- Cross-service comparisons
4.4 Develop new surveys to address Navy policy matters on diverse issues (i.e., Hazing, Motorcycle Safety)
4.5 Conduct analysis.
- Analysis of individual and aggregate ACASS data
- Publish papers/reports detailing analysis methods and findings.
- Provide briefings to Naval leadership highlighting analysis the findings and implications.
4.6 Provide continuous, uninterrupted server hosting and virus protection for the period of contract, as exercised (Other Direct Cost CLINs 0005, 1005, 2005, 3005, and 4005).
4.7 Provide Academic level presentations of ACASS analysis. Typically these are high level broad base briefings that will allow decision makers to make programmatic Command wide decisions. Contractor shall identify weaknesses and provide recommendations supported by statistical and trend analysis of empirical data, and case studies.
4.8 Travel to CNAP, CNAL, CNAFR, CNATRA, and NAVAIR to provide ACASS presentations (CLINs 0006, 1006, 2006, 3006, and 4006).
5.0 ESTIMATED/HISTORICAL WORKLOAD INFORMATION:
5.1 General Population Covered: It is estimated approximately 300 shore and afloat units participate annually.
5.2 Estimated number of unit requests to participate in process/month: approximately 30 unit requests per month (a unit may request 1-10 different types of surveys).
5.3 Estimated number of ACASS requests tracked through survey completion/month: Approximately 100 surveys taken/tracked/completed per month.
5.4 Frequency of Feedback provided to CO’s/OIC’s: Approximately 100 survey feedback reports per month (plus any follow-up questions or requests for information that CO’s/OIC’s may have.
5.5 Estimated number of new surveys: Historically, approximately 2-5 new surveys were delivered per year.
5.6 Number of Presentations: Approximately 12 presentations per year, utilizing Microsoft Word or Microsoft Power Point.
5.7 Survey refinements: Generally 2-4, but overall it is undefined. Shifts in tasking from Combatant Commanders, in response to Congressional Foreign Policy will dictate how many refinements will occur – the contractor will need to change the survey to adapt to the changing environment of those deployed, working to be deployed, as well as those returning home from deployments that are longer than normal (e.g. changes necessary to accommodate a Carrier Strike Group on a 10 month deployment, after having only 6 months off from a 6 month deployment).
5.8 Approximately 2-5 trips per year usually no more than 2 individuals traveling.
6.0 DELIVERABLES.
6.1 The contractor shall provide a monthly status report and a monthly financial status report to include detailed information on each of tasks 4.1 through 4.8 that were performed (or not performed), as well as a full financial breakdown of expenditures and funds remaining in accordance with Exhibits A002 and A003. Contractor format as approved by the Government.
7.0 LABOR LEVEL OF EFFORT.
7.1 The level of effort estimated to be expended each year of this contract is 1,857 man-hours of direct labor if each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) is executed. An estimated total level of effort of 9,285 man-hours of direct labor over the life of the contract is expected if all options are exercised. The composition by task/requirement of the estimated man-hours is provided in the table below. The labor categories and associated hours are provided for proposal preparation and evaluation purposes only. The contractor shall manage the contract so as to meet all goals and objectives set forth in this PWS.
BASE PERIOD LABOR CATEGORY/HOURS
CLIN Prime/Sr Subject Matter Expert (945) 0001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 369 hours 0002 CNAL @ 271 hours 0003 CNAFR @ 113 hours 0004 NAVAIR @ 101 hours
CLIN Prime/Functional Analyst, mid-level (155) 0001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 57 hours 0002 CNAL @ 43 hours 0003 CNAFR @ 17 hours 0004 NAVAIR @ 13 hours
CLIN Subcontractor/Functional Analyst, mid-level (145) 0001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 95 hours 0002 CNAL @ 33 hours 0003 CNAFR @ 14 hours 0004 NAVAIR @ 20 hours
CLIN Subcontractor/Subject Matter Expert (905) 0001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 512 hours
0002 CNAL @ 114 hours 0003 CNAFR @ 40 hours 0004 NAVAIR @ 45 hours
OPT YEAR 1 LABOR CATEGORY/HOURS
1001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 369 hours 1002 CNAL @ 271 hours 1003 CNAFR @ 113 hours 1004 NAVAIR @ 101 hours
CLIN Prime/Functional Analyst, mid-level (155) 1001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 57 hours 1002 CNAL @ 43 hours 1003 CNAFR @ 17 hours 1004 NAVAIR @ 13 hours
CLIN Subcontractor/Functional Analyst, mid-level (145) 1001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 95 hours 1002 CNAL @ 33 hours 1003 CNAFR @ 14 hours 1004 NAVAIR @ 20 hours
CLIN Subcontractor/Subject Matter Expert (905) 1001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 512 hours 1002 CNAL @ 114 hours 1003 CNAFR @ 40 hours 1004 NAVAIR @ 45 hours
OPT YEAR 2 LABOR CATEGORY/HOURS
2001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 369 hours 2002 CNAL @ 271 hours 2003 CNAFR @ 113 hours 2004 NAVAIR @ 101 hours
CLIN Prime/Functional Analyst, mid-level (155) 2001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 57 hours 2002 CNAL @ 43 hours 2003 CNAFR @ 17 hours 2004 NAVAIR @ 13 hours
CLIN Subcontractor/Functional Analyst, mid-level (145) 2001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 95 hours 2002 CNAL @ 33 hours 2003 CNAFR @ 14 hours 2004 NAVAIR @ 20 hours
CLIN Subcontractor/Subject Matter Expert (905) 2001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 512 hours 2002 CNAL @ 114 hours 2003 CNAFR @ 40 hours 2004 NAVAIR @ 45 hours
OPT YEAR 3 LABOR CATEGORY/HOURS
3001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 369 hours 3002 CNAL @ 271 hours 3003 CNAFR @ 113 hours 3004 NAVAIR @ 101 hours
CLIN Prime/Functional Analyst, mid-level (155) 3001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 57 hours 3002 CNAL @ 43 hours 3003 CNAFR @ 17 hours 3004 NAVAIR @ 13 hours
CLIN Subcontractor/Functional Analyst, mid-level (145) 3001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 95 hours 3002 CNAL @ 34 hours 3003 CNAFR @ 14 hours 3004 NAVAIR @ 20 hours
CLIN Subcontractor/Subject Matter Expert (905) 3001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 512 hours 3002 CNAL @ 114 hours 3003 CNAFR @ 40 hours 3004 NAVAIR @ 45 hours
OPT YEAR 4 LABOR CATEGORY/HOURS
4001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 369 hours 4002 CNAL @ 271 hours 4003 CNAFR @ 113 hours 4004 NAVAIR @ 101 hours
CLIN Prime/Functional Analyst, mid-level (155) 4001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 57 hours 4002 CNAL @ 43 hours 4003 CNAFR @ 17 hours 4004 NAVAIR @ 13 hours
CLIN Subcontractor/Functional Analyst, mid-level (145) 4001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 95 hours 4002 CNAL @ 33 hours 4003 CNAFR @ 14 hours 4004 NAVAIR @ 20 hours
CLIN Subcontractor/Subject Matter Expert (905) 4001 CNAP/CNATRA @ 512 hours 4002 CNAL @ 114 hours 4003 CNAFR @ 40 hours 4004 NAVAIR @ 45 hours
7.2 Labor Categories and Key Personnel: The following labor categories are anticipated. The contractor shall provide only personnel fully-qualified and competent to perform the scope of effort set forth herein. The levels of skills, education and experience of the different classifications of personnel provided for contract performance must meet the requirements set forth below.
7.2.1 Labor Categories:
7.2.1.1 Professional Services include all tasks requiring higher education and extensive experience, which includes identifying customer’s assessment goals and intended metrics, survey content development and refinement to achieve intended metrics, interfacing with customers regarding technical or contracting issues, research and statistical analysis of survey results, and producing written reports based on statistical analyses of survey results.
7.2.1.1.1 Professional Services also requires Doctorate level degree (Phd) of Organizational Management or Applied Management and Decision Science for the survey development/refinement and presentation to CNAP/CNAL, plus recent long-term prior experience directly related to the programs and tasks addressed in work statement. Prior direct experience working with CNAP and CNAF organizations with knowledge/understanding of Naval Aviation Culture is highly desirable. The subject matter expert will have high level of technical knowledge and experience in the field of survey development, administration, and analysis.
7.2.1.1.2 Professional Services may also include hours spent in traveling to/from customer locations, software development of survey website functionality, and database management in support of survey websites and data analysis, of which the contractor must have six years of experience and exhibit strength in the areas of survey content design, data analysis, report writing, software engineering, and/or database management.
7.2.1.2 Administrative Services (“Functional Analyst”): Associate degree in science, administration, or business, or an equivalent combination of education and practical systems analysis is required. The functional analyst will have a basic understanding of the survey process, the customer’s organizational structure, and the software used to conduct surveys. Prior recent, direct experience in the workplace that demonstrates communication skills and the ability to assimilate new information is required.
7.2.2 Certain skilled experienced professional and/or technical personnel are essential for accomplishing the work to be performed under this contract. The contractor shall provide resumes for all Key Personnel. No substitutions shall be made of accepted key personnel except for sudden illness, death, or termination of employment, without prior written approval from the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and Contracting Officer. Substitutions shall only be accepted if in compliance with paragraph 7.2.3 Substitution of Key Personnel.
7.2.2.1 For the purposes of this work statement, Professional Services labor category is considered Key Personnel.
7.2.3 Substitution of Key Personnel: All Contractor requests for approval of substitutions shall be submitted in writing to the Contracting Officer and the COR within thirty (30) calendar days in advance of the effective date, whenever possible, and shall provide a detailed explanation of the circumstances necessitating the proposed substitution, a complete resume for the proposed substitute, and any other information requested by the Contracting Officer necessary to approve or disapprove the proposed substitution. Any interview by the COR may also be requested. The Contracting Officer and the COR will evaluate such requests and promptly notify the Contractor of approval or disapproval in writing.
8.0 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: Period of Performance will be for a Base, plus four (4) Option Years:
Base Yr: 03 January 2026 – 02 January 2027 Opt Yr 1: 03 January 2027 – 02 January 2028 Opt Yr 2: 03 January 2028 – 02 January 2029 Opt Yr 3: 03 January 2029 – 02 January 2030 Opt Yr 4: 03 January 2030 – 02 January 2031
9.0 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: Work will be accomplished at vendor’s place of business.
10.0 TRAVEL. Travel may be required, as such the Government has budgeted $8,478.96 per year for travel (CLINs 0006, 1006, 2006, 3006, and 4006). This amount should be incorporated into the contractor’s proposal. No travel will be performed without prior approval by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). Trip Reports must be submitted in accordance with Exhibit A001 and Attachment 1.
11.0 CLASSIFICATION/SECURITY: Unclassified. Security clearance not required.
COR responsibilities and QASP
1. CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE (COR) is responsible for:
a. Liaison with personnel at the Government installation and the contractor personnel on site;
b. Technical advice/recommendations/clarification on the statement of work;
c. The statement of work for delivery/task orders placed under this contract;
d. An independent government estimate of the effort described in the definitized statement of work
e. Quality assurance of services performed and acceptance of the services or deliverables;
f. Government furnished property;
g. Security requirements on Government installation;
h. Providing the PCO or his designated Ordering Officer with appropriate funds for issuance of the
Delivery/Task order; and/or
i. Certification of invoice for payment.
NOTE: When, in the opinion of the Contractor, the COR requests effort outside the existing scope of the contract (or delivery/task order), the Contractor shall promptly notify the Contracting Officer (or Ordering Officer) in writing.
No action shall be taken by the contractor under such direction until the Contracting Officer has issued a modification to the contract or, in the case of a delivery/task order, until the Ordering Officer has issued a modification of the delivery/task order, or until the issue has otherwise been resolved. THE COR IS NOT AN
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTING OFFICER AND DOES NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO DIRECT THE
ACCOMPLISHMENT OF EFFORT WHICH IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE STATEMENT OF WORK IN
THE CONTRACT OR DELIVERY/TASK ORDER.
Contracting Officers Representative:
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION PLAN
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION PLAN (CAP) FOR COST TYPE CONTRACTS
In order to expedite the administration of this contract, the following delineation of duties is provided. The names, addresses and phone numbers for these offices or individuals are included elsewhere in the contract award document.
The office or individual designated as having responsibility should be contacted for any questions, clarifications or information regarding the administration function assigned.
1. The Procuring Contract Office (PCO) is responsible for:
a. All pre-award duties such as solicitation, negotiation and award of contracts.
b. Any information or questions during the pre-award stage of the procurement.
c. Freedom of Information inquiries.
d. Changes in contract terms and/or conditions.
e. Post award conference.
2. The Contract Administration Office (CAO) is responsible for matters specified in FAR 42.302, except those areas otherwise designated as the responsibility of the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) or someone else herein.
3. The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) is responsible for audit verification/provisional approval of invoices and final audit of this contract prior to final payment to the contractor.
4. The paying office is responsible for making payment of proper invoices after acceptance is documented.
5. The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) is responsible for interface with the contractor and performance of duties such as those set forth below. It is emphasized that only the PCO/CAO has the authority to modify the terms of the contract. In no event will any understanding, agreement, modification, change order, or other matter deviating from the terms of the basic contract between the contractor and any other person be effective or binding on the government. If in the opinion of the contractor an effort outside the scope of the contract is requested, the contractor shall promptly notify the PCO in writing. No action may be taken by the contractor unless the PCO or CAO has issued a contractual change. The COR duties are as follows:
a. Technical Interface
(1) The COR is responsible for all Government technical interface concerning the contractor and furnishing technical instructions to the contractor. These instructions may include: technical advice/recommendations/clarifications of specific details relating to technical aspects of contract requirements;
milestones to be met within the general terms of the contract or specific subtasks of the contract; or, any other interface of a technical nature necessary for the contractor to perform the work specified in the contract. The COR is the point of contact through whom the contractor can relay questions and problems of a technical nature to the PCO.
(2) The COR is prohibited from issuing any instruction which would constitute a contractual change.
The COR shall not instruct the contractor how to perform. If there is any doubt whether technical instructions contemplated fall within the scope of work, contact the PCO for guidance before transmitting the instructions to the contractor.
b. Contract Surveillance
(1) The COR shall monitor the contractor's performance and progress under the contract. In performing contract surveillance duties, the COR should exercise extreme care to ensure that he/she does not cross the line of personal services. The COR must be able to distinguish between surveillance (which is proper and necessary) and supervision (which is not permitted). Surveillance becomes supervision when you go beyond enforcing the terms of the contract. If the contractor is directed to perform the contract services in a specific manner, the line is being crossed. In such as situation, the COR's actions would be equivalent to using the contractor's personnel as if they were government employees and would constitute transforming the contract into one for personal services.
(2) The COR shall monitor the contractor's performance to see that inefficient or wasteful methods are not being used. If such practices are observed, the COR is responsible for taking reasonable and timely action to alert the contractor and the PCO to the situation. When contract performance is taking place at a government location, the COR shall also monitor contractor employees performing under the contract with regard to kind, number and hours worked to ensure that the contractor is properly charging time applied to the contract. A record of such personal observations should be kept and compared with charges invoiced by the contractor for that task and time frame. This information can also be used as a tool in evaluating the contractor certificate of performance. It is essential that the COR coordinate these efforts with the CAO designated in the contract.
(3) The COR will take timely action to alert the PCO to any potential performance problems. If performance schedule slippage is detected, the COR should determine the factors causing the delay and report them to the PCO, along with the contractor's proposed actions to eliminate or overcome these factors and recover the slippage. Once a recovery plan has been put in place, the COR is responsible for monitoring the recovery and keeping the PCO advised of progress.
(4) The COR shall maintain surveillance of the contractor's performance to determine if the percentage of work performed reasonably corresponds to the percentage of funds expended. This responsibility requires a thorough review of the contractor's progress reports. The COR shall immediately report to the PCO any difficulties perceived in this area. The COR is also responsible for providing the contractor with any written comments the PCO may make in response to the progress reports and/or personal observations of the COR.
(4) If the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) is applicable to the contract you are responsible for completing a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) in the CPARS Automated Information System (AIS). The initial CPAR, under an eligible contract, must reflect evaluation of at least 180 days of contractor performance. The completed CPAR, including contractor comments if any, (NOTE: contractors are allowed 30 days to input their comments) should be available in the CPARS AIS for reviewing official (PCO) review no later than 270 days after start of contract performance. Subsequent CPARs covering any contract option periods should be ready at 1-year intervals thereafter.
c. Invoice Review and Approval/Inspection and Acceptance
(1) The COR is responsible for quality assurance of services performed and acceptance of the services or deliverables. The COR shall expeditiously review copies of the contractor's invoices or vouchers, certificate of performance and all other supporting documentation to determine the reasonableness of the billing. In making this determination, the COR must take into consideration all documentary information available and any information developed from personal observations.
(2) The COR must indicate either complete or partial concurrence with the contractor's invoice/voucher by executing the applicable certificate of performance furnished by the contractor. The COR may request DCAA to take a payment offset on questioned costs, when documentary evidence or personal observations do not support submitted invoices. The COR shall notify DCAA when questioned costs have been resolved with the contractor. The COR will ensure that DCAA conducts floor checks and/or timecard checks when actual monitoring is not feasible.
The COR will be cognizant of the invoicing procedures and the prompt payment due dates detailed elsewhere in the contract.
(3) The COR will provide the PCO and the CAO with copies of acceptance documents such as Certificates of Performance.
(4) The COR shall work with the Contractor to obtain and execute a final voucher no more than 60 days after completion of contract performance. The COR shall ensure that the voucher is clearly marked as a “Final Voucher.”
d. Contract Modifications.
(1) The COR is responsible for developing the statement of work for change orders, technical direction letters (TDLs) or modifications and for preparing an independent government cost estimate of the effort described in the proposed statement of work.
(2) Once the Contracting Officer has requested and received the contractor's proposal the COR shall review and evaluate the contractor's proposal and furnish comments and recommendations.
e. Administrative Duties
(1) The COR is responsible for taking appropriate action on technical correspondence pertaining to the contract and for maintaining files on each contract. This includes all modifications, government cost estimates, contractor invoices/vouchers, certificates of performance, DD 250 forms and contractor's status reports.
(2) The COR shall maintain files on all correspondence relating to contractor performance, whether satisfactory or unsatisfactory, and on trip reports for all government personnel visiting the contractor's place of business for the purpose of discussing the contract.
(3) The COR must take prompt action to provide the PCO with any contractor or technical code request for change, deviation or waiver, along with any supporting analysis or other required documentation.
f. Government Furnished Property. When government property is to be furnished to the contractor, the COR will take the necessary steps to ensure that it is furnished in a timely fashion and in proper condition for use. The COR will maintain adequate records to ensure that property furnished is returned and/or that material has been consumed in the performance of work.
g. Security. The COR is responsible for ensuring that any applicable security requirements are strictly adhered to.
h. Standards of Conduct. The COR is responsible for reading and complying with all applicable agency standards of conduct and conflict of interest instructions.
i. Written Report/Contract Completion Statement
(1) The COR is responsible for timely preparation and submission to the PCO, of a written, annual
N00244-16-C-0006 evaluation of the contractors performance. The report shall be submitted within 30 days prior to the exercise of any contract option and 60 days after contract completion. The report shall include a written statement that services were received in accordance with the Contract terms and that the contract is now available for close-out. The report shall also include a statement as to the use made of any deliverables furnished by the contractor. For contracts where technical direction letters (TDLs) are issued, one consolidated report which addresses all actions under the contract may be submitted.
(2) If the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) is applicable to the contract you are responsible for completing a final Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) in the CPARS with 30 days of contract completion.
(3) The COR is responsible for providing necessary assistance to the Contracting Officer in performing Contract Close-out in accordance with FAR 4.804, Closeout of Contract Files.
6. The Technical Assistant (TA), if appointed, is responsible for providing routine administration and monitoring assistance to the COR. The TA does not have the authority to provide any technical direction or clarification to the contract. Duties that may be performed by the TA are as follows:
a. Identify contractor deficiencies to the COR.
b. Review contract deliverables, recommend acceptance/rejection, and provide the COR with documentation to support the recommendation.
c Assist in preparing the final report on contractor performance for the applicable contract in accordance with the format and procedures prescribed by the COR.
d. Identify contract noncompliance with reporting requirements to the COR.
e. Review contractor status and progress reports, identify deficiencies to the COR, and provide the COR with recommendations regarding acceptance, rejection, and/or Government technical clarification requests.
f. Review invoices for the appropriate mix of types and quantities of labor, materials, and other direct costs, and provide the COR with recommendations to facilitate COR certification of the invoice.
g. Provide the COR with timely input regarding technical clarifications for the statement of work, possible technical direction to provide the contractor, and recommend corrective actions.
h. Provide detailed written reports of any trip, meeting, or conversation to the COR subsequent to any interface between the TA and contractor.
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
CNAF N45 Aviation Climate Assessment Survey System (ACASS)
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
PWS
paragraph Performance Requirement
Performance Standard MADR Method of Surveillance
4.0 Provide Administration of ACASS
4.1 Process unit requests
to participate in the survey process.
Within two working days of receipt of request, have the applicable survey set- up and available to the requesting unit.
95% of unit requests processed within 2 working days
Customer Feedback
4.2 Provide Feedback of
survey results to
Commanding Officers, Officer's In Charge (CO, OIC).
Within seven working days of notification of unit survey completion, provide survey feedback and potential intervention strategies to unit
CO, OIC.
No deviation
Customer Feedback
4.3 Provide Software
refinements, functional improvements, maintenance and fixes, and cross comparison requirements.
Within two working days of notification of requests or identification of errors, make appropriate fixes and/or changes to surveys to ensure proper functionality and/or new assessments as directed by the government.
No deviation
COR
communication
4.4 Develop new
surveys and/or assessments
Within 20 working days of notification or requests for new surveys, provide the appropriate survey and/or assessment as requested by the government.
No deviation
COR
communication
4.5 Conduct analysis, provide briefings.
On a monthly basis conduct analysis draft and release issue papers to Naval Aviation Leadership on pertinent aviation issues that are developed from the ACASS Survey data.
No deviation
Measured by receipt of issue papers on a monthly basis.
4.6 Provide continuous
and uninterrupted server hosting and virus protection for the period of performance.
Uninterrupted, virus free server hosting.
No deviation with exception of acts of nature.
COR
communication
4.7 Provide
presentations
Provide Academic level presentations of ACASS analysis, Contractor shall identify weaknesses and provide recommendations supported by statistical and trend analysis of empirical data, and case studies.
Approximately 12 presentations per year
No deviation
COR
communication;
presentations by
PhD.
4.8 Travel to CNAF to
provide ACASS presentations to staff, as requested
Travel to provide ACASS presentations as approved by
COR.
No deviation
COR
communication;
6.0 Monthly financial and
status report of all tasks
By the th of the subsequent month
No deviation
Government acceptance or directive to change format and/or content
| PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT |
| 5.0 ESTIMATED/HISTORICAL WORKLOAD INFORMATION: |
| 6.0 DELIVERABLES. |
| 7.0 LABOR LEVEL OF EFFORT. |
| Contracting Officers Representative: |
| QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP) |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .