N1OPNAV20250308

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as p rovid ed herein, all terms and cond itions o f th e document referenced in Item 9A o r 10 A, as hereto fore chang ed , remains un ch an ged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND T IT LE OF SIGNER (T ype or print )

30-105-04EXCEP TION T O SF 30

AP PROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) P rescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to provide answers to questions submitted by potential quoters and provide the Past Performance Inf ormation Form f or this solicitation. The due date f or quote submissions is hereby extended until 12::00 PM EST February 10, 2026.

See Summary of Changes.

The contracting point of contact is Elene Chappelle, w ho can be reached via email at elene.y.chappelle.civ@us.navy.mil.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 03-Feb-2026

16B. UNITED STAT ES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Cont ract ing Officer)(Signat ure of person aut horized t o sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONT RACT OR (No., St reet , County, Sta te and Zip Code) X N0018925QZ320

X 9B. DATED (SEE IT EM 11)

15-Jan-2026

10B. DATED (SEE IT EM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS IT EM ONLY AP PLIES TO AMENDMENT S OF SOLICITAT IONS

X Th e ab ove n umbered solicitation is amend ed as set forth in Item 1 4. Th e hou r and date sp ecified for receipt o f Offer X is extend ed , is not extended.

Offer mu st ackn owled ge receipt of this amen dment p rior to the h our an d d ate specified in the solicitation or as amen ded b y o ne of the following method s:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15 , and returnin g 1 co pies of the amen dment; (b ) By ackn owled ging receipt of this amen dment o n each copy of the o ffer sub mitted ;

o r (c) By separate letter o r teleg ram wh ich includ es a reference to th e so licitation and amend men t nu mbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtu e of this amen dment y ou desire to change an offer already su bmitted, su ch change may be made by teleg ram or letter, p rovid ed each telegram o r letter mak es reference to th e so licitation and this amen dment, an d is receiv ed prio r to the op en ing hou r and date sp ecified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND AP PROP RIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM AP PLIES ONLY T O MODIFICATIONS OF CONT RACT S/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES T HE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED P URSUANT T O: (Spec ify aut horit y) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN T HE

CONT RACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. T HE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office , appropria tion dat e, et c.) SET FORT H IN ITEM 14, P URSUANT TO T HE AUT HORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. T HIS SUPP LEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENT ERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUT HORITY OF:

D. OT HER (Specify type of modificat ion and aut horit y)

E. IMP ORTANT: Contrac tor is not, is required t o sign this document and re turn copies to t he issuing office.

14. DESCRIP TION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF sec tion headings, inc luding solic ita tion/contrac t subject mat t er whe re feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If app licable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Feb-2026

CODE

NAVSUP FLC NORFOLK PHILADELPHIA OFFICE

AT TN: ELENE CHAPPELLE

700 ROBBINS AVE

PHILADELPHIA PA 19111

N00189 7 . ADMINISTERED BY (If o ther than item 6)

4 . REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0018925QZ320

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

PAST PERFORMANCE INFO FORM

Current As Of: 06/17/2008

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FORM Form of

Name of Offeror:

Contract Number, order number, or identifier:

Customer Name & Location:

Customer Point of Contact (Name & Title):

Telephone Number (PLEASE VERIFY):

and e-mail address

Total dollar amount for this effort during the past five (5) years:

(For ordering vehicles, show both the annual estimated contract amount and the amount of orders actually performed):

(Show calendar year and dollars)

Number of personnel (FTE) performing per year (avg.):

Period of Performance: From:

To:

Detailed description of the work performed sufficient to demonstrate the relevance of the reference to the solicitation:

Quality, delivery, or cost problem(s); corrective action(s) taken; and effectiveness of the corrective action(s):

Subcontractor(s) Utilized in Performance of this contract, description of the extent of work performed by subcontractor(s), along with annual dollar value of all subcontracts:

RESPONSE TO SUBMITTED QUESTION

QUESTIONS SUBMITTED BY POTENTIAL QUOTERS

1. The PWS emphasizes interactive, improvisational, in-person facilitation. Is the Government open to a blended delivery model where live, facilitated edutainment sessions are supported by digital, provided live audience engagement remains the primary modality?

See PWS paragraph 1.1 Scope of Work.

2. Will attendees be permitted to use Government-approved mobile devices or PCs during or immediately following training sessions for approved instructional or assessment activities?

Will Government Wi-Fi be available, or should the contractor plan to provide connectivity?

No mobile devices for students, No Wi-Fi. No private assessments.

3. Can the Government clarify whether “edutainment” is defined strictly as live theatrical performance, or whether it may include facilitated interactive scenarios augmented by digital decision-making and reflection tools, provided improvisational and audience interaction requirements are met?

Trying to establish both but be entertaining to the students and absent from routine rhetorical models used commonly in instructional norms to capture attention and depict the need to reverse Hollywood accepted norms.

4. Are facilitators required to have formal acting or improvisational theater backgrounds, or is demonstrated experience delivering interactive, scenario-based prevention training to young adult audiences sufficient?

Training is not required for acting theater or delivery, however a background in sexual assault prevention training with practice on delivery is essential.

5. Does the Government have preferred assessment instruments for measuring training effectiveness, or may the contractor propose validated tools aligned with SAPR objectives and behavior-change outcomes?

See PWS paragraph 8.3 Government Quality Assurance.

6. Is there an incumbent or preferred contractor? If so, who is it?

Catharsis, Inc. is the incumbent. They are located in Chicago, IL

7. Is this a follow-on to an existing contract or a re-bid/re-write of a previous contract? If so, who had the existing/previous contract?

This is a follow-on to the existing contract, N0018921DZ016

8. If a previous contractor existed, is there any reason for you to believe that this contractor would not be bidding this RFP?

This is not a question that the Government can answer on behalf of another contractor.

9. If a previous contract existed, what was the value of that contract?

The total value of the current contract is $3,951,569.89, inclusive of any options.

10. What is your budget or budget range for this project?

The Government will not provide a response to this question. The contractor should price the effort based on the information in the solicitation.

11. Did you have a third party help with the preparation of this bid? If so, please identify them and their role, and indicate if they will be allowed to bid?

No

12. For Volume II of the quote, the government asks that each page of each copy reference the “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.” There does not appear to be a FAR 2.101 and 3.104 in the RFQ. Where can the quoter find the Source Selection Information to reference in Volume II?

Any FAR reference can be found in the FAR

FAR 2.101 (https://www.acquisition.gov/far/part-2#FAR_2_101) FAR 3.104 (https://www.acquisition.gov/far/part-3#FAR_3_104_1)

13. For Volume I of the quote, the government asks that the quoter complete a “Past Performance Information Form” for each reference. There does not appear to be such a form attached to the RFQ. Where can the quoter find the “Past Performance Information Form”?

The Past Performance Form is attached to this amendment

14. Does the government anticipate common, reasonable escalation to be built into the pricing presented in Volume II? If so, does the government have a preferred method of the contractor communicating that? Would a table showing the contract years broken out with escalated unit pricing be acceptable as a supplement, not substitution, to the solicitation pricing pages?

A table showing the contract years broken out with escalated unit pricing is acceptable as a supplement, not substitution, to the solicitation pricing pages

15. Program Execution & Scheduling Does the Government anticipate that the weekly large-group and small-group training volumes described in the PWS represent steady-state averages throughout the year, or should quoters anticipate periodic fluctuations in volume based on training pipeline throughput?

Routine fluctuations usually occur on an annual basis and during seasonal changes in training through RTC based on graduations from Highschool and enlistments in the U. S. Navy

16. Facilitator Staffing Levels For weekly large-group training sessions, does the Government expect a consistent two-facilitator delivery model regardless of class size, or may facilitator staffing be adjusted based on student count and venue configuration, provided learning objectives are met?

PWS 5.8.1 Large Group Session Concept The contractor shall provide a single weekly, interactive, improvisational, 60- to 90-minute, two-person facilitated session that directly targets audiences of up to a maximum of 300 Navy students who recently joined the service.

17. Surge Capacity Expectations Are there known or historical periods of increased student throughput during which the Government anticipates a need for additional training sessions or expanded facilitator capacity beyond the standard weekly cadence described in the PWS?

No, maximum Large group sessions are always one per week, maximum small group sessions are 6 /day during busy high peak student levels.

18. Curriculum Ownership & Initial Approval

The PWS references Government review and approval of training curriculum. Is the Government’s expectation that the contractor provides a fully developed curriculum at the start of performance, subject to Government review and approval prior to delivery?

Yes

19. Curriculum Revision & Approval Timelines When curriculum modifications are requested, does the Government have an anticipated review and approval timeframe that contractors should account for when planning training schedules?

See PWS paragraph 5.2 Kick-Off Meeting and PWS paragraph 5.4 Curriculum and Assessment Tools Revisions.

20. Quality Control Plan (QCP) Does the Government require use of a specific QCP format or template, or may contractors submit a QCP that aligns with FAR-based quality standards and maps to the Government’s Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)?

See PWS paragraph 8.2 Contractor Quality Control Plan Specifics.

21. Reporting Formats & Data Elements Will the Government provide standardized templates for required monthly reports, rosters, and meeting minutes, or should contractors propose reporting formats for Government review and approval at contract kickoff?

See PWS paragraph 5.2 Kick-Off Meeting.

22. Government-Furnished Facilities & Resources While the PWS notes Government-furnished training facilities and sound systems, should contractors plan to operate all audiovisual equipment independently, or will on-site technical or audiovisual support be provided?

See PWS paragraphs 3.1, 4.0, 5.7.2, and 5.8.2.

23. Historical Delivery Model Assumptions.

Are the training volumes, delivery methods, and session durations outlined in the PWS reflective of historical program execution, or do they represent updated or revised requirements the Government intends to implement under this contract?

Yes to all of the above. Only mild revisions have been requested for training demands.

24. Transition Considerations In the event of a change in contractors, does the Government anticipate any transition activities, coordination, or knowledge transfer, or will the awarded contractor assume full performance responsibilities at the start of the ordering period?

A transition period is not listed in the RFQ and awarded contractor will be expected to be able to perform services in full on the first day of the effective date of the contract.

25. Transition Planning Considerations.

Does the Government anticipate any formal transition activities or coordination period at the start of performance to support continuity of training delivery, or should quoters plan to assume full operational responsibility on Day One of the ordering period?

The awardee will assume full operational responsibility on day one.

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 05-Feb-2026 12:00 PM to 10-Feb-2026 12:00 PM.

(End of Summary of Changes)