N0018925Q0159 0001.pdf

1301242588

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of amendment 0001 is to make changes to the SOW, provide answ ers to the questions received, and to extend the close date to 28 April 2025. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 12

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 21-Apr-2025

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N0018925Q0159

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

28-Mar-2025

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

21-Apr-2025

CODE

NAVSUP FLC NORFOLK CONTRACTING

NORFOLK OFFICE

ATTN: T. WATSON

1968 GLIBERT STREET, SUITE 600

NORFOLK VA 23511-3392

N00189 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0018925Q0159

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 24-Apr-2025 12:00 PM to 28-Apr-2025 12:00 PM.

The following have been modified:

52.212-1 ADDENDUM

In addition to FAR 52.212-1, “Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items,” and any other instructions contained elsewhere in this solicitation, the following information is provided. Vendors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including all terms and conditions of the RFQ, representation and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in a quotation being ineligible for award. Vendors shall clearly identify any exceptions to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale.

The Government intends to award a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract award as a result of this solicitation in accordance with FAR Part 12 and 13. Award will be made to that vendor whose quote is most advantageous to the Government under the selection criteria set forth in this solicitation. The Government intends to evaluate quotes and award a contract based on initial quotes. Therefore, the vendor’s initial quote should contain the vendor’s best terms from a Past Performance and Price standpoint. The Government may contact any or all of the vendors with questions concerning their quotes. The Government reserves the right to award a FFP contract to other than the lowest priced quote; award a FFP contract without exchanges; or award a FFP contract after exchanges, whichever is in the best interest of the Government.

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS

Vendor shall submit their quotation so that it is received by the Navy no later than the time of closing included on Block 8 of the SF1449. Quotation shall be submitted via email to Tierra Watson at tierra.k.watson.civ@us.navy.mil.

Only electronic submissions shall be accepted.

I. QUOTE PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

The quotation shall consist of the following:

1. A completed SF1449 Solicitation to include total price

2. A detailed quote of how the vendor intends to meet the requirements listed within the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

3. The quote shall consist of the following separate volumes:

Volume 1: Factor I – Past Performance Volume 2: Factor II – Price

Each page of each copy shall be affixed with the following legend:

Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

IMPORTANT NOTES:

(1) Vendors shall respond to all requirements of the solicitation. Vendors are cautioned not to alter the solicitation.

(2) In the event that any person who is not a bona fide employee of the offeror participated in the creation, formulation, or writing of any portion of the quote, a certificate to this effect shall be included in the quote which shall be signed by an officer of the offeror. Such certificate shall identify the name of the person who is not a bona fide employee, that person’s employment capacity, the name of the person’s firm, the relationship of that firm to the offeror, and the portion of the quote in which the person participated.

(3) Vendors may submit questions regarding clarification of solicitation requirements via email to Tierra Watson at tierra.k.watson.civ@us.navy.mil. It is requested that all questions be received by 12:00 p.m.

EST 10 Aprill 2025, as time may not permit responses to questions received after that date to be prepared and issued prior to the receipt of quotes. The government reserves the right to not answer questions after the deadline.

(4) Quotes are to be submitted via email to Tierra Watson at tierra.k.watson.civ@us.navy.mil. Quotes are due no later than the closing date and time identified on the front page of the solicitation.

II. REQUIREMENTS FOR QUOTE CONTENT

(1) Introduction and Purpose: This section specifies the format Vendors shall use in this request for quote (RFQ). The intent is not to restrict Vendors in the manner in which they will perform the work, but rather to ensure a certain degree of uniformity in the format of the responses for evaluation purposes.

(2) Each quote should contain the following items in addition to the other information required by this solicitation:

The cover should indicate the following:

Title of the quote Solicitation number Name and address of offeror, point of contact information (name, phone number, and email address), CAGE code, DUNS number, and applicable tax identification number (TIN) Identification if original or a copy of the quote Quote validity until 12 May 2025.

Table of Contents: The table of contents should provide sufficient detail as to allow the important elements to be easily located. The use of tabs and dividers is encouraged.

(3) Requirements for Style: Each quoter shall submit a quote that clearly and concisely describes and defines the quoter’s response to the requirements contained in the solicitation. Unnecessary elaboration or other presentations beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective quote are not desired. Elaborate artwork, expensive paper or bindings, and expensive visual or other presentation aids are neither necessary nor desired. The quote shall contain all the pertinent information in sufficient detail in the one area of the quote where it contributes most critically to the discussion of the same information. When necessary, quoters shall refer to the initial discussion and identify its location within the submitted quote.

(4) Quote Page Limitations:

Title Page Limit* Volume 1: Factor I: Past Performance 12 pages Volume 2: Factor II: Price No limit

All submission and attachments shall be in Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft Office Word or Excel. Submissions are page limited to the maximum number of pages as defined above. These page limitations are inclusive of the executive summary and any charts, diagrams, and/or other graphics. Graphics (including tables) in the quote may use an alternative font with 8-point size type or larger. Each “page” is defined as one sheet, 8 ½“ x 11”, with at least one inch margins on all sides, using a font with a point size of 12 or greater (e.g., "Times New Roman" style with 12-point font). Lines shall, at a minimum, be selected as single-spaced in Microsoft Word with Microsoft Word Normal character spacing. Pages shall be consecutively numbered. Multiple pages, double pages, two-sided pages, or foldouts will count as an equivalent number of 8 ½" x 11" pages. The quoter is permitted to submit no more than one page for each of the following, which will not be included in the page count: a cover sheet, list of tables, list of figures, compliance matrix, acronyms, table of contents, tabs, and dividers.

Pages submitted in excess of the page limitations described above will not be evaluated.

*Page limits represent the maximum pages the Government will evaluate and are not construed as de facto standards for the amount of material expected in the quote.

III. QUOTE CONTENT:

Volume 1: Factor I: Past Performance To demonstrate its past performance, the offeror shall identify up to three (3) of its most relevant contracts performed within five (5) years of the solicitation issuance date. Those contracts must also reflect one year of completed performance by the closing date of the solicitation. Offerors shall provide a detailed explanation demonstrating the relevance of the contracts to the requirements of the solicitation.

For purposes of this solicitation, a contract is defined as a single contract or a single task order placed under an ID/IQ contract, a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), or a Federal Supply Schedule. Offerors shall not submit the IDIQ contract, FSS contract, or BPA itself as a reference. Offerors may submit a combination of no more than three (3) delivery orders (DOs), task orders (TOs), technical direction letters (TDLs), and/or technical area tasks (TATs) placed under an ID/IQ or BPA as one of the three examples of past performance. Such a combination must also meet the requirements stated above: each individual example in the combination must have been performed within five (5) years of the solicitation issuance date and demonstrate at least one (1) year of completed performance by the closing date of the solicitation. If a combination of DOs, TOs, TDLs and or TATs are used as a past performance example, the offeror shall state the specific experience claimed, period of performance, and dollar value of each. A Past Performance example that does not provide the level of detail required may not be evaluated. No more than one combination of DOs, TOs, TDLs and or TATs is permitted in the past performance submittal.

If a proposed subcontractor’s past performance is provided as part of the three (3) of its most relevant contracts or efforts, the percentage and type of work to be done by the subcontractor on the solicitation requirement must be stated. The offeror’s submittal shall also detail clearly the aspects of the work in the solicitation that the subcontractor is proposed to perform. A Past Performance example which does not detail clearly the aspects of the work in the solicitation that the subcontractor is proposed to perform may not be evaluated.

If the prime offeror or intended subcontractor/partner submits a past performance example in which it served as a subcontractor, the prime/sub/partner shall detail clearly the work that it performed and the magnitude (dollar value) of that subcontracted work only. A Past Performance example that does not differentiate between the overall contract effort and the subcontractor effort may not be evaluated.

The past performance of subcontractors who will be performing major or critical aspects of the solicitation will be considered as highly as a prime contractor’s past performance.

Failure of offerors to provide the required information and level of specificity may result in the contract reference not being evaluated.

With respect to joint ventures, the procuring activity will consider work done individually by each member of the joint venture as well as any work done by the joint venture itself previously. Joint venture references must meet the temporal requirements described in section L (within five years and a year of completed performance). Additionally, if a joint venture member submits a past performance reference, the joint venture member shall detail clearly the work that it performed in that effort and the magnitude (dollar value) of that work. A reference that does not differentiate between the overall contract effort and the joint venture member’s effort for that reference may not be evaluated. The past performance of a joint venture member who will be performing major or critical aspects of the solicitation will be considered as highly as the joint venture’s past performance.

The offeror shall complete a “Past Performance Information Form” for each reference submitted. The form is an attachment to the solicitation.

In addition to the information requested above, offerors shall contact their past performance references and request that each reference complete the Past Performance Report Form attached to the solicitation and e-mail the completed survey form directly to Tierra Watson at tierra.k.watson.civ@us.navy.mil by the DUE DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION. The Government reserves the right to consider past performance report forms received after the due date of the solicitation and to contact references for verification or additional information.

***The Past Performance submission is limited to 12 pages***

Volume 2: Factor II – Price Quote: This volume shall include the completed solicitation documents and a complete and detailed price breakdown with all supporting documentation. The pricing information shall be completed in accordance with the following:

A complete and signed Standard Form 1449, “Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items” and executed copy of amendments, if applicable.

Unless completed in the System for Award Management, the quoter shall complete the representations and certifications contained in the solicitation. If the quoter has completed all of the representations and certifications required by this solicitation in the System for Award Management, then the quoter need not submit the hardcopy representations and certifications.

Quoter shall provied a breakdown of their prices with labor categories and houly rates.

The price section is not page-limited, but is strictly limited to the requested information and supporting documentation only. No price information shall be contained in any other part of the quote.

(End of FAR provision 52.212-1 Addendum)

Addendum to FAR provision 52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Items The Government intends to award a single, FFP task order to the responsible quoter whose quote represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors in the solicitation. The quoter’s quote shall be in the form prescribed by and shall contain a response to each of the areas identified in the solicitation provision FAR 52.212-1 entitled “Instructions to Quoters—Commercial Items” and its Addendum. The evaluation and award are being conducted in accordance with FAR Part 8.4, Federal Supply Schedules and FAR Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items.

The Government intends to award a contract without discussions and does not anticipate establishment of a competitive range. Accordingly, each quoter should submit its most favorable terms from a price and non-price standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to establish a competitive range and conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary.

The trade-off evaluation of quotes will consider the quoter’s non-price factors to be significantly more important than the price factor. The non-price factor(s) are the following: Past Performance.

The Government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest priced quoter.

A Quoter’s price will be determined by adding all extended amounts for the CLINs, inclusive of all option periods.

If the lowest priced evaluated quote is evaluated to have a Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating of “Substantial Confidence”, that quote represents the best value for the Government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that Quoter without further consideration of any other quotes. However, if the lowest priced Quoter is not evaluated to have a “Substantial Confidence” Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating, the next lowest priced Quoter will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order of price from lowest to highest) until a Quoter is evaluated to have a “Substantial Confidence” Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating. At that time, the Source Selection Authority shall make an integrated assessment best value award decision between the quote rated with a “Substantial Confidence” and all lower priced Quoters. If no quotes are rated with a “Substantial Confidence” Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating, the Source Selection Authority shall make an integrated best value award decision from the awardable quotes.

Although price is the least important evaluation factor, it has the potential to become more significant during the evaluation process. The degree of importance of price will increase with the degree of equality of the quotes in relation to the other factors on which selection is to be based. The importance of price will also increase when a quote's price is so significantly high as to diminish the value to the Government that might be gained under the other aspects of the quote. If, at any stage of the evaluation, all Quoters are determined to have submitted equal, or virtually equal, non-price quotes, price could become the factor in determining which Quoters shall receive the award.

All quotes will be reviewed for timeliness. If the quote is received after the closing date and does not meet the criteria for “late submissions” in the solicitation, the quote will not be opened. Timely quotes will be reviewed for compliance to the solicitation. If the quote is not compliant to the solicitation, it will not be evaluated and the Quoter will be notified that the quote is non-responsive.

Volume 1: Factor I – Past Performance:

The past performance evaluation factor assesses the degree of confidence the Government has in an offeror’s ability to meet the contract’s requirements based on the quality of a demonstrated record of recent and relevant performance. There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy, and quality. These are combined to establish a single performance confidence assessment rating for each offeror.

Past Performance Recency: Recency is the first aspect of the past performance evaluation and is the time period during which past performance references are considered relevant. Recency is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information. For purposes of this solicitation, recent past performance is performance that has taken place within five (5) years of the issuance date of this solicitation. Performance outside of this stated period will not be considered for evaluation purposes.

Past Performance Relevancy: Regarding relevancy, each past performance reference under each offeror’s Past Performance submission will be evaluated to determine its scope and magnitude relative to the instant requirement.

The following definitions will apply to this evaluation:

● Scope: Experience in the areas described in the PWS.

● Magnitude: The similarity of the dollar value of actually performed work that exists between the PWS and the offeror’s referenced contracts during the stated five-year period established by the solicitation.

The references will be evaluated in the aggregate to allow quoters who may not have the entire scope and magnitude of the requirement under one individual contract or order to still be evaluated for quality if past performance with the full scope and magnitude of the requirement can be demonstrated within the allotted number of references as described above. The aggregate of each quoter’s past performance references in terms of scope and magnitude will result in the assessed overall relevance of that quoter’s past performance.

The relevancy rating assigned to each past performance reference will be considered in determining the weight to be given to that reference in the overall Past Performance Confidence Assessment. References determined to be “Not Relevant” will not be further considered. Similarly, the quality of performance under a past performance reference that has no relevance to the instant requirement will not be considered in the overall assessment of past performance confidence. In determining the rating for the past performance factor, past performance of greater relevancy will have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Table

Rating Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Past Performance Quality: The third aspect of the past performance evaluation is to establish the overall quality of the offeror’s past performance. The Government will review all past performance information collected and determine the quality of the offeror’s performance, including general trends and usefulness of the information, and will incorporate this into the performance confidence assessment.

Past Performance Confidence Assessment: The overall assigned rating for past performance will be the Past Performance Confidence Assessment rating, defined in the table below. The assignment of this rating will be based on the overall quality of the recent and relevant past performance and will also consider the source of the information, the context of the data, and general trends in the offeror’s performance. The quality of performance under a past performance reference that has no relevance to the instant requirement will not be considered in the overall assessment of past performance confidence. Evaluation will focus only on work already performed. Work yet-to-be performed and work not reflecting one year of completed performance by the solicitation issuance date will not be considered.

If the quoter’s aggregated past performance is determined to be not relevant as defined in the solicitation, then the quality of the quoter’s past performance will not be evaluated through a confidence assessment and the past performance factor will be rated as “Neutral Confidence”. If a quoter’s aggregate past performance is determined to be relevant, then each past performance reference under the quoter’s past performance submission that contributed to the determination of aggregate relevance (i.e., each reference that is rated at least somewhat relevant) will be evaluated to determine the quality of the quoter’s performance under that reference. The quality of performance on contract references that are rated Not Relevant is not evaluated even when the overall past performance is found to be relevant.

In the case of offerors for which there is no information on past contract performance or where past contract performance information is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the past performance factor. In this case, the offeror’s past performance is unknown and assigned a performance confidence rating of “Neutral Confidence”. Although an offeror that lacks recent, relevant past performance may not be rated favorably or unfavorably with regard to past performance, the Government may determine that a “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance rating provides better value to the Government than a “Neutral Confidence” past performance rating.

In order to evaluate Past Performance, the Government may also utilize existing data sources, including the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), the Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases;

communication with points of contact in the offeror’s customer’s organization, which could include private sector requirements and contracts personnel, Administrative Contracting Officers, Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) personnel, Procuring Contracting Officers, Contracting Officer’s Representatives, and other Government activity requirements personnel. The Government may verify past performance information. The Government may contact some or all of the references provided, as appropriate, and may collect information through questionnaires, telephone interviews, and existing data sources. The Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources, including sources outside of the Government. This information will be used for the evaluation of past performance.

The past performance factor evaluation and past performance confidence assessment rating is separate and distinct from the contracting officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the relative capability of the offeror and other competitors to successfully meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings Table

Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: A rating of “Limited Confidence” for the past performance factor means that the quoter’s quote is not awardable without a change or changes to the quoter’s quote. A quote that includes a “Limited Confidence” rating is considered to be susceptible to correction if the contracting officer determines an exchange is appropriate and said exchange is conducted. A rating of “No Confidence” for the past performance factor means that the quoter’s quote is not awardable and is not susceptible to correction.

The Past Performance section is limited to twelve pages.

Volume 2 – Factor II – Price:

The Government will evaluate price quotes in accordance with FAR 15.404, Quote Analysis. The Government may evaluate any and all information submitted by the quoter to support the reasonableness of the cost/prices proposed.

The method of evaluation used by the contracting officer is solely within the discretion of the contracting officer.

If the quoter’s quote is determined to be unacceptable in any of the non-price evaluation factors, the price quote will not be evaluated by the contracting officer. The Government reserves the right to award the contract to other than the lowest priced quoter.

Although price is not the most important evaluation factor, it has the potential to become more significant during the evaluation process. The degree of importance of price will increase with the degree of equality of the quotes in relation to the other factors on which selection is to be based. The importance of price will also increase when a quote’s price is so significantly high as to diminish the value to the Government that might be gained under the other aspects of the offer. If, at any stage of the evaluation, all quoters are determined to have submitted equal, or virtually equal, non-price quotes, price could become the factor in determining which quoter will receive the award.

WRITTEN NOTICE

A written notice of award or acceptance of a quote, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful quoter within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.

Before the quote’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of FAR provision 52.212-2 Addendum)

ATTACHMENTS

I. Wage Determination 2015-4281 Revision 32 Dated: 12/23/2024 II. Past Performance Information Form

III. Past Performance Report Form

SOW

Statement of Work (SOW) From Technology, Operations and Plans Division (Code 67) Navy’s Office of the Judge Advocate General and Naval Legal Service Commands

JAGLINK (5.0)

I. BACKGROUND

The Office of the Judge Advocate General (OJAG) and Commander, Naval Legal Service Command (CNLSC), are responsible for providing legal advice and related services throughout the Department of the Navy (DON). The JAGLINK application is a custom contact application that houses information on service members and civilians in the JAG community. JAGLINK was developed and hosted inside of SharePoint.

II. SCOPE

Support for the existing platform will be discontinued in FY25 and a new solution will need to be developed. The new platform to develop the replacement application would be Microsoft Azure Power Apps on Navy’s FlankSpeed tenant.

III. ASSUMPTIONS.

1. Personnel will report to IT OPS and the Detailers Office and provide weekly reports to IT OPS on hours worked and what actions were completed for the week.

2. Personnel will maintain access to the NMCI Navy Network and an active CAC

3. Personnel will talk with the Stake Holders and let them know what is and is not possible in the JAGLINK application now and in the future.

IV. APPROACH

The Developers/Architects are responsible for moving over the current iteration of JAGLINK off of the SECNAV Portal and into the FlankSpeed environment. They will be developing a new solution to replace the existing application. They will also be responsible with the maintenance and ongoing add-on requests from the IT OPS and Detailers groups.

V. REQUIREMENTS

a) GENERAL KNOWLEDGE

1. SharePoint

2. PowerApps

3. HTML Coding/Scripting

4. CSS and JavaScript Coding/Scripting

5. SharePoint Online (2019) Out of the box (OOTB) Knowledge

6. PC literacy to include Microsoft Word, Excel, and Outlook

b) REQUIREMENTS

1. Occasional off-hours and weekend work may be required.

2. Assigned personnel must possess:

a. Background investigation T1

b. Associates degree or equivalent training and 10 years’ previous technical experience as a

SharePoint developer

c. Working knowledge of personal computer applications (specifically Windows and Microsoft

Office and DOS Prompts).

d. Technical knowledge and ability to perform operation of the SharePoint functions.

e. Ability to communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing.

f. Ability to work effectively with other employees, customers, and other communication vendors.

g. Ability to analyze and trouble shoot SharePoint related problems

h. Ability to develop Microsoft Power Apps

c) COMPLEXITY/RESPONSIBILITY Work in this position is characterized by the requirements of possessing a high level of knowledge of the various SharePoint Architecture and software associated with Microsoft systems. The position requires analyzing and understanding JAG’s business processes and requirements in order to gain a clear knowledge of user goals relative to recommending telecommunication services.

d) SCOPE OF INTERPERSONAL CONTACTS

Contacts are with IT OPS government personnel and detailers.

NECESSARY SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

1. Daily connectivity via cellular telephone, email, or Microsoft Teams.

2. Ability to travel to remote CONUS OJAG offices to evaluate, recommend and implement any required upgrades or if needed to maintain NMCI Account Access.

e) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT:

1. Participate in any situation where it might be assumed that they are an agency employee or representative.

2. Determine agency policy, such as determining the content and application of regulations.

3. Work in any situation that permits or might permit gaining access to confidential business information and/or any other sensitive information.

4. Determine what Government property is to be disposed of and on what terms.

VI. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS.

1. The minimum is a background investigation T1. There is no expectation that contractor personnel will require a security clearance of Secret. Therefore, the contractor must be able to provide individuals who are eligible for a T1 background investigation in order to immediately begin performance at the time of task awards.

VII. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED EQUIPMENT (GFE).

1. Not required

VIII. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE.

1. Performance will be from the contractor’s location.

2. Normal working hours are 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM, Monday through Friday, with the exception of

Federal government holidays, and include an allowance for a 30 minute lunch period. However, there may be circumstances where work hours may be adjusted to meet mission critical requirements.

3. The following government holidays are typically observed by government personnel: New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King’s Birthday, Presidential Inauguration Day (metropolitan DC area only), President’s Day, Memorial Day, Juneteenth, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veteran’s Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, and any other day designated by Federal Statute, Executive Order, and/or Presidential Proclamation.

IX. TRAVEL.

1. Not Required

X. DELIVERABLES.

1. Sustain and maintain the current version of JAGLINK hosted in SECNAV SharePoint until the new PowerApps version is developed and migrated into FlankSpeed.

2. Convert the JAGLINK main page (the card display and search functions) to an Microsoft Power Apps, keeping the existing style and presentation.

3. Convert the JAGLINK profile detail page display to Microsoft Power Apps, keeping the existing style and presentation, to include input forms and display for the following content types:

Profile main details Expertise tab Education

Bar Admissions (display only) (Note: if possible. This information is not stored in or managed by

JAGLINK.)

Subspecialty Codes Certifications Operational Experience Knowledge Languages Academic Papers Job History Activities and Interests Preference Sheet information ▪ Main preference sheet details Ranked billet preferences Billet assignment notification area

4. Convert the JAGLINK detailing dashboard to Microsoft Power Apps, keeping existing style and presentation

5. Convert the JAGLINK NSL (Code 10) dashboard to Microsoft Power Apps, keeping the existing style and presentation

6. Test and/or develop methods for migrating data from the existing JAGLINK site to Microsoft Power Apps.

7. Testing of the Microsoft Power Apps JAGLINK version (to include testing with a focus group of users / detailers, etc.)

8. Produce technical documentation for the new JAGLINK version

9. Final migration of data from existing JAGLINK site to Microsoft Power Apps, and JAGLINK Online go-live / cut-over.

10. Sustain and maintain JAGLINK services in FlankSpeed environment after completing migration.

XI. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

1. POP shall be in effect: 5 MAY 2025 – 3 May 2026

2. One (1) Supervisory Microsoft Power Apps Architect (with 10 or more years’ experience) and One

(1) Microsoft Power Apps Developer (with 10 or more years’ experience) for remote Microsoft Power Apps support.

XII. METHOD OF PAYMENT

WAWF

Payment POC: JCAB_ORDERING@US.NAVY.MIL

(360) 627-5919

XIII. GOVERNMENT POINT OF CONTACT:

Cashia Garland

(202) 685-4425 cashia.k.garland.civ@us.navy.mil

XIV. ABILITYONE CLOSEOUT

NAVSUP FLCN Regional Directorate may utilize contractor support through the AbilityOne Program, as needed, to perform contract closeout functions for this acquisition. Information, including business sensitive/confidential or proprietary data, that the offeror provides to the Government or information already in the possession of the Government may be viewed and utilized by the AbilityOne Program support contractor personnel during the course of its contract performance. The information that may be made available to the support contractor may include, for example, pricing and technical proposals, historical contract, pricing and performance information, Commercial Asset Visibility (CAV) reporting information and similar data/information.

By submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation, the offeror and its subcontractors consent to a release of their business sensitive/confidential or proprietary data to the Government's AbilityOne Program support contractor personnel in order to perform close out services. Prior to the release of any such information to the support contractor, the support contractor will have in place with the Government a Non-Disclosure/Non- Use Agreement in accordance with the terms of the AbilityOne Program support contract.

Offerors may execute their own Non-Disclosure Agreement with the AbilityOne Program (AbilityOne contact information available from the contracting point of contact). The support contractor must provide copies of the executed agreements to the Contracting Officer and the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) for the support contract; and the offeror/contractor for this acquisition must provide copies of the executed Agreement to the Contracting Officer for this acquisition. If the offeror/contractor seeks such a Non-Disclosure Agreement with the AbilityOne Program support contractor, the Agreement must be executed no later than the date of final delivery under the resulting NAVSUP FLC Norfolk contract.

(End of SOW)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Volume 1: Factor I – Past Performance Volume 2: Factor II – Price

The trade-off evaluation of quotes will consider the quoter’s non-price factors to be significantly more important than the price factor. The non-price factor consist of the past performance factor.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)