Solicitation N0018920Q0312 Questions and Answers.pdf

Solicitation N0018920Q0312 Questions and Answers

1. Can you share who is the current incumbent?

These services were originally performed under multiple award IDIQs under the following contracts:

N0018918D0003 Aermor, LLC

N0018918D0002 AVW Technologies

N0018918D0006 Core Services Group, Inc.

N0018918D0005 Hamilton Consulting Solutions Corporation

N0018918D0007 Klett Consulting Group, Inc.

N0081918D0004 Tekla Research, Inc.

2. There appears to be a minor difference between the Labor Categories identified on pages 23-25 of the solicitation in paragraph 6 of the PWS (6.2. Senior Warfare Systems T&E Specialist, 6.3.

Junior Warfare Systems Test and Evaluation Specialist, 6.4. Surface Warfare Specialist, 6.5. Air

Warfare Specialist, 6.6. Mine Countermeasures Specialist, 6.7. Anti-Submarine Warfare

Specialist) and the Labor Categories identified in Attachment+4+-+Price+Worksheet (Cell A5, Senior Test and Evaluation Specialist; Cell A6, Junior Test and Evaluation Specialist; Cell A7, SUW Specialist; Cell A8, AW Specialist; Cell A9 MCM Specialist, and Cell A10, ASW

Specialist.) Would the government please resolve the conflict and specify the Labor Categories that we should propose to?

The Government has revised the Price Worksheet.

The correct labor categories are:

1. Program Manager (PM)

2. Senior Warfare Systems T&E Specialist

3. Junior Warfare Systems Test and Evaluation Specialist

4. Surface Warfare Specialist

5. Air Warfare Specialist

6. Mine Countermeasures Specialist

7. Anti-Submarine Warfare Specialist

8. Statistician

9. Cyber Systems Test Engineer (CTE)

3. On pages 3 and 5 of 108 in the solicitation, Item No 0002 and 1002 calls for a FFP price for

“Services ODCs in accordance with Paragraph 1.10 of the Performance Work Statement.” PWS paragraph 1.10 does not provide sufficient detail to estimate a price for the “…unanticipated requirement or contingency arises due to changes in testing events or operations;” that may be required. Further, Attachment+4+-+Price+Worksheet does not provide for the unburdened ODC and any burden on the ODC to be presented. Will the Government provide plug numbers for

Items 0002 and 1002 or provide sufficient detail for us to accurately estimate the costs of

“Increased Operational Requirements and Contingency Support” that may be required to meet the requirements of PWS 1.10?

On pages 3 and 5 of 108 in the solicitation Items No 0002 and 1002 call for a FFP price for

“Services in accordance with paragraph 1.10 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).” No

ODCs are included within Items No 0002 and 1002.

The Government has revised RFP attachment 4, Price Worksheet to include Emergent Tasking.

4. The RFP attachment 4, Price Worksheet does not have any underlying formulas in columns D, G, J, M, P, and S to calculate the extended price for each labor category. Does the Government desire that the spreadsheet be modified with the addition of appropriate formulas by each respondent or will the Government provide a revised Spreadsheet?

The Government has revised RFP attachment 4, Price Worksheet.

5. In the RFP attachment 4, Price Worksheet the cells B4-B12, E4-E12, H4-H12, K4-K12, N4-N12, and Q4-Q12 have links to “='T:\NRFK\C200\Admin\DIVISION 245\9 COTF

ADMINISTRATION\Omnibus contract (Danielle''s Recompetes)\Div 80 EW LCS\IGE and backups\[LCS Div LCS IDIQ Cost Estimate_23Jan20 with breakdown.xlsx]Sheet2'!__” (the highlighted __ varies in each cell) in them. Does the Government desire that the spreadsheet be modified by replacing the links with the number of hours by each respondent or will the

Government provide a revised Spreadsheet?

The Government has revised RFP attachment 4, Price Worksheet.