Attachment_3_-_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N0018919Q0195
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N0018919Q0195-0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2_-_2001_DPM_Local_Drayage_Contact_Info.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_1_-_Wage_Determination_1995-0623_Revision_37_Dated_10_January_2018.pdf | ||
| Attachment_4_-_Estimated_Quantities.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) For the Direct Procurement Method (DPM) Personal Property Shipments
1. Purpose This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is a Government developed and applied document used to make sure that systematic quality assurance methods are used in the administration of the Performance Based Service Contract (PBSC) standards included in this contract. The intent is to ensure that the Contractor performs in accordance with performance metrics set forth in the contract documents, that the Government receives the quality of services called for in the contract and that the Government only pays for the acceptable level of services received. The QASP will be used primarily as a tool to verify that the contractor is performing all services required by the PWS in a timely, accurate and complete fashion.
2. Authority Authority for issuance of this QASP is provided under FAR clause 52.212-4(a), Inspection/Acceptance, which provides for inspections and acceptance of the articles, services and documentation called for in the contract to be accomplished by the Contracting Officer or their duly authorized representative.
3. Scope The Contractor, and not the Government, is responsible for management and quality control actions necessary to meet quality standards set forth by the contract. The QASP is put in place to provide Government surveillance oversight of the Contractor’s quality control efforts to assure that they are timely, effective and are delivering the results specified in the contract. The QASP is not a part of the contract nor is it intended to duplicate the Contractor’s Management Plan. The Government may provide the Contractor an information copy of the QASP as an Attachment to the solicitation to support the Contractor’s efforts in developing its plan for maintaining the levels of quality anticipated to be delivered under the terms of the contract.
4. Responsibilities The Government resources shall have responsibilities for the implementation of this QASP as follows:
· Contracting Officer – The Contracting Officer ensures performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensures compliance with the terms of the contract and safeguards the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. It is the Contracting Officer that assures the Contractor receives impartial, fair and equitable treatment under the contract. The Contracting Officer is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the Contractor’s performance.
· Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) – An individual designated in writing by the Contracting Officer to act as his authorized representative to assist in administering a contract. The source and authority for the COR is the Contracting Officer. COR limitations are contained in the written letter of appointment.
5. Methods of QA Surveillance The below listed methods of surveillance shall be used in the administration of this QASP. The QASP Matrix describes the methods of surveillance that may be used to monitor the services and deliverables to be provided under the contract.
· Customer Feedback – Customer feedback may be obtained either from the results of formal customer satisfaction surveys or from random customer complaints. Customer complaints, to be considered valid, must set forth clearly and in writing the detailed nature of the complaint, must be signed and must be forwarded to the Contractor. The Contractor shall maintain a summary log of all formally received customer complaints as well as a copy of each complaint in a documentation file.
· Periodic Inspection – The COR will conduct periodic inspections by reviewing information from the Monthly Progress Reports, In Progress Report, and Technical Status Report. For the potential tasks identified in the PWS, the COR typically performs the periodic inspection on a monthly basis.
7. Documentation In addition to providing written reports to the Contracting Officer, the COR will maintain a complete Quality Assurance file. The file will contain copies of all reports, evaluations, recommendations, and any actions related to the Government’s performance of the quality assurance function. All such records will be maintained for the life of the order. The COR shall forward these records to the Contracting Officer at termination or completion of the order.
8. Surveillance The analysis of contractor performance shall be conducted at the end of each month and serves to provide a summary of the Contractor’s performance to the Contracting Officer and the Contractor. Overall performance is important in determining whether to increase, decrease or maintain the current level of surveillance and/or whether to initiate corrective action to bring the Contractor’s work up to the standards of the specification.
QASP Matrix
| PWS Para. |
| Performance Element |
| Performance Requirement |
| 1.7 |
| Accurate Invoicing of Charges |
| 98% error-free invoice submission rate per month. |
| 5.2.9, 5.8.1, 5.8.3, 5.8.10 |
| Timely Pickup/Return, Proper Preparation of Documentation |
| 98% on-time return of completed, accurate, legible documentation to PPSO per month. 96% on-time pickup of documentation from PPSO per month. |
| 5.3 |
| On-Time Pickup/Delivery of Personal Property |
| No more than 5% per month of the total number of shipments are validated customer complaints for untimely pickup/delivery. |
| 5.4, 5.7 |
| Proper Packing, Loading, Containerization of Personal Property for Onward Movement |
| No more than 3% of the total number of shipments are incorrectly packed, loaded, containerized per month. |
| 5.7.1, 5.7.1.1, 5.7.5 |
| Protection and Accountability of Government-Owned Containers (GOCs) |
| No more than 2% of total number of GOCs improperly protected during this quarter. Less than 2 failures per month to recoup GOCs within the specified time frame. |
| 5.11 |
| Maintain Adequate Facilities and Serviceable Equipment |
| Less than 3 violations per quarter based on inadequate facilities or unserviceable equipment as outlined in Appendix E. |
| 8. |
| Quarterly Usage Report |
| Submitted every 3 months for 100% accuracy to the contract specialist |
| Overall Contract Performance |
| Overall contract performance of sufficient quality to earn a Satisfactory (or higher) rating in the COR’s annual report on Contractor Performance |
INCENTIVES/DISINCENTIVES:
The COR makes an annual report on Contractor Performance (CPARS or other annual report). The contractor’s failure to achieve satisfactory performance under the contract/task order, reflected in the COR’s annual report, may result in termination of the contract and may also result in the loss of future Government contracts. Additionally, the contractor’s failure to achieve satisfactory performance under the contract may also result in the non-exercise of available options.
For each item that does not meet acceptable levels, the Government may issue a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR). CDRs will be forwarded to the Contracting Officer with a copy sent to the contractor. The contractor must reply in writing within 5 days of receipt identifying how future occurrences of the problem will be prevented. Based upon the contractor’s past performance and plan to solve the problem, the Contracting Officer will determine if any further action will be taken.
File details come from the government source that posted it.