23RWM36_FINAL_SOL_0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

This amendment to the solicitation is being issued to answ er questions in response to the solicitation, to update the Statement of Work in sections, 3.2.7, 3.3.18, 3.3.23, and 4.0, update CDRLs A015, A016 and A045 and to incorporate WI-WXMR-FAR-8579500 REV (B)(6) into Section J as Attachment 4. See Summary of Changes herein.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 20

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 20-Sep-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0016423RWM36

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10-Jul-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

20-Sep-2023

CODE

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV

L. MASTERSON-BRINEGAR (812-854-8865)

BLDG 3373

300 HWY 361

CRANE IN 47522-5001

N00164 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0016423RWM36

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0003 NOTES

Answers to Questions in Response to the Solicitation:

1) Does the government have and will it provide the Technical Data Package PCAB drawings source files?

All of the TDP PCAB drawing source files available are listed in Section J and provided with the solicitation.

2) PWS 3.3.23 identifies a GFI First Article Test Plan and Procedure – In order to scope/price this process we have assumed this document requires performing Production Acceptance Testing, ESS, and SEI/SEIPW testing at CRANE. Is this assumption correct? If not, what requirements are in the GFI First Article Test Plan?

The only testing that will be done at Crane is the SEI/SEIPW testing. The GFI First Article Test Plan is “WI- WXMR-FAT-8579500 REV (B)” and will be provided via solicitation amendment. The solicitation amendment will include a revised SOW that clarifies these testing requirements.

3) How long is testing to occur at NSWC Crane?

Testing at Crane would be expected to be about 3 working days

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

STATEMENT OF WORK

Statement of Work

SECTION 1 – SCOPE

1.0 Scope

This SOW defines Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division’s (NSWC-CR) requirement for the redesign of the AN/SLA-10D (P/N 8579500) to eliminate the use of obsolete parts. The goal of the redesign is to field a fully qualified, form fit and functional replacement of the SLA-10D. This redesign effort shall utilize Commercial-off-the-Shelf items and Non-Development Items where practical.

This SOW also defines spares, repairs and data requirements for the redesigned AN/SLA-10D. The SLA-10D is comprised of Blanker Video Mixer (P/N 8579011) and Control Indicator (P/N 8579411) assemblies. The Contractor shall build and test this system in accordance with (IAW) the Technical Data Package (TDP) provided as Government Furnished Information (GFI), as referenced in Paragraph 3.1.4, and additional design changes or data produced during the redesign phase.

1.1 Background

The AN/SLA-10D is a component of the AN/SLQ-32(V)6 system and is used to prevent interference from other emitters of the same ship. Having this capability is essential in order to minimize the interference the ship’s emitters causes with the reception and analysis of Radio Frequency (RF) signals. The AN/SLA-10D is able to take in 31 inputs from the ship’s radars given it is configured to provide a pretrigger. After receiving a pretrigger, blanking pulses are provided by the AN/SLA-10D to the AN/SLQ-32(V)6. This allows for the capability to know when the receiver will see the ship radar and set filters to “blank” them.

SECTION 2 – APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.0 Applicable Documents

The following documents of the revision or issue in effect at the date of award, form a part of this SOW for reference. In the event of conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents of this SOW, the contents of this SOW shall prevail.

2.1 Military Standards

MIL-STD-129P Standard Practice for Military Packaging MIL-STD-130N Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property MIL-STD-2073-1E Standard Practice for Military Packaging MIL-STD-881C Work Breakdown Structure for Defense Material Items MIL-STD-810G Environmental Engineering Considerations and Implementation

Plan

2.2 Military Handbooks/Manuals

MIL-HDBK-61A Configuration Management Guidance MIL-HDBK-470A Maintainability Program Requirements of Systems and

Equipment MIL-HDBK-2036A Preparation of Electronic Equipment MIL-HDBK-2164A Environmental Stress Screening Process for Electronic

Equipment TE000-AB-GTP-020A Environmental Stress Screening Requirements and Application

Manual for Navy Electronic Equipment MIL-STD-882D Standard Practice for System Safety

2.3 Other Government Documents/Standards

NAVSOP 6071 Best Practices for Manufacturing Planning SEWIP CMP -32 Configuration Management Standard ISO 9001 Quality Management Standard DoD Guide DoD Guide to Uniquely Identifying Items Version 1.1 DoD DIR 8500.1 Information Assurance, dated 24 October 2002 NAS411 Rev 2 Hazardous Materials Management Program MIL-STD-882E DOD Standard Practice System Safety TE000-AB-GTP-020 Government Stress Screening of Hardware (for guidance only)

Jan 92 NAVEDTRA M-130B Task Based Curriculum Development Manual F-WXMP-020 REV (A) AN/SLQ-32(V) Software Feedback Report

NSC-Q32-WXM-2011-

002 REV (B)

Pre-trigger Converter and Blanker (PCAB) Specifications for Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP) Block 2

47221-7-101-REV B AN/SLQ-32(V)6 – AN/SLA-10D ALIGNMENTS

WI-WXMR-FAT-

8579500 REV (B)

FINAL ACCEPTANCE TEST PROCEDURE FOR THE

AN/SLA-10D BLANKER VIDEO MIXER P/N: 8579500

2.4 Non-Government Documents/Standards

Y14.38M Abbreviations & Acronyms Y14.100 Engineering Drawing Practices Y14.24 Types & Applications of Engineering Drawings Y14.35M Revision of Engineering Drawings Y14.34M Associated Lists SAE AS5553A Fraudulent/Counterfeit Electronic Parts; Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition SAE AS6462 Verification Criteria for Certification against AS5553 SAE AS6081 Counterfeit Electronic Parts Avoidance – Independent

Distributors SAE ARP6178 Counterfeit Electronic Parts; Tool for Risk Assessment of

Distributors SAE AS6174A Counterfeit Materiel; Assuring Acquisition of Authentic and

Conforming Materiel SAE AS6301 Fraudulent/Counterfeit Electronic Parts: Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition – Independent Distributors Verification Criteria

SECTION 3.0 – PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

3.0 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

3.1 General Requirements

3.1.1 General Security Requirements

The Contractor shall develop, provide, and implement a security program which addresses aspects and risks that could allow critical technical and program information, materials, equipment, product, or other related aspects to be disseminated without Government authorization, lost, or stolen.

3.1.2 Operations Security (OPSEC)

The Contractor is required to protect critical information associated with this requirement to prevent unauthorized disclosure and will observe OPSEC requirements.

The Contractor shall develop and implement an internal OPSEC plan to reduce security risks on the program.

Contractor personnel should be aware of unusual persons or packages in the work area and immediately report those to the building security staff. If Contractor personnel become aware of a person seeking unauthorized access to information or program materials, it should immediately be reported to the Government Contracting Officer.

3.1.3 Website Security

The Contractor shall ensure its publicly accessible websites are free of For Official Use Only (FOUO), Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), and/or indicators that could tip-off adversaries about impeding program activity.

The Government will provide additional OPSEC guidance as necessary.

3.1.4 Government Furnished Information (GFI)

The Contractor shall be provided GFI as listed in Section J on the contract.

The Contractor shall submit a GFI Deficiency Report via Contract Data Requirement List (CDRL) A006 IAW the following guidelines:

a. If GFI is not received within 14 days after the date it is scheduled to be delivered.

b. Within 20 calendar days after Contractor receipt of the GFI and inspection for patent defects such as quantity, identification, description, and readability, or if it differs in some other significant respect from that expected to be delivered.

c. Within 14 calendar days after Contractor determination that GFI has latent defects such as technical, engineering, or design deficiencies that existed at the time of GFI delivery, but which were not discovered until actual attempted use of the GFI.

3.2 SLA-10D Redesign Requirements

3.2.1 Program Management

The Contractor shall allow the Government and Government-designated representative’s access to Contractor facilities. The Government reserves the right to witness tests and inspections documented in the Integrated Master Schedule (CDRL A001). The Contractor shall notify the Government a minimum of 14 calendar days in advance of the tests and/or inspections. The Contractor shall maintain the capability to participate in status meetings via telephone conversations with Government staff every two (2) weeks. The Contractor shall document Meeting Minutes (CDRL A003).

3.2.2 Safety

The Contractor shall establish a safety program in compliance with MIL-STD-882D and prepare a System Safety Hazard Analysis Report (CDRL A021). The Contractor shall follow Hazardous Material and Pollution Prevention policies specified by NAS411 Revision 2.

3.2.3 List of Obsolete Parts

The Contractor shall redesign the following subassemblies without the use of the parts listed in Table 1:

Table 1: Obsolete Parts List

Obsolete Parts Type Where Used

1-1634816-0 nut Main assy.

DEBB33D222KA2B cap PS

12106D107KAT2A cap FPGA board C3216X5R0J336M130AC cap FPGA board MCR10EZPF1211 res FPGA board CRCW06031K00FKEA res FPGA board ERJ-8ENF2700V res FPGA board XCF32PFSG48C PROM FPGA board XC6SLX100-2FGG484I FPGA FPGA board GRM319R71H104KA01D cap I/O-1 board BSO613SPVG MOSFET I/O-1 board ERJ-8GEYJ105V res I/O-1 board, Display PS SN54LS244J buffer I/O-1 board ERG-1SJ511 res I/O-2 board ERG-1SJ202 res I/O-2 board ERJ-8GEYJ102V res I/O-2 board, Display PS ERJ-8GEYJ752V res I/O-2 board AA121XK01 display Main assy.

5750489-1 conn Display PS ERJ-8GEY0R00V res Display PS ERJ-8GEYJ106V res Display PS ERJ-8GEYJ331V res Display PS ERJ-8GEYJ472V res Display PS

ERJ-8GEYJ470V res Display PS ERJ-8GEYJ104V res Display PS ERJ-8GEYJ563V res Display PS ERJ-8GEYJ103V res Display PS ERJ-8GEYJ101V res Display PS ERJ-8GEYJ181V res Display PS EMI shield Display 5749374-3 conn Display PS

3.2.4 Redesign

The Contractor shall prepare a redesign that satisfies requirements of the PCAB Specification, NSC-Q32-WXM- 2011-002 Rev B. The Contractor shall adhere to the latest revision for all applicable documents and Military Standards referenced in NSC-Q32_WXM-2011-022 REVISION B. The redesigned AN/SLA-10D shall be capable of passing the acceptance test procedure and first article tests to perform, at a minimum. The redesigned AN/SLA- 10D shall be compatible with the original AN/SLA-10D (P/N 8579500) it was designed to replace. Furthermore, the redesigned Blanker Video Mixer shall be compatible with the original Control Indicator (P/N 8579411) and the redesigned Control Indicator shall be compatible with the original Blanker Video Mixer (P/N 8579011).

The Contractor shall deliver a hardware and software design that satisfies requirements of the Performance Specification NSC-Q32-WXM-2011-002 Revision B. This will entail upgrading the design and documentation developed IAW NSC-Q32-WXM-2011-002 (Initial Production) Within 20 days after award of contract, the Contractor shall conduct a Preliminary Design Review (PDR) at the Contractor’s facility for the purpose of reviewing the program requirements and the Contractor’s approach and functional allocations to meet those requirements.

The Contractor shall conduct a Critical Design Review (CDR) at the Contractor’s facility for the purpose of reviewing the Contractor’s detailed design within 90 days after contract award.

The Contractor shall develop and submit Conference Agendas for technical reviews (PDR, CDR) IAW CDRL A002. The Contractor shall prepare and submit Meeting Minutes for technical reviews IAW CDRL A003. The Contractor shall develop the Entrance and Exit Criteria for PDR and CDR (CDRL A024) IAW the NAVSEA Technical Review Manual.

The Contractor shall develop functional hardware and software that demonstrate the PCAB meets the functional specifications. The Contractor shall conduct and document Open Systems Standards & Life Cycle Trade Studies IAW CDRL A025 and employ methods conducive to the use of Open Systems Standards and Life Cycle Cost reduction. The Contractor shall maintain a spares pool to ensure failures that occur do not impact the system schedule through Factory Qualification Testing (FQT) and Environmental Qualification Testing (EQT).

A redesigned Shop Replaceable Assembly (SRA) shall be completely repairable at organic depot (i.e. SRA failure modes can be repaired by removal and replacement of either sub-module(s) or component(s)).

The Contractor shall support Government testing of the redesigned SRAs.

3.2.5 Reliability

A redesigned AN/SLA-10D shall meet or exceed the Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) of the existing AN/SLA- 10D. Compliance with this requirement will be verified by comparing the predicted reliability of the redesigned AN/SLA-10D to the predicted reliability of the original AN/SLA-10D.

The Contractor shall prepare and perform Reliability Predictions and Documentation of Supporting Data in accordance with (IAW) CDRL A022 and Reliability Block Diagrams and Mathematical Models Report IAW CDRL A023. Reliability predictions shall utilize a 100% duty cycle and naval sheltered environment as defined within

MIL-HDBK-217F.

3.2.6 Obsolescence

The Contractor shall be responsible for minimizing obsolescence, (parts/components that are at end of production), by selecting products that will avoid or resolve hardware, software, and firmware obsolescence issues. The Contractor shall utilize a design approach which to the maximum extent possible shall mitigate risks associated with technology obsolescence, proprietary technology, and single source components.

3.2.7 Environmental Qualification

The Contractor shall successfully perform EQT, as directed by the Government, on one (1) first article, production representative unit. The Contractor shall perform the EQT IAW section 2.7 of Performance Specification NSC- Q32-WXM-2011-002 REV (B). The Contractor shall develop EQT Test Procedures IAW CDRL A026. EQT results shall be documented in the EQT Report IAW CDRL A027. The Contractor shall design modifications and update design documentation to address failures that result from EQT.

3.2.8 Status Reports

The Contractor shall prepare monthly status reports providing work progress, schedule updates and technical risk.

The work progress is to include completed work, work in progress, future work plans, and issues that may cause work stoppage or long lead times. Status Reports shall be delivered IAW CDRL A028.

3.2.9 Quality Assurance

The Contractor shall demonstrate conformance to its existing quality assurance system.

3.3 SLA-10D Hardware Production Items

The Contractor shall provide the personnel, facilities, equipment, and fixtures to manufacture and/or assemble and test the configuration items required to construct, test and deliver the SLA-10D units and assemblies that meet the technical documentation requirements in the TDP. The list of the part numbers and serial numbers for each item delivered shall be provided IAW CDRL A007, As-Built Configuration List (ABCL).

3.3.1 Program Management Support

The Government reserves the right to witness tests and inspections documented in the Integrated Master Schedule (CDRL A001). The Contractor shall notify the Government a minimum of 14 calendar days in advance of the tests and/or inspections. The Contractor shall maintain the capability to participate in status meetings via telephone conversations with Government staff every two (2) weeks. The Contractor shall document Meeting Minutes (CDRL A003).

3.3.2 Contract Management

The Contractor shall assign a qualified Program Manager (PM) who shall have responsibility for the planning, execution, control and reporting of the program, and for directing in-house and subcontractors’ efforts. The PM shall ensure subcontractor, supplier, or vendor procedures are compliant with the Government requirements and inform the Government in advance about obsolete and replacement parts. The Contractor shall develop and deliver SLA-10D Product Management Plan (PMP) IAW CDRL A004. The Contractor shall develop and deliver a Production Status Report (PSR) monthly IAW CDRL A005. The PMP shall include:

(1) Fabrication, Assemble and Test Schedule and Events;

(2) Supply Chain Management/Major Subcontracts: (Describe the supply chain and identify key stakeholders. Identify the Inventory Control Points (ICPs)/Source of Supply (SOS) for SLA-10D hardware and software items, whether organic, support Contractor, or procured straight from vendor.);

(3) Facility Planning;

(4) Qualification Testing.

3.3.3 Integrated Digital Data Environment

The Contractor shall use the Integrated Digital Data Environment (IDDE) to transmit unclassified CDRLs and documents. The Contractor will have its own private section within the IDDE that only Government personnel may access. These personnel will be allowed access for program execution, CDRLs and other document handling duties.

Contractor source data published in the IDDE shall be in native format unless otherwise specified.

3.3.4 Information Assurance (IA)

The Contractor shall perform the following functions to provide IA:

1) Install and run antivirus scanner to verify clean system, capture results for inclusion in PIT Risk Approval (PRA) package, and uninstall antivirus scanner later.

2) Run DoD-approved vulnerability scanner on system to identify vulnerabilities. This shall include:

a) Nessus scan;

b) Secure Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) tool.

3) Mitigate vulnerabilities from most severe (Category I) to least severe (Category III). This shall include:

a) Manually applying patches that Window Server Update Service (WSUS) does not install;

b) Registry configuration changes;

c) System configuration changes.

4) Add DoD warning banner to boot-up sequence without user interaction.

5) Rerun DoD-approved vulnerability scanner on system to verify vulnerabilities have been mitigated.

6) Capture final vulnerability scan results, Nessus and SCAP scan results in a Plan of Action & Milestones

(POA&M), and the raw results, for inclusion in PRA package.

7) Lock down the BIOS with a password so boot mode cannot be bypassed. NSWC-CR will provide guidance.

8) Put system into normal operational (kiosk) mode.

9) Provide usernames and passwords for accounts and BIOS access.

10) Provide, via email communication, scan procedures. The procedures shall include special accounts to be added and deleted, and required permissions, to run the scans.

3.3.5 License

The Contractor shall provide a rights assertion table utilizing the format in DFARS clause 252.227-7014 for third-party software furnished as part of a deliverable under this contract. The Contractor shall obtain licenses required to develop, implement, update, operate, maintain, install or perform training with respect to third-party software, including the SLA-10D operating system, furnished as a deliverable or part of a deliverable, (e.g. installed software on hardware deliverables). The Contractor shall provide the Government a copy of the license and proof of purchase or authorization to furnish to the Government as a deliverable with respect to third-party software.

A license required to operate the PCAB shall be included as part of the units designed and delivered under this contract.

3.3.6 Obsolescence

The Contractor shall be responsible for minimizing obsolescence by selecting products that will avoid or resolve hardware, software, and firmware obsolescence issues. The Contractor shall prepare Source Data for Forecasting Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages to include updated component price data IAW CDRL A042. The Contractor shall prepare a Component Obsolescence Report IAW CDRL A043.

3.3.7 Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP)

The Contractor shall build and deliver LRIP units as defined by the Technical Data Package (TDP) [CDRLs A034- A035].

3.3.8 Acceptance Test Plan and Procedures/Results

The Contractor shall develop an Acceptance Test Plan and Procedures and submit to the Government for approval IAW CDRL A017. The Acceptance Test Plan and Procedures shall specifically address production acceptance tests, Quality Control tests, ESS, and inspection procedures the Contractor plans to implement.

The units shall be tested IAW Contractor-developed, Government-approved Acceptance Test Plan and Procedures.

The Contractor shall correct deficiencies found as a result of the Acceptance Tests, by correcting PCAB units delivered or in production subsequent to discovering the deficiencies. Acceptance Test results shall be documented in the Acceptance Tests Report IAW CDRL A045.

3.3.9 Configuration Management (CM)

The Contractor shall maintain a CM program guided by MIL-HDBK-61A and EIA-649B. The Contractor shall identify obsolete components during procurement of material and document the results IAW CDRL A009. Parts obsolescence shall be managed such that a part known by the Contractor to be in danger of becoming obsolete (based on vendor 'last time buy' or 'end of life' announcements) shall be identified with its related impacts and options (including recommended quantity to purchase as part of a last time buy). The Government will then make a determination as to whether or not to pursue a last-time-buy to place parts in inventory for potential future use, initiate a redesign effort, or accept the risk associated with that part potentially becoming unavailable.

3.3.10 Design Changes

The design changes shall be documented with the Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Process as follows:

In the event the design of the SLA-10D has to be permanently changed, then a Class I ECP for Class I ECPs, and Class II ECP for Class II ECPs will need to be submitted for approval. Class I ECP will need to be submitted for approval IAW CDRL A010. The ECP shall be developed IAW MIL-HDBK-61A(Table 6-2), EIA-649-B, and EIA- 649-1. Class II ECPs shall be submitted in a list IAW CDRL A010.

Major (Class I): An ECP proposing a change to approved configuration documentation for which the Government is the Current Document Change Authority (CDCA) or that has been included in the contract Statement of Work (SOW) by the tasking activity and:

o Affects any physical or functional requirement in approved functional or allocated configuration documentation o Affects any approved functional, allocated or product configuration documentation, and cost, warranties or contract milestones, or affects approved product configuration documentation

Minor (Class II): An ECP proposing a change to approved configuration documentation for which the Government is the CDCA or that has been included in the contractor SOW by the tasking activity and which is not a Class I

The Contractor shall not implement an ECP (Class I or II) until after receipt of Government review and approval by the Contracting Officer.

3.3.10.1 Notice of Revision (NOR)

The NOR is a sub-document of the ECP. This form is used to document the drawing changes associated with an ECP. The NOR shall be submitted IAW CDRL A011.

3.3.11 Training

The Contractor shall provide training products consisting of PCAB operations, and corrective and preventative maintenance training to serve as formal curriculum for schoolhouse training. The Contractor shall develop training materials in Authoring Instructional Materials Version 2 (AIM-2) format per NAVEDTRA 130B. Training shall be in a SCORM 1.2 compliant Computer Based Training format. The Contractor shall provide a subset of this training for Government personnel prior to FQT. Training shall consist of PCAB operational training, and corrective and preventative maintenance. A minimum of six (6) and maximum of 20 personnel shall be trained. The Training Data shall be delivered IAW CDRL A032.

3.3.12 Tools

The Contractor shall deliver special tooling required to operate or maintain the units designed and delivered under this contract.

3.3.13 Engineering and Test Support

The Production Program Manager shall ensure the associated Test Personnel, Equipment, and Facilities are used for the required Production Tests: Factory Acceptance Tests, and Environmental Stress Screen Tests.

3.3.14 Factory Qualification.

The Contractor shall trace requirements from the PCAB specification to the PCAB Formal Qualification Test Descriptions (CDRL A029) and document the requirements’ traceability within the System Requirements Verification Matrix (SRVM) IAW CDRL A030. The SRVM shall include the validation and verification strategy in the execution plan and schedule. The Contractor shall perform FQT to ensure PCAB requirements are met. FQT Results shall be documented in the FQT Report IAW CDRL A031.

3.3.15 Configuration Management Program

The Contractor shall plan, implement, and maintain configurations for the PCAB IAW TECHAMERICA GEIA- HB-649 and MIL-HDBK-61A.

3.3.16 Factory Acceptance Testing

Factory Acceptance Testing shall be conducted on delivered units at Contractor facility before SLA-10D product delivery. Each factory tested unit shall meet the performance Specification NSC-Q32-WXM-2011-002 Revision B requirements. The Contractor shall submit desired updates to the Factory Acceptance Testing Plan IAW CDRL A017 at least 60 days before the Factory Acceptance Testing date. The Contractor shall submit desired updates to the Factory Acceptance Testing Procedure IAW CDRL A018 and submit 30 days prior to the Factory Acceptance Testing date. The Contractor shall document the results of the Factory Acceptance Testing Report IAW CDRL A019.

3.3.17 Packaging

Packaging shall be IAW MIL-STD-2073-1E Level A. The Contractor shall package each of the SLA-10D units into a separate protector case with interior foam insulation and interior dimensions (L/W/D) 20”/17”/10”, as well as, roller wheels and pull handle. The case shall protect the display assembly during shipping. Delivered SLA-10D production units that fail the Government acceptance test to be conducted at NSWC-CR will be returned to the Contractor for repair at no additional cost to the Government. The Contractor shall be responsible for repair and shipping of the returned unit.

3.3.18 Environmental Stress Screening (ESS)

The Contractor shall submit desired updates to the GFI ESS Acceptance Test Plan and Procedure IAW with CDRL A015. The Contractor shall perform ESS IAW the approved ESS Acceptance Test Plan and Procedure on each SLA- 10D production unit. Results of ESS shall be documented IAW CDRL A016.

3.3.19 Software Trouble Reports

Software Trouble Reports shall be submitted IAW Government form Software Feedback Report (SFR) WI-WXMP- SSA-011 Rev (C). The SFR must be filled out in the event the SLA-10D software or firmware may need to be changed. Software Trouble Reports are only generated if the SLA-10D software or firmware is suspect in a First Article Test event failure.

3.3.20 Production Documentation Support

The Contractor shall deliver a CM Plan IAW CDRL A008. The Contractor shall deliver Handling Procedures for Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Sensitive Devices IAW CDRL A013. The Contractor shall deliver a Counterfeit Parts Plan IAW CDRL A014.

3.3.21 Post-Award Conference

This conference shall take place at the Contractor’s facilities within 20 days after contract award. The purpose of this conference is to acquaint the Contractor and Government teams and to review the initial production plans. The Contractor shall deliver an agenda IAW CDRL A002 at least one (1) week before the date of the post-award conference. The Contractor shall deliver meeting minutes IAW CDRL A003 no later than one (1) week after completion of the post-award conference.

3.3.22 Production Readiness Review (PRR)

This review shall be held 30 days after EQT if EQT is needed, otherwise 30 days after First Article Approval date.

At least one (1) week before the PRR date, the Contractor shall deliver the following documentation: CDRL A002, CDRL A008, CDRL A009, CDRL A012, CDRL A013, CDRL A014, CDRL A017. The PRR shall assess:

a. Manufacturing process readiness;

b. Quality management systems;

c. Production planning and test facilities;

d. Inventory management, and supplier management.

The Contractor shall deliver an agenda IAW CDRL A002 at least one (1) week before the date of the PRR. The Contractor shall deliver meeting minutes IAW CDRL A003 no later than one (1) week after completion of the PRR.

3.3.23 First Article Test

The Contractor shall conduct a First Article Test on the first unit produced. The First Article Test will be witnessed by Government, in person. The Contractor shall own or have access to equipment and facilities capable of testing IAW the GFI First Article Test Plan and Procedure. WI-WXMR-FAT-8579500 REV (B) shall be provided as GFI and serve as the First Article Test Plan and Procedure. The approved first article will serve as the manufacturing standard. The Contractor shall correct deficiencies found as a result of First Article Test, by correcting hardware delivered or in production subsequent to discovering the deficiencies. The Contractor shall document results in a First Article Test Report IAW CDRL A045.

The last part of the AN/SLA-10D’s First Article Test shall validate the Specific Emitter Identification (SEI) and Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP) Block 2 interfaces. This testing shall be performed at NSWC-CR. The blanking shall be validated using TEST NO: 47210-7-101: “AN/SLQ-32(V)6 - AN/SLA-10D ALIGNMENTS” which includes “Appendix A” in order to setup the pre-trigger and pulsed Radio Frequency (RF) signal pair. The Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) pre-trigger input (J1) and the non-CIWS pre-trigger input (J5) shall be validated for both SEI and SEWIP Block 2. For SEI, the 20V output (J40) shall be utilized. For SEWIP Block 2, a Digital Filter shall be linked to each pre-trigger under test and configured to filter the pulsed RF. For the CIWS pre-trigger input (J1), both the High Pulse Repetition Frequency (PRF) and Low PRF modes shall be validated. The High PRF mode shall be stimulated by setting the Pulse Repetition Interval (PRI) less than 45 microseconds whereas the Low PRF mode shall be stimulated by setting the PRI greater than 45 microseconds. On the AN/SLA-10D Mixer, PW1 shall be set for the Low PRF mode, and PW2 shall be set for the High PRF mode.

The AN/SLA-10D Remote Panel shall be used to enable (light off) and disable (light on) the blanking for the pre-trigger under test. For SEI, Output Test Point 8 (instead of J40) shall be monitored on the oscilloscope. It shall provide the appropriate blanking signal when the blanking is enabled and shall remove the blanking signal when blanking is disabled. The SEI’s Manual Mode display shall show an emitter entry when the blanking signal is disabled and no emitter entry when the blanking signal is enabled. Lastly, for the SEWIP Block 2 interface, the SEWIP Block 2 display shall show an active emitter when the blanking signal is disabled and an inactive emitter when the blanking signal is enabled.

3.3.24 Physical Configuration Audit (PCA)

The Contractor shall support a PCA of one LRIP unit using Product Drawings and Associated Lists at the contactor’s facility. The PCA shall be held at the Contractor facility after the first production unit has completed its First Article Test. This event will require detailed disassembly of the first unit and an in-depth review of the associated Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists in comparison with the first unit. Conflict between the Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists and the first unit will be identified, documented, and corrected. The Contractor shall conduct a PCA, based on EIA-649 and MIL-HDBK-61A, IAW the Government plan provided as GFI. The Contractor shall propose a PCA date at least 60 days in advance of when production hardware is expected to be available. The Contractor shall perform the approved PCA Plan on the unit(s) which successfully completed the First Article Test. The Government shall document the results of the PCA and provide the report to the Contractor. The PCA being conducted is also dependent upon whether the TDP is modified due to an ECP. The Contractor shall deliver an agenda IAW CDRL A002 at least one (1) week before the date of the PCA. The Contractor shall deliver meeting minutes IAW CDRL A003 no later than one (1) week after completion of the PCA.

The Contractor shall document the configuration audit findings IAW CDRL A044.

3.3.25 Failure Analysis/Corrective Action Report (FACAR)

A FACAR shall be generated IAW CDRL A020 for each configuration item that fails during a test event.

The Contractor shall establish a formal Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS). The Contractor’s FRACAS shall address non-conformances and failures. The Contractor shall prepare and submit a Failure Analysis and Corrective Action Report (FACAR) for each occurrence of each non-conformance and each test failure IAW CDRL A020. Each FACAR shall describe the test conditions and test setup when non-conformance/failure occurred, root cause analysis of the non-conformance/failure, the impact of the proposed corrective action on the contract cost and delivery schedule, and the recommended process or process control changes when the non-conformance/failure cause is due to workmanship defects. Each FACAR shall also include, as applicable, photographs, images, recordings or any other data necessary to characterize the non-conformance/failure. Each FACAR shall include recommended regression testing. Upon Government approval of a FACAR, the Contractor shall implement corrective actions and perform regression testing identified in the FACAR.

3.3.26 Counterfeit Parts and Materiel

Counterfeit materiel is a serious threat to the safety and operational effectiveness of DoD systems. The Contractor (and Subcontractors) shall implement a risk mitigation process when obtaining critical or high risk materiel IAW paragraphs (a) and (b) below:

(a) If the materiel is currently in production or currently available, the materiel shall be obtained only from authorized sources. Authorized sources are the original manufacturer, a source with the express written authority of the original manufacturer or current design activity, or an authorized aftermarket manufacturer.

(b) If the materiel is not in production or currently available from authorized sources, the materiel shall be obtained from suppliers that meet appropriate counterfeit avoidance criteria. Counterfeit avoidance criteria can be found in the following Industry Standards - SAE AS5553A; SAE AS6462; SAE AS6081; SAE ARP6178; SAE AS6174A; and SAE AS6301.

Contractors shall notify the Government Contracting Officer when critical or high risk materiel cannot be obtained from an authorized source. The Contractor shall take mitigating actions to authenticate the materiel if purchased from another source.

The Contractor shall report instances of counterfeit and suspect counterfeit materiel to the Government Contracting Officer and the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) as soon as the Contractor becomes aware of the issue.

3.3.27 Technical Manual

The Contractor shall provide a Technical Manual IAW CDRL A033 and CDRL A057. The Technical Manual shall provide detailed procedures for operations and maintenance of the PCAB to include hardware and software operational descriptions, parts lists, fault detection/fault isolation, component removal/replacement.

3.3.28 Data Rights

The Government shall have unlimited data rights for data/documentation delivered/created in support of this effort.

3.3.29 Technical Documentation

For other than commercial/modified commercial items, the Contractor shall deliver Developmental Design Drawings/Models and Associated Lists IAW CDRL A034. For commercial/modified commercial items used as part of the PCAB, the Contractor shall deliver Commercial Drawings/Models and Associated Lists IAW CDRL A035 that shall contain data customarily provided to the public and when such data are not customarily provided to commercial users, the following data: 1) form, fit and function data: 2) data required for maintenance, installation, operating or handling of the commercial items(s); and 3) descriptions of the modifications made at Government expense to the commercial items(s). The Contractor shall develop and deliver Installation Control Drawings IAW CDRL A036. The Contractor shall use NAVSEA drawing numbers and request a block of drawing numbers required by submitting a Drawing Number Assignment Report IAW CDRL A037. The Contractor shall develop and deliver the Software Requirements Specification IAW CDRL A038, the Interface Requirements Specification IAW A039, and the Software User’s Manual IAW CDRL A040. The Contractor shall develop and deliver provisioning technical documentation consisting of a Provisioning Parts List IAW CDRL A041.

There shall be no outstanding changes to the TDP upon final submission. The Contractor shall submit the following documentation to the Government for review and approval:

(1) Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists IAW CDRL A046

(2) Commercial Drawings/Models and Associated Lists IAW CDRL A047

(3) Special Inspection Equipment Drawings/Models and Associated Lists IAW CDRL A048

(4) Special Tooling Drawings/Models and Associated Lists IAW CDRL A049

(5) Special Packaging Instructions IAW CDRL A050

(6) Software Design Description IAW CDRL A051

(7) Interface Design Description IAW CDRL A052

(8) Software Product Specification IAW CDRL A053

(9) Software Version Description IAW CDRL A054

(10) Computer Software Product IAW CDRL A055

The TDP shall contain, but not be limited to, drawings, parts lists, data lists, wiring lists, schematics, interconnect diagrams, special tooling drawings, specifications, special packaging instructions (including storage, shipping container), source control drawings, specification control drawings, digital photographic images of assembly procedures, cable dressing techniques, software user’s manual, software version description documents, firmware version description documents, software, firmware, and interface control information for both hardware and software. The Contractor drawings and associated lists shall be developed and structured IAW ASME Y14.24 and contain data requisite for a subsequent competitive re-procurement.

The Contractor shall provide rights in Technical Data, Computer Software, and Computer Software Documentation IAW the Supplemental 7017-CRL (Commercial Restrictions List) Cost-Price List. The Contractor shall remove or revise markings and legends IAW the rights provided.

The Contractor shall include new software and firmware version numbers resulting from the implementation of the redesign in the Software Version Description.

The Computer Software Product contents shall include, but not be limited to, the following items:

1) Latest revision of Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) design source, test-bench source, and data files used for simulation and or verification of the FPGA;

2) Make files or scripting files used during the design, development, and verification of the FPGA;

3) FPGA configuration bit file;

4) Software Source Code, software developmental documentation, and resulting Software Image.

3.3.30 Detailed Theory of Operation

For each SRA, the Contractor shall generate a Detailed Theory of Operation that shall include equipment characteristics, location and description of major components, functional description of how each SRA and its major components work and interface and functional block diagrams. The Contractor shall submit the SRA Detailed Theory of Operations IAW CDRL A056.

3.4 SLA-10D Shop Replaceable Assemblies (SRA) List

a. 8579071- Power Supply Assy - (1-20 order quantities)

b. 8579110- Display Assy - (1-20 order quantities) This P/N is obsolete

c. 8579140-Computer-Assy (1-20 order quantities)

d. 8579120-KEYPAD-Assy(1-20 order quantities)

e. 8579031-I/O-1-Assy (1-20 order quantities) This P/N is obsolete

f. 8579041-I/O-2-Assy (1-20 order quantities) This P/N is obsolete

g. 8579051-FPGA-Assy (1-20 order quantities) This P/N is obsolete

h. 8579291-Main PCB-Assy(1-20 order quantities)

The Contractor shall deliver AN/SLA-10D units listed above IAW the TDP. The list of commercial part numbers and/or serial numbers for each item delivered shall be provided IAW vendor item drawing provided in the TDP.

3.5 Over and Above Repair and Failure Trend Analysis

Upon receiving authorization for repair, the Contractor shall execute the repair corrective actions necessary, perform applicable environmental and acceptance testing, document the actions and results, affix Serviceable Material Tag (DD Form 1574 or Equivalent) to the unit, indicating Condition Code “A” and return the item to the Government within 60 calendar days of authorization. The Contractor shall monitor faults and corrective actions and report identified failure trends to the Government via monthly Contractor Status Report. Execution and reporting of detailed failure trend analysis will be as directed by the Government Contracting Officer. (CDRL A028 Contractor’s Progress, Status, and Management Report).

3.6 Repair

The Contractor shall provide failure analysis and repair the GFP to a Ready-for-Issue condition IAW the specifications and latest revision.

CATEGORY 1 – TEST, TEARDOWN AND EVALUTION (TT&E) ONLY – The TT&E category will be Firm Fixed Price (FFP). The Contractor shall perform failure analysis on GFP returned to the Contractor by the Government. The Contractor shall clean, visually inspect and bench-test the module. The Contractor shall also disassemble the GFP to the extent necessary to verify failure and/or inspect for needed repair processes and parts of subassemblies as required. This process may include the removal and replacement of components in order to verify failures. If failure cannot be determined or duplicated during failure analysis, the Contractor shall make cosmetic repairs (i.e. nicks, scratches, dents, corrosion, etc.). Parts and material used in the repair shall be form, fit and function interchangeable with the equipment baseline. Failure analysis shall be completed and documented within 30 calendar days after receipt of the failed modules (CDRL A020.

The Contractor shall perform failure analysis and submit a detailed Firm Fixed Price (FFP) proposal to the Contract Office Point of Contact (POC) within 30 calendar days after completion of the TT&E analysis. At a minimum, the proposal shall identify: types, quantities, and cost of material and parts required for repair, number of hours and labor mix, or number of hours and shop rate charged for the repair, indirect rates charged for the repair, and the total FFP for the repair (CDRL A020).

CATEGORY 2 – REPAIRS – The Contractor shall forward the data required IAW CDRL A020 within 30 days of receipt of the failed unit. Upon the RTA’s review and recommendation of the failure analysis report and cost proposal, the NSWC-CR PCO will negotiate a FFP to complete the Category 2 repair. The Contractor shall proceed with Category 2 repairs upon issuance of Contract Modification.

The Contractor shall subject the repaired part(s) to the Environmental Stress Screening (ESS) tests that are applicable to the parts as defined by the ESS Procedures referenced in section 3.3.18.

The turnaround time for repair is 60 days, best efforts, after receipt of an executed modification for a Category 2 repair. In the event a repair requires long lead material and will exceed the 60 day turnaround, the Contract Office POC shall be notified with an estimated return date. The repair of hardware shall consist of, as applicable, disassembly, repair, re-assembly, alignment, and final acceptance testing to replenish the units to a fully functional performance condition, IAW acceptance test requirements. Failed units shall be brought back to the revision/configuration of the original unit, or to a newer revision if possible, or to a working intermediate configuration. The final repaired unit shall be form, fit, and function compatible with the component drawings.

CATEGORY 3 – BEYOND ECONOMICAL REPAIR (BER) – When the total cost estimate to repair the GFP is equal to or approaches 75% of the current replacement cost, failures may be classified as BER. The Contractor shall recommend to the Contract Office POC, in writing, the unit is considered to be BER and shall delineate the reasons for making the recommendation. The final decision to determine a unit to be BER remains with the Contracting Office. The Contract Office POC will provide disposition instructions for a unit that has been determined to be

BER.

3.7 Travel

Travel to Contractor’s facility or production partners will occur, as necessary, after award to witness acceptance testing, address production concerns not easily resolved by remote means, and attend program reviews.

SECTION 4.0 – TECHNICAL DATA

4.0 Technical Data Deliverables

The Contractor shall ensure data delivered under each CDRL is; timely, complete, valid, accurate, and consistent.

CDRL Exhibit SOW Paragraph DID Integrated Master Schedule A001 3.2.1, 3.3.1, 3.6 DI-MGMT-81650

Meeting Agenda A002 3.2.4, 3.3.21, 3.3.22, 3.3.24

DI-ADMN-81249C

Record of Meetings Minutes Report

A003 3.2.1, 3.2.4, 3.3.1, 3.3.21, 3.3.22, 3.3.24, 3.6

DI-ADMN-81505

Parts Management Plan A004 3.3.2 DI-SDMP-81748 NOT 1 Production Status Report A005 3.3.2 DI-MGMT-81255 NOT 2 Status of Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Report

A006 3.1.4

DI-MGMT-80269 NOT 1

(STATUS)

As-Built Configuration List

A007 3.3

DI-CMAN-81516 –CANCELLED;

DI-SESS-81830 NOT 1

ALTERNATE

Supplier's Configuration Management Plan

A008 3.3.20, 3.3.22 DI-SESS-80858D

Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Implementation Plan

A009 3.3.9, 3.3.22 DI-MGMT-81949 NOT 1

Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)

A010 3.3.10 DI-SESS-80639E

Notice of Revision (NOR) A011 3.3.10.1 DI-SESS-80642E Quality Assurance Program Plan

A012 3.3.22 DI-QCIC-81794A

Handling Procedures for Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Sensitive Items

A013 3.3.20, 3.3.22 DI-RELI-80671A

Counterfeit Prevention Plan

A014 3.3.20, 3.3.22 DI-MISC-81832

Environmental Stress Screening Procedures and Implementation Plan

A015 3.3.18, DI-ENVR-81014A NOT 1

Environmental Stress Screening (ESS) Report

A016 3.3.18, DI-ENVR-81663

Factory Acceptance Test Plan

A017 3.3.8, 3.3.16, 3.3.22 DI-QCIC-80553A

Test Procedure A018 3.3.16 DI-NDTI-80603A Acceptance Test Report A019 3.3.16 DI-QCIC-81891 NOT 2 Failure Analysis and Corrective Action Report

A020 3.3.25, 3.6, 4.0, DI-SESS-81927 NOT1

System Safety Hazard Analysis Report

A021 3.2.2

DI-SAFT-80101C

Reliability and Maintainability Predictions Report

A022 3.2.5

DI-SESS-81497B

Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Block Diagrams and Mathematical Models Report

A023 3.2.5

DI-SESS-81…