16RGS49_sol_0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is summariized as follow s:

Provide Attachment 6 (Product Sample Description)that w as inadvertently not included in a previous amendment Provide a revised. Attachment 2 - Paragraph 6.2 and 6.3 have been removed.

Section 1-The required response time is changed and is extended to July 21, 2016.

Section 1 - Delivery Note added - The Government w ill not accept accelerated delivery.

Section 5. 52.212-1 Add 3 - paragraph a , first sentance has changed and a NOTE w as added at the end of the section w /r/t facility requirements Section 5 - 52.212-2 Paragraphs a and c have changed.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 08-Jul-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N00164-16-R-GS49

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10-Jun-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-Jul-2016

CODE

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV

ELLEN.MCDANIEL@NAVY.MIL

E.MCDANIEL (812-854-5315) BLG 121

300 HIGHWAY 361

CRANE IN 47522-5001

N00164 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N00164-16-R-GS49

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SECTION 4.0 - CLAUSES & OTHER FULL TEXT INFORMATION

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 1.0 - SCHEDULE/INSPECTION & ACCEPTANCE/DELIVERY

The required response date/time has changed from 11-Jul-2016 02:00 PM to 21-Jul-2016 02:00 PM.

The following have been added by full text:

DELIVERY NOTE

THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT ACCEPT ACCELERATED DELIVERIES OF THE DIRECT IMAGING

SYSTEM.

SECTION 5.0 - INSTRUCTIONS & PROVISIONS

The following have been modified:

52.212-1 ADDENDUM 3

NOTE - THE PROVISION AT 52.212-1 HAS BEEN TAILORED (SEE ADDENDUM 1)

ADDENDUM 1 - 52-212-1 TAILORING

The contractor’s proposal shall include the following:

Required Submittal

Technical Product Sample

Technical Capability Information Summary – Unclassified

Past Performance Summaries & Matrix - Unclassified

Completed Solicitation including pricing – Unclassified

General Information:

a) Delivery & Submission Method

Mailed or Commercial Delivery of Proposals. Mailed or commercially delivered hard copy proposals shall be sent to the address in Block 9 on Page 1 of the Solicitation and shall be received by the date and time in Block 8 on Page 1 of the solicitation. Please provide shipping information to the Contract Specialist to ellen.mcdaniel@navy.mil if a hard copy is being sent. OFFERORS ARE AUTHORIZED TO SUBMIT PROPOSALS VIA MAIL ONLY.

SEE ADDRESS IN BOX 9, PAGE 1 METHODS. NO ELECTRONIC PROPOSALS WILL BE

ACCEPTED. FAR 52.212-1 (F) APPLIES.

Technical Capability:

a) Each offeror shall provide detailed description of how each requirement in the Statement of Work (Att 1) AND the Specification (Att2) will be met and/or brochures and a capability statement (no more than 3 pages in length) describing the offeror’s technical capability in manufacturing/ producing the various types of Direct Imaging systems as called out in Attachments 1 and 2 of the solicitation. .

Offerors shall not paraphrase the specifications/Statement of Work or attest that "standard procedures will be employed.” This is inadequate to demonstrate how the proposal complies with the requirements of the specification/Statement of Work.

b) Offers shall provide submit two product samples for evaluation – one dry film photoresist sample and one vendor selected photoresist sample in addition to their written proposal. The product sample shall be manufactured and be in conformance to all specification and standards outlined in Attachment 1,2,3 and 6.

When required by the solicitation, product samples shall be submitted at or prior to the date specified for the receipt of offers

The product sample shall be sent to the address below:

Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane Div Attn: Ellen McDaniel for N00164-16-R-GS49

BLDG 121 FLR 2 CODE 0221

300 Highway 361 Crane, IN 47522-5001

PRODUCT SAMPLES SUBMITTED SHALL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE GOVERNMENT, AND

WILL NOT BE RETURNED BY THE GOVERNMENT.

c) Offerors shall identify any “exceptions” to the Specifications, Drawings, and Statement of Work and state precisely how the offered supplies/services differ from the solicitation documents.

NOTE: Without this information, the Offeror may be deemed unacceptable and may not considered be for further evaluation.

Past Performance:

a) Offerors shall provide a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) past performance references on prior contracts that are recent and relevant to this requirement.

b) Offerors shall contact past performance references directly and request that they complete and submit the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 1) to ellen.mcdaniel@navy.mil before the closing date and time in Block 9 of Page 1 of the Solicitation. Under no circumstances shall the completed PPQs be sent to or by the proposing offerors. Any information provided by the offeror’s references is subject to verification/validation by the Government during the evaluation process. In the event references are not received by the close of the solicitation, the Government may make contact and follow up with the listed references.

c) Offeror shall provide a one (1) page matrix (Attachment 2) identifying the following information for each of the PPQs sent out:

1) Organization/Customer

2) Brief Description

3) Contract Number

4) Telephone & E-mail of Organization/Customer Point of Contact (POC)

Proposals must prove PPQs have been sent to each POC; failure to send the PPQ to each POC may result in exclusion of the offeror’s proposal from consideration for award. The offeror shall exert its best efforts to ensure that at least two POCs per relevant contract submit a completed PPQ directly to the Government.

Proposals must prove PPQs have been sent to each POC; failure to send the PPQ to each POC may result in exclusion of the offeror’s proposal from consideration for award. The offeror shall exert its best efforts to ensure that at least two POCs per relevant contract submit a completed PPQ directly to the Government.

d) Offerors should include a discussion of any significant achievements and explain any rectification of Past Performance problems that are relevant to the proposed efforts.

e) For the purposes of this solicitation, recent contracts are defined as those on which performance occurred during the last three (3) years from the solicitation date.

f) Each offeror shall submit present and past performance information for itself on projects of similar size, scope, and technical complexity. The Offerors may choose to submit present and past performance information for major proposed subcontractors, team members, and/or joint venture partners that have experience in projects of similar size, scope, and technical complexity with its proposal. The total number of past performance references for each offeror shall not exceed five (including any references submitted by subcontractors, team members and/or joint ventures). The offeror may submit performance on classified programs as long as that information can be verified in an unclassified manner. If the offeror intends to submit in this manner the information that is classified (customer, contract number, etc.) should be marked “reserved” and the description/write up of the work performed shall remain unclassified. If the offeror cannot describe what work was accomplished in an unclassified manner they cannot submit that program for evaluation. Offerors are notified that the Government will use the data provided in this volume that is determined to be current and relevant to the effort at hand and data obtained from other sources in the development of performance risk assessments.

g) The Contracting Officer is not responsible for locating or securing any information not furnished with the offer. The SSA/Contracting Officer may, however, utilize all available information, including information not provided by the offeror, in the past performance evaluation. The Government reserves the right to review less than all information submitted, and to only analyze sufficient information to make a reasonable determination of each offeror’s past performance rating. If insufficient information regarding the offeror’s corporate history is available, the offeror is encouraged to submit for evaluation, evidence of relevant past performance on the part of the offeror’s key/principal employees, as either a prime- or sub-contractor.

h) Offerors that have no record of past performance (i.e., new businesses) must submit a signed and dated statement to that effect.

Solicitation/Pricing:

a) Offerors shall submit a list of names and telephone numbers of persons authorized to conduct negotiations in a cover letter.

b) Offerors shall submit a completed and signed solicitation package, with all representations and certifications executed within Section “5.0.”

c) Offerors shall submit unit prices for each item listed in Section “1.0.” Completion of unit pricing matrices is required, if provided.

d) The prices shall include all shipping and be proposed f.o.b. destination.

EXCEPTIONS

Offerors are not encouraged to take exceptions to this solicitation. Any exceptions taken to the terms and conditions of this solicitation shall be explained in detail and set forth in a cover letter. Offerors are to detail the particular section, clause paragraph and page to which they are taking exception. The Government is not required to concur with any exceptions, and Offerors are placed on notice that exceptions, depending on their significance, may result in an offer being determined unacceptable.

i) DELETED - Multiple awards will not be made.

NOTE: AS NOTED IN PARAGRAPH 2.2.1 OF THE STATEMENT OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL

PROVIDE WITH THE RESPONSE TO THE SOLICITATION A LIST OF FACILITY UTILITY

REQUIREMENTS (I.E.POWER REQUIREMENTS, COMPRESSED AIR, COOLANT LOOPS, FILTER

REQUIREMENTS,SITE PERPARATION, SIZE OF FITTINGS/CONNECTIONS, VACUUM, LOCATION OT

ERMINALS AND LENGTH OF CABLES/HOSES).

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers in the descending order of importance:

i) Technical Capability w/Product Sample Evaluation

ii) Past Performance

iii) Price

Technical Acceptability and Past Performance, when combined are more important than price.

(i) Technical Acceptability

a. Each offeror shall submit a detailed description of how each requirement in the Statement of Work

(Attachment 1) AND the Specification (Attchment 2) will be met and/or brochures and a capability statement (no more than 3 pages in length) describing the offeror’s technical capability in manufacturing/ producing the various types of Direct Imaging systems as called out in Attachments 1 and 2 of this solicitation.

b. The offeror shall submit two product samples for evaluation – one dry film photoresist sample and one vendor selected photoresist sample. See Attachments 3 and 6 for Product Sample Description and pattern that must be resolved in product sample.

1.0 EVALUATION CRITERIA

1.1 All Sample Panels are 12”x18”, no less than .020” thick, and copper foil laminated P F

1.2 Dry-Film Photoresist Product Sample

1.2.1 Dry-Film Photoresist used . P F

1.2.2 Horizontal Patterns show good trace resolution down to .002” +/-10%

Space/Trace. P F

1.2.3 Vertical Patterns show good trace resolution down to .002” +/-10%

Space/Trace. P F

1.2.4 Diagonal Patterns show good trace resolution down to .002” +/-10%

Space/Trace. P F

1.2.5 Type of photoresist, application method, and development chemistry identified by Direct Image Vendor. P F

1.3 Vendor Selected Photoresist

1.3.1 Horizontal Patterns show good trace resolution down to .0004” +/-10%

Space/Trace. P F

1.3.2 Vertical Patterns show good trace resolution down to .0004” +/-10% Space/Trace. P F

1.3.3 Diagonal Patterns show good trace resolution down to .0004” +/-10% Space/Trace. P F

1.3.4 Type of photoresist, application method, and development chemistry identified by Direct Image Vendor. P F

P= Pass F=Fail

c. The following ratings will apply as set forth below:

In order to be considered technically acceptable, the direct imaging system must meet all of the requirements as stated in (a) above, and the product samples must pass all of the evaluation criteria above. If the proposal is not technically acceptable, the Government will not evaluate past performance and price.

(ii) Past Performance

a. The Government will assess each offeror’s and proposed significant subcontractors’ past performance. The assessment will be an unbiased judgment about the quality of an offeror’s past performance. The Government will use its subjective assessment to make a comparative assessment of an offeror’s capability. Past performance is a measure of the degree to which an offeror satisfied its customers in the past and complied with the Specification, Drawings, Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement, contract schedule and contract terms and conditions. Past performance is also a measure of the risk of performance associated with the offeror.

b. In addition to the sources identified by the offeror, the Government may review Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and/or DOD Past Performance Information Retrieval System ratings and other existing past performance ratings on relevant contracts. The Government may also review other relevant past performance information contained in local files and other sources, including Federal, State, and local Government agencies, Better Business Bureaus, an offeror’s customers and business associates , published media and electronic databases. General trends in a contractor’s past performance will also be considered.

c. The Government reserves the right to limit the number of references it decides to contact and to contact references other than those provided by the offeror. The evaluation will take in account the same type of information regarding significant subcontractors proposed in the offeror’s proposal.

d. The Contracting Officer is not responsible for locating or securing any information not furnished with the offer. The SSA/Contracting Officer may, however, utilize all available information, including information not provided by the offeror, in the past performance evaluation. The Government reserves the right to review less than all information submitted, and to only analyze sufficient information to make a reasonable determination of each offeror’s past performance rating. If insufficient information regarding the offeror’s corporate history is available, the offeror is encouraged to submit for evaluation, evidence of relevant past performance on the part of the offeror’s key/principal employees, as either a prime- or sub-contractor.

e. Past performance is assigned adjectival ratings in the evaluation. There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation:

Relevancy - The past performance relevancy rating, as defined in the table below, is the assessment of the offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract's requirements.

TECHNICAL ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE RATINGS

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATING

Rating Definition Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved much of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Confidence - The past performance confidence rating, as defined in the table below, is the evaluation of the offeror’s demonstrated ability to successfully perform the contract’s requirements, based on past performance information.

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT

Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

f. Offerors that have no record of past performance (i.e., new businesses) must submit a signed and dated statement to that effect. If an offer submits a certification statement and the Government has no information available regarding the offeror’s past performance, that offeror will receive a neutral rating (i.e., the offeror is evaluated Neutral) for past performance. If offerors (prime and significant subcontractors) provide reference information that is deemed not relevant and current, the offeror will receive a neutral past performance rating for those contracts.

(iii) Price

a. Price will be evaluated as the sum of CLIN 0001, CLIN 0002 and CLIN 0003.

Source selection will consist of determining proposal technically acceptable or unacceptable. If an Offeror receives a Technical rating less than “Acceptable” the Government will not rate the Offeror’s Past Performance nor evaluate proposal cost as the Offeror may not be considered for award.

(b) Options. DELETED

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)