SOW MJU-64 66 FY25 04-25-24.docx

(04/25/2024)

DECOY, INFRARED, COUNTERMEASURE, MJU-66/B

FY25 3-YEAR IDIQ

1. SCOPE: This Statement of Work (SOW) is for the production, acceptance, and delivery of the Decoy, Infrared Countermeasures, MJU-64/B and Decoy, Infrared, Countermeasure, MJU-66/B. The MJU-64/B and MJU-66/B are pyrophoric devices that are designed to protect aircraft from heat seeking missiles.

2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS:

2.1 GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS:

MIL-STD-1168 Rev. C Department of Defense Standard Practice Ammunition Lot Numbering and Ammunition Data Cards

2.2 NON-GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS:

SAE ANSI/EIA-649-C Configuration Management Standard

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories

ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems – Requirements

ISO 10012:2003 Measurement Management Systems - Requirements for Measurement Processes and Measuring Equipment

ISPM 15 International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures – Regulation of Wood Packaging Material in International Trade (2018)

ASME Y14.100 Engineering Drawing Practices

ASME Y14.5 Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing

SNT-TC-1A Personnel Qualification and Certification in Nondestructive Testing

SAE AMS-STD-2154E Inspection, Ultrasonic, Wrought Metals, Process for

3. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT:

3.1 The Contractor shall maintain required Systems Engineering and Program Management policies and procedures to accomplish the tasks identified herein. The Contractor shall plan, organize and manage the effort throughout the life of this contract. The Contractor shall maintain a record of program costs, performance and schedule to ensure requirements are being met, and to provide early detection of problems to resolve and reduce risk. The Contractor shall develop an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) to establish the milestones to accomplish the contract delivery schedules.

3.1.1 Status Reporting: The Contractor Program Manager shall track, measure, and report program status using Contractor standard internal processes, metrics, and procedures. Status reports shall include reporting of Program Risks and Risk Management activities. Management Status Reports shall be provided monthly and include the information in the following sub-paragraphs:

3.1.1.1 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS): An IMS, to include critical path network, shall be developed and delivered by the Contractor and shall be agreed upon by the Government and the Contractor. The Contractor shall generate and maintain a milestone schedule, which shall be used to control the project and report status to the Government. CDRL A001 (Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR)) applies.

3.1.1.2 Financial Reporting: The Contractor shall determine, document, and maintain the status of contract funds. The Contractor shall report monthly financial progress. The Contractor shall establish and maintain an integrated uniform funding database to support the collection and reporting of available and expended funds, performance, and related data. Status of contract funds should be provided as part of the Contractor’s Progress, Status and Management Report. CDRL A002 (Contractor's Progress, Status and Management Report) applies.

3.1.2 Meetings: Contractor shall plan for a minimum of two (2) scheduled Program Management Reviews (PMR) per year.

4. REQUIREMENTS:

4.1 ITEM IDENTIFICATION: The MJU-64/B is defined by ADL 30003-3864AS100 Revision G, Change Notice 001. The MJU-66/B is defined by ADL 30003-3952AS100 Revision B, Change Notice 001.

4.1.1 The Contractor shall use internal processes to manufacture the MJU-64/B in accordance with ADL 30003-3864AS100 Revision G, Change Notice 001, and the MJU-66/B in accordance with ADL 30003-3952AS100 Revision B, Change Notice 001.

4.1.2 All MJU-64/B production lots shall meet the Lot Acceptance Test requirements of OES-3038 Revision G. All MJU-66/B production lots shall meet the Lot Acceptance Test requirements of OES-3044 Revision B.

4.2 AMMUNITION DATA CARDS (ADCs): Detailed requirements for the preparation of ADCs are contained in Exhibit 1, reference CDRL A003 (Ammunition Data Card - Ammunition and Explosive Technical Data).

4.2.1 Hard copy ADCs are not required to be placed in every Ammunition Container, or with the pallet of packaged MJU-64/B or MJU-66/B Infrared Countermeasures.

4.3 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT: The Government will be responsible for the Configuration Management of the MJU-64/B and MJU-66/B.

4.3.1 Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) and Requests for Variance (RFVs): Proposed changes or departures which include ECPs and RFVs in the configuration or configuration identification of an item shall be documented. A local form that documents proposed changes in the configuration or configuration identification of an item may be utilized. Form approval will be provided by the Government. All ECPs and RFVs shall be submitted for evaluation and approval/disapproval through the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO).

4.3.1.1 Government disposition of ECPs will be in no more than 90 calendar days.

4.3.1.2 Government disposition of Minor RFVs will be in no more than 60 calendar days.

4.3.1.3 Government disposition of Major RFVs, or RFVs for Lot Acceptance Test failures, will be in no more than 90 calendar days.

4.3.2 Material Review Board authority will be withheld by the Government. Any variance from the baseline configuration-controlled documentation will be evaluated by the Government.

4.3.2.1 All ECPs affecting this item shall be documented in accordance with CDRL A004 (Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)) and SAE ANSI/EIA-649-C.

4.3.2.2 All RFVs affecting this item shall be documented in accordance with CDRL A005 (Request for Variance (RFV)) and SAE ANSI/EIA-649-C. The Government Acquisition Engineer will determine/verify the Classification of the Variance. The Classification of Characteristic is determined by the Drawing and the field on the RFV form is completed by the Contractor.

4.3.3 Rework and Repair: Rework and Repair are allowed during production. The Contractor shall conduct rework and repair in accordance with Exhibit 2 requirements.

4.3.4 Product Quality Deficiency Reporting: All product quality deficiencies shall be reported using the Product Data Reporting and Evaluation Program (PDREP). To gain access to PDREP, register at the following link: www.nslcptsmh.csd.disa.mil

4.4 MEASUREMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION: Detailed requirements for Measurement System Evaluation and Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AIE), including acceptance test procedures, are contained in Exhibit 3, as well as CDRL A006 (Measurement System Evaluation (MSE)- Measurement and Inspection Equipment System Design Documentation for Acceptance of Product – MSE/AIE), and CDRL A007 (Measurement System Evaluation (MSE)- Measurement and Inspection Equipment System Design Documentation for Acceptance of Product - Measurement System Analysis (MSA)).

4.5 APPROVAL OF CONTRACTOR’S INFRARED (IR) OUTPUT TEST FACILITY: Prior to MJU-64/B First Article Testing, the Contractor shall conduct a formal IR Output measurement correlation test event to gain U.S. Government approval of the Contractor’s Infrared Output Test Plan and facility.

4.5.1 Correlation Test Samples: The Contractor shall provide sixty (60) MJU-64/B IR Output Test samples, at no additional cost to the U.S. Government. Thirty (30) units shall be functioned at the Contractor’s facility, and the remaining thirty (30) shall be functioned at the U.S. Government’s dynamic Windstream test facility at NSWC Crane.

4.5.2 MJU-64/B Correlation Test Event: The Contractor shall coordinate and conduct an MJU-64/B IR Output measurement event at the Contractor’s static test facility.

4.5.2.1 The Contractor shall provide a minimum of _60_ calendar days notice of the test date to the U.S. Government.

4.5.2.2 The Contractor shall submit the measurement filters to be utilized in the MJU-64/B correlation test event to the U.S. Government for response characterization a minimum of _60_ calendar days prior to the test date. Filter response characterization shall be coordinated with Terry Chastain (812-854-6460, or terry.chastain@navy.mil), or Marty Terry (812-854-8407, or marty.terry@navy.mil).

4.5.2.3 The Contractor shall host U.S. Government representatives with measurement equipment during the MJU-64/B correlation test event, and make side-by-side measurements using Contractor measurement equipment.

4.5.2.4 The Contractor will be invited, but is not required, to send representatives (with or without measurement equipment) to attend the MJU-64/B IR Output Correlation Testing at the Government facility.

4.5.2.5 The Contractor shall palletize the thirty (30) MJU-64/B Government test units on a wooden pallet and ship to the following location:

NSWC Crane Attn: Code JXRP and/or Code WXRP

4.5.2.5.2 For MJU-64/B test samples, the WAWF Receiving Report shall have the following entered into the PRODUCT/SERVICE ID and QUALIFIER entries: Product/Service ID – 1370015230965, Qualifier – FS.

4.5.3 MJU-64/B Infrared (IR) Output Test Procedure: The Contractor shall submit a detailed MJU-64/B Infrared (IR) Output Test Procedure within _30_ calendar days of Contract award, in accordance with CDRL A006 (Measurement System Evaluation (MSE) – Measurement and Inspection Equipment System Design Documentation for Acceptance of Product – MSE/AIE). At a minimum, the IR Output Test Procedure shall include:

· Proposed pass/fail Infrared Output envelopes based on historical correlation data. Historical correlation data shall be included as supporting documentation.

· A correlation number or factor between NSWC Crane’s test facilities and the Contractor’s facility based on historical correlation data. Historical correlation data shall be included as supporting documentation.

· Configuration (with dimensions) of IR test facility - Drawings and pictures shall be provided if available.

· Calibration distance to Blackbody and distance for test setup.

· Copy of data acquisition program software and data reduction software with data reduction logic.

· Configuration management plan for software to prevent any unapproved changes.

· Step-by-step procedure for IR Output Test from start to finish.

· List of all calibrated equipment, with model numbers and serial numbers, to include at a minimum: Pyroelectric Detectors, Chopper/Controllers, Blackbody and Controller, Filters, Air System if used, and Pressure Transducers if an air system is used.

Conditional approval of the MJU-64/B IR Output Test Procedure and Contractor Test Facility is required before the MJU-64/B First Article can occur. The PCO shall, by written notice to the Contractor within _30_ calendar days, approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve the MJU-64/B IR Output Test Procedure and Contractor Test Facility. In the case of approval, the written notice from the PCO will reference the delivery of the Contractor’s Test Facility MJU-64/B IR Output Acceptance Correlation Curve (Classified) to the Contractor by separate means. If any changes are made to the Contractor’s baseline MJU-64/B IR Output Test Procedure, equipment, software, or settings, the Contractor shall notify the Government immediately, and a new correlation test event (similar to 4.5.2) may be required at no cost to the Government.

4.6 FIRST ARTICLE: The Contractor shall produce a First Article Sample for the MJU-64/B in accordance with OES-3038 Revision G, and for the MJU-66/B in accordance with OES-3044 Revision B. The First Article sample shall be as specified and shall be examined and tested in accordance with the contract, the item specification(s), and drawing(s).

4.6.1 First Article Sample: There are two types of First Article Samples: 1) Initial First Article Sample, and 2) Subsequent First Article Sample.

4.6.1.1 Initial First Article Sample: This is the First Article required at the start of a contract. The initial First Article Sample shall be submitted to the Government _120_ calendar days after contract award.

4.6.1.2 Subsequent First Article Sample: This is the First Article required due to failing an initial First Article or if a Class II ECP change is made to the technical data, whenever there is a lapse in production for a period in excess of _45_ calendar days, or whenever a change occurs in the place of performance, manufacturing process, material used, drawing, specification, or source of supply.

4.6.1.2.1 When any of the conditions in paragraph 4.6.1.2 occur, the Contractor shall notify the PCO, by letter, so that a determination can be made concerning the need for an additional First Article Sample or portion thereof, and instructions provided concerning the submission, inspection and notification of results. The PCO will respond to the additional First Article request within _14_ calendar days.

4.6.1.2.2 Unless the PCO determines otherwise, subsequent First Article testing will be at the cost and expense of the Contractor.

4.6.1.3 The Contractor shall provide to the PCO at least _14_ calendar days advance notice of the scheduled date for a First Article Sample build.

4.6.1.4 The First Article Sample shall be representative of items to be manufactured using the same processes and procedures as production. All parts and materials, including packaging and packing, shall be obtained from the same source of supply as will be used during regular production.

4.6.2 First Article Inspections: The Contractor shall perform 100% receiving, in-process and final assembly inspections on the First Article Sample.

4.6.2.1 Results of Contractor inspections (including Supplier's and Vendor's inspection records when applicable) will be verified by the Government Quality Assurance Representative (herein referred to as QAR) and one copy of the report of findings bearing the QAR endorsement shall be forwarded with the First Article Sample.

4.6.2.2 Upon delivery to the testing activity, the First Article may be subjected to inspection for all contract, drawing, and specification requirements.

4.6.3 First Article Acceptance Testing: First Article Acceptance Testing for both the MJU-64/B and the MJU-66/B will be performed at the following Government facility after initial inspection performed by the QAR. The Contractor shall palletize the FAT samples on wooden pallets and ship to the following location:

4.6.3.1 For all shipments to NSWC Crane, the shipment must be accompanied by a completed DD Form 250 or Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) Receiving Report with all applicable information, including Contract number, nomenclature, NSN, DODIC, lot number, and quantity.

4.6.3.1.1 For MJU-64/B test samples, the WAWF Receiving Report shall have the following entered into the PRODUCT/SERVICE ID and QUALIFIER entries: Product/Service ID – 1370015230965, Qualifier – FS.

4.6.3.1.2 For MJU-66/B test samples, the WAWF Receiving Report shall have the following entered into the PRODUCT/SERVICE ID and QUALIFIER entries: Product/Service ID – 1370015515659, Qualifier – FS.

4.6.4 First Article Acceptance: The PCO will, by written notice to the Contractor within 60 calendar days or as otherwise specified by the PCO after receipt of the sample units by the testing activity, approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve the First Article sample.

4.6.4.1 QAR will perform final acceptance after receiving the Acceptance Letter from the PCO.

4.6.5 First Article Failure: Within _30_ calendar days of a First Article Test (FAT) failure, the Contractor shall create and submit a Failure Summary and Analysis Report (FSAR) in accordance with CDRL A008 (Failure Summary and Analysis Report). The FSAR shall include detailed analysis of the failure, root cause analysis, and corrective actions to be implemented. The Contractor shall submit the FSAR through the QAR for signature. Once the QAR has signed the FSAR, the Contractor shall send it to the PCO. Notice of approval or disapproval of the FSAR will be made to the Contractor by the PCO within _30_ calendar days after receipt of the FSAR.

4.6.5.1 Rejected First Articles or portions thereof not destroyed during inspection and testing will be held at the First Article test site for a period of _60_ calendar days following the date of notification of rejection, pending receipt of instructions from the Contractor for the disposition of the rejected material. The Contractor agrees that failure to furnish such instructions within said _60_ calendar day period shall constitute abandonment of said material by the Contractor and shall confer upon the PCO the right to destroy or otherwise dispose of the rejected items without liability to the Contractor by reason of such destruction or disposition.

4.6.6 The Government reserves the right to waive the First Article requirements.

4.7 Test Set-up Units: After approval of First Article, and in conjuction with the shipment of the first production lot Windstream IR Output Inspection test samples for both the MJU-64/B and MJU-66/B, the Contractor shall provide a minimum of 360 MJU-64/B test samples, and a minimum of 360 MJU-66/B test samples at no additional cost to the Government. The 360 minimum samples shall be represented by a lot number with the letter “E” placed between the interfix and sequence numbers.

· The units shall be used as LAT set-up units for each LAT to be conducted at either the Government test facility (180 MJU-64/B, 360 MJU-66/B), or the Contractor’s test facility (180 MJU-64/B).

· The MJU-64/B Test Set-up Units shall conform to all requirements of ADL 3864AS100 Revision G, Change Notice 001, and shall represent the material submitted under paragraph 4.6.

· The MJU-66/B Test Set-up Units shall conform to all requirements of ADL 3952AS100 Revision B, Change Notice 001, and shall represent the material submitted under paragraph 4.6.

· 180 MJU-64/B and 360 MJU-66/B Test Set-up Units shall be shipped to the same address as in paragraph 4.6.3. The remaining 180 Test Set-up Units for MJU-64/B will remain at the Contractor’s facility for use as set-ups before Contractor-performed MJU-64/B LAT. Before every LAT, approximately three (3) of these samples will be used as set-up units.

The Government will randomly sample five (5) of these units for each type to verify conformance to the ADL, during the Lot Acceptance Test of the first production lot.

4.8 Production Lot Acceptance Testing (LAT) for MJU-64/B: LAT and Inspection for the MJU-64/B shall be performed at the Government facility or the Contractor facility in accordance with OES-3038 Revision G, after initial inspection performed by the QAR.

4.8.1 MJU-64/B Plan A: Plan A LAT and Inspection for the MJU-64/B shall be performed at the following Government facility after initial inspection performed by the QAR. The Contractor shall palletize the LAT samples on wooden pallets and ship to the following location for LAT:

4.8.1.1 For all shipments to NSWC Crane, the shipment must be accompanied by a completed DD Form 250 or Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) Receiving Report with all applicable information, including Contract number, nomenclature, NSN, DODIC, lot number, and quantity.

4.8.1.2 For MJU-64/B test samples, the WAWF Receiving Report shall have the following entered into the PRODUCT/SERVICE ID and QUALIFIER entries: Product/Service ID – 1370015230965, Qualifier – FS.

4.8.2 MJU-64/B Plan B: Plan B LAT and Inspection for the MJU-64/B shall be performed at the Contractor facility after initial inspection performed by the QAR.

4.8.3 Delivery is considered to have been met once the lot has been officially accepted by the QAR.

4.8.3.1 Delivery of the first MJU-64/B production lot is due 109 calendar days after First Article Acceptance.

4.8.3.2 The Delivery Schedule will define each subsequent MJU-64/B production lot’s acceptance and delivery requirement in regular time intervals.

4.8.4 The first MJU-64/B LAT sample submission is due 30 calendar days after approval of FAT.

4.8.5 Prior to selection of the MJU-64/B LAT sample units, the lot shall have been inspected to and met all requirements of the contract. A sample shall not be submitted from a lot rejected for nonconformance to the detailed requirements of the specification(s) and drawing(s) unless authorized by the PCO.

4.8.6 The MJU-64/B LAT sample units shall be randomly selected from the entire lot by, or in the presence of, the QAR. Additionally, the samples selected for paragraph 4.8.14 (Verification of MJU-64/B IR Output Test Correlation) shall be randomly selected from the entire lot by, or in the presence of, the QAR.

4.8.7 Unless otherwise specified, the MJU-64/B LAT sample units are considered to be destructively tested and are in addition to the units deliverable under the contract.

4.8.8 The PCO, by written notice to the Contractor within 45 calendar days after receipt of the samples by the testing activity, shall approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve the portions of the MJU-64/B LAT conducted at the Government test facility.

4.8.9 Within 150 calendar days of the contract award, the Contractor shall submit a sample MJU-64/B LAT Report format to the PCO for approval. Notice of approval or disapproval of the sample LAT Report format shall be made to the Contractor by official correspondence within 14 calendar days after the PCO receives the sample LAT Report format.

4.8.9.1 Within _7_ calendar days of the completion of all MJU-64/B Lot Acceptance Testing, the Contractor shall create and submit a Lot Acceptance Test Report through the QAR for signature. Once the QAR has signed the LAT Report, the Contractor shall send it to the PCO. The LAT Report shall include all results of Contractor and Government testing, in accordance with CDRL A009 (Test/Inspection Reports – Production Acceptance Inspection and Test Reports). The Contractor IR Output Test section of the LAT Report shall include at a minimum:

· Pictures, drawings, and dimensions for test setup and calibration setup

· Calibration distance to Blackbody and distance for test setup

· Temperature of Blackbody during calibration

· List of all calibrated equipment, with model numbers and serial numbers, to include at a minimum: Pyroelectric Detectors, Chopper/Controllers, Blackbody and Controller, Filters, Air System if used, and Pressure Transducers if an air system is used

· Record showing that equipment was calibrated

· Weather conditions at time of test including but not limited to: Temperature, Wind Speed, Relative Humidity, and Barometric Pressure

· Air speed in feet per second, if an air system is used during the test

· Run Sheet including Batch number and test event file name

· Recorded fire pulse for each test file to determine when the event begins

· Raw data consisting of fire pulse and raw detector voltages*

· Scaled data incorporating fire pulse and plotting radiant intensity (Watts per Steradian) versus time (seconds)*

*Plan B MJU-64/B LAT Test Reports shall include unclassified IR Output plots for the Contractor-performed IR Output Test. The classified data shall be available at the request of the Government. If the Government requests the classified data, the data shall be mailed to the following address:

(Inner Package)

COMMANDER

NSWC CRANE

ATTN CODE WXRP, BLDG 121

300 HIGHWAY 361

CRANE, IN 47522-5001

(Outer Package)

COMMANDER

NSWC CRANE

ATTN SECURITY MANAGER BLDG 121

300 HIGHWAY 361

CRANE, IN 47522-5001

The MJU-64/B LAT Report shall be reviewed and approved by the PCO before the lot can be accepted. Notice of approval or disapproval of the LAT Report shall be made to the Contractor by official correspondence within _7_ calendar days after the PCO receives the LAT Report.

4.8.10 Final Acceptance: Acceptance, shipment, and payment shall not be accomplished until the lot has been tested, the required LAT Report approved, and the lot has been released for service use by the Acceptance Letter from the PCO. The final acceptance of the LAT will be performed by the QAR at the Contractor facility after receiving the Acceptance Letter from the PCO.

4.8.11 Upon receipt of the written approval accepting a production lot, the Contractor shall ship the lot as soon as possible, and no later than 15 calendar days after receipt of the Acceptance Letter.

4.8.12 If the production lot LAT sample fails to meet applicable requirements, the Contractor shall notify the PCO immediately. The Contractor may be required to submit an additional production lot test sample for test at Contractor’s expense. When notified by the PCO to submit an additional production lot test sample, the Contractor shall make any necessary changes, modifications, or repairs and randomly select another sample for testing. The additional test sample shall be furnished under the terms and conditions and within the time specified in the notification.

4.8.12.1 Within _30_ calendar days of an MJU-64/B LAT failure, the Contractor shall create and submit a Failure Summary and Analysis Report (FSAR) in accordance with CDRL A008 (Failure Summary and Analysis Report). The FSAR shall include detailed analysis of the failure, root cause analysis, and corrective actions to be implemented. The Contractor shall submit the FSAR through the QAR for signature. Once the QAR has signed the FSAR, the Contractor shall send it to the PCO. Notice of approval or disapproval of the FSAR will be made to the Contractor by the PCO within _30_ calendar days after receipt of the FSAR.

4.8.13 Unless authorized by the PCO, the lot from which the samples are drawn shall not be shipped until the tested units have satisfactorily met the established requirements, and the lot has been formally accepted by the QAR.

4.8.14 Verification of MJU-64/B IR Output Test Correlation: For every Plan B MJU-64/B LAT, the Contractor shall submit an additional ten (10) randomly selected IR Output Test samples (in addition to standard Plan B LAT requirements) for verification and validation testing at the Government facility. NOTE – This is performed after Contractor-performed Lot Acceptance Testing and will not be used to pass or fail the lot. If the Government review of these test results compared to the Contractor-provided LAT data indicates that the correlation factor is within 10% of the original correlation factor established during First Article Testing, the Contractor may continue performing Plan B LAT. If the correlation factor is NOT within 10% of the original correlation factor, the Government may choose to take responsibility of performing all LATs. The verification samples may be held and shipped with the next required Plan A LAT samples. The verification test samples shall be palletized on wooden pallets, and shipped to the following location for the IR Output verification testing:

4.8.14.1 For all shipments to NSWC Crane, the shipment must be accompanied by a completed DD Form 250 or Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) Receiving Report with all applicable information, including Contract number, nomenclature, NSN, DODIC, lot number, and quantity.

4.8.14.2 For MJU-64/B test samples, the WAWF Receiving Report shall have the following entered into the PRODUCT/SERVICE ID and QUALIFIER entries: Product/Service ID – 1370015230965, Qualifier – FS.

4.9 PRODUCTION LOT ACCEPTANCE TESTING (LAT) for MJU-66/B: After initial inspection performed by the QAR, and for every MJU-66/B production lot, the Contractor shall palletize the LAT samples on wooden pallets, and ship to the following location for LAT:

4.9.1 For all shipments to NSWC Crane, the shipment must be accompanied by a completed DD Form 250 or Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) Receiving Report with all applicable information, including Contract number, nomenclature, NSN, DODIC, lot number, and quantity.

4.9.2 For MJU-66/B test samples, the WAWF Receiving Report shall have the following entered into the PRODUCT/SERVICE ID and QUALIFIER entries: Product/Service ID – 1370015515659, Qualifier – FS.

4.9.3 Delivery is considered to have been met once the lot has been officially accepted by the QAR.

4.9.3.1 Delivery of the first MJU-66/B production lot is due 109 calendar days after First Article Acceptance.

4.9.3.2 The Delivery Schedule will define each subsequent MJU-66/B production lot’s acceptance and delivery requirement in regular time intervals.

4.9.4 The first MJU-66/B LAT sample submission is due 30 calendar days after approval of FAT.

4.9.5 Prior to selection of the MJU-66/B LAT sample units, the lot shall have been inspected to and meet all requirements of the contract. A sample shall not be submitted from a lot rejected for nonconformance to the detailed requirements of the specification(s) and drawing(s) unless authorized by the PCO.

4.9.6 The MJU-66/B LAT sample units shall be randomly selected from the entire lot by, or in the presence of, the QAR.

4.9.7 Unless otherwise specified, the MJU-66/B LAT sample units are considered to be destructively tested and are in addition to the units deliverable under the contract.

4.9.8 The PCO, by written notice to the Contractor within _45_ calendar days after receipt of the samples by the testing activity, shall approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve the MJU-66/B lot acceptance sample.

4.9.9 Within _150_ calendar days of the contract award, the Contractor shall submit a sample MJU-66/B LAT Report format to the PCO for approval. Notice of approval or disapproval of the sample LAT Report format will be made to the Contractor by official correspondence within _14_ calendar days after the PCO receives the sample LAT Report format.

4.9.9.1 Within _7_ calendar days of the completion of all MJU-66/B Lot Acceptance Testing, the Contractor shall create and submit a Lot Acceptance Test (LAT) Report through the QAR for signature. Once the QAR has signed the LAT Report, the Contractor shall send it to the PCO. The LAT Report shall include all results of Contractor and Government testing, in accordance with CDRL A009 (Test/Inspection Reports - Production Acceptance Inspection and Test Reports). The MJU-66/B LAT Report shall be reviewed and approved by the PCO before the lot can be accepted. Notice of approval or disapproval of the LAT Report will be made to the Contractor by official correspondence within _7_ calendar days after the PCO receives the LAT Report.

4.9.10 Final Acceptance: Acceptance, shipment, and payment shall not be accomplished until the lot has been tested, the required LAT Report approved, and the lot has been released for service use by the Acceptance Letter from the PCO. The final acceptance of the LAT will be performed by the QAR at the Contractor facility after receiving the Acceptance Letter from the PCO.

4.9.11 Upon receipt of the written approval accepting a production lot, the Contractor shall ship the lot as soon as possible, and no later than _15_ calendar days after receipt of the Acceptance Letter.

4.9.12 Lot Acceptance Test Failure: Within _30_ calendar days of an MJU-66/B LAT failure, the Contractor shall create and submit a Failure Summary and Analysis Report (FSAR) in accordance with CDRL A008 (Failure Summary and Analysis Report). The FSAR shall include detailed analysis of the failure, root cause analysis, and corrective actions to be implemented. The Contractor shall submit the FSAR through the QAR for signature. Once the QAR has signed the FSAR, the Contractor shall send it to the PCO. Notice of approval or disapproval of the FSAR will be made to the Contractor by the PCO within _30_ calendar days after receipt of the FSAR.

4.9.13 Unless authorized by the PCO, the lot from which the samples are drawn shall not be shipped until the tested units have satisfactorily met the established requirements, and the lot has been formally accepted by the QAR.

5. QUALITY REQUIREMENTS:

5.1 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: The Contractor shall have a Quality Management Plan and submit for review in accordance with CDRL A010 (Quality Program Plan).

5.1.1 The Quality Management Plan shall comply with ISO 9001:2015.

5.1.1.1 In the event that the Contractor has not implemented the ISO 9001:2015 standard, a request to use an alternate program/system, along with all program/system supporting documentation, shall be submitted to the Government for review and disposition.

5.1.2 The Contractor shall:

5.1.2.1 Provide a copy of the Quality Management Plan to the QAR at the Contractor facility for review prior to submission to the PCO.

5.1.2.2 Submit initial Quality Management Plan no later than 60 calendar days prior to the start of production. Copies of the documented program are to be provided for review and approval to the Procuring Office with the review made by JXRT Procurement Quality Manager (PQM), and the Acquisition Engineer.

5.1.2.3 Submit revisions when developed.

5.2 STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL (SPC): The Contractor shall implement SPC in accordance with a Government-approved SPC Program Plan. NSWC Crane Munitions Acquisition Branch PQM and Acquisition Engineer will review any exceptions to this policy with approval from PMA272.

5.2.1 The SPC General and Detailed Plans will be reviewed by NSWC Crane Munitions Branch PQM and structured in accordance with CDRL A011 (Statistical Process Control (SPC) Plan), applicable for both the General and Detailed Plans.

5.2.1.1 Specific Requirements Pertaining to Plan Submittal. In accordance with CDRL A011 (Statistical Process Control (SPC) Plan), the supplemental information in Exhibit 4 for the General SPC Plan and Exhibit 5 for the Detailed SPC Plan shall be considered and used when developing the two SPC Plans.

5.2.2 The Contractor shall review all process and operation parameters for possible application of SPC techniques. This review shall include processes and operations under the control of the Prime Contractor and those under the control of Sub-Contractor (Vendor) facilities. A written justification shall be included in the Detailed SPC Plan for each process and operation parameter that controls or influences characteristics identified as Critical or Major, which have been deemed impractical for the application of SPC techniques.

5.2.3 The Contractor may request, in writing, through the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) and PCO to the PQM, and the Acquisition Engineer that acceptance inspection or testing performed in accordance with contract requirements be reduced or eliminated when the process or operation parameter under control has demonstrated both stability and capability.

5.2.3.1 Exhibit 6 provides the details for reduction/elimination of acceptance inspection utilizing SPC data.

5.3 GENERAL QUALITY PROVISIONS: General Quality Provisions are contained in Exhibit 7.

5.4 AUDITS: The Government reserves the right to conduct Physical Configuration Audits, SPC, and/or quality audits at the Contractor facility to assure the quality of products and services meets contractual requirements. The scope and schedule of the audit will be by direction of the PCO or designated representative. The PCO or designated representative will coordinate with the Contractor to assure resources required for performance of the audit are available. The Contractor will be notified 30 calendar days in advance of the scheduled audit.

5.5 DEFENSE CONTRACTS AUDIT AGENCY (DCAA) PRE-AWARD SURVEYS: Pre-award surveys are required, but may be waived by the PCO, with written concurrence of the Acquisition Engineer, the PQM, and PMA272.

5.6 TECHNICAL/QUALITY POST-AWARDS: Technical/Quality Post-award is required. If deemed unnecessary by the Government, the requirement may be waived. Technical/Quality Post-award is planned/coordinated/facilitated by the PQM.

5.7 The PMA272 IPT Lead, Acquisition Engineer, PQM, and PMA272 Expendable Assistant Program Management Systems Engineer (APMSE) shall be invited to quality, technically related surveys/assessment/ reviews and conferences resulting from procurement/production of Department of the Navy (DON) cognizant items by the Contractor facility.

6. PREPARATION FOR DELIVERY:

6.1 BAR CODING: Ammunition bar code markings are required in accordance with MIL-STD-129 Revision R. Bar coding shall be applied to outer shipping containers and to unit loads. Plastic laminated labels are required.

6.1.1 If wood containers are used, labels shall be affixed by means of stapling. The staples must not be located within the bar code or the quiet zone of the label. It is permissible to attach the pressure sensitive label to a piece of water-resistant card stock slightly larger than the label and staple the card stock to the wood container by means of heavy-duty staples.

6.2 Wood packaging material used in the palletizing of the MJU-64/B and MJU-66/B shall be heat-treated and marked in accordance with DoD 4140.65-M, Issue, Use, and Disposal of Wood Packaging Material (WPM), as well as the International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM) 15 – Regulation of Wood Packaging Material in International Trade (2018).

6.3 LOT NUMBERING AND PACKAGING: All product lot numbering and packaging shall be in accordance with the requirements of MIL-STD-1168 Revision C. No more than one lot shall be packaged in an outer shipping container.

7. SECURITY: Performance on this contract will require the Contractor to have access to classified information up to, and including, Secret level. Reference Joint Security Classification Guide “Expendable Airborne Infrared Countermeasures (IR Decoys/Devices)”, dated 21 June 2010.

7.1 The Contractor is required to maintain a SECRET Facility Clearance Level for the duration of the contract.

7.2 The Contractor is required to maintain a SECRET Safeguarding Level for the duration of the contract.

7.3 The Contractor, in efforts required for this contract, may receive, store, or generate classified information and/or controlled unclassified information (CUI).

7.4 The Contractor shall practice stringent OPSEC requirements for this contract.

8. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED MATERIAL (GFM), PROPERTY (GFP), AND EQUIPMENT (GFE): The Government will provide the following GFM, GFP, and GFE:

8.1 GFM:

8.1.1 MK 3 MOD 0 Pallets

8.2 GFM/GFP/GFE REPORTING: The Contractor shall report transactions associated with the receipt, storage, expenditure and/or changes in condition/status or issue of GFM/GFP/GFE in accordance with CDRL A012 (Contract Government Furnished Material (GFM) Monthly Requisition and Inventory Report).

9. GOVERNMENT RESTRICTIONS: The Contractor shall conform to the following restrictions:

9.1 AIRCRAFT COUNTERMEASURES: All Aircraft Countermeasures production processes shall occur within the United States.

EXHIBIT 1

Ammunition Data Card (ADC) Requirements

1. Ammunition Data Cards (ADCs). Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) A003 (Ammunition Data Card – Ammunition and Explosive Technical Data) is applicable. Detailed requirements for the preparation of ADCs are contained in MIL-STD-1168C (DI-MISC-80043B) and the Worldwide Ammunition-data Repository Program (WARP) On-Line User’s Manual. Detailed requirements for obtaining and using a manufacturer’s identification symbol, which is an integral component of the ammunition lot number, can be found in MIL-HDBK-1461B.

a. The Contractor shall develop and submit ADCs in accordance with the requirements of this clause, MIL-STD-1168C, and the WARP On-Line User’s Manual.

b. A Contractor shall prepare an ADC for each lot of the item(s) being procured under this contract on all lots produced regardless of whether or not the lots are accepted or rejected by the Government.

c. Unless otherwise authorized by the Procuring Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall include on the ADC representing the deliverable item, as a minimum: all assemblies, subassemblies, components, explosives, and propellants.

d. The Contractor shall state the Automated Data List (ADL) number (with revision) in the Remarks section of the ADC.

e. When required by the TDP, all component lot numbers will be in accordance with MIL-STD-1168C lot number convention. When not required by TDP, component lot numbers may be constructed through producer lot number convention.

f. All component RFVs/ECPs shall be listed on the ADC for the deliverable item, as well as on the component ADC. The WARP User’s Manual provides information on the level of detail required.

g. A sample ADC shall be developed and submitted via WARP 30 calendar days prior to FAT, or 30 calendar days prior to production, in the event that a FAT is not required. The WARP

E-1-1 ADC program will not allow the submission of additional ADCs until such time that the sample ADC has been approved in WARP.

h. The Contractor shall document the configuration of each production lot on an Ammunition Data Card (ADC). The top level drawing and revision shall be documented on the ADC. The following is a list of Major Components that shall be documented with drawing and revision on the ADC:

- Case

- End Cap

- Piston

- O-Ring

E-1-2

EXHIBIT 2

Rework and Repair Requirements

1. Rework and Repair are defined as follows:

a. Rework - The reprocessing of nonconforming material to make it conform completely to the drawings, specification or Contract requirements.

b. Repair - The reprocessing of nonconforming material in accordance with approved written procedures and operations to reduce, but not completely eliminate, the nonconformance. The purpose of repair is to bring nonconforming material into a usable condition. Repair is distinguished from rework in that the item after repair still does not completely conform to all of the applicable drawings, specifications or contract requirements.

c. Rework procedures along with the associated inspection procedures shall be documented by the Contractor and submitted to the QAR for evaluation and approval/disapproval prior to implementation.

d. Repair procedures shall be documented by the Contractor and submitted on a RFV, DD Form 1694, to the PCO for review and written approval prior to implementation.

e. Whenever the Contractor submits a repair or rework procedure for review and approval, the submission shall also include a description of the cause for the nonconformances and a description of the action taken or to be taken to prevent recurrence.

f. The rework or repair procedure shall also contain a provision for reinspection which will take precedence over the technical data requirements and shall, in addition, provide the assurance that the reworked or repaired items have met reprocessing requirements.

E-2-1

EXHIBIT 3

Measurement System Evaluation

1. Definitions. This paragraph defines specific terms utilized throughout the rest of this section and in the accompanying Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) and Data Item Description (DID). This aids in clarifying the Measurement System Evaluation (MSE) requirements to Government and Contractor personnel.

a. Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AIE). All equipment (includes Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE) defined below), special and standard, including dimensional gages, measuring equipment, test fixtures, electronic and physical test equipment, and other test equipment used for examination and test of a product to determine conformance to the Technical Data Package (TDP) which may include drawings and specifications (e.g., Detail, Performance, Weapon specifications, and Quality Assurance Requirements).

b. Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE). AIE in which the inspection and acceptance determination of the product is performed, in whole or in part, in an automatic manner.

c. Contractor Inspection Equipment. Government-approved equipment utilized by the Contractor to perform examination and tests to assure conformance to contract requirements.

d. Commercial Inspection Equipment. Industry-developed inspection equipment of universal application, without limitations to a specific part or item, which is advertised or cataloged as available to the trade or to the public on an unrestricted basis at an established price. Examples follow:

(1) Standard Test Equipment. Multiusage equipment that is specific to a function rather than to an item. It includes such items as hardness testers, tensile strength testers, meters, weighing devices, standard gear testers, ohmmeters, voltmeters, and oscilloscopes.

(2) Standard Measuring Equipment (SME). Multipurpose equipment and standards used for performing measurements. It includes such items as micrometers, rulers, tapes, height gages, and protractors, etc. Standards include visual inspection E-3-1 equipment such as scratch and dig standards, surface finish comparator, color standards (FED-STD-595), etc.

e. Nondestructive Testing (NDT). The development and application of technical methods to examine materials or components in ways that do not impair future usefulness and serviceability in order to detect, locate, measure and evaluate flaws; to assess integrity, properties and composition; and to measure geometrical characteristics. NDT includes Radiography/Radioscopic, Ultrasonic, Eddy Current, Magnetic Particle, and Liquid Penetrant.

f. Measurement System Analysis (MSA). Per ASTM E2782 (Standard Guide for MSA), paragraph 3.1.7, MSA is any of a number of specialized methods useful for studying a measurement system and its properties.

2. Scope. This section establishes requirements for design, supply, performance, and maintenance of AIE used for product inspection and acceptance. In addition, this section establishes requirements for the preparation, submission, and approval of AIE documentation.

3. AIE. The Contractor shall provide all AIE necessary to ensure conformance of components and end-items to contract requirements. AIE shall include inspection, measuring, and test equipment whether Government furnished or Contractor furnished (including commercially acquired) along with the necessary specifications and procedures for their use (see ISO 10012, paragraph 6.2.1). The AIE shall not create or conceal defects on the product being inspected. All AIE documentation shall contain sufficient information to permit evaluation of the AIE’s ability to test, verify, and/or measure the applicable characteristics or parameters (see applicable DID referenced in (Measurement System Evaluation (MSE)-Measurement and Inspection Equipment System Design Documentation for Acceptance – MSE/AIE CDRL A006 is applicable)).

4. AIE Designs & Government Furnished Gages. AIE designs are of two types – Government designs (see 4.a) and Contractor designs (see 4.b). When applicable, Government designs or Government furnished gages are designated in the TDP/contract. Responsibility for all other AIE is assigned to the Contractor.

E-3-2 The designs, associated inspection procedures, and theory of operation shall have the level of detail to demonstrate capability of the proposed AIE to perform the required inspection.

a. Government AIE Designs. Government AIE designs may consist of detailed drawings necessary for the fabrication and use of the AIE. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor may submit alternate or modified Contractor designs of Government AIE designs.

b. Contractor AIE Designs. Contractor AIE design drawings shall meet the requirements of ASME Y14.100, ASME Y14.5 and ASME Y14.43 and may include commercial inspection equipment. [“Commercial inspection equipment” is defined as shown in paragraph 1.d above. It shall be fully described by catalog listings or other means which provide sufficient information to permit identification and evaluation by the Government and may include illustrations and engineering data.] Designs shall be submitted for any special fixture(s) to be used. Unless otherwise specified, Gage Tolerancing Policy shall be in accordance with ASME Y14.43, “Absolute Tolerancing (Pessimistic Tolerancing).”

c. Visual Inspection. Visual inspection standards used for the acceptance/rejection of product shall be submitted for approval.

5. AIE Package Submittals. The Contractor shall prepare the AIE package submittal in accordance with the DID referenced in the applicable Contract Data Requirements List (Measurement System Evaluation (MSE)-Measurement and Inspection Equipment System Design Documentation for…