Notice_to_Offerors_0001.doc
DOC document 24 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N00033-13-R-5112
About this file
Q A N00033-13-R-5112
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Notice_to_Offerors_0003.doc | DOC document | |
| Amend_0004_5112_(RE-OPEN).docx | DOCX document | |
| Notice_to_Offerors_0002.doc | DOC document | |
| Amend_0003_5112.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amend_0002_5112_(RE-OPEN).docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP_13-5112.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
THIS IS THE MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND SEALIFT PROGRAM PM51
DATE:
15 MARCH 2013
TO:
ALL POTENTIAL OFFERORS
SUBJ:
RFP N00033-12-R-5112; NOTICE TO OFFERORS 0001
REF: (A) N00033-12-R-5112, DATED 14 MARCH 2013
1. THE FOLLOWING QUESTION AND ANSWER IS PROVIDED:
Q1: IF A US FLAG VESSEL HAS CRUDE OIL IN HER LAST THREE CARGO HISTORY UPON OFFERING, WILL THIS AUTOMATICALLY MAKE HER TECHNICALLY UNACCEPTABLE FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED REQUIREMENT, EVEN IF HER LAST CARGO, OR LAST 2 CARGOES, WILL BE CPP UPON COMMENCEMENT OF LAYCAN?
A1: YES, CRUDE OIL WOULD MAKE THE SHIP UNACCEPTABLE.
Q2: REQUIRED LOAD DATE AT SEABROOK DOES NOT
MATCH THE DATES REQUESTED UNDER LAYDAYS. IS THIS A MISPRINT, OR IS IT CORRECT?
A2: THERE IS NO MISPRINT. STATED LAYDAYS ARE CORRECT.
Q3: CYPRUS HAS A PORT RESTRICTION OF 182M, SINCE THIS IS AN OFFSHORE TANKER BERTH IS THERE ANY WAY THAT A VESSEL GREATER THAN 182M CAN BE CONSIDERED FOR THIS REQUIREMENT?
A3: LOA RESTRICTION STANDS FIRM. WE CONFIRMED THE LOA RESTRICTION WITH BRITISH AND TURKISH AUTHORITIES. IT IS AN ISSUE OF MANEUVERING ROOM IN THE PORT.
SIGNED: KENNETH D. ALLEN, CONTRACTING OFFICER, N1033
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .