N0002421R4427 A0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1) Provide responses to Bidder Questions 12-22;

2) Update Section B, Notes B & D; and

3) Update Sections L & M.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 17

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 18-Nov-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0002421R4427

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02-Nov-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

18-Nov-2020

CODE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2030

N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0002421R4427

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

The following have been modified:

NOTE B: FIXED SHIP REPAIR LABOR AND MATERIAL BURDEN CEILING RATES FOR

GROWTH AND NEW WORK

SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)

1. The Contractor’s fully burdened ship repair labor rate will be used for negotiating Firm Fixed Price (FFP)

Delivery Orders, growth and new work to be performed under this IDIQ-MAC for each Delivery Order. The fully burdened ship repair labor rate(s) and material burden rate(s) identified below reflect the ceiling rate(s) for each applicable time period. The contractor agrees that the number of hours included in its price proposal submitted in response to RCCs, GMRs and RTRs shall include only direct production hours. For these purposes, direct production hours are for skilled labor at the journeyman level expended in direct production including but not limited to the following functions:

Abrasive cleaning/blasting

Fire Watch

Welding

Burning

Brazing

Carpentry

Machinists (inside and outside)

Electrical Work

Electronic Work

Engineering

Design Support

Lagging

Ship-fitting

Boiler-making

Painting

Sheet-metal Work

Pipefitting

Rigging

General Labor

Staging/Scaffolding

Diesel Mechanics

2. The fully burdened ship repair labor rate proposed by the contractor listed in paragraph 7 below shall include all costs associated with support functions (whether charged directly or indirectly by the offeror’s accounting systems) provided in support of the direct production functions listed in paragraph 1 above.

Support functions shall be considered to be included in the offeror’s fully burdened ship repair labor rate for direct production hours. Labor hours for the below support functions shall not be separately proposed, including in support of subcontractors. Support functions include, and are not limited to, those types listed below:

Testing

Quality Assurance

Execution Planning

Cleaning (except tank cleaning)

Supervision (all types, including, but not limited to supervision of trades, support personnel and subcontractors)

Security

Surveying

Administration

Transportation

Purchasing

Staff

Lofting

Other indirect support

Handling & Warehousing

Safety/Environmental

Program Management

3. The fully burdened ship repair labor rate is a fixed hourly rate that includes all wages (i.e. straight time, overtime, shift differential, holiday time, etc.), overhead, all other indirect costs, general and administrative expenses, Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCOM) and profit. The fully burdened ship repair labor rate represents a blended rate including labor transferred between divisions, subsidiaries, or affiliates of the contractor under a common control.

4. Consumable materials are goods used in the ordinary course of work performance such as office supplies, paper, rags, vehicle or equipment fuel costs, cleaning chemicals, disposable tools, welding rods, paint buckets, paint brushes, protective clothing, etc., that are consumed/used in the process of repair and do not become an integral part of the repaired vessel. Consumable material shall be included in the contractor’s fully burdened ship repair labor rate and not separately priced.

5. Physical materials are goods that become incorporated into the repaired vessel in the course of the repair, such as replacement steel, pipes, paint, and fasteners. The material burden rate applies to physical materials but not to consumable materials. The material burden rate will be applied to the actual cost of the physical material. Actual cost does not include handling charges, general and administrative cost, overhead, profit, or any other indirect cost.

6 . For contract changes involving subcontractors, subcontractor quotes will be treated as Other Direct Costs

(ODCs) and will be subject to the contract material burden rate shown in paragraph (7) below. Subcontractor quotes must be competitively acquired and submitted with the contractor’s COPA in response to Request for

Contract Changes (RCCs) and Reservation Task Requests (RTRs) issued by the Contracting Officer. At no time will the proposed total to be performed by the prime contractor combined with subcontractor quote, material quote, and applicable burdens be allowed to cost more than it would have, had the prime contractor directly provided all material and labor. The proposed total pricing restriction addressed in the preceding sentence does not apply in any case where the work is required to be performed by Original Equipment

Manufacturers (OEMs), Government directed subcontractors, and/or Government authorized vendors. RCCs and RTRs that are subcontracted for material only (no associated labor required within the RCC) shall not be subject to the Material Burden Rate. Any material burden rate applied to new work for material only shall be approved at the discretion of the ACO, upon receipt of supporting documentation in accordance with FAR

15.404-3 ‘Subcontract Pricing Considerations.’

7. Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor and Material Rate Schedule (transcribed from J-1, Labor and Material

Burden Rate Tab):

Base Period

Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate

Material Burden Rate

Option Period 1

Option Period 2

Option Period 3

Option Period 4

8. In the event of a one-bid or directed availability, the Contracting Officer may negotiate the Fully Burdened

Ship Repair Labor Rate and Material Burden Rate (not to exceed the ceiling rate(s) identified above) with the offeror(s) in accordance with FAR 15.4 at the Delivery Order level. The rates herein are not considered a

Forward Pricing Rate Agreement (FPRA) and are identified solely for the purpose of establishing base and option period ceilings.

9. In the event of an extension due to excusable or compensable delay the Contractor’s fully burdened ship repair labor rate shall be escalated by an amount determined at the Delivery Order level, as applicable, commencing three (3) months after the Delivery Order’s Attachment J-3 specified “Contract Complete” date. This rate shall be escalated quarterly through the 24th month, if necessary, following the “Contract Complete” date and shall be used to negotiate all growth and new work. Note, in the event of an excusable delay, this escalation rate shall be applied only to new and growth work not previously identified in the Pricing Worksheet (J-

Attachment) corresponding to the applicable Delivery Order. The material burden rate for each Delivery Order shall not increase.

NOTE D: SCHEDULE OF DAILY CEILING RATES FOR PIERSIDE AND DRY-DOCKING (FULLY

BURDENED) FOR PURPOSES OF A COMPENSABLE EXTENSION TO THE DRY-DOCKING OR

DELIVERY DATE FOR AVAILABILITIES PERFORMED AT THE CONTRACTOR’S FACILITY

1. In the event of a compensable extension to the dry-docking or delivery date, the Contractor’s fully burdened daily ceiling rates as outlined within this Note will be used for negotiating additional dry-dock and/or pierside performance days for all CNO Delivery Orders under this IDIQ-MAC executed at the contractor’s facility under this contract.

2. The contractor agrees that the daily ceiling rates shall include all costs that run with time associated with additional performance days in accordance with the work package specification requirements of this availability. The daily ceiling rates shall include all costs associated with additional performance days (whether charged directly or indirectly by the offeror’s accounting systems) including but not limited to:

Temporary Services, including but not limited to:

o Decking services o Pumping services o Electricity

Internet Connectivity

Air Conditioning

Support Services for the Navy, its agents and Contractors

Facilities, including but not limited to:

o Piers o Drydocks o Office spaces o Trailers o Parking o Flammable Liquid Storage and Hazardous Material Storage o Material Warehousing and Lay-down space

Project Management and other labor costs that run with time including but not limited to:

o Program Management o Supervision o Integration & Scheduling o Cleaning (except tank cleaning) o Quality Assurance o Execution Planning o Security o Administration o Contracts o Purchasing o Other indirect support o Safety/Environmental

Transportation

3. The fully burdened daily ceiling rates are fixed rates that include all wages, overhead, all other indirect costs, general and administrative expenses, Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCOM) and profit.

4. The contract’s fixed fully burdened daily ceiling rates for pierside and dry-docking are shown below. These rates are to be used during the availability’s extension period, up to 24 months after the attachment J-3

“Contract Complete” date. These fixed rates shall be used for additional docking and pierside days:

Base Period Additional Day requiring

Availability Extension

Additional Day does not require

Additional Dry-Docking Day

Additional Pierside Day

Option Period 1 Additional Day requiring

Additional Day does not require

Option Period 2 Additional Day requiring

Additional Day does not require

Option Period 3 Additional Day requiring

Additional Day does not require

Option Period 4 Additional Day requiring

Additional Day does not require

5. The Contractor bears the burden of proving the requested extension is compensable in accordance with the contract, and establish the duration of compensability through schedule analysis utilizing the Contractor’s

Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), establishing impact to critical path and/or controlling work items. The

Government reserves the right to perform its own independent review of the Contractor’s submitted IMS. The

Contractor agrees that, in the event of such an extension, a bilateral modification will be executed with the price of the extension calculated as follows:

Total Price of Extension = D(e) * (P/D)

D(e) = Agreed Extension Days to the Delivery Date

(P/D) = Price/Day entered in “Daily Extension Rate” tab of Attachment J-4

6. The (P/D) will be utilized for modifications to extend the Delivery Order in the event of compensable delay, regardless of the number of modifications or the number of days required to meet the Schedule Milestone

“Contract Complete” within 24 months of the “Contract Complete” date. If the Contracting Officer determines a delay in meeting the “Schedule Milestone” is not compensable, no modification will be executed and the

Contractor will be directed to continue work until certified ‘Contract Complete’ by the RMC.

7. In the event the Contracting Officer determines the delay is concurrent, a bilateral modification will be executed with the price calculated as follows:

Total Price of Extension = (D(g) – D(c)) * (P/D)

D(g) = Government Responsible Delay (measured in days)

D(c) = Contractor Responsible Delay (measured in days)

(P/D) = Price/Day entered in “Daily Extension Rate” tab of Attachment J-4

The values for D(g) and D(c) will be determined by the Contracting Officer.

8. If the Contracting Officer determines the delay is excusable, a modification will be executed to extend the

Delivery Date, however, the Contractor shall not be entitled to recover its Daily Extension Rate.

9. All terms and conditions under the contract apply to all modifications to extend the delivery date. If the

Contracting Officer and Contractor are unable to reach agreement the Government reserves the right to execute a unilateral modification utilizing the parameters outlined in paragraphs 5 through 8 above. Failure to agree as to extension duration or whether a delay, or portion thereof, is compensable shall be a dispute subject to the requirements of FAR 52.233-1(Alt. 1) ‘Disputes.’

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTIONS AND NOTICES

This solicitation is a Request for Proposals (RFP) that will result in the award of Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity

Multiple Award Contracts (IDIQ-MACs) for Surface Combatants (CG and DDG) and Amphibious (LPD, LSD, LHA, and LHD) class ships. Contract holders will compete for Delivery Orders to provide surface ship repair and overhaul as outlined in Section C of this solicitation. Offerors may propose for either LOTS 1 & 2 (Complex) or LOTS 3 & 4

(Non-Complex) as outlined below:

LOT 1 - Complex Ship Repair & Overhaul on Surface Combatant Class Ships

LOT 2 - Complex Ship Repair & Overhaul on Amphibious Class Ships

LOT 3 – Non-Complex Ship Repair & Overhaul on Surface Combatant Class Ships

LOT 4 – Non-Complex Ship Repair & Overhaul on Amphibious Class Ships

For each LOT, the Navy intends to award contracts to a minimum of two (2) awardees (contractors) who will compete for Delivery Orders to provide surface ship repair and overhaul as outlined in Section C of this solicitation.

Thus, the Government anticipates awarding the IDIQ contracts through a Best Value source selection process, utilizing Lowest Price Technically Acceptable source selection procedures as outlined in FAR 15.101-2. Awards will be made to those responsible Offerors whose proposals represent the Best Value to the Government in accordance with the evaluation criteria and factors set forth in Section M. Offerors that are selected to become

MAC holders will have the opportunity to compete for Delivery Orders throughout the duration of the contemplated ordering period IAW Fair Opportunity requirements established in Section G.

LOTS 1 & 2 of the acquisition described in this solicitation are solicited under full and open competition on an unrestricted basis.

In accordance with FAR 19.502, LOTS 3 & 4 of the acquisition described in this solicitation are reserved exclusively for participation by small business concerns. The applicable NAICS code for this solicitation is 336611, and the related small business size standard is 1,250 employees. Offerors are advised that the Government will evaluate and consider for award only those proposals submitted by Offerors that qualify as small business concerns under the applicable size standard. Offers received for LOTS 3 & 4 from Offerors that do not qualify as small business concerns will be considered nonresponsive and will be rejected by the Government. Offerors shall refer to the clauses entitled “Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside” (FAR 52.219-6) and “Limitations on

Subcontracting” (FAR 52.219-14) under Section I of this solicitation for further information and requirements relating to a total small business set-aside.

Additional Information to Offerors

1. Inquiries: All inquiries shall be directed to Daniel Magrino, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) at daniel.magrino@navy.mil and Contract Specialists, Benjamin Smallenbroek and Jacqueline Black at benjamin.smallenbroe@navy.mil and jacqueline.black@navy.mil. To ensure the Government is able to adequately address and respond to an offeror’s request for pre-proposal information (PPI) via a solicitation amendment, questions shall be submitted no later than 1300 local time, Washington, DC (EST), 30

November 2020. Requests or questions received will be answered in writing and provided to all offerors prior to the required date for submittal of proposals. The Navy reserves the right to not answer any requests received after 1300, local time Washington, DC (EST), on 30 November 2020. All requests for

PPI should reference the applicable solicitation and/or specification page and paragraph number and be submitted on the Request for PPI form (Attachment S-2) provided with this solicitation.

2. Proposal Validity: Offerors shall fill in Block 12 in Section A (Standard Form 33) with 180 days. If an

Offeror fails to fill in Block 12 in Section A, the proposal will be presumed to be valid for 180 days.

2. Proposal Information: Offerors shall not presume the Government has knowledge outside of information provided in the proposal. Additionally, Offerors are advised that statements such as: “the offeror understands,” “the offeror has a long history of outstanding support,” “standard procedures shall be used,”

“well known techniques shall be employed” or any paraphrasing of the solicitation, shall be considered inadequate to demonstrate experience, knowledge of, or compliance with solicitation requirements.

Offerors are encouraged to provide specific and concise information to validate all assertions.

mailto:daniel.magrino@navy.mil mailto:benjamin.smallenbroe@navy.mil mailto:jacqueline.black@navy.mil

3. Amendments: The Government may revise the solicitation at any time by means of an Amendment. It is an Offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing the https://beta.SAM.gov/ website to view potential amendments and procurement notifications for this solicitation.

4. Inspections and Other Pre-award Surveys: The Government reserves the right to conduct a pre-award survey or to require other evidence of technical, production, managerial, financial, and similar abilities to perform prior to the award of any proposed contracts; regardless of whether the offeror has an existing

MSRA.

5. Teaming Arrangements: Proposals must be submitted by one (1) prime contractor. Offerors may be listed as subcontractors in multiple proposals but may only submit one (1) proposal as a prime contractor with a unique Commercial and Government Entity code and Taxpayer Identification Number. To be evaluated as a Joint Venture (JV), Offerors must provide a notarized agreement (with the price proposal) delineating roles and responsibilities for all proposed work.

6. Estimated Award Date: The Government anticipates awarding IDIQ-MACs in the 2nd Quarter of FY21 timeframe. The MACs will each have a five (5) year ordering period.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

The Price and Non-Price Proposals shall be based on the requirements contained in this RFP document (including those documents, exhibits, and other attachments to the RFP identified in Section J). The Offeror shall submit all information required by this RFP.

Offerors are advised the Government will not evaluate any proposal information not contained within the body of the proposal. Letters of transmittal and/or cover letters that forward the proposal to the Government are not considered part of the body of the proposal.

The Offeror shall not submit the Security Classification Specification as a part of the proposal. The DD Form 254 will, however, become a material part of any resultant delivery order, as applicable.

Documents, exhibits, and other attachments that are a part of this RFP will become part of any resultant contract identified in Section J. The following RFP sections listed below (which are also a part of this RFP), will not become a part of any resultant contract:

Section J – “S” Attachments

Section K – Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors

Section L – Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

Section M – Evaluation and Award Factors

SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

A. Proposal Due Date: All copies of proposals (Volumes I and II) shall be received by the Government no later than 14 December 2020 at 1300 local time Washington, DC (EST). Late proposals WILL NOT be considered. Partial proposals or attachments submitted late WILL NOT be considered. Offerors are advised to consult FAR 15.208 related to timely receipt of proposals.

B. Offerors shall submit:

VOLUME TITLE

I Price Proposal https://beta.sam.gov/

II Non-Price Proposal

Note 1. Electronic Submission. Due to ongoing restrictions resulting from the global COVID-19 pandemic, hand delivery of proposals is not possible at this time to the Washington Navy Yard. Offerors are instructed to submit their proposals electronically via the DoD SAFE application located at https://safe.apps.mil.

Note 2. Notification of Electronic Submission. Offerors wishing to submit a proposal in response to this notification shall notify the Contracting Officer and Contracts Specialist noted as points of contact on this solicitation no later than three business days prior to the proposal deadline of this solicitation and no earlier than 14 calendar days prior to the proposal deadline. The Offeror shall provide their name and e-mail as contact information so the Government can generate a pick-up request from the DoD SAFE application to be sent to the Offeror, which is valid for 14 calendar days.

Note 3. DoD SAFE. Offerors shall address their package with the RFP number and Offeror’s company name. Offerors shall click the “Confirm Delivery” button within the DoD SAFE app in order to receive a confirmation of pick up by the Government. The DoD SAFE system records the time that files are submitted for transmission. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that they drop-off their proposal and generate a drop-off time prior to the proposal submission date and time. In the event of a dispute of proposal time submission, the pick-up e-mail with the system generated drop off time within the body of the e-mail shall serve as the official time that the proposal was submitted to the Government. Late proposal submissions will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1.

Note 4. Proposal Format. Proposals must be submitted as one .zip file, formatted so that the Volume and

Volume II are submitted in separate file folders clearly marked. Each Volume shall be formatted with separate files submitted for each Factor. All files uploaded must be scanned to ensure that there are no computer viruses within the file. The files shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in the most current Microsoft Office Suite or Adobe Acrobat. The proposal shall have separate files

All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious and traceable. No fields or documents shall be password protected. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

Note 5. Small Business Participation. Offerors for LOTS 1 & 2 shall allow the maximum practicable opportunity for small business to participate in contract performance and are required to submit a Small

Business Subcontracting Plan as required by FAR 19.702 with the Price Proposal. Offerors for LOTS 1 &

2 shall plan for at least 30% small business participation. A subcontracting plan is NOT REQUIRED from

Offerors for LOTS 3 & 4.

Note 6. Proposals shall be submitted to the following individuals via DoD SAFE:

Daniel Magrino, daniel.magrino@navy.mil

Benjamin Smallenbroek, benjamin.smallenbroe@navy.mil

Jacqueline Black, jacqueline.black@navy.mil

Note 7. Alteration/Non-Compliance with Solicitation Requirements. Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) or fail to comply with all aspects of the solicitation, may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

Note 8. Solicitation Responsiveness. Offerors are advised to submit Proposals that are complete, clear, and consistent in all respects without the need for additional explanation or information. Offerors are cautioned against the use of general, vague, or unsubstantiated statements, which prevent concise proposal evaluations. Each factor will be evaluated on how well the response meets the requirements of the solicitation. The response that completely addresses all of the solicitation requirements may be judged superior to the response that minimally addresses solicitation requirements.

https://safe.apps.mil/ mailto:daniel.magrino@navy.mil mailto:benjamin.smallenbroe@navy.mil

Note 9. Competitive Range. If an award is not made on the basis of initial proposals, the Contracting

Officer will make the determination as to which proposals are in the “competitive range.” The competitive range shall be determined based on the results of the evaluation of initial price and non-price proposals considering all evaluation criteria, and shall include the most competitive proposals. The number of proposals within the competitive range may also be reduced if the Contracting Officer determines the number of most competitive proposals that might otherwise be included within the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted.

PROPOSAL CONTENT:

VOLUME I – Price Proposal (1 for each Lot):

Cover Letter to include offeror’s CAGE and DUNS number

Signed SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged

Labor and Material Burden Rates Price Sheet (Attachment J-1) (Offerors proposing for both

LOT 1 and 2 shall submit separate proposals for each lot)

Historical Rate narrative and supporting documentation as reflected in Attachment J-1

Subcontracting Plan (Attachment J-3) (LOT 1 and LOT 2, from large business concerns only)

VOLUME II – Non-Price Proposal (1 for each LOT)

For LOTS 1 & 2 Submissions:

MSRA Agreement; current Complex MAC-IDIQ contract; and narrative confirming offeror is a current Complex IDIQ-MAC holder in good standing

(i.e. not debarred or suspended); OR

MSRA Equivalency (Attachment J-2) (if not an MSRA holder) and Technical

Capabilities Data Sheet (Attachment S-1)

For LOTS 3 & 4 Submissions:

Narrative confirming offeror is a current Non-Complex IDIQ-MAC holder in good standing (i.e. not debarred or suspended); OR

Technical Capabilities Data Sheet (Attachment S-1)

A. VOLUME I - Price Proposal

Volume I shall be limited to the Cover Letter, SF 33, acknowledged amendments, the Labor and Material Burden

Rates Price Sheet/excel worksheet (Attachment J-1) documenting the proposed ship repair and overhaul rates and the Joint Venture/teaming agreement (if applicable).

Additional submission criteria are as follows:

Cover Letter: The Cover Letter shall meet all requirements of the “first page of the proposal” outlined in FAR

52.215-1(c)(2)(i-v) and not exceed three (3) pages. In addition to those requirements, the offeror shall include the following in the cover letter:

Identification of all enclosures included with the proposal

CAGE and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers for the Prime contractor

Number of employees (for LOTS 1 & 2 only)

A statement as to which lot(s) the offeror is proposing for

Notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications)

Standard Form 33 (SF 33): As part of the Price proposal package, the offeror shall submit the completed SF 33 with blocks 12 through 18 completed as well as all sections with applicable fill-ins. Offerors shall populate Section B

CLIN max values and Section B, NOTE B: FULLY BURDENED SHIP REPAIR LABOR AND MATERIAL

RATES (CEILING RATES),” based on completed Attachment J-1 Labor and Material Burden Ceiling Rates Price

Sheet. Offerors must also complete Section B “NOTE D: SCHEDULE OF DAILY RATES FOR PIERSIDE

AND DRY-DOCKING (FULLY BURDENED) FOR PURPOSES OF A COMPENSABLE EXTENSION TO

THE DRY-DOCKING OR DELIVERY DATE FOR AVAILABILITIES PERFORMED AT THE

CONTRACTOR’S FACILITY,” to be considered responsive. Section K shall be returned in its entirety.

Submission of a signed offer to the Government constitutes agreement and acceptance of the solicited terms and conditions. The representative who signs this form must be authorized to contractually bind the company providing the offer. The Offeror must acknowledge all amendments.

Labor and Material Burden Rates Price Sheet: Offerors shall provide fully burdened ship repair labor rates and material burden rates as described in Section B. These rates shall be completed for all potential contract periods by completing the Labor and Material Burden Rates Price Sheet (Attachment J-1) provided with this solicitation. These rates shall be completed for all potential CLINs and periods by completing the Labor and Material Burden Ceiling

Rates Price Sheet (Attachment J-1) provided with this solicitation. These rates shall be completed for all potential contract periods (Base and Option Periods) and shall be projected based on the number of Government-estimated man-hours and material dollars in Attachment J-1. The "Estimated Direct Production Labor Hours" and "Estimated

Material" values are for evaluation purposes only. While the hour and material dollar values are based on historical data and are indicative of the typical requirements for work expected under the respective CLINs, the actual number of man-hours and material dollars awarded under the IDIQ-MACs may vary.

Potential Negative Response: The Government requests a negative response from any potential Offeror who, after reviewing this solicitation, does not intend on submitting a proposal. Negative response are to be delivered to the

Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist listed above NLT 30 calendar dates after solicitation release.

Small Business Subcontracting Plan (SBSP) (*for LOTS 1 & 2 only):

a) Offerors shall submit a SBSP outlining its strategy for maintaining compliance with FAR 52.219-9 for the duration of the base and option periods, which includes:

i. A subcontracting goal of 30 percent of an offeror’s total contracting dollars utilizing small disadvantaged businesses, women-owned small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, and HUB-Zone small businesses. Note, the 30 percent goal is inclusive of the congressionally mandated five percent (5%) goal for small disadvantaged business concerns.

ii. In addition, offerors for LOTS 1 & 2, must provide explanation for any SBSP which fails to address all requirements outlined in FAR 52.219-9.

iii. A SBSP is NOT REQUIRED from Offerors for LOTS 3 & 4.

Historical Rate Information: All current Complex and Non-Complex MAC Holders must provide a narrative as well as other than certified cost and pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-3, outlining rate information for each

Delivery Order award under the applicable MAC-IDIQ for the three (3) years prior to the date of this Solicitation.

The narrative should addsress any periods of time six (6) months or greater where the offeror was not contracted to execute a DO and fluctuations in rates of 10 percent or more among DOs. To be considered complete, offerors must submit a narrative and fill-in Attachment J-1. Offerors submitting proposals for LOTS 1 and

2 must fill out tabs for LOT 1 and LOT 2, while offerors submitting proposals for LOTS 3 and 4 must fill out tabs for LOT 3 and LOT 4. Additionally, all offerors must fill in the Historical Rates Info for all ship classes.

*If an offeror is NOT a current Complex or Non-Complex MAC Holder, the offeror must provide a narrative as well as other than certified cost and pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-3, outlining rate information for each contract awarded within the past three (3) years. In addition to the narrative requirements in the preceeding paragraph, the offeror must provide information regarding the type(s) of contracts (i.e. FFP, Cost, etc.) as well as the entities contracted with and the duration of each contract.

B. VOLUME II – Non-Price Proposal (1 for each LOT)

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT OFFERORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS READ AND FOLLOW THESE

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY. THE NAVY RESERVES

THE RIGHT TO CONSIDER AN INACCURATE OR INCOMPLETE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

INDICATIVE OF THE OFFERORS’ INABILITY TO PERFORM THE WORK REQUIRED UNDER THE

CONTRACT. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL AS REQUIRED BY

THESE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS MAY RESULT IN THE ELIMINATION OF AN

OFFERORS’ PROPOSAL FROM THIS COMPETITION.

The Contracting Officer reserves the right to request such additional information regarding scheduling, manpower, facilities, and management organization and capabilities as may be necessary to determine the Offerors’ qualifications for award of a contract, to determine the relative merit of the Offerors’ proposal, or to otherwise clarify any aspect of the proposal.

Offerors should note that if awarded a contract based upon this solicitation, the Offerors’ Non-Price Proposal or portion thereof may be incorporated into the contract by reference.

Release of Technical Information: All technical information submitted pursuant to this solicitation is for the exclusive use of Government representatives, and will be treated as business confidential and will not be publicly disclosed, provided that, where a request for disclosure of such technical information is submitted to the

Government pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), the Government will not disclose the

Offerors’ technical information if public disclosure of information would substantially harm the Offeror in its competitive position. In order to help ensure non-disclosure, the title page of the technical proposal and other sheets of proposal data should be marked with restrictive legends contained in the Solicitation Instruction in Section I entitled “RESTRICTIVE MARKING ON TECHNICAL DATA,” and the technical proposal should be enclosed in a sealed envelope marked “TECHNICAL INFORMATION – NOT TO BE PUBLICLY DISCLOSED”.

The Non-Price Proposal shall be bound separately from the Price Proposal. The Non-Price Proposal shall not contain Price Proposal information. The evaluation of these parts will be discussed in detail in Section M.

A Non-Price Proposal is required from each Offeror and will be evaluated as specified in Section M. The Offerors shall provide the required copies of their Non-Price Proposals as specified in Section L, “Submission of Proposals,” containing information organized under the following:

LOTS 1 & 2: In response to Non-Price Factor, Offerors shall provide:

1) The Offeror’s Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA). (Please note that offerors are not required to hold an

MSRA to satisfy the requirements of Factor 1.)

2) The Offeror’s awarded Complex MAC-IDIQ contract. (Please note that offerors are not required to hold an awarded Complex MAC-IDIQ contract to satisfy the requirements of Factor 1.)

And

3) A narrative confirming the Offeror is a current Complex IDIQ-MAC holder in good standing (i.e. not debarred or suspended).

OR

4) Proof of the Offeror’s MSRA Equivalency: If an Offeror for LOTS 1 & 2, does not possess an MSRA, it may demonstrate organization equivalent to that reflected in a MSRA. The requirements are laid out in Attachment

J-2 (MSRA Equivalency Requirements). Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a MSRA must contact the Contracting Officer no later than one (1) week after the solicitation is posted on beta.SAM to schedule an on-site inspection. The on-site inspection will supplement documentation provided with the offeror’s proposal.

and

5) A completed Attachment S-1 (Technical Experience Data Sheet) and corresponding narrative, not exceeding 25 pages, that demonstrates the technical and management capabilities necessary to complete at least one (1)

Selected Restricted Availability (22,000 man-days or 176,000 man hours). Offerors shall demonstrate their capability to complete at least 50% of the Selected Restricted Availability scope utilizing in-house resources.

Offerors shall complete Attachment S-1, describing availabilities/projects the offeror has completed that include both technical and management experience. These examples must have been completed or substantially completed within the past three (3) years as of the date of the initial date of this RFP. The technical experience required depends on LOT application, as outlined in Section M.

To demonstrate technical capability the offeror shall:

Include two (2) relevant events, individual contracts or a collection or concurrent projects, constituting approximately 22,000 man-days worth of maintenance, modernization and repair

Demonstrate the offeror executed least fifty percent (50%) of the scope for each event utilizing in-house resources.

Demonstrate planning and execution, including engineering, quality control, integration/coordination/production, and component/system testing and trials across multiple work items, covering work on systems of similar complexity as the critical systems listed in Section C Statement of

Work

Demonstrate experience providing engineering and design support capabilities with sufficient capability to diagnose and evaluate technical problems and issues and to make competent technical recommendations.

To demonstrate that the offeror has the management capabilities necessary to complete a SRA, management experience events must:

Demonstrate experience providing an established management organization geared toward completing highly complex ship repair requirements, with clear lines of authority, delegation of responsibility and mid-level managerial positions

Demonstrate experience in completing, controlling, integrating, scheduling, estimating and progressing complex ship repair requirements

Demonstrate experience purchasing, monitoring, receiving, inspecting, segregating, issuing, determining nonconformance, and disposing of material

Demonstrate experience managing subcontractors successfully, including successfully selecting, scheduling, managing, monitoring and controlling of subcontractors.

Discuss the data deliverable requirements of the contract, including completion reports and tracking actual progress versus planned progress.

LOTS 3 & 4: In response to Factor 1, Offerors shall provide:

1) The Offeror’s awarded Non-Complex MAC-IDIQ contract. (Please note that offerors are not required to hold an awarded Non-Complex MAC-IDIQ contract to satisfy the requirements of Factor 1.)

OR

2) A completed Attachment S-1 (Technical Experience Data Sheet) and corresponding narrative, not exceeding 25 pages, that demonstrates the technical and management capabilities necessary to complete at least two (2) two

(2) concurrent CMAVs. Offerors shall demonstrate their capability to complete at least 50% of the scope of both availabilities utilizing in-house resources. Offerors shall complete Attachment S-1, describing availabilities/projects the offeror has completed that include both technical and management experience. These examples must have been completed or substantially completed within the past three (3) years as of the date of the initial date of this RFP. The technical experience required depends on LOT application, as outlined in

Section M.

To demonstrate technical capability the offeror shall:

Demonstrate the offeror’s ability to complete two (2) concurrent CMAVs, outlining planning and execution of each identified CMAV. Provide examples as relevant to substantiate capabilities.

Demonstrate the offeror executed least fifty percent (50%) of the scope for each event utilizing in-house resources.

Demonstrate planning and execution, including engineering, quality control, integration/coordination/production, and component/system testing and trials across multiple work items

Demonstrate experience providing engineering and design support capabilities with sufficient capability to diagnose and evaluate technical problems and issues and to make competent technical recommendations.

To demonstrate that the offeror has the management capabilities necessary to complete two (2) concurrent CMAVs, management experience events must:

Demonstrate management capabilities necessary to complete at least two (2) concurrent CMAV work packages, showing the use of the Prime efforts and successful selection, management, monitor and control of subcontractors. The narrative should demonstrate the management capabilities when competing efforts are present. Provide examples as relevant to substantiate capabilities.

Demonstrate experience in completing, controlling, integrating, scheduling, estimating and progressing concurrent ship repair requirements. Provide examples as relevant to substantiate capabilities.

Demonstrate experience purchasing, monitoring, receiving, inspecting, segregating, issuing, determining nonconformance, and disposing of material. Provide examples as relevant to substantiate capabilities.

Discuss the data deliverable requirements of the contract, including completion reports and tracking actual progress versus planned progress.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1.0 GENERAL

The Government reserves the right not to award any MAC-IDIQ contracts; however, the Government intends to award a minimum of the following:

Two (2) IDIQ contracts for Surface Combatants (CG 47, DDG 51 and DDG 1000 class ships) and two (2)

IDIQ contracts for Amphibious (LPD, LSD, LHA and LHD class ships) for the procurement of complex surface ship repair and overhaul.

o Full and Open Competition (not set aside for small business unless there are two or more small businesses capable of performing)

Two (2) IDIQ contracts for Surface Combatants (CG 47, DDG 51 and DDG 1000 class ships) and two (2)

IDIQ contracts Amphibious (LPD, LSD, LHA, and LHD class ships) for the procurement of non-complex surface ship repair and overhaul o Small Business Set-Aside

Awards will be made to those responsible offerors pursuant to FAR Subpart 9.1, whose proposals represent the best value to the Government; considering price and non-price factors as described below.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

The evaluation of proposals submitted in response to the solicitation will be conducted utilizing the Lowest Price

Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Source Selection Procedures. To be eligible for award, offerors shall meet the following criteria:

1) Obtain a Non-Price proposal rating of Acceptable

2) Offer a total evaluated price determined fair and reasonable by the Contracting Officer

3) *Offer a subcontracting plan in accordance with FAR Part 19.704 (LOTS 1 & 2 large businesses ONLY), and

4) Be determined responsible under FAR Part 9.104

An unacceptable rating in any of the basis of award requirements listed above renders an offeror’s proposal not awardable.

The Government intends to award without discussions with offerors, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if they are determined to be in the best interest of the Government. Therefore, each proposal shall contain Offerors’ best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

For LOTS 1 & 2 only, equivalency documentation provided by non-MSRA offerors will be assessed in accordance with the MSRA process, which is managed by Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center (CNRMC). Thus, assessment will occur concurrently and independently of the evaluation. All documentation requirements and assessment standards will be provided to offerors once the inspection request is received (no later than 25 November

2020).

3.0 EVALUATION FACTORS

The purpose of the proposal evaluation is to ensure impartial and comprehensive examination of competitive proposals. Statements and representations made in the offeror’s proposal may be subject to verification by proposal evaluators. The evaluation factors are set forth below:

Volume 1: Price Proposal

Description Adjectival Rating

Factor 1 Price See FAR 15.404 and FAR

19.704

Volume 2: Non-Price Proposal

Description Adjectival Rating

Factor 1

Technical & Management

Capabilities Acceptable / Unacceptable

*The Subcontracting Plan submission requirement is for Large Businesses only.

The proposal will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria set forth below:

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS FOR NON-PRICE PROPOSAL FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL & MANAGEMENT

CAPABILITIES

VOLUME I – Price Proposal

Factor 1 – Price: The Government will not evaluate price adjectivally or assign strengths or weaknesses to the price proposal. The Government will analyze the ship repair labor rates proposed in accordance with FAR 15.404

Proposal Analysis to determine fair and reasonable pricing.

Total evaluated price shall be calculated in the following manner:

Multiplying the fully burdened ship repair labor rate by the total number of hours allocated for the

Base Period and each Option Period to yield the total price for labor.

Multiplying the material burden rate for the Base Period and each Option Period by the dollar value of material expected to be purchased in the Base Period and each Option Period to yield the total price for material.

Adding the sum of the total price for labor and the sum of total price for material for each one-year period (base period and each option period), to yield the total price for each period.

Adding the total prices for each one-year period. This sum is the Total Evaluated Price.

Offerors are advised that the number of hours and material dollar value for the material burden rate are for evaluation purposes only. The numbers are based on historical data and are indicative of the hour type proportions and the dollar value of material the Government anticipates within the execution of the IDIQ-MACs for the Surface

Combatants and the Amphibious class ships. However, proposed labor and material burden rates will be fixed ceiling rates for each one-year period (base period or option period, as applicable) regardless of how many hours are procured. Offerors must utilize the Labor and Material Burden Rates Price Sheet, Attachment J-1, to document the price proposal. Offerors may elect to propose rates for either the surface combatants or amphibious class ships, or both. Additionally, all current* Complex and Non-Complex MAC holders must submit a narrative and historical rate information (Attachment J-1, ‘Historical Rate Info - CRUDES’ and ‘Historical Rate Info – AMPHIBS’ Tabs.)

supporting its proposed Labor and Material Burden Rates.

*If an offeror is NOT a current Complex or Non-Complex MAC Holder, the offeror must provide a narrative as well as other than certified cost and pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-3, outlining rate information for each contract awarded within the past three (3) years.

Offerors are reminded that all proposed rates must be found fair and reasonable IAW FAR 15.404 in order for an award to be made.

The Subcontracting Plan will be evaluated in accordance with FAR Part 19.704 and must meet all of the criteria to be considered Acceptable.

VOLUME II – Non-Price Proposal

In order for a non-price proposal to be found acceptable, the offeror must submit all of the required documents in

Section L and must meet the acceptable criteria set forth in the adjectival ratings table above.

Factor 2 – Non Price: The objective of this factor is to:

1. Gauge the offeror's management and technical experience as a prime contractor or subcontractor in completing work similar to the work expected to be ordered off the resultant IDIQ-MACs awarded in response to this solicitation. To be rated as Acceptable in this factor, offerors must meet the requirements outlined below:

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

a. LOTS 1 & 2: Offerors must submit either: (1) Proof of MSRA; current Complex IDIQ-MAC contract; and a supporting narrative regarding its current good standing as a Complex IDIQ-MAC holder (as outlined in Section L above) OR (2) Proof of MSRA Equivalency and Attachment S-1 outlining of one (1) to two (2)…